Download PDF
Semin intervent Radiol 2004; 21(4): 275-281
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-861562
Copyright © 2004 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Biopsy of the Transplanted Kidney

Iftikhar Ahmad1
  • 1Assistant Professor of Radiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, University Hospital, Indianapolis, Indiana
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
07 January 2005 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

This article describes the current state-of-the-art technique of percutaneous transplant renal biopsy. A brief overview of the history of transplant renal biopsy is given. The indications and contraindications are discussed, including pre- and postprocedure patient management. The technique of the procedure and the devices that are available in the market are described.

KEYWORDS

Biopsy - transplant kidney - technique

REFERENCES

  • 1 Report, O.S.A. .UNOS: URREA; 2002
  • 2 Cecka J. The UNOS renal transplant registry. In: Cecka E, Terasaki Clinical Transplants Los Angeles; UCLA Immunogenetics Center 2002
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 Iversen P, Bran C. Aspiration biopsy of the kidney.  Am J Med. 1951;  11 324
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Riehl J, Maigatter S, Kierdorf H, Schmitt H, Maurin N, Sieberth H. Percutaneous renal biopsy: comparison of manual and automated puncture techniques with native and transplanted kidney.  Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1994;  9 1568-1574
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Nampoory M, Das D, Johny K et al.. Comparative study of ultrasonogram, renogram, and fine needle aspiration cytology in diagnosis of acute allograft rejection.  Transplant Proc. 1997;  29 2807-2811
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 McConnell J, Sagalowsky A, Lewis S et al.. Prospective evaluation of renal allograft dysfunction with 99mtechnetium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid renal scans.  J Urol. 1984;  131 875-879
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Solez K, Axelsen R, Benediktsson H et al.. International standardization of criteria for the histologic classification of kidney transplant pathology.  Kidney Int. 1993;  44 411-422
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Brown S, Horsburgh T, Veitch P, Bell P. Comparison of fine-needle aspiration biopsy and Tru-cut biopsy performed under ultrasound guidance.  Transplant Proc. 1988;  20 595-596
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Renowden S, Griffiths D, Nair S, Krishnan H, Cochlin D. Renal transplant sonography: correlation of Doppler and biopsy results in cellular rejection.  Clin Radiol. 1992;  46 265-269
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Mazzali M, Ribeiro-Alves M A, Alves Filho G. Percutaneous renal graft biopsy: a clinical laboratory and pathological analysis.  Sao Paulo Med J. 1999;  117 57-62
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Parfrey P, Kuo Y, Hanley J et al.. The diagnostic and prognostic value of renal allograft biopsy.  Transplantation. 1984;  38 586-590
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Al-Awwa I, Hariharan S, First M. The importance of allograft biopsy in renal transplant recipients.  Am J Kidney Dis. 1998;  31 S15-S18
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Kiss D, Landmann J, Mihatsch M, Huser B, Brunner F, Thiel G. Risks and benefits of graft biopsy in renal transplantation under cyclosporine-A.  Clin Nephrol. 1992;  38 132-134
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Schwartz A, Mengel M, Gwinner W et al.. Protocol biopsy program after renal transplantation: structure and first results.  Transplant Proc. 2002;  34 2238-2239
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Rush D, Jeffery J, Gough J. Sequential protocol biopsies in renal transplant patients: clinico-pathological correlations using the Banff schema.  Transplantation. 1995;  59 511-514
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Gaber L. Role of renal allograft biopsy in multicentre clinical trials in transplantation.  Am J Kidney Dis. 1998;  31 S19-S25
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Chavers B, Reinsmoen N, Mauer S, Najarian J, Maltas A. High incidence of histologically-defined renal allograft rejection in asymptomatic patients following treatment. Presented at the American Society of Transplant Physicians 12th Annual Meeting 1993
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 18 Sharma P, McDonald G B, Banaji M. The risk of bleeding after percutaneous liver biopsy: relation to platelet count.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 1982;  4 451-453
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Gilmore I T, Burroughs A, Murray-Lyon I M, Williams R, Jenkins D, Hopkins A. Percutaneous liver biopsy in England and Wales; an audit by the British Society of Gastroenterology and Royal College of Physicians of London.  Gut. 1995;  36 437-441
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Falstrom J, Moore M M, Caldwell S H, Matsumoto A H, Abbott R D, Spotnitz W D. Use of fibrin sealant to reduce bleeding after needle liver biopsy in an anticoagulated canine model: work in progress.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999;  10 457-462
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Kim E H, Kopecky K K, Cummings O W, Dreesen R G, Pound D C. Electrocautery of the tract after needle biopsy of the liver to reduce blood loss: experience in the canine model.  Invest Radiol. 1993;  28 228-230
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Chisholm R, Jones S, Lees W. Fibrin sealant as a plug for the post liver biopsy needle track.  Clin Radiol. 1989;  40 627-628
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Rodriguez Fuchs C A, Bruno M. Plugging liver biopsy sites with coagulation factors.  Lancet. 1987;  2 1087
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Tabuse Y, Tabuse K, Mori K et al.. Percutaneous microwave tissue coagulation in liver biopsy: experimental and clinical studies.  Nippon Geka Hokan. 1986;  55 381-392
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Riley S A, Ellis W R, Irving H C, Lintott D J, Axon A T, Losowsky M S. Percutaneous liver biopsy with plugging of needle track: a safe method for use in patients with impaired coagulation.  Lancet. 1984;  2 436
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Klauser R, Zlabinger G J, Traindl O et al.. Influence of immunosuppressive therapy on infectious complications in renal transplant recipients.  Transplant Proc. 1992;  24 292-294
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Nyman R, Cappelen-Smith J, Al Suhaibani H, Alfurayh O, Shakweer W, Akhtar M. Yield and complications in percutaneous renal biopsy. A comparison between ultrasound-guided gun-biopsy and manual techniques in native and transplant kidneys.  Acta Radiol. 1997;  38 431-436
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Cozens M, Murchison J, Allen P, Winney R. Conventional 15 G needle technique for renal biopsy compared with ultrasound-guided spring-loaded 18 G needle biopsy.  Br J Radiol. 1992;  65 594-597
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Wennberg L, Miyahara S, Wilczek H. Percutaneous core-needle biopsy of renal transplant performed safely without radiographic aid: a prospective study.  Transplant Proc. 1994;  26 1769-1770
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Kudryk B, Martinez G, Gunasekeran S, Ramirez G. CT guided renal biopsy using coaxial technique and an automated biopsy gun.  South Med J. 1995;  88 543-546
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Mimata H, Kasagi Y, Nasu N et al.. Renal needle biopsy along the retrograde puncture line of the renal calyx: A new promising technique.  Urol Int. 1998;  60 165-168
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Leal J. A new technique for renal biopsy: the transurethral approach.  J Urol. 1993;  149 1061-1063
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Pirani C. Evaluation of kidney biopsy specimens. In: Tisher BBC Renal Pathology with Clinical and Functional Correlations Philadelphia; Lippincott 1989: 11-42
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 34 Sakai H, Abe K, Kobayash Y et. al.. Clinical guidelines of IgA nephropathy.  Nippon Jinzo Gakkai Shi. 1995;  37 417-421
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Yoshinari M, Suzuki R, Watanabe K, Katoh T, Watanabe T. How long is enough: length of renal needle biopsy specimen for histological diagnosis.  Am J Nephrol. 2002;  22 402
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Chan R, Common A, Marcuzzi D. Ultrasound guided renal biopsy: experience using an automated core biopsy system.  Can Assoc Radiol J. 2000;  51 107-113
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Hopper K D, Abendroth C, Sturtz K, Matthews Y, Shirk S, Stevens L. Blinded comparison of biopsy needles and automated devices on vitro: 2. Biopsy of medical renal disease.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;  161 1299-1301
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Boyvat F, Tarhan N, Coskun M, Agidere A, Tutar N, Bilgin N. Comparison of two biopsy techniques for renal transplant assessment.  Transplant Proc. 1998;  30 777-779
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Hlatky M. Is renal biopsy necessary in adults with nephrotic syndrome?.  Lancet. 1982;  2 1264-1268
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Rosenbaum R, Hoffsten P, Stanley R, Klahr S. Use of computerized tomography to diagnose complications of percutaneous renal biopsy.  Kidney Int. 1978;  14 87-92
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Diaz-Buxo J, Donadio Jr J V. Complication of percutaneous renal biopsy: an analysis of 1000 consecutive biopsies.  Clin Nephrol. 1975;  4 223-227
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Stiles K, Yuan C, Chung E, Lyon R, Lane J, Abbott K. Renal biopsy in high-risk patients with medical disease of the kidney.  Am J Kidney Dis. 2000;  36 419-433
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Kersnik Levart T, Kenig A, Buturovic Ponikvar J, Ferluga D, Avgustin Cavic M, Kenda R. Real-time ultrasound-guided renal biopsy with a biopsy gun in children: safety and efficacy. Acta Paediatr 2001 90: 1394-1397
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 44 Chesney D, Brouhard B, Cunningham R. Safety and cost effectiveness of pediatric percutaneous renal biopsy.  Pediatr Nephrol. 1996;  10 493-495
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Mahoney M, Racadio J, Merhar G, First M. Safety and efficacy of kidney transplant biopsy: Tru-Cut needle vs sonographically guided biopsy gun.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;  160 325-326
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Murphy B, Macisaac A. Percutaneous renal biopsy as a day-patient procedure.  Am J Kidney Dis. 1989;  14 77
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Hussain F, Watson A, Hayes J. Standards for renal biopsies: comparison of inpatient and day care procedures.  Pediatr Nephrol. 2003;  18 53-56
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Fraser I R, Fairley K. Renal biopsy as an outpatient procedure.  Am J Kidney Dis. 1995;  25 876-878
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Maddux F, Maddux D, Sterling J, Baker W, Moore M. Outpatient renal biopsy is a safe procedure in the community setting.  J Am Soc Nephrol. 1992;  3 345 , Abstract
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Al-Wakeel J. Outcome of early ambulation after renal biopsy using automated biopsy needle by inexperienced trainees.  Int Urol Nephrol. 1998;  30 399-405
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 White R, Poole C. Day care renal biopsy.  Pediatr Nephrol. 1996;  10 408-411
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Khajehdehi K, Junaid S, Salinas-Madrgal L, Schmitz P, Bastani B. Percutaneous renal biopsy in the 1990’s: safety, value and implication for early hospital discharge.  Am J Kidney Dis. 1999;  34 92-97
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 53 Davis I, Ochlenschlager W, O'Riordan M, Avner E. Pediatric renal biopsy: should this procedure be performed in an outpatient setting?.  Pediatr Nephrol. 1998;  12 96-100
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Chesney D, Brouhard B, Cunningham R. Safety and cost effectiveness of pediatric percutaneous renal biopsy.  Pediatr Nephrol. 1996;  10 493-495
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar

Iftikhar AhmadM.D. 

Assistant Professor of Radiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, University Hospital

Room 0279, 550 North University Blvd.

Indianapolis, IN 46202