Patients Treated by Model-C Gamma Knife with APS are Less Exposed to Non-Therapeutic Irradiation

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the defocused (non-therapeutic) irradiation between the Model-C gamma knife with the automatic positioning system™ (APS) and with the non-APS mode.

Methods: 41 males and 59 females (mean age: 54 years) had the following pathologies: 38 benign tumors, 43 malignant tumors, 16 vascular lesions, and 3 trigeminal neuralgias. These included 192 lesions (mean volume: 4.8 mL), 61 (32%) of them were located deeply. The radiation treatment time needed and the choice of helmets and shots for each lesion were analyzed. The inter-group difference is analyzed using the one-way ANOVA method.

Results: The APS mode could be applied alone in 79 patients or was always possible in nearly 95% of patients with benign lesions. APS-treatment failed in three patients due to unexpected collisions, and the other 18 harbored some advanced peripheral metastatic lesions. The non-APS mode required 47% more defocused time than the pure APS mode (1.1 vs. 0.75 minutes, p<0.01) before starting the next shot. Patients treated by the APS mode are exposed to a 70% less (p<0.05) unplanned, defocused irradiation dose than those by the non-APS mode. Although there is a tendency in the APS group to use fewer helmets but more shots per lesion for achieving an optimal dosimetry, there was no difference in the averaged defocused time per patient.

Conclusions: The APS system makes GK radiosurgery run more smoothly, rapidly, comfortable and safer than ever. It improves the design of more conformal dose plans, especially for benign lesions, and the patients will also be exposed to less unnecessary radiation doses.

Key words

automatic positioning system - gamma knife - irradiation - radiosurgery

References

• 1 Gerosa M, Nicolato A, Foroni R. The role of gamma knife radiosurgery in the treatment of primary and metastatic brain tumors.  Curr Opin Oncol. 2003;  15 188-196
• 2 Surdell Jr DL, Bhattacharjee S, Loftus CM. Pros, cons, and current indications of open craniotomy versus gamma knife in the treatment of arteriovenous malformations and the role of endovascular embolization.  Neurol Res. 2002;  24 347-353
• 3 Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD, Konziolka D, Maitz A. Potential human error in setting stereotactic coordinates for radiosurgery: implications for quality assurance.  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993;  27 397-401
• 4 Goetsch SJ. Risk analysis of Leksell gamma knife model c with automatic positioning system.  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;  52 869-877
• 5 Kuo JS, Yu C, Giannotta SL, Petrovich Z, Apuzzo MLJ. The Leksell gamma knife model U versus model C: a quantitative comparison of radiosurgical treatment parameters.  Neurosurgery. 2004;  55 168-173
• 6 Régis J, Hayashi M, Porcheron D, Delsanti C, Muracciole X, Peragut JC. Impact of the model C and automatic positioning system on gamma knife radiosurgery: an evaluation in vestibular schwannomas.  J Neurosurg. 2002;  97 ((Suppl 5)) 588-591
• 7 Massager N, Régis J, Porcheron D, Devriendt D, Desmedt F, Levivier M. Lateral positioning technique for the treatment of far-lateral targets with the Leksell gamma knife: technical note.  Neurosurgery. 2002;  51 1512-1519
• 8 Kondziolka D, Maitz AH, Niranjan A, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD. An evaluation of the model C gamma knife with automatic patient positioning.  Neurosurgery. 2002;  50 429-432
• 9 Horstmann GA, Eck AT Van. Gamma knife model C with the automatic positioning system and its impact on the treatment of vestibular schwannomas.  J Neurosurg. 2002;  97 ((Suppl 5)) 450-455

Correspondence