Notfall & Hausarztmedizin 2007; 33(2): 94-99
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-973524
Brennpunkt

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Medikamentöse Prophylaxe bei Gabe nichtsteroidaler-antientzündlicher Pharmaka - Gastrointestinale Effekte einer NSAID-Therapie

Prophylaxis by means of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs - gastrointestinal effects of NSAID treatmentKlaus Pönicke1 , Joachim Neumann1
  • 1Institut für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
14 March 2007 (online)

Nichtsteroidale antientzündliche Pharmaka (NSAID) verfügen über analgetische, antipyretische und/oder antiphlogistische Eigenschaften. NSAID verursachen jedoch auch Schädigungen des GI-Traktes. Zur Verhinderung dieser gastrointestinalen Effekte sollten die Patienten daher routinemäßig einen Mukosaschutz erhalten. Zurzeit ist die Blockade der Protonenpumpen - (H+/K+-ATPase) - in Parietalzellen durch Protonenpumpeninhibitoren (PPI) die wirksamste Methode zur Hemmung der Säuresekretion. PPI sind allgemein wirksamer als H2-Blocker und verhinderten sowohl duodenale als auch gastrale Ulzera bei Risiko-Patienten. Die Häufigkeitsrate der unerwünschten Wirkungen der PPI liegt im Bereich der Anwendung der H2-Blocker oder eines Placebos. Bei Patienten ohne erhöhtes Risiko für das Auftreten gastroduodenaler Komplikation ist zur Prävention kardiovaskulärer und/oder zerebrovaskulärer Ereignisse auch die Anwendung niedrig dosierter ASS in einer magensaftresistenten, dünndarmlöslichen Darreichungsform in Betracht zu ziehen.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) have analgesic, antipyretic and/or antiphlogistic properties. However, they may also damage the GI tract. Hence, patients should also be given mucosal protection as a matter of routine. Presently, the most effective inhibition of acid secretion is blocking of the proton pumps - (H+/K+-ATPase) in parietal cells by means of proton pump inhibitors (PPI). PPIs are generally more effective than H2 blockers; in high-risk patients, they prevent both duodenal and gastric ulcers. Frequency rate of undesirable side effects of PPI is within the range of application of H2 blockers or placebos. In case of patients without enhanced risk of gastroduodenal complications it may also be considered using low-dosage ASA in gastric juice-resistant and enterosoluble preparations to prevent cardiovascular and/or cerebrovascular incidents.

Literatur

  • 1 Jahrbuch Sucht 2005. Geesthacht: Neuland Verlag 2003: 79
  • 2 Schwabe U, Paffrath D. Arzneiverordnungs-Report. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag 2004: 217
  • 3 Jones MK, Wang H, Peskar BM. et al. . Inhibition of angiogenesis by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: insight into mechanisms and implications for cancer growth and ulcer healing.  Nat Med. 1999;  5 1418-1423
  • 4 Nasdal J, Brown K. NSAID-associated adverse effects and acid control aids to prevent them.  Drug Safety. 2006;  29 119-132
  • 5 Leivonen M, Sipponen P, Kivilaakso E. Gastric changes in coronary-operated patients with low-dose aspirin.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 1992;  27 912-916
  • 6 Weil J, Colin-Jones D, Langman M. et al. . Prophylactic aspirin and risk of peptic ulcer bleeding.  BMJ. 1995;  310 827-830
  • 7 Derry S, Loke YK. Risk of gastrointestinal haemorrhage with long term use of aspirin: meta analysis.  BMJ. 2000;  321 1183-1187
  • 8 Serano P, Lanas A. et al. . Risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients taking low-dose aspirin for prevention of cardiovascular diseases.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002;  16 1945-1953
  • 9 Henry D, Lim LL-Y. et al. . Variability in risk of gastrointestinal complications with individual non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: results of a collaborative meta-analysis.  BMJ. 1996;  312 1563-1566
  • 10 Cozzarini W, Rath J, Bauer A. et al. . Mukosaprotektive Therapie unter Langzeitmedikation mit nichtsteroidalen Antirheumatika.  Wien med Wschr. 2003;  153 295-303
  • 11 Hooper L, Brown T, Elliott RA. et al. . The effectiveness of the five strategies for the prevention of gastrointestinal toxicity by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: systematic review.  BMJ. 2004;  329 948-957
  • 12 Silverstein FE, Graham DY, Senior JR. et al. . Misoprostol serious gastrointestinal complications in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.  Ann Intern Med. 1995;  123 241-249
  • 13 Raskin JB, White RH, Jackson JE. et al. . Misoprostol dosage in the prevention of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastric and duodenal ulcers: a comparison of three regimens.  Ann Intern Med. 1995;  123 344-350
  • 14 Taha AS, Hudson N. et al. . Famotidine for the prevention of gastric and duodenal ulcers caused by nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs.  N Engl J Med. 1996;  334 1435-1439
  • 15 Hudson N, Taha AS, Russell RI. et al. . Famotidine for healing and maintenance in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated gastroduodenal ulceration.  Gastroenterology. 1997;  112 1817-1822
  • 16 Prichard PJ, Jones DB, Yeomans ND. et al. . The effectiveness of ranitidine in reducing gastric acid-secretion decreases with continued therapy.  Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1986;  22 663-668
  • 17 Singh G, Ramey DR, Morfeld D. et al. . Gastrointestinal tract complications of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug treatment in rheumatoid arthritis. A prospective observational cohort study.  Arch Intern Med. 1996;  156 1530-1536
  • 18 Bianchi PG, Lazzaroni M, Petrillo M. Double-blind, double-dummy endoscopic comparison of the mucosal protective effects of misoprostol versus ranitidine on naproxen-induced mucosal injury to the stomach and duodenum in rheumatic patients.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;  92 663-667
  • 19 Sachs G, Shin JM, Howden CW. Review article: the clinical pharmacology of proton pump inhibitors.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;  23 2-8
  • 20 Shin JM, Sachs G. Differences in binding properties of two proton pump inhibitors on the gastric H+,K+-ATPase in vivo.  Biochem Pharmacol. 2004;  68 2117-2127
  • 21 Singh G, Triadafilopoulos G. Appropriate choice of proton pump inhibitor therapy in the prevention and management of NSAID-related gastrointestinal damage.  Int J Clin Pract. 2006;  59 1210-1217
  • 22 Yeomans ND, Tulassay Z, Juhasz L. et al. . A comparison of omeprazole with ranitidine for ulcers associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Acid Suppression Trial: Ranitidine versus Omeprazole for NSAID-associated Ulcer Treatment (ASTRONAUT) Study Group.  N Engl J Med. 1998;  338 719-726
  • 23 Hawkey CJ, Karrasch JA, Szczepanski L. et al. . Omeprazole compared with Misoprostol for ulcers associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. (OMNIUM- Study Group).  N Engl J Med. 1998;  338 727-734
  • 24 Mearin F, Ponce J. Potent acid inhibition: summary of the evidence and clinical application.  Drugs. 2005;  65 113-126
  • 25 Robinson M. Review article: current perspectives on hypergastrinaemia and enterochromaffin-like-cell hyperplasia.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1999;  13 5-10
  • 26 Argila Martin de C.. Safety of potent gastric acid inhibition.  Drugs. 2005;  65 97-104
  • 27 Meyer UA. Metabolic interactions of the proton-pump inhibitors lansoprazole, omeprazole and pantoprazole with other drugs.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996;  8 21-25
  • 28 Klotz U. Clinical impact of CYP2C19 polymorphism on the action of proton pump inhibitors: a review of a special problem.  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006;  44 297-302
  • 29 Schwab M, Klotz U, Hofmann U. et al. . Esomeprazole-induced healing of gastroesophageal reflux disease is unrelated to the genotype of CYP2C19: evidence from clinical and pharmacokinetic data.  Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2005;  78 627-634
  • 30 Fork FT, Lafolie P. et al. . Gastroduodenal tolerance of 75 mg clopidogrel versus 325 mg aspirin in healthy volunteers. A gastroscopic study.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000;  35 464-469
  • 31 CAPRIE Steering Committee. . A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE).  Lancet. 1996;  348 1329-1339
  • 32 Chan FK, Ching JY, Hung LC. et al. . Clopidogrel versus aspirin and esomeprazole to prevent recurrent ulcer bleeding.  N Engl J Med. 2005;  352 238-244
  • 33 Kelly JP, Kaufman DW, Jurgelon JM. et al. . Risk of aspirin-associated major upper-gastrointestinal bleeding with enteric-coated or buffered product.  Lancet. 1996;  348 1413-1416
  • 34 Laine L, Maller ES, Yu C. et al. . Ulcer formation with low-dose enteric-coated aspirin and the effect of COX-2 selective inhibition: a double-blind trial.  Gastroenterology. 2004;  127 395-402
  • 35 Banoob DW, McCloskey WW, Webster W. Risk of gastric injury with enteric- versus nonenteric-coated aspirin.  Ann Pharmacother. 2002;  36 163-166
  • 36 Dammann HG, Burkhardt F, Wolf N. Enteric coating of aspirin significantly decreases gastroduodenal mucosal lesions.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1999;  13 1109-1114
  • 37 Darius H. Aspirin protect - Anwendungsbeobachtung dokumentiert gute Verträglichkeit.  Pharmazeutische Zeitung. 2006;  151 26-34

Korrespondenz

Prof. Dr. med. Joachim Neumann

Institut für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg

Magdeburger Straße 4

06097 Halle (Saale)

Fax: 0345/557-1835

Email: joachim.neumann@medizin.uni-halle.de

    >