Pharmacopsychiatry 2001; 34(4): 119-127
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-15873
Review
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Lithium Augmentation in Depressive Patients Not Responding
to Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors[1]

D. Zullino, P. Baumann
  • Unité de Biochimie et Psychopharmacologie Clinique, Département Universitaire de Psychiatrie Adulte, Prilly-Lausanne, Switzerland
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2001 (online)

Preview

This communication reviews current literature on lithium augmentation in patients not responding to SSRIs, giving some recommendations at the end. A significant proportion of depressive patients do not respond to a first antidepressive treatment independently of the class of drugs used. During the last 10 years, there have been several case reports published about open and controlled studies on the use of lithium augmentation in patients who were non-responders to SSRIs, including citalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine and sertraline. The main underlying hypothesis is a synergistic effect between SSRIs and lithium, which both act on serotonergic neurotransmission. The available studies vary considerably in methodology. There are insufficient results available to confirm a rapid improvement (within 24 - 48 h) after introduction of lithium, but most studies show substantial effects after 1 - 2 weeks, and some after 6 weeks. There is as yet no more clear evidence for a pharmacokinetic interaction between lithium and SSRIs with pharmacodynamic consequences. In conclusion, present evidence suggests that a lithium augmentation in depressive patients who do not respond to SSRIs may be an efficacious and generally well tolerated treatment, with a response rate of at least 50 % after a period lasting 1 - 2 weeks. However, special care is indicated when treating elderly patients, where the risk of adverse effects is higher.

1 This contribution was part of an oral presentation at the ECNP meeting in Vienna, 1997 (Baumann, P. Advantages and disadvantages of lithium augmentation. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 7 (suppl. 2): the S82, 1997. [Abstract])

References

1 This contribution was part of an oral presentation at the ECNP meeting in Vienna, 1997 (Baumann, P. Advantages and disadvantages of lithium augmentation. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 7 (suppl. 2): the S82, 1997. [Abstract])

Daniele ZullinoMD 

Unité de Biochimie et
Psychopharmacologie Clinique
Département Universitaire de
Psychiatrie Adulte

1008 Prilly-Lausanne
Switzerland