Seven case studies are presented to illustrate how the tasks in the proposed test battery provide the tools to distinguish language differences due to development or dialect from true signs of delay or disorder. The case studies exemplify different combinations of language strengths and weakness found among participants of extensive field research in the age range from 4 to 9 years. Special attention is paid to certain aspects of language development, such as time clauses or double wh-questions, in which dialect features play no role. All levels of performance, from the highest to the lowest, are found in children who are speakers of Mainstream American English (MAE) and the same is true for those whose language patterns indicate a strong variation from MAE.
KEYWORDS
Profile - path of progress - subdomain - item types - strength - weakness - interpretation
REFERENCES
-
1
Seymour H N, Pearson Z P.
Steps in designing and implementing an innovative assessment instrument.
Semin Speech Lang.
2004;
25
27-32
-
2
Roeper T.
Diagnosing language variations: underlying principles for syntactic assessment.
Semin Speech Lang.
2004;
25
41-56
-
3
de Villers P.
Assessing pragmatic skills in elicited production.
Semin Speech Lang.
2004;
25
57-72
-
4
de Villers J G.
Cultural and linguistic fairness in the assessment of semantics.
Semin Speech Lang.
2004;
25
73-90
-
5
Seymour H N.
A noncontrastive model for assessment of phonology.
Semin Speech Lang.
2004;
25
91-100
Barbara Zurer PearsonPh.D.
Research Associate, Department of Communication Disorders, University of Massachusetts Amherst
Amherst, MA 01003
Email: bpearson@comdis.umass.edu
