RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1027517
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Stellenwert des endoskopischen Ultraschalls bei gastrointestinalen Lymphomen
Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Gastrointestinal LymphomasPublikationsverlauf
Manuskript eingetroffen: 24.1.2008
Manuskript akzeptiert: 6.5.2008
Publikationsdatum:
09. Juni 2008 (online)

Zusammenfassung
Die überwiegende Mehrzahl der gastrointestinalen Lymphome manifestiert sich als niedrig malignes Marginalzonenlymphom vom MALT(mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue)-Typ im Magen und ist daher einer endoskopischen Diagnostik zugänglich. Die Stadieneinteilung erfolgt derzeit meist noch entsprechend der modifizierten Ann-Arbor-Klassifikation. Jedoch wird alternativ die an das TNM-System angelehnte Paris-Stadienteilung aufgrund ihrer detaillierteren Beschreibung sowohl des lokalen Tumorwachstums als auch der extraintestinalen Lymphomausbreitung empfohlen. Insbesondere in Bezug auf die Beurteilung der Tiefeninfiltration der Magenwand und der lokoregionären Lymphknotenbeteiligung stellt die Endosonografie das beste derzeit zur Verfügung stehende Verfahren dar und ist somit für die lokoregioniäre Stadienbeurteilung unverzichtbar. Über die Bedeutung im Rahmen des Stagings hinaus besitzt die Endosonografie bei gastralen MALT-Lymphomen einen hohen prognostischen Stellenwert bezüglich des Therapieansprechens auf eine Helicobacter-pylori-Eradikation. So wurde bei Vorliegen eines MALT-Lymphoms im endosonografischen Stadium EI 1 ein 70 - 100 %iges Ansprechen auf eine Helicobacter-pylori-Eradikationsbehandlung gezeigt. Der Stellenwert der Endosonografie im Follow-up gastraler Lymphome nach konservativer Therapie erscheint derzeit eher unklar. In Studien ergab sich keine klare Korrelation zwischen histologischem Ansprechen und endosonografischem Ergebnis. Daher kann die Endosonografie die regelmäßige endoskopisch bioptische Verlaufskontrolle im Follow-up von Patienten mit gastralem MALT-Lymphom und konservativer Therapie nicht ersetzen.
Abstract
The majority of gastrointestinal lymphomas belongs to the group of the MALT (mucosa-associated lymphoid type) lymphomas arising in the stomach, therefore rendering them accessible to endoscopy. Staging currently follows the modified Ann Arbor classification but most likely in the future, the TNM-based Paris staging system will be applied due to its detailed description of the local spread as well as the extraintestinal dissemination. For assessment of gut wall infiltration and local lymphonodular involvement, endoscopic ultrasound currently represents the standard procedure and is an essential diagnostic tool regarding locoregional staging. Additionally, the method confers a high prognostic value regarding treatment response in MALT lymphoma. In endoscopic ultrasound stage EI 1, Helicobacter pylori eradication leads in 70 - 100 % to a complete response. However, the value of endoscopic ultrasound in the follow-up of lymphomas after chemotherapy remains elusive and controversial. There is no clear correlation between histologically proven residual disease and endosonographic results. Thus, so far, endoscopic ultrasound will not replace bioptic surveillance after MALT lymphoma treatment.
Schlüsselwörter
MALT-Lymphom - Helicobacter pylori - Gastritis
Key words
MALT lymphoma - Helicobacter pylori - gastritis
Literatur
- 1 Jaffe E S, Harris N L, Stein H. et al .World Health Organization and Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics: Tumours
of haematopoetic and lymphoid tissues. Lyon, I; ARC Press 2002
MissingFormLabel
- 2
Koch P, delValle F, Berdel W E. et al .
Primary gastrointestinal non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: Anatomic andhistologic distibution
clinical features and survival data of 371 patients registered in the German multicenter
study GIT NHL 01 / 92.
J Clin Oncol.
2001;
19
3861-3873
MissingFormLabel
- 3
Cogliatti S B, Schmid U, Schuhmacher U. et al .
Primary B-cell gastric lymphoma: a clinico-pathological study of 145 patients.
Gastroenterology.
1991;
101
1159-1170
MissingFormLabel
- 4
Kolve M, Fischbach W, Greiner A. et al .
Differences in endoscopic and clinicopathological features of primary and secondary
gastric non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1999;
49
307-315
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Fischbach W, Dragosics B, Kolve-Goebeler M E. et al .
Primary gastric B-cell lymphoma: results of a prospective multicenter study.
Gastroenterology.
2000;
119
1191-1202
MissingFormLabel
- 6
Boot H, Jong de D.
Diagnosis, treatment decisions and follow up in primary gastric lymphoma.
Gut.
2002;
51
621-622
MissingFormLabel
- 7
Fischbach W, Daum S.
Gastrointestinale Lymphome.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr.
2003;
128
1899-1901
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Musshoff K.
Klinische Stadieneinteilung der nicht-Hodgkin lymphome.
Strahlentherapie.
1977;
153
218-221
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Radaszkiewicz T, Dragosics B, Bauer P.
Gastrointestinal malignant lymphomas of the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue: factors
relevant to prognosis.
Gastroenterology.
1992;
102
1628-1638
MissingFormLabel
- 10
Ruskone-Fourmestraux A, Dragosics B, Morgner A. et al .
Paris staging system for primary gastrointestinal lymphomas.
Gut.
2003;
52
912-913
MissingFormLabel
- 11
Fischbach W.
Gastrointestinale Lymphome. Ätiologie, Pathogenese und Therapie.
Internist.
2000;
41
831-840
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Fischbach W, Goebeler-Kolve M E, Dragosics B. et al .
Long-term outcome of patients with gastric marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of MALT following
exclusive Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. Experience from a large prospective
series.
Gut.
2004;
53
34-37
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Raderer M, Streubel B, Wöhrer S. et al .
Successful antibiotic treatment of Helicobacter pylori negative gastric mucosa associated
lymphoid tissue lymphomas.
Gut.
2006;
55
616-618
MissingFormLabel
- 14
Di Magno E P, Regan P T, Wilson D A. et al .
Ultrasonic endoscope.
Lancet.
1980;
1
629-631
MissingFormLabel
- 15
Kimmey M B, Martin R W, Haggitt R C. et al .
Histologic correlates of gastrointestinal ultrasound images.
Gastroenterology.
1989;
96
433-441
MissingFormLabel
- 16
Gordon S J, Rifkin M D, Goldberg B B.
Endosonographic evaluation of mural abnormalities of the upper gastrointestinal tract.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1986;
32
193-198
MissingFormLabel
- 17
Catalano M F, Sivak M V, Rice Jr T. et al .
Endosonographic features predictive of lymph node metastasis.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1994;
40
442-446
MissingFormLabel
- 18
Tio I L, den Hartog Jager F CA, Tytgat G NJ.
Endoscopic ultrasonography of non-Hodgkins lymphoma of the stomach.
Gastroenterology.
1986;
91
401-408
MissingFormLabel
- 19
Bolondi L, Casanova P, Caletti G C. et al .
Primary gastric lymphoma versus gastric carcinoma: endoscopic US evaluation.
Radiology.
1987;
165
821-826
MissingFormLabel
- 20
Fujishima H, Misawa T, Maruoka A. et al .
Staging and follow up of primary gastric lymphoma by endoscopic ultrasonography.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1991;
86
719-724
MissingFormLabel
- 21
Caletti G C, Ferrari A, Brocchi E. et al .
Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and staging of gastric cancer
and lymphoma.
Surgery.
1993;
113
14-27
MissingFormLabel
- 22
Suekane H, Iida M, Yao T. et al .
Endoscopic ultrasonography in primary gastric lymphoma: a correlation with endoscopic
and histologic findings.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1993;
39
139-145
MissingFormLabel
- 23
Schüder G, Hildebrandt U, Kreisler-Haag D. et al .
Role of endosonography in the surgical management of non-Hodgkins lymphoma of the
stomach.
Endoscopy.
1993;
25
509-512
MissingFormLabel
- 24
Palazzo L, Roseau G, Ruskone-Fourmestraux A. et al .
Endoscopic ultrasonography in the local staging of primary gastric lymphoma.
Endoscopy.
1993;
25
502-508
MissingFormLabel
- 25
Fischbach W, Goebeler-Kolve M E, Greiner A.
Diagnostic accuracy of EUS in the local staging of primary gastric lymphoma: results
of a prospective, multicenter study comparing EUS with histopathologic stage.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2002;
56
696-700
MissingFormLabel
- 26
Fusaroli P, Buscarini E, Peyre S. et al .
Interobserver agreement in staging gastric MALT lymphoma by EUS.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2002;
55
662-668
MissingFormLabel
- 27
Hoepffner N, Lahme T, Gilly J. et al .
Wertigkeit der Endosonografie im diagnostischen Staging primärer Magenlymphome.
Med Klin.
2003;
98
313-317
MissingFormLabel
- 28
Sackmann M, Morgner A, Rudolph B. et al .
Regression of gastric MALT lymphoma after eradication of Helicobacter pylori is predicted
by endosonographic staging.
Gastroenterology.
1997;
113
1087-1090
MissingFormLabel
- 29
Nobre-Leitão C, Lage P, Cravo M. et al .
Treatment of gastric MALT lymphoma by Helicobacter pylori eradication: a study controlled
by endoscopic ultrasonography.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1998;
93
723-736
MissingFormLabel
- 30
Ruskonè-Fourmestraux A, Lavergne A, Aegerter P H. et al .
Predictive factors for regression of gastric MALT lymphoma after anti-Helicobacter
pylori treatment.
Gut.
2001;
48
297-303
MissingFormLabel
- 31
Nakamura S, Matsumoto T, Suekane H. et al .
Predictive value of endoscopic ultrasonography for regression of gastric low grade
and high grade MALT lymphoma after eradication of Helicobacter pylori.
Gut.
2001;
48
454-460
MissingFormLabel
- 32
Caletti G, Zinzani P L, Fusaroli P. et al .
The importance of endoscopic ultrasonography in the management of low-grade gastric
mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther.
2002;
16
1715-1722
MissingFormLabel
- 33
Sheu B S, Shiesh S C, Wang J T. et al .
Clinical application of 20 MHz endosonography and anti-Helicobacter pylori immunoblots
to predict regression of low-grade gastric MALToma by H. pylori eradication.
Helicobacter.
2003;
8
36-45
MissingFormLabel
- 34
El Zahabi L MN, Jamali F R, El-Hajj I I. et al .
The value of EUS in predicting the response of gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid
tissue lymphoma to Helicobacter pylori eradication.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2007;
65
89-96
MissingFormLabel
- 35
Pavlick A C, Gerdes H, Portlock C S.
Endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of gastric small lymphocytic mucosa-associated
lymphoid tumors.
J Clin Oncol.
1997;
15
1761-1766
MissingFormLabel
- 36
Lévy M, Hammel P, Lamarque D. et al .
Endoscopic ultrasonography for the initial staging and follow up in patients with
low-grade gastric lymphoma of mucosa associated lymphoid tissue treated medically.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1997;
46
328-333
MissingFormLabel
- 37
Lügering N, Menzel J, Kucharzik T. et al .
Impact of miniprobes compared to conventional endosonography in the staging of low-grade
gastric MALT lymphoma.
Endoscopy.
2001;
33
832-837
MissingFormLabel
- 38
Yeh H Z, Chen G H, Chang W D. et al .
Long-term follow up of gastric low-grade mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma
by endosonography emphasizing the application of a miniature ultrasound probe.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2003;
18
162-167
MissingFormLabel
- 39
Püspök A, Raderer M, Chott A. et al .
Endoscopic ultrasound in the follow up and response assessment of patients with primary
gastric lymphoma.
Gut.
2002;
51
691-694
MissingFormLabel
- 40
Di Raimondo F, Caruso L, Bonanno G. et al .
Is endoscopic ultrasound clinically useful for follow-up of gastric lymphoma?.
Ann Oncol.
2007;
18
351-356
MissingFormLabel
PD Dr. Oliver Al-Taie
Medizinische Klinik II, Klinikum Aschaffenburg
Am Hasenkopf 1
63739 Aschaffenburg
Telefon: ++ 49/60 21/32 30 11
Fax: ++ 49/60 21/32 30 31
eMail: oliver.altaie@klinikum-aschaffenburg.de