Diagnosis of AOS: Definition and Criteria

ABSTRACT

Presented in this article is a discussion of current progress in behavioral, cognitive, and neuroanatomic definitions of apraxia of speech (AOS). A behavioral definition summarizes the speech symptoms that should be considered diagnostic of AOS with or without co-occurring aphasia and dysarthria. AOS is defined in cognitive terms as an impairment in the translation of phonological representations into specifications for articulation. Progress toward a neuroanatomic definition of AOS will rely on mapping the processes described by increasingly sophisticated cognitive models of normal speech production to the brain. The article describes criteria that have been proposed for differentiating apraxic from phonological and dysarthric disorders and suggests that syndrome-based approaches to the diagnosis of AOS may obscure important differences between individual presentations of apraxic disruption as well as similarities between AOS and other speech-language disorders.

KEYWORDS

Speech production - clinical syndrome - cognitive model - brain mapping

REFERENCES

• 1 McNeil M R, Robin D A, Schmidt R A. Apraxia of speech: definition, differentiation, and treatment. In: McNeil MR, ed. Clinical Management of Sensorimotor Speech Disorders New York: Thieme 1997: 311-344
• 2 Rosenbek J C, McNeil M R. A discussion of classification in motor speech disorders. In: Moore CA, Yorkston KM, Beukelman DR, eds. Dysarthria and Apraxia of Speech: Perspectives on Management Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes 1991: 289-294
• 3 Marr D. Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information.  San Francisco, CA: WH Freeman 1982
• 4 Weismer G, Liss J M. Reductionism is a dead-end in speech research: perspectives on a new direction. In: Moore CA, Yorkston KM, Beukelman DR, eds. Dysarthria and Apraxia of Speech: Perspectives on Management Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes 1991: 15-27
• 5 Code C. Models, theories and heuristics in apraxia of speech.  Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics . 1998;  12 47-65
• 6 Wambaugh J L, West J E, Doyle P J. A VOT analysis of apraxic/aphasic voicing errors.  Aphasiology . 1997;  11 521-532
• 7 Duffy J R. Motor Speech Disorders: Substrates, Differential Diagnosis and Management.  St Louis, MO: Mosby 1995
• 8 Nickels L. Spoken Word Production and Its Breakdown in Aphasia.  Hove, UK: Psychology Press 1997
• 9 Ballard K J, Granier J P, Robin D A. Review: understanding the nature of apraxia of speech: theory, analysis and treatment.  Aphasiology . 2000;  14 969-995
• 10 Perkell J, Guenther F, Lane H. Planning and auditory feedback in speech production. In: Maassen B, Hulstijn W, Kent RD, Peters HFM, van Lieshout PHMM, eds. Speech Motor Control in Normal and Disordered Speech Fourth International Speech Motor Conference, June 13-16, 2001. Nijmegen: Unitgeverij Vantilt 2001: 5-11
• 11 Miller N. Apraxia of speech. In: Code C, ed. The Characteristics of Aphasia Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum 1991: 131-154
• 12 Darley F L, Aronson A E, Brown J R. Motor Speech Disorders.  Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders 1975
• 13 Itoh M, Sasanuma S. Articulatory movements in apraxia of speech. In: Rosenbek JC, McNeil MR, Aronson AE, eds. Apraxia of Speech: Physiology, Acoustics, Linguistics, Management San Diego, CA: College-Hill 1984: 135-165
• 14 Dogil G, Mayer J. Selective phonological impairment: a case of apraxia of speech.  Phonology . 1998;  15 143-188
• 15 Wertz R T, LaPointe L, Rosenbek J C. Apraxia of Speech in Adults: The Disorder and Its Management.  Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton 1984
• 16 Van der Merwe A. A theoretical framework for the characterization of pathological speech sensorimotor control. In: McNeil MR, ed. Clinical Management of Sensorimotor Speech Disorders New York: Thieme 1997: 1-25
• 17 Dronkers N F, Redfern B B, Knight R T. The neural architecture of language disorders. In: Gazzaniga MS, ed. The New Cognitive Neurosciences, 2nd ed Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 2000: 949-958
• 18 Kent R D. Clinicoanatomical studies in dysarthria: review, critique, and directions for research.  J Speech Lang Hear Res . 2001;  44 535-551
• 19 Odell K H, Hashi M, Miller S B, McNeil M R. A critical look at the notion of selective impairment.  Clinical Aphasiology . 1995;  23 1-8
• 20 Coltheart M. Editorial.  Cognitive Neuropsychology . 1984;  1 1-8
• 21 Varley R, Whiteside S P. Forum: what is the underlying impairment in acquired apraxia of speech?.  Aphasiology . 2001;  15 39-56
• 22 Saltzman E L, Munhall K G. A dynamical approach to gestural patterning in speech production.  Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research . 1989;  99-100 38-68
• 23 Dronkers N F. A new brain region for coordinating speech articulation.  Nature . 1996;  384 159-161
• 24 McNeil M R, Doyle P J, Wambaugh J. Apraxia of speech: a treatable disorder of motor planning and programming. In: Nadeau SE, Gonzalez Rothi LJ, Crosson B, eds. Aphasia and Language: Theory to Practice New York: Guildford Press 2000: 221-266
• 25 Mesulam M-M. Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language and memory.  Ann Neurol . 1990;  28 597-613
• 26 McNeil M R, Odell K H, Miller S B, Hunter L. Consistency, variability, and target approximation for successive speech repetitions among apraxic, conduction aphasic, and ataxic dysarthric speakers.  Clinical Aphasiology . 1995;  23 39-55
• 27 Duffy J R, Gawle C A. Apraxic speakers' vowel duration in consonant-vowel-consonant syllables. In: Rosenbek JC, McNeil MR, Aronson AE, eds. Apraxia of Speech San Diego, CA: College-Hill 1984: 167-196
• 28 Yorkston K M, Beukelman D R, Bell K R. Clinical Management of Dysarthric Speakers.  Boston, MA: College-Hill 1987
• 29 Rogers M A, Storkel H L. Planning speech one syllable at a time: the reduced buffer capacity hypothesis in apraxia of speech.  Aphasiology . 1999;  13 793-805