Am J Perinatol 2003; 20(4): 201-204
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-40607
Copyright © 2003 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Evaluation of a New Thermometer for Rapid Axillary Temperature Measurement in Preterm Infants

Shaul Dollberg, Larissa Mincis, Francis B. Mimouni, Gina  Ashbel, Mila Barak
  • Department of Neonatology, Lis Maternity Hospital, Tel Aviv-Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
21 July 2003 (online)

ABSTRACT

Mercury-in-glass thermometers are considered the “gold-standard” for temperature measurements, but require at least 4 minutes for accuracy. Electronic thermometers sample temperature measurements over a shorter period. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of the Penguin (Medisim, Jerusalem, Israel) and the IVAC (San Diego, CA) Temp plus II thermometers in preterm infants. Axillary temperature was obtained in 50 thermally stable preterm infants each time with the mercury-in-glass, the IVAC, and the Penguin thermometers. Analysis of variance F-test, and linear regression analyses were used to test correlation of each electronic thermometer with the mercury-in-glass one, and the effect of body weight. Temperature measurement taken with the Penguin thermometer was significantly higher than that measured with the two other ones, p < 0.001. The differences in means and in variances were not significantly different between IVAC and mercury-in-glass, while the variance of the Penguin measurement was higher than that of the two other instruments (p < 0.001). The IVAC instrument correlated more tightly with the mercury-in-glass (r = 0.89, p < 0.001) than did the Penguin (r = 0.54, p < 0.001). There was an inverse correlation between the deviation of the Penguin measurement from the mercury-in-glass and the weight of the patient (p < 0.08), while no significant correlation was found between the deviation of the IVAC measurement from the mercury in glass and the patient's weight (p = 0.56). Measurements of axillary temperature using the Penguin thermometer in incubated preterm infants are less accurate and less reproducible than those obtained using the IVAC or the glass thermometers.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Dollberg S, Hoath S B. Temperature regulation in preterm infants: role of the skin-environment interface.  Neoreviews . 2001;  2 282-291
  • 2 Morley C J, Hewson P H, Cole T J. Axillary and rectal temperature measurements in infants.  Arch Dis Child . 1992;  67 122-125
  • 3 Weisse M E. Temperature measurement: gold standard [letter].  Pediatrics . 1992;  90 649
  • 4 Torrence J T. Temperature readings of preterm infants.  Nurs Res . 1968;  17 312-319
  • 5 Mayfield S R, Bhatia J, Nakamura K T, Rios G R, Bell E F. Temperature measurement in term and preterm neonates.  J Pediatr . 1984;  104 271-275
  • 6 Jaeger A. Accidental acute mercury vapor poisoning.  Vet Hum Toxicol . 1979;  21 62-63
  • 7 Yetman R J, Coody D K, West M S, Montgomery D, Brown M. Comparison of temperature measurements by an aural infrared thermometer with measurements by traditional rectal and axillary techniques.  J Pediatr . 1993;  122 769-773
  • 8 Dollberg S, Lahav S, Mimouni F B. Precision of a new thermometer for rapid rectal temperature measurement in neonates.  Am J Perinatol . 2001;  18 103-105
  • 9 Dollberg S, Rimon A, Atherton H D, Hoath S B. Continuous measurement of core body temperature in preterm infants.  Am J Perinatol . 2000;  17 257-264
  • 10 Togawa T. Body temperature measurement.  Clin Phys Physiol Meas . 1985;  6 83-108
    >