Methods and Strategies for Audiological Assessment of Individuals Who Are Deaf-Blind with Developmental Disabilities

John Mascia; Nancy Mascia

doi:10.1055/s-2003-41350

Seminars in Hearing, Table of Contents

Semin Hear 2003; 24(3): 211-222
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-41350

Methods and Strategies for Audiological Assessment of Individuals Who Are Deaf-Blind with Developmental Disabilities

John Mascia¹ , Nancy Mascia²

¹Helen Keller National Center for Deaf-Blind Youths and Adults, Sands Point, New York, and Department of Speech Language and Hearing Sciences, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York
²Department of Speech Language and Hearing Sciences, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Clients who are deaf-blind with developmental disabilities pose unique challenges to the clinician who is administering an audiological assessment. This article highlights some of these challenges. Communication strategies that can be employed when evaluating an individual who is deaf-blind with developmental disabilities are discussed. Functional recommendations for making the audiology office accessible are outlined. Methods for adapting standard evaluation procedures are presented. The suggested protocol for audiological assessment of this low-incidence population includes the combination of behavioral testing procedures and objective measurements, as well as functional observation in natural environments.

KEYWORDS

Deaf-Blind - tactile - personal futures planning - shared participation - natural environments - acoustic immittance - otoacoustic emissions - auditory brainstem response

Full Text

References

REFERENCES

1 Helen Keller National Center. Act United States Congress, as amended, Title 29, Chapter 21, Sec 1905, 1998.
2 Department of Health, United Kingdom, Local Authority Circular. London: Deaf-Blind Services Consultation . 2001
3 Regenbogen L S, Coscas G J. Oculo-auditory Syndromes. Chicago: Yearbook Medical; 1985
4 National Technical Assistance Consortium. 2000 Annual Census, Teaching Research Division, Western Oregon University, Monmouth, Oregon; Helen Keller National Center, Sands Point, NY. Monmouth, OR: National Technical Assistance Consortium (NTAC); 2001
5 Shprintzen R. Syndrome Identification for Audiology: An Illustrated Pocket Guide. San Diego, CA: Singular 2001: 233-237-272-289
6 Armstrong N, Carr T, Houghton J, Belanich J, Mascia J. Supporting medical concerns of young adults who are deaf-blind. In: Everson JM, ed. Supporting Young Adults Who Are Deaf-Blind in Their Communities Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes 1995: 43-65
7 Goodall D, Everson J. Communication instruction and support strategies. In: Everson JM, ed. Supporting Young Adults Who Are Deaf-Blind in Their Communities Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes 1995: 203-224
8 Mascia J. Non-traditional view of clinical services: thoughts of a former traditionalist. National Family Association for Deaf-Blind Newsletter 1995 (Spring): 6-7
9 O'Brien J. A guide to lifestyle planning: using the activities catalog to integrate services and natural support systems. In: Bellemy, Wilcox, eds. A Comprehensive Guide to the Activities Catalog: An Alternative Curriculum for Youth and Adults with Severe Disabilities Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes 1987: 175-189
10 Mount B, Zwernik K. Making Futures Happen: A Manual for Facilities of Personal Futures Planning. St. Paul, MN: Metropolitan Council's Developmental Disabilities Case Management Project; 1990
11 Crook L, Miles B, Riggio M. Selection of communication modes. In: Remarkable Conversations: A Guide to Developing Meaningful Communication with Children and Young Adults Who Are Deaf-Blind Watertown, MA: Perkins School for the Blind 1999: 126-145
12 Feist N. Making Your Office Accessible to a Person Who is Deaf-Blind and Developmentally Disabled. Sands Point, NY: Helen Keller National Center; 2002 (unpublished document).
13 Broadston D. Functional Hearing Inventory for Deaf-Blind Children. Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University; 2000 (unpublished document)
14 Blaha R, Shafer S. Informal Auditory Observation Form. Austin, TX: Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired, Outreach Department; 1997
15 Hesson K, Pollock K, Saunders M, Thompson J, Watt L. Functional Assessment for Work with Deaf-Blind Persons. Toronto, Canada: Canadian National Institute for the Blind, Ontario Division, Deaf-Blind Services; 1992
16 Gee K. Functional Auditory Assessment. Monmouth, OR: The National Information Clearinghouse on Children Who Are Deaf-Blind, U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, 1996; D-B Link Document No. ASM-96-020
17 Johnson C D. The Functional Listening Evaluation. Revised 2001
18 Borus J F. Acoustic impedance measurements with hard of hearing mentally retarded children. J Mental Deficiency Res . 1972; 16 196-202
19 Fulton R T, Lamb L E. Acoustic impedance and tympanometry with the retarded: a normative study. Audiology . 1972; 11 199-208
20 Karjalainen S, Kaariainen R, Vohlonen I. Ear disease and hearing sensitivity in retarded children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol . 1983; 5 235-241
21 Zoller M K, Ruhe D J, Dunster J R. Tympanometry screening in developmentally delayed individuals. J Aud Res . 1985; 99 11-22
22 Hall III J W, Mueller III H G. Audiologists' Desk Reference, Vol I. San Diego, CA: Singular; 1997
23 Jerger J, Anthony L, Jerger S, Mauldin L. Studies in impedance audiometry iii middle ear disorders, 1974. Arch Otolaryngol . 1975; 99 165-171
24 Niswander P S, Ruth R A. Prediction of hearing sensitivity from acoustic reflexes in mentally retarded persons. Am J Ment Defic . 1997; 81 474-481
25 Hall III W J. Predicting hearing levels from the acoustic relfex: a comparison of three methods. Arch Otolaryngol . 1978; 104 602-605
26 Hood L. Clinical Applications of the Auditory Brainstem Response. San Diego, CA: Singular 1999: 93-144
27 Glattke T J, Robinette M S. Transient otoacoustic emissions. In: Robinette MS, Glattke TJ, eds. Otoacoustic Emissions: Clinical Applications, 2nd ed New York: Thieme; 2001: 95-115
28 Lonsbury-Martin B L, Martin G K. The clinical utility of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear . 1990; 11 144-154
29 Stein L K, Ozdamar O, Scnabel M. Auditory brainstem responses (ABR) with suspected deaf-blind children. Ear Hear . 1981; 2 30-40
30 Stein L K. Auditory evoked potentials with special populations. Semin Hear . 1988; 9 35-46
31 Stapells D R, Oates P. Estimation of the pure-tone audiogram by the auditory brainstem response: a review. Audiol Neurol . 1997; 2 257-280
32 Jerger J, Hayes D, Jordan C. Clinical experience with auditory brainstem response audiometry in pediatric assessment. Ear Hear . 1980; 1 19-25
33 Hall J W, Tucker D. Auditory brainstem response in the evaluation of peripheral versus central nervous system dysfunction in the pediatric intensive care unit. Semin Hear . 1988; 9 47-60