Download PDF
manuelletherapie 2004; 8(5): 214-229
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-813805
Originalarbeit

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Effektivität der Rückenschule für Erwachsene

Effectivity of Back School for AdultsJ. Schomacher1
  • 1PT-Schule Ortenau
Diese Arbeit ist im Rahmen einer Hausarbeit zum Studiengang Physiotherapie der Fachhochschule Fulda/Universität Marburg entstanden.
Further Information

Publication History

Manuskript eingetroffen: 19.3.2004

Manuskript akzeptiert: 7.5.2004

Publication Date:
13 December 2004 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Im Anschluss an die Definition der Rückenschule wird ihre Entwicklung beschrieben.

Von den 32 in Medline gefundenen Arbeiten berichteten 23 von positiver, 5 von negativer und 4 von unklarer Wirkung der Rückenschule für Erwachsene. Von 5 Leitlinien zur Behandlung lumbaler Rückenschmerzen empfehlen 2 die Rückenschule, 3 erwähnen sie nicht. 3 deutsche Fachbücher der Orthopädie befürworten sie und 1 englisches gibt keine klare Aussage.

Im Vergleich ist die Unterrichtsdauer bei Rückenschulstudien mit negativer Wirkung kürzer als bei denen mit positiver Wirkung. Die unterschiedlichen Untersuchungszeiträume und Messparameter erschweren eine Vergleichbarkeit zwischen den Studien.

Verschiedene Aspekte der Rückenschule werden diskutiert und für künftige Forschung Empfehlungen zu Studiendesign, Messparameter und -zeitraum, Gestaltung und Inhalte der Rückenschule gegeben.

Die Erstellung von Leitlinien für die Durchführung von Rückenschulen stellt eine dringende Notwendigkeit zur Verbesserung des praktischen Handelns dar, die der Erforschung langfristiger Wirkungen der Rückenschule vorausgehen sollte.

Abstract

Following the definition of back school its development is described.

Of the 32 articles found in Medline 23 show positive, 5 negative and 4 unclear effects of back school for adults. Of 5 guidelines for the treatment of low back pain 2 recommend back school and 3 do not mention it. 3 German orthopaedic textbooks support it and 1 English book does not give a clear statement.

In comparison the length of the back school with negative effects is shorter than those with positive effects. The differing length of described back schools and the varying measurement parameters between used in the studies make comparison difficult.

Various aspects of back school are discussed. Suggestions for future research concerning study design, measurement parameters and duration as well as design and contents of back schools are given.

The compilation of guidelines for the performance of back schools is urgently necessary in order to improve clinical practice, which must precede research of long term effects of back schools.

Schlüsselwörter

Rückenschule - Effektivität

Key words

Back school - effectivity

Literatur

  • 1 Assendelft W JJ, Morton S C, Yu E I. et al . Spinal Manipulative Therapy for Low Back Pain. A Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness Relative to Other Therapies.  Annals of Internal Medecine. 2003;  138 871 - 881 u. E888 - E900
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Atlas S J, Nardin R A. Evaluation and treatment of low back pain: An evidence-based approach to clinical care.  Muscle Nerve. 2003;  27 265-284
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bendix A F, Bendix T, Lund C. et al . Comparison of three intensive programs for chronic low back pain patients: a prospective, randomized, observerblindet study wiht one-year follow-up.  Scand J Rehabil Med. 1997;  29 (2) 81-89
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bergquist-Ullman M, Larsson U. Acute Low Back Pain in Industry. A controlled prospective study with special reference to therapy and confounding factors.  Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 1977;  Supp. 170 1-117
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Berwick D M, Budman S, Feldstein M. No clinical effect of back schools in an HMO. A randomized prospective trial.  Spine. 1989;  14 338-344
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Biering-Sørensen F. Physical Measurements as Risk Indicators for Low-back Trouble Over a One-Year Period.  Spine. 1984;  9 106-119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Czolbe A. Rückenschulen - Gestern, heute und morgen. Funktionskrankheiten des Bewegungsapparates.  1993;  6 19-25
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Daltroy L H, Iversen M D, Larson M G. et al . A controlled trial of an educational program to prevent low back injuries.  The New England Journal of Medicine. 1997;  337 322-328
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Debrunner A M. Orthopädie, Orthopädische Chirurgie. Die Störungen des Bewegungsapparates in Klinik und Praxis. Bern; Huber 1995
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Derebery V J, Giang G M, Saracino G. et al . Evaluation of the Impact of a Low Back Pain Educational Intervention of Physician’s Practice Patterns and Patients’ Outcomes.  J Occup Environ Med. 2002;  44 (10) 977-984
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Deutsch F E. Isolated lumbar strengthening in the rehabilitation of chronic low back pain.  Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 1996;  19 124-133
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Di Fabio R P. Efficacy of Comprehensive Rehabilitation Programs and Back School for Patients with Low Back Pain: A Meta-analysis.  Physical Therapy. 1995;  75 865-878
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Donchin M, Woolf O, Kaplan L. et al . Secondary prevention of low-back pain. A clinical trial.  Spine. 1990;  15 1317-1320
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Donelson R, Grand W, Kamps C. et al . Pain Response to Sagittal End-Range Spinal Motion. A Prospective, Randomized, Multicentered Trial.  Spine. 1991;  Suppl. 16 206-212
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Engel G L. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedical science.  Science. 1977;  196 129-136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Ferreira P H, Ferreira M L, Maher C G. et al . Effect of applying different „levels of evidence” criteria on conclusions of Cochrane reviews of interventions for low back pain.  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2002;  55 1126-1129
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Frank J, Sinclair S, Hogg-Johnson S. et al . Preventing disability from work-related low-back pain. New evidence gives new hope - if we can just get all the players onside.  Canadian Medical Association Journal. 1998;  16 1625-1631
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Frost H, Klaber M offett JA, Moser J S. et al . Randomised controlled trial for evaluation of fitness programme for patients with chronic low back pain.  British Medical Journal. 1995;  310 151-154
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Gerster J C. Le traitement médical de la lombalgie selon les principes de la médecine fondée sur les preuves.  Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax. 2000;  89 619-623
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Gifford L S, Butler D S. The Integration of Pain Sciences into Clinical Practice.  Journal of Hand Therapy. 1997;  3 86-95
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Gifford L. The „central” mechanisms. Gifford L Topical Issues in Pain Kestrel/UK; NOI Press 1998
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Glomsrød B, Lønn J H, Soukup M G. et al . „Active Back School” - Prophylactic Management for Low Back Pain: Three-Year Follow-up of a Randomized, Controlled Trial.  Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2001;  33 26-30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Harris G R, Susman J L. Managing musculoskeletal complaints with rehabilitation therapy: Summary of the Philadelphia Panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on musculoskeletal rehabilitation interventions.  The Journal of Family Practice. 2002;  51 1042-1046
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Hides J A, Jull G A, Richardson C A. Long-term Effects of Specific Stabilising Exercises for First Episode Low Back Pain.  Spine. 2001;  26 E243-E248
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Hochschuler S H, Cotler H B, Guyer R D. Rehabilitation of the Spine - Science and Practice. St. Louis; Mosby Year Book 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Hodselmans A P, Jaegers S M, Goeken L N. Short-term outcomes of a back school program for chronic low back pain.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;  82 1099-1105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Hsieh C Y, Adams A H, Tobis J. et al . Effectiveness of four conservative treatments for subacute low back pain: a randomized clinical trial.  Spine. 2002;  27 1142-1148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Karas B E, Conrad K M. Back injury prevention interventions in the workplace: an integrative review.  AAOHN Journal. 1996;  44 189-196
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Keijsers J F, Groenman N H, Gerards F M. et al . A back school in The Netherlands: evaluating the results.  Patient Education and Counselling. 1989;  14 31-44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Kendall N, Watson P. Identifying psychosocial yellow flags and modifying management. Gifford L Topical Issues in Pain 2 - Biopsychosocial assessment and management, Relationships and pain. Physiotherapy Pain Association Yearbook Falmouth; CNS Press 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Klaber M offett JA, Chase S M, Portek I. et al . A controlled, prospective study to evaluate the effectiveness of a back school in the relief of chronic low back pain.  Spine. 1986;  11 120-122
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Koes B W, van Tulder M W, van der Windt D AWM. et al . The efficacy of back schools: a review of randomized clinical trials.  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1994;  47 851-862
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Krämer J. Orthopädie. Berlin; Springer 1996
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Laser T. Lumbale Bandscheibenleiden. München; Zuckschwerdt 1994
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Leclaire R, Esdaile J M, Suissa S. et al . Back school in a first episode of compensated acute low back pain: a clinical trial to assess efficacy and prevent relapse.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;  77 673-679
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Lindström I, Öhlund C, Eek C. et al . The Effect of Graded Activity on Patients with Subacute Low Back Pain: A Randomized Prospective Clinical Study with an Operant-Conditioning Behavioral Approach.  Physical Therapy. 1992;  72 279-293
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Lønn J H, Glomsrød B, Soukup M G. et al . Active Back School: Prophylactic Management for Low Back Pain.  Spine. 1999;  24 865-871
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Maier-Riehle B, Harter M. The effects of back schools - a meta-analysis.  International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 2001;  24 199-206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 McGuirk B, King W, Govind J. et al . Safety, efficacy, and cost effectiveness of evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute low back pain in primary care.  Spine. 2001;  26 2615-2622
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Melzack R, Wall P D. Pain mechanisms: a new theory.  science. 1965;  150 971-979
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Moog M, Zusman M. Von der „Mobilisation” zur Funktion - Anwendung kognitiv-verhaltenstherapeutischer Strategien als Erweiterung des manualtherapeutischen Behandlungskonzepts für subakute und chronische Schmerzpatienten.  Manuelle Therapie. 2001;  5 67-73
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Moore A, Cupit R. The Manual Therapist as an Educator. Editorial.  Manual Therapy. 2001;  6 1-2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Nentwig C G. Effektivität der Rückenschule. Ein Überblick über die Ergebnisse der evidenz-basierten Evaluation.  Der Orthopäde. 1999;  28 958-965
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Nentwig C G. Evidenz-basierte Evaluation der Rückenschule - Weite Verbreitung bei geringer Wirksamkeit?.  Z Orthopädie. 1999;  137 Oa1-Oa3
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Nielson W R, Weir R. Biopsychosocial approaches to the treatment of chronic pain.  The Clinical Journal of Pain. 2001;  Suppl. 17 S114-S127
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Niesten-Dietrich U. Effektivität von Rückenschulkonzepten. Ein Literaturüberblick.  Gesundheitssport und Sporttherapie. 1999;  15 114-118
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Niethard F, Pfeil J. Orthopädie. Stuttgart; Thieme 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Östgaard H C, Zetherström G, Roos-Hansson E. et al . Reduction of Back and Posterior Pelvic Pain in Pregnancy.  Spine. 1994;  19 894-900
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Penttinnen J, Nevala-Puranen N, Airaksinen O. et al . Randomized controlled trial of back school with and without peer support.  J Occup Rehab, 12 (1), . 2002;  21-29
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Philadelphia Panel . Evidence-Based Clinical Practice, Guidelines on Selected Rehabilitation Interventions for Low Back Pain.  Physical Therapy. 2001;  81 1641-1674
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Pincus T, Vlaeyen J W, Kendall N A. et al . Cognitive-behavioral therapy and psychosocial factors in low back pain: directions for the future.  Spine. 2002;  27 E133-E138
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Poiraudeau S, Lefèvre-Colau M M, Mayoux-Benhamou M A. et al . Quelle rééducation pour quel lombalgique?.  La revue du practicien. 2000;  50 1779-1783
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Quittan M. Management of back pain.  Disability and Rehabilitation. 2002;  24 423-434
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Revel M. Rehabilitation of low back pain patients. A review.  Revue du Rhumatisme (English Edition). 1995;  62 35-44
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Richardson C, Jull G, Hodges P. et al .Therapeutic Exercise for Spinal Segmental Stabilization in Low Back Pain. Scientific Basis and Clinical Approach. Edinburgh; Churchill Livingstone 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 56 Scheer S J, Radack K L, O’Brien J r DR. Randomized controlled trials in industrial low back pain relating to return to work. Part 1: Acute interventions.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;  76 966-973
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Schenk R J, Doran R L, Stachura J J. Learning effects of a back education program.  Spine. 1996;  21 2183-2188
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Sirles A T, Brown K, Hilyer J C. Effects of back school education and exercise in back injured municipal workers.  AAOHN Journal. 1991;  39 7-12
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Stankovic R, Johnell O. Conservative treatment of acute low back pain, A Prospective Randomized Trial: McKenzie Method of Treatment versus Patient Education in „Mini Back School”.  Spine. 1990;  15 120-123
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Stankovic R, Johnell O. Conservative treatment of acute low back pain. A 5-year follow-up study of two methods of treatment.  Spine. 1995;  20 469-472
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Turner J A. Educational and behavioral interventions for back pain in primary care.  Spine. 1996;  21 2851-2857
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Versloot J M, Rozeman A, van Son A M. et al . The cost-effectiveness of a back school program in industry. A longitudinal controlled field study.  Spine. 1992;  17 22-27
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Vester F. Denken, Lernen, Vergessen. München; dtv 1996
    Google Scholar
  • 64 Waddell G. The Back Pain Revolution. Edinburgh; Churchill Livingstone 1998
    Google Scholar
  • 65 Waddell G, Burton A K. Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain at work: evidence review.  Occup Med (Lond). 2001;  51 124-135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 van der Weide W E, Verbeek J H, van Tulder M W. Vocational outcome of intervention for low-back pain.  Scand J Work Environ Health. 1997;  23 165-178
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Youdas J W, Garrett T R, Egan K S. et al . Lumbar lordosis and pelvic inclination in adults with chronic low back pain.  Phys Ther. 2000;  80 261-275
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Zachrisson-Forssell M. The Swedish Back School.  Physiotherapy. 1980;  66 112-114
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Zachrisson-Forssell M. The Back School.  Spine. 1981;  6 104-106
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

Jochen Schomacher, PT

PT-Schule Ortenau

Birkenstr. 5

D-77731 Willstätt-Eckartsweier

      >