Telephone across the Life Span: An Issue for All

Elaine Mormer; Allison Mack

doi:10.1055/s-2003-37908

Seminars in Hearing, Table of Contents

Semin Hear 2003; 24(1): 001-016
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-37908

Telephone across the Life Span: An Issue for All

Elaine Mormer, Allison Mack

University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The telephone is a widely used, yet highly disregarded, instrument of daily living. Census data reveal that just fewer than 3% of U.S. homes were phoneless in the year 2000. The telephone has a significant impact on society and on individuals' lives. In the context of Maslow's hierarchy of human needs, this article explores how the telephone contributes to one's general well being at different points over the life span. Federal legislation mandates telephone accessibility for all individuals in the United States. Specific laws are explored. Finally, survey data on normal and hard-of-hearing listeners are reported in an effort to illustrate the need for hearing health practitioners to aggressively address telephone solutions.

KEYWORDS

Telephone - telecoil - disability - sociability

Full Text

References

REFERENCES

1 U.S. Census Bureau. Profile of selected housing characteristics: 2000; accessed 12 December 2001, http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/QTTable?ds name=ACS C2SS EST G00 &geo id=01000US&qr name=ACS C2SS EST G00 QT04 .
2 U.S. Census Bureau. Historical census of housing graphs-telephones; last revised 15 December 2000; www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/census/ historic/tpgraph.html .
3 U.S. Census Bureau. Statistics in brief-law, education, communications, transportation, housing; last revised 12 April 2001; www.census.gov/statab/ www/part2.html .
4 Fisher C. America Calling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press 1992
5 Pool I de Sola. The Social Impact of the Telephone. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1977
6 Fisher C. Educating the public. In: Fisher C, ed. America Calling Berkeley, CA: University of California Press 1992: 60-85
7 Fisher C. Educating the public. In: Fisher C, ed. America Calling Berkeley, CA: University of California Press 1992: (photo7)
8 Fisher C. Educating the public. In: Fisher C, ed. America Calling Berkeley, CA: University of California Press 1992: (photo8)
9 Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. February 4, 2002;A-7 .
10 Boettinger H M. Our sixth-and-a-half sense. In: Pool I de Sola, ed. The Social Impact of the Telephone Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1977: 200-207
11 Dimmick J W, Sikand J, Patterson S J. The gratifications of the household telephone. Commun Res . 1994; 22 643-663
12 Maslow A. Motivation and Personality . 3rd ed. New York: Harper and Row 1987
13 Hamilton C, Parker C. Communicating for Results (A Guide for Business and the Professions). 3rd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company 1990
14 Bowe F. National survey on telephone services and products: the views of deaf and hard-of-hearing people. Am Ann Deaf . 1991; 136 278-283
15 Office of Technology Assessment. Critical connections: communication for the future (OTA-CIT-407). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office 1990
16 Ryan E B, Anas A P, Hummert M L, Laver-Ingram A. Young and older adults' views of telephone talk: conversation problems and social uses. J Appl Commun Res . 1998; 26 83-98
17 Lawton M P, Brody E. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist . 1969; 9 179-186
18 Harwood J. Communication media use in the grandparent-grandchild relationship. J Commun . 2000; 50 56-78
19 Mayer M. The telephone and uses of time. In: Pool I de Sola, ed. The Social Impact of Telephone Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1977: 225-245
20 Hogg J R, Heiler K. A measure of relational competence for community-dwelling elderly. Psychol Aging. 1990; 5 580-588
21 Kepler L J, Terry M, Sweetman R H. Telephone usage in the hearing-impaired population. Ear Hear . 1992; 13 311-319
22 Gove P B. Webster's Third New International Dictionary. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster Inc. 1981: 921
23 Palmer C, Mormer E. Goals and expectations of the hearing aid fitting. Trends Amp . 1999; 4 61-71
24 Piette J, Weinberger M, McPhee S J. Do automated calls with nurse follow-up improve self-care and glycemic control among vulnerable patients with diabetes?. Am J Med . 2000; 108 20-27
25 Piette J. Patient education delivered via automated telephone calls: a study of English and Spanish speakers with diabetes. Am J Prev Med . 1999; 17 138-141
26 Piette J D, Weinberger M, McPhee S. The effect of automated calls with telephone nurse follow-up on patient centered outcomes of diabetes care: a randomized controlled trial. Medical Care . 2000; 38 218-230
27 House Report No. 888. 97th Cong., 2nd Session. 1982 .
28 U.S Congress. Hearing Aid Compatibility Act. Public Law 100-394, 2. 1988 .
29 Federal Communications Commission. Frequently asked questions regarding hearing aid compatibility and volume control. Published 12 December 2001; available at www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common Carrier/FAQ/faq hac.html
30 Federal Communications Commission. Notice of proposed rulemaking: rules governing hearing aid-compatible telephones. Docket No. 01-309 RM-8658; 14 November 2001
31 Access Board. The American with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990; accessed 12 January 2002. www.access-board.gov/about/ADA%20Overview.htm
32 Association of Tech Act Projects. Text version of P.L 105-394. accessed 12 January 2002; www. ataporg.org/ legislation.htm
33 Association of Tech Act Projects. Highlights of Tech Act project accomplishments. accessed 12 January 2002; www.ataporg.org/highlights.htm
34 Murphy J. Don't hang up: use of the telephone by people with communication difficulties. Nursing Standard . 1999; 13 33-36
35 Erber N P. Telephone Communication and Hearing Impairment. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press; 1985
36 Holmes A E, Kaplan H S, Yanke R. Tell us your telephone troubles: using open-ended questionnaires to explore telephone use. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology . 1998; 31 87-96
37 Ross M. Beyond hearing aids: hearing assistance technologies. Semin Hear . 1997; 18 103-214