Laparoskopische Therapie kolorektaler Karzinome: Bleiben Vorbehalte?

Zusammenfassung

Die Diskussion, ob kolorektale Karzinome laparoskopisch in kurativer Absicht reseziert werden dürfen, konzentriert sich auf die Frage nach der onkologischen Radikalität und Tumorzellverschleppung sowie die Problematik von Trokarkanalmetastasen. Im Hinblick auf bestehende Vorbehalte gegenüber der laparoskopischen Resektion muss überprüft werden, ob die laparoskopische Methode zu einer Qualitätsverbesserung in der Behandlung des kolorektalen Karzinoms führt, indem die kurz- und langfristigen Vorteile der laparoskopischen Therapie mit der konventionellen Chirurgie verglichen werden. Hierbei belegen randomisierte Studien (Phase IIIa), dass die kurzfristigen Resultate laparoskopischer Operationen zumindest gleichwertig sind, wobei onkologische Langzeitergebnisse noch ausstehen. Im Hinblick auf die Problematik von Trokarkanalmetastasen bestätigt sich, dass es sich hierbei um ein technisches Problem aus den Anfangsjahren laparoskopischer Tumorchirurgie handelt. Ob die laparoskopische Chirurgie des kolorektalen Karzinoms letztendlich zu identischen onkologischen Langzeitergebnissen führt wie die konventionelle Chirurgie, ist derzeit nicht vorbehaltlos zu beantworten, da die Resultate der multizentrischen randomisierten Studien (Phase IIIb) noch ausstehen.

Abstract

Controversial discussion focusses on the application of laparoscopic curative resection for colorectal cancer due to oncologic radicality, tumor cell dissemination, and port-site metastases. Considering the limitations of laparoscopic surgery, it is necessary to objectively evaluate whether laparoscopic surgery is associated with an improvement of quality related to curative treatment of colorectal cancer. Therefore, controlled studies comparing the results of laparoscopic vs. conventional cancer surgery are mandatory. To date, comparable short-term outcome of laparoscopic with open resection has been demonstrated by randomized studies (phase IIIa). However, long-term data including recurrence and survival are still missing. Focussing on the issue of port-site metastases, it has become obvious that the incidence of port-site metastases has been a technical problem of the initial phase of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Finally, as randomized studies (phase IIIb) are still to be completed, the crucial issue whether laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer is oncologically equivalent to open surgery cannot be answered definitely.

Schlüsselwörter

Laparoskopische Chirurgie - kolorektales Karzinom - Radikalität - Trokarkanalmetastasen

Key words

Laparoscopic surgery - colorectal cancer - radicality - port-site metastases

Literatur

• 1 Bruch H P, Schwandner O, Keller R. Grenzen der laparoskopischen Viszeralchirurgie in der Onkologie.  Chirurg. 2003;  74 290-300
• 2 Johnstone P AS, Rohde D C, Swartz S E, Fetter J E, Wexner S D. Port site recurrences after laparoscopic and thoracoscopic procedures in malignancy.  J Clin Oncol. 1996;  14 1950-1956
• 3 Neuhaus S J, Texler M, Hewett P J, Watson D I. Port-site metastases following laparoscopic surgery.  Br J Surg. 1998;  85 735-741
• 4 Jorgensen J O, McCall J L, Morris D L. Port site seeding after laparoscopic ultrasonographic staging of pancreatic carcinoma.  Surgery. 1995;  117 118
• 5 Patsner B, Damien M. Umbilical metastases from a stage IB cervical cancer after laparoscopy: a case report.  Fertil Steril. 1992;  88 1248-1249
• 6 Stolla V, Ross D, Bladow F, Rather C. et al . Subcutaneous metastases after coelioscopic lymphadenectomy for vesical urothelial carcinoma.  Eur J Urol. 1994;  36 342-343
• 7 Hughes E S, McDermott F T, Polglase A I, Johnson W R. Tumor recurrence in the abdominal wall scar after large bowel cancer surgery.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1983;  26 571-572
• 8 Reilly W T, Nelson H, Schroeder G, Wieand H S, Bolton J, O'Connell M J. Wound recurrence following conventional treatment of colorectal cancer: a rare but perhaps underestimated problem.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 200-207
• 9 Alexander R J, Jacques B C, Mitchell K G. Laparoscopically assisted colectomy and wound recurrence (letter).  Lancet. 1993;  341 249-250
• 10 Fusco M A, Paluzzi M W. Abdominal wall recurrence after laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for adenocarcinoma of the colon.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;  36 858-861
• 11 Prasad A, Avery C, Foley R JE. Abdominal wall metastases following laparoscopy (letter).  Br J Surg. 1994;  81 (suppl) 31
• 12 Wexner S C, Cohen S M. Port-site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy.  Br J Surg. 1995;  82 295-298
• 13 Bouvy N D, Marquet R L, Jeekel H, Bonier H J. Impact of gas(less) laparoscopy and laparotomy on peritoneal tumor growth and abdominal wall metastases.  Ann Surg. 1996;  224 694-701
• 14 Hewett P J, Thomas W M, King G, Eaton M. Intraperitoneal cell movement during abdominal carbon dioxide insufflation and laparoscopy.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 S62-66
• 15 Jones D B, Guo L W, Reinhard M K. et al . Impact of pneumoperitoneum on trocar site implantation of colon cancer in hamster model.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;  38 1182-1188
• 16 Watson D I, Mathew G, Ellis T. et al . Gasless laparoscopy may reduce the risk of port-site metastases following laparoscopic tumor surgery.  Arch Surg. 1997;  132 166-168
• 17 Whelan R L, Sellers G J, Allendorf J D. et al . Trocar site recurrence is unlikely to result from aerosolization of tumor cells.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 S 7-S 13
• 18 Ishida H, Hashimoto D, Takeuchi I, Yokoyama M. et al . Liver metastases are less established after gasless laparoscopy than after carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum and laparotomy in a mouse model.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  16 193-195
• 19 Kim Z G, Mehl C, Lorenz M, Gutt C N. Impact of laparoscopic CO₂-insufflation on tumor-associated molecules in cultured colorectal cancer cells.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  16 1182
• 20 Lecuru F, Agostini A, Camatte S, Robin F. et al . Impact of pneumoperitoneum on tumor growth. Results of an experiment on two ovarian carcinoma models.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  16 1170
• 21 Jacobi C A. Trokarkanalmetastasen: Was ist gesichert?.  Chir Gastroenterol. 2001;  17 (suppl 2) 39
• 22 Jacobi C A, Bonjer H J, Puttick M I, O'Sullivan R. et al . Oncologic implications of laparoscopic and open surgery.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  16 441-445
• 23 Balli J E, Franklin M E, Almeida J A, Glass J L. et al . How to prevent port-site metastases in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.  Surg Endosc. 2000;  14 1034
• 24 Franklin M E , Rosenthal D, Abrego-Medina D. et al . Prospective comparison of open vs. laparoscopic colon surgery for carcinoma.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 (suppl) S35-S 46
• 25 Hoffman G C, Baker J W, Doxey J B. et al . Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer. Initial follow-up.  Ann Surg. 1996;  223 790-798
• 26 Vukasin P, Ortega A E, Greene F L. et al . Wound recurrence following laparoscopic colon cancer resection: results of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Laparoscopic Registry.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 (suppl) S 20-S 23
• 27 Fleshman J W, Nelson H. et al: Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group .Early results of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: retrospective analysis of 372 patients treated by Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group. Dis Colon Rectum 1996 39 Suppl. S 53-S 58
• 28 Lacy A M, GArcia-Valdecasas J C, Delgado S. et al . Postoperative complications of laoaroscopic-assisted colectomy.  Surg Endosc. 1997;  11 119-122
• 29 Larach S W, Patankar S K, Ferrara A. et al . Complications of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: analysis and comparison of early vs. later experience.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;  40 592-596
• 30 Croce E, Azzola M, Russo R. et al . Laparoscopic colectomy: the absolute need for a standard operative technique.  J Soc Laparoendosc Surg. 1997;  1 217-224
• 31 Leung K L, Yiu R Y, Lai P B. et al . Laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: five-year audit.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;  42 327-332
• 32 Poulin E C, Mamazza J, Schlachta C M, Gregoire R, Roy N. Laparoscopic resection does not adversely affect early survival curves in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal adenocarcinoma.  Ann Surg. 1999;  229 487-492
• 33 Melotti G, Tamborrino E, Lazzaretti M G. et al . Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.  Semin Surg Oncol. 1999;  16 332
• 34 Schiedeck T HK, Schwandner O, Baca I. et al . Laparoscopic surgery for the cure of colorectal cancer: results of a German five-center study.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;  43 1-8
• 35 Lujan H J, Plasencia G, Jacobs M, Viamonte M , Hartmann R F. Long-term survival after laparoscopic colon resection for cancer: complete five-year follow-up.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;  45 491-501
• 36 Lumley J, Stitz R, Stevenson A, Fielding G, Luck A. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer: intermediate to long-term outcomes.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;  45 867-874
• 37 Sillecchia G, Perrotta N, Giraudo G, Salval M. et al . Abdominal wall recurrences after colorectal resection for cancer: rsults of the Italian Registry of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;  45 1172-1177
• 38 Patankar S K, Larach S W, Ferrara A, Williamson P R, Gallagher J T, DeJesus S, Narayanan S. Preoperative comparison of laparoscopic vs. open resections for colorectal adenocarcinoma over a ten-year period.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;  46 601-611
• 39 Braga M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Radaelli G. et al . Training period in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. A case-matched comparative study with open surgery.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  16 31
• 40 Bruch H P, Schwandner O. Laparoskopische Chirurgie beim kolorektalen Karzinom: Sind die onkologischen Standards einzuhalten?.  Chir Gastroenterol. 2001;  17 (suppl 2) 4-11
• 41 Wichmann M W, Meyer G, Angele M K, Schildberg F W, Rau H G. Recent advances in minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery.  Onkologie. 2002;  25 318
• 42 Bruch H P, Schwandner O, Schiedeck T HK, Roblick U J. Actual standards and controversies on operative technique and lymph-node dissection in colorectal cancer.  Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 1999;  384 167-175
• 43 Farrell T M, Johnson A B, Metrevelli R E, Smith C D, Hunter J G. Fascial closure limits metastasis after pneumoperitoneum.  Surg Endosc. 1999;  13 (suppl) 33
• 44 Jacobi C A, Ordemann J, Böhm B, Zieren H U. et al . Inhibition of peritoneal tumor cell growth and implantation in laparoscopic surgery in a rat model.  Am J Surg. 1997;  174 359-363
• 45 Jacobi C A, Sabat R, Ordemann J, Wenger F. et al . Peritoneal instillation of taurolidine and heparin for preventing intraperitoneal tumor cell growth and trocar metastases in laparoscopic operations in the rat model.  Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 1997;  382 31
• 46 Neuhaus S J, Watson D I, Ellis T, Dodd T. et al . Efficacy of cytotoxic agents for the aprevention of laparoscopic port-site metastases.  Arch Surg. 1998;  133 762-766
• 47 Sobin S H, Wittekind C. TNM: classification of malignant tumours. 5th ed. New York; Willey and Sons 1997
• 48 Tate J JT, Kwok S, Dawson J W, Lau W Y, Li A KC. Prospective comparison of laparoscopic and conventional anterior resection.  Br J Surg. 1993;  80 1396-1398
• 49 Franklin M E , Rosenthal D, Norem R F. Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic colon resection versus open colon resection for adenocarcinoma.  Surg Endosc. 1995;  9 811-816
• 50 Lord S A, Larach S W, Ferrara A, Williamson P R. et al . Laparoscopic resections for colorectal carcinoma: a three-year experience.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 148-154
• 51 Goh Y C, Eu K W, Seow-Chen F. Early postoperative results of a prospective series of laparoscopic vs. open anterior resections for rectosigmoid cancers.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;  40 776-780
• 52 Stage J G, Schulze S, Moller P. et al . Prospective randomized study of laparoscopic versus open colonic resection for adenocarcinoma.  Br J Surg. 1997;  84 391-396
• 53 Khalili T M, Fleshner P R, Hiatt J R. et al . Colorectal cancer: comparison of laparoscopic with open approaches.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;  41 832-838
• 54 Milsom J W, Böhm B, Hammerhofer K A, Fazio V. et al . A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventinal techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report.  J Am Coll Surg. 1998;  187 46-57
• 55 Lacy A M, Delgado S, Garcia-Valdecasas J C, Pique J M. et al . Port site metastases and recurrence after laparoscopic colectomy. A randomized trial.  Surg Endosc. 1998;  12 1039-1042
• 56 Hong D, Tabet J, Anvari M. Laparoscopic vs. open resection for colorectal adenocarcinoma.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 10-19
• 57 Lezoche E, Feliciotti F, Paganini A M, Guerrieri M. et al . Laparoscopic vs open hemicolectomy for colon cancer.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  16 596-602
• 58 Schwandner O, Schiedeck T HK, Bruch H P. Ist die Lymphknotenausbeute laparoskopischer Resektionen beim kolorektalen Karzinom adäquat?.  Minimal Invasive Chirurgie. 2002;  11 44-48
• 59 Köckerling F, Reymond M A, Schneider C, Wittekind C. et al . The Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group. Prospective multicenter study of the quality of oncologic resections in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;  41 963-970
• 60 Bährlehner E, Decker T, Anders S, Heukrodt B. Laparoskopische Chirurgie des Rektumkarzinoms. Onkologische Radikalität und Spätergebnisse.  Zentralbl Chir. 2001;  126 302-306
• 61 Hartley J E, Mehigan B J, Qureshi A E, Duthie G S. et al . Total mesorectal excision: assessment of the laparoscopic approach.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 315-321
• 62 Poulin E C, Schlachta C M, Gregoire R, Seshadri P. et al . Local recurrence and survival after laparoscopic mesorectal resection for rectal adenocarcinoma.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  16 989-995
• 63 Pikarsky A J, Rosenthal R, Weiss E G, Wexner S D. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  16 558-562
• 64 Morino M, Parini U, Giraudo G, Salval M, Brachet Contul R, Garrone C. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a consecutive series of 100 patients.  Ann Surg. 2003;  237 335-342
• 65 Yong L, Deane M, Monson J RT, Darzi A. Systematic review of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal malignancy.  Surg Endosc. 2001;  15 1431-1439
• 66 Hewitt P M, Ip S M, Kwok S P, Somers S S. et al . Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open surgery for colorectal cancer: comparative study of immune effects.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;  41 901-909
• 67 Leung K L, Lai P B, Ho R L, Meng W C. et al . Systemic cytokine response after laparoscopic-assisted resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: a prospective randomized trial.  Ann Surg. 2000;  231 506-511
• 68 Schwenk W, Jacobi C, Mansmann U, Böhm B, Müller J M. Inflammatory response after laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resections - results of a prospective randomized trial.  Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 2000;  385 2-9
• 69 Delgado S, Lacy A M, Filella X, Castells A. et al . Acute phase response in laparoscopic and open colectomy in colon cancer: randomized study.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 638-646
• 70 Ordemann J, Jacobi C A, Schwenk W, Stösslein R, Müller J M. Cellular and humoral inflammatory response after laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resections.  Surg Endosc. 2001;  15 600-608
• 71 Tang C L, Eu K W, Tai B C, Soh J G. et al . Randomised clinical trial of the effect of open versus laparoscopically assisted colectomy on systemic immunity in patients with colorectal cancer.  Br J Surg. 2001;  88 801-807
• 72 Braga M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Radaelli G. et al . Metabolic and functional results after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a randomized, controlled trial.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;  45 1070-1077
• 73 Targarona E M, Garcia E, Garriga J, Martinez-Bru C. et al . Prospective randomized trial comparing conventional laparoscopic colectomy with hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: applicability, immediate clinical outcome, inflammatory response, and cost.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  16 234-239
• 74 Wu F P, Sietses C, Blomberg B M von, Leeuwen P A van, Mejer S, Cuesta M A. Systemic and peritoneal inflammatory response after laparoscopic or conventional colon resection in cancer patients: a prospective, randomized trial.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;  46 147-155
• 75 Schneider C, Scheidbach H, Scheuerlein H, Köckerling F. Prospektiv multizentrische Erhebungsstudie laparoskopische kolorektale Chirurgie.  Zentralbl Chir. 2000;  125 (suppl 2) 164-168
• 76 Schwenk W, Haase O, Böhm B, Müller J M. Einsatz der minimal-invasiven Chirurgie bei Malignomen? Ein Konzept der Qualitätssicherung durch phasenweise Evaluation am Beispiel kolorektaler Karzinomresektionen.  Zentralbl Chir. 2000;  125 (suppl 2) 152-156
• 77 Böhm B, Engelhardt T, Seifert M, Bauer G. Indikation zur laparoskopischen Resektion beim kolorektalen Karzinom.  Zentralbl Chir. 2003;  128 329-332
• 78 Lacy A M, Garcia-Valdecasas J C, Pique J M, Delgado S, Campo E, Bordas J M, Taura P, Grande L, Fuster J, Pachero J L. et al . Short-term outcome analysis of a randomized study comparing laparoscopic vs. open colectomy for colon cancer.  Surg Endosc. 1995;  9 1101-1105
• 79 Ortiz H, Armendariz P, Yarnoz C. Is early postoperative feeding feasible in elective colon and rectal surgery?.  Int J Colorect Dis. 1996;  11 119-121
• 80 Curet M J, Putrakul K, Pitcher D E, Josloff R K, Zucker K A. Laparoscopically assisted colon resection for colon carcinoma.  Surg Endosc. 2000;  14 1062-1066
• 81 Weeks J C, Nelson H, Gelber S, Sargent D, Schroeder G. Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs. open colectomy for colon cancer.  J Am Med Ass. 2002;  287 321-328
• 82 Lacy A M, Garcia-Valdecasas J C, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique J ;, Visa J. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial.  Lancet. 2002;  359 2224-2229
• 83 Hazebroek E J. The Color Study Group . A randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  16 949-953