Affective Language and Humor Appreciation after Right Hemisphere Brain Damage

Margaret Lehman Blake

doi:10.1055/s-2003-38902

Seminars in Speech and Language, Table of Contents

Semin Speech Lang 2003; 24(2): 107-120
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-38902

Affective Language and Humor Appreciation after Right Hemisphere Brain Damage

Margaret Lehman Blake

Department of Communication Disorders, University of Houston, Houston, Texas

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Many adults with right hemisphere brain damage exhibit difficulties in the comprehension and expression of emotional language and humor. Affective comprehension deficits range in severity and can be modulated by task and response demands as well as by the strength of emotional content. Expressive emotional language deficits, as characterized by reduced emotional intensity, are more pervasive than comprehension deficits. Deficits in humor appreciation generally affect the ability to integrate an incongruous element (e.g., a punch line) with the preceding context. Several co-occurring disorders (e.g., depression, cognitive and visuoperceptual deficits, and reduced auditory comprehension) may exacerbate problems with affective language and humor. Although some formal measures evaluate humor appreciation, none specifically addresses emotional language. While no hard data exist regarding efficacy of treatment for deficits in affective language or humor processing, several suggestions for such treatment are provided.

KEYWORDS

Right brain damage - emotion - humor

Full Text

References

REFERENCES

1 Brownell H, Martino G. Deficits in inference and social cognition: the effects of right hemisphere brain damage on discourse. In: Beeman M, Chiarello C, eds. Right Hemisphere Language Comprehension: Perspectives from Cognitive Neuroscience Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum 1998: 309-328
2 Borod J C. Interhemispheric and intrahemispheric control of emotion: a focus on unilateral brain damage. J Consult Clin Psych . 1992; 60 339-348
3 Gardner H. The stories of the right hemisphere. In: Spaulding, WD, ed. Integrative Views of Motivation, Cognition, and Emotion: Volume 41, the Nebraska Symposium on Motivation Lincoln, NE: Univ Nebraska Pr 1994: 57-69
4 Tompkins C A. Redundancy enhances emotional inferencing by right- and left-hemisphere-damaged adults. J Speech Hear Res . 1991; 34 1142-1149
5 Rehak A, Kaplan J A, Weylman S T. et al . Story processing in right-hemisphere brain-damaged patients. Brain Lang . 1992; 42 320-336
6 Borod J C, Andelman F, Obler L K, Tweedy J R, Welkowitz J. Right hemisphere specialization for the identification of emotional words and sentences: evidence from stroke patients. Neuropsychologia . 1992; 30 827-844
7 Cicero B A, Borod J C, Santschi C. et al . Emotional versus nonemotional lexical perception in patients with right and left brain damage. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol . 1999; 12 255-264
8 Tompkins C A, Baumgaertner A. Clinical value of online measures for adults with right hemisphere brain damage. Am J Speech Lang Pathol . 1998; 7 68-74
9 Brownell H H, Potter H H, Birhle A M, Gardner H. Inference deficits in right brain-damaged patients. Brain Lang . 1986; 27 310-321
10 Lehman M T, Tompkins C A. Inferencing in adults with right hemisphere brain damage: an analysis of conflicting results. Aphasiology . 2000; 14 485-499
11 Lehman-Blake M T, Tompkins C A. Predictive inferencing in adults with right hemisphere brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res . 2001; 44 639-654
12 Myers P S. Right Hemisphere Damage: Disorders of Communication and Cognition. San Diego: Singular; 1999
13 Tompkins C A, Bloise C GR, Timko M L, Baumgaertner A. Working memory and inference revision in brain damaged and normally aging adults. J Speech Hear Res . 1994; 37 896-912
14 Tompkins C A, Lehman-Blake M T, Baumgaertner A, Fassbinder W. Mechanisms of discourse comprehension impairment after right hemisphere brain damage: suppression in inferential ambiguity resolution. J Speech Lang Hear Res . 2000; 44 400-415
15 Brownell H H, Carroll J J, Rehak A, Wingfield A. The use of pronoun anaphora and speaker mood in the interpretation of conversational utterances by right hemisphere brain-damaged patients. Brain Lang . 1992; 43 121-147
16 Blonder L X, Bowers D, Heilman K M. The role of the right hemisphere in emotional communication. Brain . 1991; 114 1115-1127
17 Wapner C A, Hamby S, Gardner H. The role of the right hemisphere in the apprehension of complex linguistic materials. Brain Lang . 1981; 14 15-33
18 Tompkins C A. Right Hemisphere Communication Disorders: Theory and Management. San Diego: Singular; 1995
19 Gainotti G. Emotional behavior and hemispheric site of the lesion. Cortex . 1972; 8 41-55
20 Borod J C, Koff E, Lorch M P, Nicholas M. Channels of emotional expression in patients with unilateral brain damage. Arch Neurol . 1985; 42 245-348
21 Bloom R L, Borod J C, Obler L K, Koff E. A preliminary characterization of lexical emotional expression in right and left brain-damaged patients. Intern J Neurosci . 1990; 55 71-80
22 Bloom R L, Borod J C, Obler L K, Gerstman L J. Impact of emotional content on discourse production in patients with unilateral brain damage. Brain Lang . 1992; 42 153-164
23 Bloom R L, Borod J C, Obler L K, Gerstman L J. Suppression and facilitation of pragmatic performance: effects of emotional content on discourse following right and left brain damage. J Speech Hear Res . 1993; 36 1227-1235
24 Borod J C, Pick, L H, Andelman F. et al . Verbal pragmatics following unilateral stroke: emotional content and valence. Neuropsychologia . 2000; 14 112-124
25 Cimino C R, Verfaellie M, Bowers D, Heilman K M. Autobiographical memory: influence of right hemisphere brain damage on emotionality and specificity. Brain Cogn . 1991; 15 106-118
26 Tompkins C A, Fassbinder W, Lehman-Blake M T, Baumgaertner A. The nature and implications of right hemisphere language disorders: issues in search of answers. In: Hillis AE, ed. Handbook on Adult Language Disorders: Integrating Cognitive Neuropsychology, Neurology, and Rehabilitation Philadelphia: Psychology Press 2002 14: 429-448
27 Semenza C, Pasini M, Zettin M. Right hemisphere patients' judgements on emotions. Acta Neurol Scand . 1986; 74 43-50
28 Borod J C, Rorie K D, Haywood C S. et al . Hemispheric specialization for discourse reports of emotional experiences: relationships to demographic, neurological, and perceptual variables. Neuropsychologia . 1996; 34 351-359
29 Lane R D, Chua PM-L, Dolan R J. Common effects of emotional valence, arousal and attention on neural activation during visual processing of pictures. Neuropsychologia . 1999; 37 989-997
30 Ostrove J M, Simpson T, Gardner H. Beyond scripts: a note on the capacity of right hemisphere-damaged patients to process social and emotional content. Brain Cogn . 1990; 12 144-154
31 Suls J M. A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons: an information-processing analysis. In: Goldstein JH, McGhee PE, eds. The Psychology of Humor: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Issues New York: Academic Press 1972: 81-100
32 Brownell H, Gardner H. Neuropsychological insights into humor. In: Durant J, Miller J, eds. Laughing Matters New York: Wiley 1989: 17-34
33 McGhee P E. The role of arousal and hemispheric lateralization in humor. In: McGhee PE, Goldstein JH, eds. Handbook of Humor Research: Volume 1, Basic Issues New York: Springer-Verlag 1983: 13-37
34 Brownell H H, Michel D, Powelson J, Gardner H. Surprise but not coherence: sensitivity to verbal humor in right-hemisphere patients. Brain Lang . 1983; 18 20-27
35 Winner E, Brownell H, Happe F, Blum A, Pincus D. Distinguishing lies from jokes: theory of mind deficits and discourse interpretation in right hemisphere brain-damaged patients. Brain Lang . 1998; 62 89-106
36 Gardner H, Ling P K, Flamm L, Silverman J. Comprehension and appreciation of humorous material following brain damage. Brain . 1975; 98 399-412
37 Dagge M, Hartje W. Influence of contextual complexity on the processing of cartoons by patients with unilateral lesions. Cortex . 1985; 21 607-616
38 Gillikin L S, Derks P L. Humor appreciation and mood in stroke patients. Cogn Rehab . 1991; 9 30-35
39 Shammi P, Stuss D T. Humor appreciation: a role of the right frontal lobe. Brain . 1999; 122 657-666
40 Coulson S, Kutas M. Getting it: human event-related brain response to jokes in good and poor comprehenders. Neurosci Letters . 2001; 316 71-74
41 Spencer K A, Tompkins C A, Schulz R. Assessment of depression in patients with brain pathology: the case of stroke. Psych Bull . 1997; 122 132-152
42 Carota A, Staub F, Bogousslavsky J. Emotions, behaviours and mood changes in stroke. Curr Opin Neurol . 2002; 15 57-69
43 Karow C M, Marquardt T P, Marshall R C. Affective processing in left and right hemisphere brain-damaged subjects with and without subcortical involvement. Aphasiology . 2001; 15 715-729
44 Zajonc R B. On the primacy of affect. Am Psychol . 1984; 39 117-123
45 Zajonc R B. Feeling and thinking: preferences need no inferences. Am Psychol . 1980; 35 151-175
46 Pimental P A, Kingsbury N A. Mini Inventory of Right Brain Injury. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 1983
47 Burns M S. Burns Brief Inventory of Communication and Cognition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp; 1997
48 Bryan K L. The Right Hemisphere Language Battery. Leicester, UK: Far Communications; 1989
49 McDonald S, Flanagan S, Rollins J. The Awareness of Social Inference Test. Suffolk, UK: Thames Valley Test Co; 2002
50 Spector C C. Linguistic humor comprehension of normal and language-impaired adolescents. J Speech Hear Disord . 1990; 55 533-541
51 Halper A S, Cherney L R, Burns M S. Clinical Management of Right Hemisphere Dysfunction, 2nd ed. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publications; 1996.
52 Spector C C. Remediating humor comprehension deficits in language-impaired students. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch . 1992; 23 20-27