Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2003; 20(4): 181-188
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-40608
Copyright © 2003 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Vaginal Delivery and Neonatal Outcome in Extremely-Low-Birth-Weight Infants Below 26 Weeks of Gestational Age

Jacqueline Bauer1 , R. Hentschel2 , H. Zahradnik3 , U. Karck3 , O. Linderkamp1
  • 1Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Heidelberg, Germany
  • 2Department of Pediatrics, University of Freiburg
  • 3Department of Obstetrics, University of Freiburg, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
21 July 2003 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Outcomes of extremely-low-birth-weight infants (ELBW) with gestational age below 26 weeks based on mode of delivery (vaginal versus cesarean delivery) were retrospectively compared. During the observation period (1997 to 2000) 48 ELBW infants, below 26 weeks of gestational age, had been admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of the Department of Pediatrics, University of Freiburg, Germany. Twenty-seven (56%) patients were born vaginally and 21 (44%) by cesarean section. Birth weight, umbilical artery pH, and rectal temperature were significantly lower in the cesarean than in the vaginal group. Clinical Risk Index for Babies (CRIB) score showed significantly (p < 0.005) higher values in the cesarean group compared with the vaginal group. Hypothermia (rectal temperature below 36.2°C after birth) was more common in the cesarean group (48%) than in the vaginal group (33%). Eighty-five percent of the fetuses in the vaginal group received antenatal corticosteroids and 88% in the cesarean group. Survival rate was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in infants born vaginally (78%) than in the cesarean group (43%). Several complications occurred less frequently after vaginal birth than after cesarean section: intraventricular hemorrhage grade III to IV (18 versus 33%); periventricular leukomalacia (4 versus 14%); and neonatal septicemia (33 versus 52%), but not statistical significant. In our study group, extremely immature preterm infants had a more favorable outcome if they were born vaginally when compared with infants delivered by cesarean section.

KEYWORDS

Preterm - cesarean section - vaginal delivery - outcome

REFERENCES

  • 1 Main D M, Main E K, Maurer M M. Cesarean section versus vaginal delivery for the breech fetus weighing less than 1500 grams.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1983;  146 580-584
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Malloy M H, Onstad L, Wright E. The effect of cesarean delivery on birth outcome in very low birth weight infants.  Obstet Gynecol . 1991;  77 498-503
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Faber-Nijholt R, Huisjes H J, Towen B CL, Fidler V J. Neurological follow-up of 281 children born in breech presentations: a controlled study.  BMJ . 1983;  286 9-12
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kitchen W, Ford G W, Doyle L W. Cesarean section or vaginally delivery at 24 to 48 weeks' gestation: comparison of survival and neonatal and two-year morbidity.  Obstet Gynecol . 1985;  66 149-157
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Wolf H, Schaap A HP, Bruinse H W, Smolders-de Haas H, Ertbruggen I, Treffers P E. Vaginal delivery compared with cesarean section in early preterm breech delivery: a comparison of long term outcome.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol . 1999;  106 486-491
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Papile L A, Burstein R, Koffler H. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birthweight less than 1500 g.  J Pediatr . 1978;  92 529-534
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bancalari E. Changes in the pathogenesis and prevention of chronic lung disease of prematurity.  Am J Perinatol . 2001;  18 1-9
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Melchor J C, Aranguren G, Lopez J A, Avila M, Fernandez-Llebrez L, Linares A. Perinatal outcome of very low birth weight infants by mode of delivery.  Int J Gynecol Obstet . 1992;  38 181-187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Litt R, Armon Y, Seidman D S, Yafe H, Gale R. The effect of mode of delivery on long-term outcome of very low birthweight infants.  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol . 1993;  52 5-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Baud O, Foix-L'Helias L, Kaminski M. Antenatal glucocorticoid treatment and cystic periventricular leukomalacia in very premature infants.  N Engl J Med . 1999;  341 1190-1196
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Fenton A, Field D J, Mason E, Clarke M. Attitudes to viability of preterm infants and their effect on figures for perinatal mortality.  BMJ . 1990;  300 434-436
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Robertson P A, Sniderman S H, Laros R K. Neonatal morbidity according to gestational age and birth weight from five tertiary care centers in the United States, 1983 through 1986.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1992;  166 1629-1645
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Emilain A, Verma U, Visintainer P, Tejani N. Effectiveness of multidose antenatal steroids.  Obstet Gynecol . 2000;  95 34-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Piazze J J, Maranghi L, Nigro G, Cosmi E V, Anceschi M M. The effect of glucocorticoid therapy on fetal lung maturity indices in hypertensive pregnancies.  Obstet Gynecol . 1998;  92 220-225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Abbasi S, Hirsch D, Davis J. Effect of single versus multiple courses of antenatal corticosteroids on maternal and neonatal outcome.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 2000;  182 1243-1249
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Costeloe K, Hennessy E, Gibson A T, Marlow N, Wilkinson A R. The EPICure Study: outcome to discharge from hospital for infants born at the threshold of viability.  Pediatrics . 2000;  106 659-671
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Poets C F, Sens B. Changes in intubation rates and outcome of very low birth weight infants: a population-based study.  Pediatrics . 1996;  98 24-27
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Gittermann M K, Fusch C, Gittermann A R, Regazzoni B M, Moessinger A C. Early nasal continuous positive airway pressure treatment reduces the need for intubation in very low birth weight infants.  Eur J Pediatr . 1997;  156 384-388
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Lindner W, Vossbeck S, Hummler H, Pohlandt F. Delivery room management of extremely low birth weight infants: spontaneous breathing or intubation?.  Pediatrics . 1999;  103 961-967
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 French N P, Hagan R, Evans S F, Godfrey M, Newham J P. Repeated antenatal corticosteroids: size at birth and subsequent development.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1999;  180 114-121
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 The International Network. The CRIB (clinical risk index for babies) score: a tool for assessing initial neonatal risk and comparing performance of neonatal intensive care units.  Lancet . 1993;  342 193-198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Bauer J, Sontheimer D, Fischer C H, Linderkamp O. Metabolic rate and energy balance in very low birth weight infants during kangaroo holding by their mothers and fathers.  J Pediatr . 1996;  129 608-611
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Hack M, Fanaroff A A. Outcomes of children of extremely low birthweight and gestational age in the 1990s.  Early Hum Dev . 1999;  53 193-218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Hack M, Horbar J D, Malloy M H, Tyson J E, Wright E, Wright L. Very low birth weight outcome of the national institute of child health and human development neonatal network.  Pediatrics . 1991;  87 587-597
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Yu V YH, Bajuk B, Cutting D, Orgill A A, Astbury J. Effect of mode of delivery on outcome of very low birthweight infants.  Br J Obstet Gynecol . 1984;  91 633-639
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Als H, Lawhon G, Duffy F H, McAnulty G B, Gibes-Grossmann R. Individualized developmental care for the very low-birth-weight preterm infant: medical and neurofunctional effects.  JAMA . 1994;  272 853-858
    Google Scholar
      >