The Outcome and Cumulative Morbidity Associated with the Second and Third Postcesarean Delivery

Ron Gonen; Shlomi Barak; Viki Nissenblat; Gonen Ohel

doi:10.1055/s-2007-986676

American Journal of Perinatology, Table of Contents

Am J Perinatol 2007; 24(8): 483-486
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-986676

The Outcome and Cumulative Morbidity Associated with the Second and Third Postcesarean Delivery

Ron Gonen¹ ^, ² , Shlomi Barak¹ ^, ² , Viki Nissenblat¹ ^, ² , Gonen Ohel¹ ^, ²

¹Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Bnai Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
²Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome and cumulative morbidity among women who delivered twice after a cesarean delivery (CD), and who underwent in the second delivery either a trial of labor (TOL) or planned cesarean delivery (PCD). Eligible women (N = 399) were divided into two groups based on first post-CD: a TOL (n = 304) or PCD (n = 95). Women attempting a TOL were successful in 70 and 75% in the first and second post-CD, respectively. All participants undergoing a PCD subsequently had a third PCD. The overall morbidity was 8.4 and 5.3% among PCD and TOL groups, respectively (p = 0.258). Women attempting a TOL after a previous CD had a 70 and 53% likelihood for at least one successful or two successful vaginal births in the two subsequent deliveries, respectively. No significant difference was documented between the groups regarding the cumulative morbidity.

KEYWORDS

Planned cesarean delivery - trial of labor after cesarean - repeated cesarean delivery - morbidity

Full Text

References

REFERENCES

1 Mozurkewich E L, Hutton E K. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 183 1187-1197
2 Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt V L, Easterling T R, Martin D P. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345 3-8
3 McMahon M J, Luther E R, Bowes W A, Olshan A F. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl J Med. 1996; 335 689-695
4 Landon M B, Hauth J C, Leveno K J et al.. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351 2581-2589
5 Lynch C M, Kearney R, Turner M J. Maternal morbidity after elective repeat caesarean section after two or more previous procedures. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003; 106 10-13
6 Gilliam M, Rosenberg D, Davis F. The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity. Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 99 976-980
7 Ananth C V, Smulian J C, Vintzileos A M. The association of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and abortion: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 177 1071-1078
8 Gielchinsky Y, Rojansky N, Fasouliotis S J, Ezra Y. Placenta accreta - summary of 10 years: a survey of 310 cases. Placenta. 2002; 23 210-214
9 Zorlu C G, Turan C, Isik A Z, Danişman N, Mungan T, Gökmen O. Emergency hysterectomy in modern obstetric practice: changing clinical perspective in time. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998; 77 186-190
10 Rageth C J, Juzi C, Grossenbacher H. Delivery after previous cesarean: A risk evaluation. Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 93 332-337
11 Mankuta D, Leshno M M, Menasche M M, Brezis M M. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: Trial of labor or repeat cesarean section? A decision analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 189 714-719

Ron GonenM.D.

Deputy Chairman, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Director of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Bnai Zion Medical Center

47 Golomb Street, Haifa, Israel