Download PDF
Osteosynthesis and Trauma Care 2005; 13(1): 7-13
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-832301
Original Article

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Basic Operative Techniques with Short Nails: Operative Technique for Short Gamma Nails

S. van Zutphen1 , J. Verbruggen1 , J. Stapert1
  • 1Department of General Surgery and Traumatology, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
24 March 2005 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The Gamma nail is a commonly used implant for proximal femoral fractures (AO classification 31 A1-3). 31 A3 fractures should be treated with a long Gamma nail. The Gamma nail consists of a nail, a lag screw and a distal locking screw. After positioning the patient on a fracture table, the fracture is then reduced. The surgeon can choose a Gamma nail of 125, 130 or 135 degrees, depending on the femoral neck angle. There are several possibilities for opening the femoral canal to introduce the nail. The lag screw is placed via a targeting device. The optimal position is still a subject of discussion. Distal locking is also done via a targeting device. Complications of this procedure are femoral fractures, cut-out of the lag screw, fatigue fractures of the locking bolts and infection.

Key words

Gamma nail - operative technique - proximal femoral fracture

References

  • 1 Adams C I, Robinson C M, Court-Brown C M, McQueen M M. Prospective randomized controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus dynamic screw and plate for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur.  J Orthop Trauma. 2001;  15 394-400
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bannister G C, Gibson A G, Ackroyd C E, Newman J H. The closed reduction of trochanteric fractures.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1990;  72 317
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bellabarba C, Herscovici D, Ricci W M. Percutaneous treatment of peritrochanteric fractures using the Gamma nail.  Clin Orthop. 2000;  375 30-42
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bodoky A, Neff U, Heberer M, Harder F. Antibiotic prophylaxis with two doses of cephalosporin in patients managed with internal fixation for a fracture of the hip.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1993;  75 61-65
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Boriani S, De lure F, Campanacci L, Specchia L, Bungaro P, Regnoli R, Triscari C, Giacomelli M, Dorigotti P, Costa P, Carretti P, Carfagni A, Giacomi R. A technical report reviewing the use of the 11 mm Gamma nail: intraoperative femur fracture incidence.  Orthopedics. 1996;  19 597-600
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Boxma H, Broekhuizen T, Patka P, Oosting H. Randomised controlled trial of single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical treatment of closed fractures: the Dutch Trauma Trial.  Lancet. 1996;  347 1133-1137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Boyd R J, Burke J F, Colton T. A double-blind clinical trial of prophylactic antibiotics in hip fractures.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1973;  55 1251-1258
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Britton J R, Dunkerley D R. Closed nailing of a femoral fracture followed by sciatic nerve palsy.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1990;  72 318
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Brumback R J, Ellison T S, Molligan H, Molligan D J, Mahaffey S, Schmidhauser C. Pudendal nerve palsy complicating intramedullary nailing of the femur.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1992;  74 1450-1455
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Burnett J W, Gustilo R B, Williams D N, Kind A C. Prophylactic antibiotics in hip fractures, a double-blind, prospective study.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1980;  62 457-462
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Chen C M, Chiu F Y, Lo W H. Avascular necrosis of femoral head after Gamma-nailing for unstable intertrochanteric fractures.  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2001;  121 505-507
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Davis T R, Sher J L, Horsman A, Simpson M, Porter B B, Checketts R G. Intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Mechanical failure after internal fixation.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1990;  72 26-31
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Docquier P L, Manche E, Autrique J C, Geulette B. Complications associated with gamma nailing. A review of 439 cases.  Acta Orthop Belg. 2002;  68 251-257
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 France M P, Aurori B F. Pudendal nerve palsy following fracture table distraction.  Clin Orthop. 1996;  276 272-276
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Gaebler C, Stanzl-Tschegg S, Tschegg E K, Kukla C, Menth-Chiari W A, Wozasek G E, Heinz T. Implant failure of the gamma nail.  Injury. 1999;  30 91-99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hartog B D den, Bartal E, Cooke F. Treatment of the unstable intertrochanteric fracture. Effect of the placement of the screw, its angle of insertion, and osteotomy.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1991;  73 726-733
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Haynes R C, Poll R G, Miles A W, Weston R B. Failure of femoral head fixation: a cadaveric analysis of lag screw cut-out with the Gamma locking nail and AO dynamic hip screw.  Injury. 1997;  28 337-341
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Haynes R C, Poll R G, Miles A W, Weston R B. An experimental study of the failure modes of the Gamma locking nail and AO dynamic hip screw under static loading: a cadaveric study.  Med Eng Phys. 1997;  19 446-453
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kawaguchi S, Sawada K, Nabeta Y. Cutting-out of the lag screw after internal fixation with the Asiatic Gamma nail.  Injury. 1998;  29 47-53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kukla C, Pichl W, Prokesch R, Jacyniak W, Heinze G, Gatterer R, Heinz T. Femoral neck fracture after removal of the standard gamma interlocking nail: a cadaveric study to determine factors influencing the biomechanical properties of the proximal femur.  J Biomech. 2001;  34 1519-1526
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kukla C, Heinz T, Gaebler C, Heinze G, Vécsei V. The standard Gamma nail: a critical analysis of 1,000 cases.  J Trauma. 2001;  51 77-83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kyle R F, Wright T M, Burstein A H. Biomechanical analysis of the sliding characteristics of compression hip screws.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1980;  62 1308-1314
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lacroix H, Arwert H, Snijders C J, Fontijne W P. Prevention of fracture at the distal locking site of the gamma nail. A biomechanical study.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1995;  77 274-276
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Leung K S, Chen C M, So W S, Sato K, Lai C H, Machaisavariya B, Suntharalingam S. Multicenter trial of modified Gamma nail in East Asia.  Clin Orthop. 1996;  323 146-154
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Leunig M, Meyer M, Beck M, Triller J, Stupnicki A, Zimmermann H. Fatal retroperitoneal hemorrhage caused by perforation of a guide wire pin for proximal femur fixation.  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2002;  122 61-63
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Lyddon D W. The prevention of complications with the Gamma locking nail.  Am J Orthop. 1996;  25 357-363
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Madsen J E, Naess L, Aune A K, Alho A, Ekeland A, Stromsoe K. Dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilizing plate in the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a comparative study with the Gamma nail and compression hip screw.  J Orthop Trauma. 1998;  12 241-248
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 McConnell T, Tornetta P, Benson E, Manuel J. Gluteus medius tendon injury during reaming for Gamma nail insertion.  Clin Orthop. 2003;  407 199-202
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Mousavi M, David R, Ehteshami J, Pajenda G, Vécsei V. Pressure changes during reaming with different parameters and reamer designs.  Clin Orthop. 2000;  373 295-303
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Muller C, McIff T, Rahn B A, Pfister U, Weller S. Intramedullary pressure, strain on the diaphysis and increase in cortical temperature when reaming the femoral medullary cavity during reaming. A comparison between blunt and sharp reamers.  Injury. 1993;  24 (Suppl 3) 22-30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Muller C, Frigg R, Pfister U. Effect of flexible drive diameter and reamer design on the increase of pressure in the medullary cavity during reaming.  Injury. 1993;  24 40-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Muller C, Rahn B A, Pfister U, Weller S. Extent of bluntness and damage to reamers from hospitals.  Injury. 1993;  24 (Suppl 3) 31-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Park S R, Kang J S, Kim H S, Lee W H, Kim Y H. Treatment of intertrochanteric fracture with the Gamma AP locking nail or by a compression hip screw - a randomised prospective trial.  Int Orthop. 1998;  22 157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Parker M J. Cutting out of the dynamic hip screw related to its position.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1992;  74 625
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Parker M J, Handoll H H. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; (4): CD000093
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Rantanen J, Aro H T. Intramedullary fixation of high subtrochanteric femoral fractures: a study comparing two implant designs, the Gamma nail and the intramedullary hip screw.  J Orthop Trauma. 1998;  12 249-252
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Sim E, Freimuller W, Reiter T J. Finite element analysis of the stress distributions in the proximal end of the femur after stabilization of a pertrochanteric model fracture: a comparison of two implants.  Injury. 1995;  26 445-449
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Tait G R, Dalton M. Contralateral sciatic nerve palsy following femoral nailing.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1991;  73 689-690
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Valverde J A, Alonso M G, Porro J G, Rueda D, Larrauri P M, Soler J J. Use of the Gamma nail in the treatment of fractures of the proximal femur.  Clin Orthop. 1998;  350 56-61
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Wang C J, Yettram A L, Yao M S, Procter P. Finite element analysis of a Gamma nail within a fractured femur.  Med Eng Phys. 1998;  20 677-683
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Yang K H, Byun Y S, Park H W, Park S J. Failure on attempted removal of a Gamma nail in two young patients.  J Orthop Trauma. 2003;  17 379-382
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Stefan van Zutphen

Department of Traumatology · University Hospital Maastricht

Postbus

5800 AZ Maastricht

The Netherlands

Email: svz@surgery.azm.nl

      >