Introduction
Introduction
Endoscopic biliary stenting is the most common method to treat obstructive jaundice.
But in 3 -12 % of cases, selective cannulation of the major papilla failed and surgery
or percutaneous biliary drainage is required. But percutaneous drainage needed dilated
intrahepatic biliary ducts and the rate of complications reach 20 % of cases including
peritoneal bleeding. A new technique of biliary drainage using EUS and EUS guided
puncture of the bile duct (common bile duct or left hepatic duct) is now possible.
Using EUS guidance and dedicated accessories it’s now possible to create bilio or
pancreatico-digestive anastomosis.
EUS guided bilio-digestive anastomosis
EUS guided bilio-digestive anastomosis
Endoscopic biliary stenting is the most common method to treat obstructive jaundice.
But in 3 -12 % of cases, selective cannulation of the major papilla failed and surgery
or percutaneous biliary drainage is required. But percutaneous drainage needed dilated
intrahepatic biliary ducts and the rate of complications reach 20 % of cases including
peritoneal bleeding. A new technique of biliary drainage using EUS and EUS guided
puncture of the common bile duct (CBD) or the left hepatic duct (segment 3) is now
possible.
Technique of EUS guided biliary drainage
Using therapeutic EUS scope, CBD was punctured with a 5F needle-knife under EUS guidance
and a cholangiography was obtained. The metallic part of the needle-knife was removed
and a 00.35 inch guide wire was introduced in the CBD. On the guide wire a 6.5F Sohendra
dilator (Wilson-Cook corporation) was placed in the CBD and allowed the placement
through the duodenum of a 10F plastic stent or a covered metallic expandable stent.
Technique of EUS guided hepatico-gastrostomy (Fig. [1])
By using an interventional echoendoscope, the dilated left hepatic duct (segment III)
was well visualized. HGE was then performed under combined fluoroscopic and ultrasound
guidance, with the tipp of the echoendoscope positioned such that the inflated balloon
was in the middle part of the small curvature of the stomach. A needle (19 G, Echotipp
Ultrasound Needle, EUSN-19-T, Cook Ireland Ltd., Limerick, Ireland) was inserted transgastrically
into the distal part of the left hepatic duct and contrast medium was injected. Opacification
demonstrated a dilated biliary ducts to the complete obstruction. The needle was exchanged
over a guidewire (0.02 inch diameter, Terumo Europe, Leuven, Belgium) for a 6.5F diathermic
sheath (prototype Cysto-Gastro set, EndoFlex, Voerde, Germany), which was then used
to enlarge the channel between the stomach and the left hepatic duct. The sheath was
introduced by using cutting current. After exchange over a guidewire (TFE-coated 0.035
inch diameter, Cook Europe, Bjaeverskov, Denmark), a 8.5 F, 8-cm-long hepatico-gastric
stent) or a covered metallic expandable stent (Boston-scientific, 8 cm length) was
positioned.As observed by fluoroscopy, contrast emptied from the stent into the stomach.
To prevent bile leakage you can leave through the metallic stent a 6 or 7F naso-biliary
drain in aspiration during 48 hours.
Fig. 1
a EUS guided puncture of the left lobe bile duct (segment 3) b Guide wire through the stenotic hepaticojejunal anstomosis c 6F cystostome into the bile duct d Hepaticogastrostomy using a covered metallic stent (endoscopic view) e Ct follow-up.
Place of the bilio-digestive anastomosis guided by EUS in comparison with ERCP
Place of the bilio-digestive anastomosis guided by EUS in comparison with ERCP
ERCP is still today the Gold Standard technique for the drainage of an obstructive
jaundice due to a pancreatic cancer. Success rate of biliary stenting using ERCP is
around 80 - 85 % but sometime ERCP failed to cannulate selectively the papilla or
failed to reach the papilla in case of duodenal obstruction.
These new techniques of biliary drainage using EUS guidance could be an alternative
to percutaneous procedures or to Surgery.
The problem with the percutaneous techniques of biliary drainage is the high rate
of complication (bleeding, peritoneal bile leakage) around 12 to 20 % of the cases
and the morbidity and the mortality of Surgery for such palliative procedures are
respectively of 35 - 50 % and 10 - 15 %.
For probably, these new techniques of biliary drainages will be in the future an alternative
to Surgery and percutaneous biliary drainage.
Regarding the data in the literature, we have found two studies concerning the hepaticogastrostomy
guided by EUS. The first was published by Burmeister et al. about 4 cases [1]. Four cases of successful EUS-guided-cholangio-drainage are presented in which the
major papilla could not be cannulated at ERCP. For puncture of the intrahepatic or
extrahepatic bile duct, a modification of the one-step technique for the drainage
of pancreatic pseudocysts was used. Stent insertion was successful in 3 of the 4 patients.
In these 3 patients cholestasis resolved promptly. The second was our work about 2
patients using plastic stents in one case and and expandable covered metallic stent
in the second case [2].
Concerning the common bile duct drainage, there are also 2 studies. The first was
published in 2001 about one case of biliary stenting using the echoendoscope [3]. The second is more recent using therapeutic echoendosocpe to perform EUS guided
”rendez-vous” technique. EUS-guided transgastric or transduodenal needle puncture
and guidewire placement through obstructed pancreatic (n = 4) or bile (n = 2) ducts
was attempted in 6 patients [4]. Efforts were made to advance the guidewire antegrade across the papilla or surgical
anastomosis. If guidewire passage was successful, rendezvous ERCP with stent placement
was performed immediately afterward. EUS-guided duct access and intraductal guidewire
placement was accomplished in 5 of 6 cases, with successful traversal of the obstruction,
and rendezvous ERCP, with stent placement in 3 of 6 cases (two biliary, one pancreatic).
The procedure was clinically effective in all successful cases (two patients with
malignant obstructive jaundice, one with relapsing pancreatitis after pancreaticoduodenectomy).
There was one minor complication (transient fever) but no pancreatitis or duct leak
after successful or unsuccessful procedures. EUS is a feasible technique for allowing
rendezvous drainage of obstructed biliary or pancreatic ducts through native papillae
or anastomoses after initially unsuccessful ERCP.
EUS guided pancreatico-gastrostomy (Fig. [2])
EUS guided pancreatico-gastrostomy (Fig. [2])
The pain associated with chronic pancreatitis (CP) is caused, at least in part, by
ductal hypertension. Both surgical and endoscopic treatments can relieve pain by improving
ductal drainage. Endoscopic drainage requires transpapillary access to the pancreatic
duct during ERCP.
The development of interventional EUS has provided better access to the region of
the pancreas. Just as pancreatic fluid collections, such as pseudocysts, can be successfully
drained from the stomach or duodenum by endoscopic cystenterostomy or cystgastrostomy,
the same technique could be used to access a dilated pancreatic duct in cases in which
the duct cannot be drained by conventional ERCP because of complete obstruction.
Technique
By using an interventional echoendoscope, the dilated MPD was well visualized. EPG
was then performed under combined fluoroscopic and ultrasound guidance, with the tipp
of the echoendoscope positioned such that the inflated balloon was in the duodenal
bulb while the accessory channel remained in the antrum. A needle (19 G, Echotipp
Ultrasound Needle, EUSN-19-T, Cook Ireland Ltd., Limerick, Ireland) was inserted transgastrically
into the proximal pancreatic duct and contrast medium was injected. Opacification
demonstrated a dilated MPD proximal to the complete obstruction. The needle was exchanged
over a guidewire (0.02 inch diameter, Terumo Europe, Leuven, Belgium) for a 6.5F diathermic
sheath (prototype Cysto-Gastro set, EndoFlex, Voerde, Germany), which was then used
to enlarge the channel between the stomach and MPD. The sheath was introduced by using
cutting current. After exchange over a guidewire (TFE-coated 0.035 inch diameter,
Cook Europe, Bjaeverskov, Denmark), a 6F, 8-cm-long pancreaticogastric stent (cut
from a 6F nasobiliary catheter, Cook Europe) was positioned. There was no bleeding
from the puncture site. As observed by fluoroscopy, contrast emptied from the stent
into the stomach.
Fig. 2
a EUS puncture of a dilated pancreatic duct (stenosis due to post-traumatic acute pancreatitis)
b Opacification of the duct c pancreaticogastrostomie using a 8.5 F plastic stent.
Discussion
Discussion
The results of the first series of patients published are much too preliminary in
nature to recommend wider use of EPG, which in any case should be restricted to tertiary
centers specializing in biliopancreatic therapy. Nevertheless, the possibility of
draining the MPD into the digestive tract through an endoscopically created fistula,
with patency maintained by stent placement, might be interesting as an alternative
method of drainage without the complication of stent occlusion that is associated
with transpapillary drainage. In conclusion, pancreatic ductal hypertension, as reflected
by duct dilation, is a cause of pain in some patients with CP. Although endoscopic
ductal decompression is useful in such cases, conventional ERCP occasionally fails
to obtain access to the targeted dilated duct. EUS-guided pancreaticogastrostomy in
4 patients is described here as a new method of ductal decompression in selected cases
[5]. Further evaluation of this technique including longer-term follow-up of patients
is warranted.
Conclusion
Conclusion
Therapeutic EUS as EUS guided pancreaticogastrostomy and hepatico-gastrostomy can
represent today an alternative to Surgery when the endoscopic procedures failed. But,
in the future dedicated accessories for such procedures will be needed.
