Dialect Identification versus Evaluation of Risk in Language Screening

This article proposes that any dialect-neutral screening test should consist of two parts: one part using contrastive items to screen for Language Variation Status (Mainstream American English [MAE] or a degree of variation from MAE), and a second part using noncontrastive items to screen for degree of risk for language disorder (low, medium, or high). The two scores are interpreted together in forming an overall clinical profile of a child. The implications for further diagnostic testing of both MAE and non-MAE speakers who exhibit risk for language disorder are discussed. Most importantly, for the African American child, viewing the results of the two types of proposed screening items together clears the “variation due to speech and language dialect” issue out of the way so that if further evaluation is needed, it is done for valid reasons, not superficial ones.

KEYWORDS

Language Variation Status - Diagnostic Risk Status - degree of risk - variation from mainstream - optional - obligatory - contrastive aspects of language - noncontrastive aspects of language - risk for disorder

REFERENCES

• 1 Baugh J. A Re-Examination of the Black English Copula. Austin, TX; Southwest Educational Development Laboratory 1979
• 2 Labov W. Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula.  Language. 1969;  45 715-762
• 3 Wyatt T A. Linguistic Constraints on Copula Production in Black English Child Speech. [dissertation].  ,  University of Massachusetts Amherst  1991; 
• 4 Roeper T. Diagnosing language variations: underlying principles for syntactic assessment.  Semin Speech Lang. 2004;  25 41-56
• 5 Campbell T, Dollaghan C, Needleman H, Janosky J. Reducing bias in language assessment: processing-dependent measures.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997;  40 519-525
• 6 Abdulkarim L, Bryant T, Seymour H N, Pearson B Z. Consonant clusters in child African American English phonology.  , Poster presented at: the Annual Meeting of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, San Francisco November 18-21, 1999; 
• 7 Abdulkarim L, Bryant T, Seymour H N, Pearson B Z. Final consonants in child African American English phonology.  , Poster presented at: the Annual Meeting of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, San Francisco November 18-21, 1999; 
• 8 de Villiers P A. Assessing pragmatic skills in elicited production.  Semin Speech Lang. 2004;  25 xxx
• 9 de Villiers J G. Cultural and linguistic fairness in the assessment of semantics.  Semin Speech Lang. 2004;  25 73-90
• 10 Pearson B Z, Ciolli L. Distinguishing dialect and development from disorder: case studies.  Semin Speech Lang. 2004;  25 101-112
• 11 Seymour H N. The challenge of language assessment for African American English-speaking children: a historical perspective.  Semin Speech Lang. 2004;  25 3-12
• 12 Muma J R. Language Handbook: Concepts, Assessment, Intervention. Englewood Cliffs, NJ; Prentice Hall 1978
• 13 Bloom L, Lahey M. Language Development and Language Disorders. New York; John Wiley 1978
• 14 Nelson N. Childhood Language Disorders in Context: Infancy through Adolescence. Columbus, OH; Merrill 1993
• 15 Paul R. Language Disorders from Infancy through Adolescence: Assessment and Interventions, 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO; Elsevier Science 2001
• 16 Benedicto E, Abdulkarim L, Garrett D, Johnson V, Seymour H. Overt copulas in African American English speaking children. In: Greenhill A, Hughes M, Littlefield H, Walsh H Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA; Cascadilla Press 1998: 50-57