Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2003; 19(6): 381-384
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-42633
Copyright © 2003 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Endoscope-Assisted Lymphatic Microanastomoses: Concept, Results, Expectations, and Applications

Mohamed M. El-Shazly, Assem H. Kamel, Mostafa A. El-Sonbaty, Mohamed S. Zaki, Andreas Frick, Ruediger G. Baumeister
  • Department of Plastic, Hand and Microsurgery, Munich University, Munich, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
29 September 2003 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Autologous lymph-vessel transplantation is one of the microsurgical procedures that should be performed with good magnification and visualization of the fine lymphatic vessels. It is the preferable surgical intervention in the authors' institute for patients with secondary lymphedema. Although this technique has been performed under the operating microscope, in this study, the authors have experimentally investigated the possibility of performance of lymphatic vessel anastomoses of the rat thoracic duct with the visual assistance of the endoscope, and compared it with the conventional operating microscope, not for its replacement, but as an alternative operating tool which may be preferred in certain situations. There were minimal technical differences between the microscope and the endoscope; however, they have recorded significantly shorter operating time and lymphatic vessel preparation time by using the endoscope. The endoscope seems to be a promising new tool in performing microsurgery, with more ease in handling and more physical comfort for the surgeon.

KEYWORDS

Endoscopic - lymphatic - microanastomoses.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Campisi C, Boccardo F. Role of microsurgery in the management of lymphoedema.  Int Angiol . 1999;  18 47-51
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 O'Brien B M. The role of microsurgery in modern surgery.  Ann Plast Surg . 1990;  24 258-267
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Campisi C, Boccardo F, Zilli A. Long-term results after lymphatic-venous anastomoses for the treatment of obstructive lymphedema.  Microsurgery . 2001;  21 135-139
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Koshima I, Inagawa K, Urushibara K, Moriguchi T. Supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis for the treatment of lymphedema in the upper extremities.  J Reconstr Microsurg . 2000;  16 437-442
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Baumeister R G, Siuda S. Treatment of lymphedemas by microsurgical lymphatic grafting: what is proved.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1990;  85 64-74
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Franken R J, Gupta S C, Banis J C. Microsurgery without a microscope: laboratory evaluation of a three-dimensional on-screen microsurgical system.  Microsurgery . 1995;  16 746-751
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Jain A, Sasaki S, Engeles B. Microvascular surgery utilizing the endoscope as the sole source of visual assistance.  Microsurgery . 1998;  18 86-89
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Medot M, Nelissen X, Heymans O. Video-microsurgery: a new tool in microsurgery.  Br J Plast Surg . 1999;  52 92-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ramakrishnan V, Villafane O, Southern S. Video microsurgery: a substitute for the operating microscope?.  <~>(Letter). Br J Plast Surg . 1997;  50 294
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
      >