Endoscopy 2008; 40(4): 302-307
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-995483
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

A comparative study of standard ERCP catheter and hydrophilic guide wire in the selective cannulation of the common bile duct

P.  Katsinelos1 , G.  Paroutoglou2 , J.  Kountouras3 , G.  Chatzimavroudis1 , C.  Zavos3 , I.  Pilpilidis1 , G.  Tzelas2 , G.  Tzovaras2
  • 1Department of Endoscopy and Motility Unit, Central Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
  • 2Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital, Larissa, Greece
  • 3Department of Gastroenterology, Second Medical Clinic, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Ippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 3 July 2007

accepted after revision 11 October 2007

Publication Date:
19 February 2008 (online)

Background and study aims: Deep cannulation of the common bile duct (CBD) is paramount for the success of endoscopic biliary intervention. The aim of the present study was to compare standard ERCP catheter and hydrophilic guide wire (HGW) in the selective cannulation of the CBD.

Patients and methods: A total of 332 patients were randomly assigned to cannulation with a standard catheter (n = 165) or a HGW (n = 167). If cannulation had not succeeded after 10 minutes with the technique assigned at randomization, a further attempt was made for an additional 10 minutes using the alternative technique. The following were assessed: primary and overall selective cannulation, time to cholangiography, number of pancreatic opacifications and guide-wire pancreatic duct insertions, and complication rates.

Results: The primary success rate of selective CBD cannulation was higher in the HGW (81.4 %) than in the standard catheter group (53.9 %; P < 0.001). The overall cannulation rate after crossover was comparable between the two groups (standard catheter 84 % vs. HGW 83.8 %; P = 0.19). Time required for primary selective CBD cannulation was 3.53 ± 0.32 minutes in the standard catheter vs. 4.48 ± 0.32 minutes in the HGW group (P = 0.04), and the number of insertions of the guide wire into the pancreatic duct was 3.29 ± 0.47 in the standard catheter vs. 2.7 ± 0.21 in the HGW group (P = 0.22). Pancreatic opacifications occurred 3.19 ± 0.20 times in the standard catheter vs. 1.50 ± 0.22 times in the HGW group (P < 0.001). Precut techniques were used in 56 patients (16.9 %) (n = 31 in the standard catheter vs. n = 25 in the HGW group; P = 0.07). The frequency of postinterventional pancreatitis and hemorrhage did not differ between the two groups. A young woman developed post-ERCP hemolytic crisis due to glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. There was no procedure-related mortality.

Conclusions: The use of HGW, as primary technique or as a secondary technique after failure of cannulation with a standard catheter, achieves a high rate of selective CBD cannulation.

References

  • 1 Kumar S, Sherman S, Hawes R H, Lehman G A. Success and yield of second attempt ERCP.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  41 445-447
  • 2 Maydeo A, Borkar D. Techniques of selective cannulation and sphincterotomy.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 S19-S23
  • 3 Cotton P B. Income and outcome metrics for the objective evaluation of ERCP and alternative methods.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56(6 Suppl) S283-S290
  • 4 Lehman G A. What are the determinants of success in utilization of ERCP in the setting of pancreatic and biliary diseases?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56(6 Suppl) S291-S293
  • 5 Kowalski T, Kanchana T, Pungpapong S. Perceptions of gastroenterology fellows regarding ERCP competency and training.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  58 345-349
  • 6 Cotton P B. Precut papillotomy - a risky technique for experts only.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1989;  35 578-579
  • 7 Freeman M L, Nelson D B, Sherman S. et al . Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy.  N Engl J Med. 1996;  335 909-918
  • 8 Rabenstein T, Ruppert T, Schneider H T. et al . Benefits and risks of needle-knife papillotomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;  46 207-211
  • 9 Baillie J. Needle knife sphincterotomy revisited.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;  46 282-284
  • 10 Masci E, Mariani A, Curioni S, Testoni P A. Risk factors for pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 830-834
  • 11 Freeman M L, Guda N M. Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a comprehensive review.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 845-864
  • 12 Cotton P B, Lehman G, Vennes J. et al . Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  37 383-393
  • 13 Lella F, Bagnolo F, Colombo E, Bonassi U. A simple way of avoiding post-ERCP pancreatitis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 830-834
  • 14 Deviere J. Using the pancreas for common bile duct cannulation?.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 750-751
  • 15 Fazel A, Quadri A, Catalano M F. et al . Does a pancreatic duct stent prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 291-294
  • 16 Sivilotti M L. Oxidant stress and haemolysis of the human erythrocyte.  Toxicol Rev. 2004;  23 169-188
  • 17 Gerrah R, Shargal Y, Elami A. Impaired oxygenation and increased hemolysis after cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;  76 523-527
  • 18 Rossos P G, Kortan P, Haber G. Selective common bile duct cannulation can be simplified by the use of a standard papillotome.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;  39 67-69
  • 19 Cortas G A, Mehta S N, Abraham N S, Barkun A N. Selective cannulation of the common bile duct: a prospective randomized trial comparing standard catheters with sphincterotomes.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  50 775-779
  • 20 Schwacha H, Allgaier H P, Deibert P. et al . A sphincterotome-based technique for selective transpapillary common bile duct cannulation.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 387-391
  • 21 Laasch H U, Tringali A, Wilbraham L. et al . Comparison of standard and steerable catheters for bile duct cannulation in ERCP.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 669-674
  • 22 Karamanolis G, Katsikani A, Viazis N. et al . A prospective cross-over study using a sphincterotome and a guidewire to increase the success rate of common bile duct cannulation.  World J Gastroenterol. 2005;  11 1649-1652
  • 23 Maeda S, Hayashi H, Hosokawa O. et al . Prospective randomized pilot trial of selective biliary cannulation using pancreatic guide-wire placement.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 721-724
  • 24 Gyökeres T, Duhl J, Varsányi M. et al . Double guide wire placement for endoscopic pancreatobiliary procedures.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 95-96
  • 25 Fry L C, Barriga J A, Linder J D, Mönkemüller K E. Placement of a biliary catheter in the pancreatic duct to and common bile duct cannulation.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 97
  • 26 Slivka A. A new technique to assist in bile duct cannulation.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  44 636
  • 27 Goldberg E, Titus M, Haluszka O, Darwin P. Pancreatic duct stent placement facilitates difficult common bile duct cannulation.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  62 592-596
  • 28 Michopoulos S, Natsios A, Manthos G. et al . First intention of the biliary tree cannulation by means of a sphincterotome and hydrophilic guide wire is a low high-risk success rate ERCP method.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 AB201 (abstract)
  • 29 Papachristou G I, Baron T H, Gleeson F. et al . Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography catheter and accessory exchange using a short hydrophilic guide wire: a prospective study.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 1133-1136

P. Katsinelos, MD

Department of Endoscopy and Motility Unit

Central Hospital

Ethnikis Aminis 41

546 35 Thessaloniki

Greece

Fax: + 30-2310-210401

Email: gchatzimav@yahoo.gr

    >