Was ist das Besondere an der Neurologischen Rehabilitation?

Zusammenfassung

Der Artikel stellt die Besonderheiten der Neurologischen Rehabilitation dar und gibt Informationen über Leistungsmengen, Phasen, den rehabilitationspflichtigen Defiziten zugrunde liegende Erkrankungen, Wirksamkeit, Trends und die Teilhabe längerfristig beeinträchtigende Krankheitsfolgen. Er soll in die von den Herausgebern der Aktuellen Neurologie initiierte Reihe „Fortschritte der Neurologischen Rehabilitation” einführen und den hohen Stellenwert der Rehabilitation in der Neurologie verdeutlichen.

Abstract

This article provides a description of the special features of neurological rehabilitation. It provides information concerning volume, phases, kinds of deficits requiring rehabilitation and underlying diseases, effectiveness, future developments and long-term disabilities. The editors of the „Aktuelle Neurologie” have initiated a series entitled „Progress in Neurological Rehabilitation” that is introduced here. The importance of neurological rehabilitation within the field of neurology is emphasised.

Schlüsselwörter

neurologische Rehabilitation - Organisation - Wirksamkeit - Leitlinien

Key words

neurological rehabilitation - organisation - effectiveness - guidelines

Literatur

• 1 Graf T. Statistische Krankenhausdaten: Grund- und Kostendaten der Vorsorge- oder Rehabilitationseinrichtungen. In: Klauber J, Robra B-P, Schellschmidt H (Hrsg) Krankenhaus-Report 2007. Stuttgart; Schattauer 2007: 371-390
• 2 Bölt U. Statistische Krankenhausdaten: Grund- und Kostendaten der Krankenhäuser. In: Klauber J, Robra B-P, Schellschmidt H (Hrsg) Krankenhaus-Report 2007. Stuttgart; Schattauer 2007: 277-308
• 3 Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft für Rehabilitation (BAR) .Empfehlungen zur Neurologischen Rehabilitation von Patienten mit schweren und schwersten Hirnschädigungen in den Phasen B und C. Frankfurt am Main; BAR/VdR 1999
• 4 Hoffmann B, Karbe H, Krusch C. et al . Patientencharakteristika in der neurologisch/neurochirurgischen Frührehabilitation (Phase B): Eine multizentrische Erfassung im Jahr 2002 in Deutschland.  Akt Neurol. 2006;  33 287-296
• 5 Wood R L. The rehabilitation team. In: Greenwood RJ, Barnes MP, McMillan TM, Ward CD (eds) Handbook of Neurological Rehabilitation, 2ed. Hove; Psychology Press 2003: 41-50
• 6 Bölsche F, Hasenbein U, Reisberg H. et al . Ergebnisse der ambulanten und stationären Rehabilitation in den ersten sechs Monaten nach Schlaganfall.  Fortschr Neurol Pychiat. 2003;  71 458-468
• 7 Schlote A, Richter M, Frank B, Wallesch C W. A longitudinal study on health-related quality of life of first stroke survivors' close relatives.  Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006;  22 137-142
• 8 Rittman M, Boylstein C, Hinojosa R. et al . Transition experiences of stroke survivors following discharge.  Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007;  14 21-31
• 9 Barnes M P. Organisation of neurological rehabilitation services. In: Greenwood RJ, Barnes MP, McMillan TM, Ward CD (eds) Handbook of Neurological Rehabilitation, 2ed. Hove; Psychology Press 2003: 29-40
• 10 Hui E, Lum C M, Woo J. et al . Outcomes of elderly stroke patients. Day hospital versus conventional management.  Stroke. 1995;  26 1616-1619
• 11 Indredavik B, Bakke F, Stordahl S A. et al . Stroke unit treatment improves long-term quality of life.  Stroke. 1998;  29 895-899
• 12 Landi F, Cesari M, Onder G. et al . Effects of an occupational therapy program on functional outcome in older stroke patients.  Gerontology. 2006;  52 85-91
• 13 Semlyen J K, Summers S J, Barnes M P. Traumatic brain injury: efficacy of multidisciplinary rehabilitation.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;  79 678-683
• 14 Kwakkel G, Kollen B J, Wagenaar R C. Long-term effects of intensity of upper and lower limb training after stroke: a randomized trial.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat. 2002;  72 473-479
• 15 Pohl M, Mehrholz J, Ritschel C, Ruckriem S. Speed-dependet treadmill training in ambulatory hemiparetic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial.  Stroke. 2002;  33 553-558
• 16 Sterr A, Freivogel S. Motor improvement following intensive training in low-functioning chronic hemiparesis.  Neurology. 2003;  61 842-844
• 17 Wallesch C W, Johannsen-Horbach H. Computers in aphasia therapy – effects and side-effects.  Aphasiology. 2004;  18 223-228
• 18 Grealy M A, Johnson D A, Rushton S K. Improving cognitive function after brain injury: the use of exercise and virtual reality.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;  80 661-667
• 19 Webster J S, McFarland P T, Rapport L J. et al . Computer-assisted training for improving wheelchair mobility in unilateral neglect patients.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;  82 769-775
• 20 Scheidtmann K, Fries W, Müller F, Koenig E. Effect of levodopa in combination with physiotherapy on motor recovery after stroke: a prospective, randomised, double-blind study.  Lancet. 2001;  358 787-790
• 21 Huber W, Willmes K, Poeck K. et al . Piracetam as an adjuvant to language therapy for aphasia: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled pilot study.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;  78 245-250
• 22 Zhang L, Plotkin R C, Wang G. et al . Cholinergic augmentation with donepezil enhances recovery in short-term memory and sustained attention after traumatic brain injury.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;  85 1050-1055
• 23 Silver J M, Koumaras B, Chen M. et al . Effects of rivastigmine on cognitive function in patients with traumatic brain injury.  Neurology. 2006;  67 748-755
• 24 Krupp L B, Christodolou C, Melville P. et al . Donepezil improved memory in multiple sclerosis in a randomized clinical trial.  Neurology. 2004;  63 1579-1585
• 25 Whyte J, Hart T, Vaccaro M. et al . Effects of methylphenidate on attentional functions after traumatic brain inury: a multidimensional, randomized, controlled trial.  Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;  83 401-420
• 26 Cappa S F, Benke T, Clarke S. et al . EFNS guidelines on cognitive rehabilitation: report of an EFNS task force.  Eur J Neurol. 2005;  12 665-680
• 27 Herrmann M, Wallesch C W. Depressive changes in stroke patients.  Disabil Rehabil. 1993;  15 55-66
• 28 Engbert A W, Teasdale T W. Psychosocial outcome following traumatic brain injury in adults: a long-term population based follow-up.  Brain Inj. 2004;  18 533-545
• 29 Teasdale T W, Engberg A W. Psychosocial consequences of stroke: a long-term population-based follow-up.  Brain Inj. 2005;  19 1049-1058
• 30 Schlote A, Wallesch C W. Psychosoziale Folgen neurologischer Erkrankungen.  Neurol Rehabil. 2007;  13 61-65
• 31 Barskova T, Wilz G. Interdependence of stroke survivors' recovery and their relatives' attitudes and health: a contribution to investigating the causal effects.  Disbil Rehabil. 2007;  29 1481-1491
• 32 Arabia G, Grossardt B R, Geda Y E. et al . Increased risk of depressive and anxiety disorders in relatives of patients with Parkinson disease.  Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;  64 1385-1392
• 33 Janssens A C, van Doorn P A, de Poer J B. et al . Impact of recently diagnosed multiple sclerosis on quality of life, anxiety, depression and distress of patients and partners.  Acta Neurol Scand. 2003;  108 389-395
• 34 Clark M S, Rubenach S, Winsor A. A randomized controlled trial of an education and counselling intervention for families after stroke.  Clin Rehabil. 2003;  17 703-712
• 35 Wilz G, Barskova Z. Evaluation of a cognitive behavioral group intervention program for spouses of stroke patients.  Behav Res Ther. 2007;  45 2508-2517