Int J Sports Med 2006; 27(12): 993-999
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-923835
Training & Testing

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Scaling Submaximal Exercise Cardiac Output and Stroke Volume: The HERITAGE Family Study

K. R. Turley1 , P. R. Stanforth2 , T. Rankinen3 , C. Bouchard3 , A. S. Leon4 , D. C. Rao5 , J. S. Skinner6 , J. H. Wilmore2 with the technical assistance of F. M. Spears1
  • 1Department of Kinesiology, Harding University, Searcy, AR, USA
  • 2Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
  • 3Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
  • 4School of Kinesiology and Leisure Studies, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
  • 5Division of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
  • 6Department of Kinesiology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
Further Information

Publication History

Accepted after revision: December 5, 2005

Publication Date:
30 May 2006 (online)

Preview

Abstract

This study investigated different methods of scaling submaximal cardiac output (Q) and stroke volume (SV) to best normalize for body size (body surface area [BSA], height [Ht], weight [Wt], and fat-free mass [FFM]). Q and SV were measured at both an absolute (50 W) and a relative power output (60 % of V·O2max) in 337 men and 422 women, 17 to 65 years of age. Traditional ratio scaling was examined in addition to allometric scaling, where scaling exponents (b) were determined for each body size variable (x) that best normalized the physiological outcome variables (y) for body size (y = ax b ). With ratio scaling, regardless of the body size variable (x = BSA, Ht, Wt, FFM), there was no evidence of a linear relationship between x and y (y = Q or SV). A linear relationship is a necessary condition for appropriate normalization. Further, when ratio-scaled variables (e.g., Q/BSA) were correlated to the body size variable (e.g., BSA) by which they were scaled, significant (p ≤ 0.05) relationships still existed for BSA, Ht, Wt, and FFM. Thus, ratio scaling did not meet either criteria for normalizing Q and SV for body size. In contrast, when allometrically-derived scaling exponents were used to normalize Q and SV (e.g., Q/BSA b ), the resulting scaled values were uncorrelated (i.e., size-independent) with BSA, Ht, Wt, or FFM. These results were independent of age, sex or race. In summary, ratio scaling did not appropriately normalize Q and SV for differences in body size, while allometric scaling did result in size-independent values. Thus, individually-derived allometric exponents should be applied to body size variables to most appropriately adjust Q and SV for body size.

References

Kenneth R. Turley

Harding University

Box 12281

Searcy

AR 72149, USA

Phone: +5012794908

Fax: +50 12 79 41 38

Email: KRTurley@Harding.edu