Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of EuroSCORE in terms of
prediction of the outcome as a result of preoperative information in a cohort of patients.
Methods: We analyzed the data from 751 patients treated between Jan 1 and Dec 31,
1998. We used contingency tables and applied methods of discriminant analysis for
the evaluation. Results: Compared to the 14.799 patients from whose data the EuroSCORE system had originally
been derived [1,2], we had a smaller portion of patients in the low-risk group (24.5
% vs. 30.6 %), a comparable portion of patients in the medium-risk group (42.2 % vs.
40.5 %) and a higher proportion of patients in the high-risk group (33.2 % vs. 29.0
%). This difference in the risk distributions was highly significant (p < 0.001).
The application of the EuroSCORE system showed that deaths only occurred in the high-risk
group in our hospital. We had 36 deaths amongst the patients, which gives an overall
mortality rate of 4.9 % and a mortality rate of 1.6 % in the medium-risk group and
of 12.4 % in the high-risk group. The discriminant analysis showed that with the EuroSCORE
as single predicting variable - virtually all survivors were classified correctly
(giving a specificity of 99.0 %). The sensitivity was rather low at only 25 %; however,
this means that many of the high-risk patients in our clinic survived. The total misclassification
rate, however, was 12.7 %. Additionally, we found that a higher score value predicts
a significantly higher probability for perioperative complications and also results
in significantly increased average times for the bypass and total time for surgery.
Conclusion: The EuroSCORE is a valuable score system for the prediction of the overall outcome
of patients following open heart surgery, and is easy to use. As far as perioperative
complications are concerned, however, some specifications seem desirable.
Key words
Cardiac surgery - risk stratification - mortality - outcome
References
1
Roques F, Nashef P, Michel E, Gauducheau C, de Vincentiis C, Baudet E, Cortina J,
David M, Faichney A, Gabrielle F, Gams E, Harjula A, Jones M T, Pinna Pintor P, Salomon R,
Thulin L.
Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery: Analysis of the EuroSCORE multinational
database of 19030 patients.
Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surgery.
1999;
15
816-823
2
Nashef S AM, Roques F, Michel P, Gauducheau E, Lemeshow S, Salamon R. the EuroSCORE
study group .
European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE).
Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surgery.
1999;
16
9-13
3
Lefering R, Neugebauer E, Lechleuthner A, Troidl H.
Asessment of critical care costs of intensive care unit with TISS (Therapeutic Intervention
Scoring System)- an economic analysis of intensive care.
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd.
1996;
113
318-320
4
Clermont G, Angus D C, Linde-Zwirble W T, Lave J R, Pinsky M R.
Measuring resource use in the ICU with computerized therapeutic intervention scoring
system-based data.
Chest.
1998;
113
(2)
434-442
5
de Keizer N F, Bonsel G J, Goldfad C, Rowan K M.
The added value that increasing levels of diagnostic information provide in prognostic
models to estimate hospital mortality for adult intensive care patients.
Intensive Care Med.
2000;
26
(5)
577-584
6
Pierpont G L, Parenti C M.
Physician risk assessment and APACHE scores in cardiac care units.
Clin Cardiol.
1999;
22
(5)
366-368
7
Teoh L S, Gowardman J R, Larsen P D, Green R, Galletly D C.
Glasgow Coma Scale: variation in mortality among permutations of specific total scores.
Intensive Care Med.
2000;
26
(2)
157-161
8
Reina A, Vasquez G, Aguayo E, Bravo I, Colmenero M, Bravo M.
Mortality discrimination in acute myocardial infarction: comparison between APACHE
III and SAPS II prognosis systems.
Intensive Care Med.
1997;
23
(3)
326-330
9
Markgraf R, Deutschinoff G, Pientka L, Scholten T.
Comparison of acute physiology and chronic health evaluations II and III and simplified
acute physiology score II: a prospective cohort study evaluating these methods to
predict outcome in a german interdisciplinary intensive care unit.
Crit Care Med.
2000;
28
(I)
26-33
10
Schuster P, Schuster F P, Ritschel P, Wilts S, Bodmann K F.
The ability of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) to predict outcome
in coronary care patients.
Intensive Care Med.
1997;
23
(10)
1056-1061
11
Schuster H P, Wilts S, Ritschel P, Schuster F P.
Predictive value of score parameters of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS)-II
for the duration of treatment of intensive care patients.
Wien Klin Wochenschr.
1996;
108
(15)
462-466
12
Gabrielle F, Roques F, Michel P, Bernard A, de Vicentis C, Roques X, Brenot R, Baudet E,
David M.
Is the Parsonnet's score a good predictive score of mortality in adult cardiac surgery:
assessment by a French multicenter study.
Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg.
1997;
11
(3)
406-414
13
Wynne-Jones K, Jackson M, Grotte G, Bridgewater B.
Limitations of the Parsonnet score for measuring in the north west of England.
Heart.
2000;
84
(I)
71-78
Dr. Semih Gürler
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heinrich Heine University
Moorenstraße 5
40225 Düsseldorf
Germany
Phone: +49/211/811-8331
Fax: +49/211/811-8333