PDF icon Download PDF
Semin Speech Lang 2001; 22(2): 149-158
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-13939
Copyright © 2001 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Treating Memory Problems in Adults with Neurogenic Communication Disorders

Lyn S. Turkstra
  • Department of Communication Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2001 (online)

Also available atMedOne
   Permissions and Reprints
Preview

ABSTRACT

Historical approaches to memory therapy have focused on rehearsal or ``relearning'' of memory skills and on compensation for impairments. Whereas the use of rehearsal-based approaches has received little empirical support, the use of external compensatory devices has proved helpful to patients with a variety of neurogenic communication disorders. More recent approaches have capitalized on advances in cognitive psychology, permitting the identification of strengths and weaknesses in specific memory functions, and increasing our understanding of the role of response errors in the therapy process. These advances, together with applied behavioral analysis, allow therapy to be tailored to the cognitive profile of an individual patient, and help explain the successes and failures of earlier techniques. In this article, both historical and current approaches are discussed, and memory therapy guidelines are suggested.

KEYWORD

Memory - therapy - rehabilitation

REFERENCES

  • 1 Carlesimo G A. The rehabilitation of memory. In: Denes G, Pizzamiglio L, eds. Handbook of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology Hove, England: Psychology Press/Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis 1999: 887-897
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Sohlberg M M, Mateer C A. Introduction to Cognitive Rehabilitation: Theory and Practice.  New York: Guilford Press; 1989
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 Rochon E, Waters G S, Caplan D. Sentence comprehension in patients with Alzheimer's disease.  Brain Lang . 1994;  46 329-349
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Turkstra L. The effect of stimulus presentation rate on syntax test performance in brain-injured adolescents.  Aphasiology . 1998;  12 421-433
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Turkstra L S, Holland A L. Working memory and syntax comprehension after adolescent traumatic brain injury.  J Speech Lang Hear Res . 1998;  41 137-149
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Salthouse T A. The aging of working memory.  Neuropsychology . 1994;  8 535-543
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Foos P. Working memory resource allocation by young, middle-aged, and old adults.  Exp Aging Res . 1995;  21 239-250
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Stuss D T, Winocur G, Robertson I H. Cognitive Neurorehabilitation New York: Cambridge University Press 2000
  • 9 Butters M A, Soety E, Becker J T. Memory rehabilitation. In: Nussbaum PD, ed. Handbook of Neuropsychology and Aging New York: Plenum 1997: 515-527
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 10 Stuss D, Winocur G, Robertson I H. Cognitive neurorehabilitation Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1999
  • 11 Lombardi W J, Weingartner H. Pharmacological treatment of impaired memory function. In: Baddeley A, Wilson B, Watts F, eds. Handbook of memory disorders Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons 1995: 578-601
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 12 Berg I J, Koning-Haanstra M, Deelmman B G. Long-term effects of memory rehabilitation: a controlled study.  Neuropsychol Rehabil . 1991;  1 97-111
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Heinrichs R W. Attempted clinical application of a technique for promoting robust free recall to a case of alcoholic Korsakoff's syndrome.  Brain Cognition . 1989;  9 151-157
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Goldstein G, McCue M, Turner S M, Spanier C, Malec E A, Shelly C. An efficacy study of memory training for patients with closed-head injury.  Clin Neuropsychol . 1988;  2 251-259
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Schacter D, Glisky E. Memory remediation: restoration, alleviation, and the acquisition of domain specific knowledge. In: Uzell B, Gross Y, eds. Clinical Neuropsychology of Intervention Boston: Martinus Nijhoff 1986: 257-282
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 16 Phelps B J, Cheney C D. Memory rehabilitation techniques with brain-injured individuals. In: Cautela JR, Ishaq W, eds. Contemporary Issues in Behavior Therapy: Improving the Human Condition New York: Plenum 1996: 123-133
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 17 Wessells M G. Cognitive Psychology.  New York: Harper & Row; 1982
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 18 Oberg L W, Turkstra L S. The use of elaborative encoding to facilitate vocabulary learning after adolescent traumatic brain injury: two case illustrations.  J Head Trauma Rehabil . 1998;  3 44-62
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Donders J. Memory functioning after traumatic brain injury in children.  Brain Injury . 1993;  7 431-437
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Swanson H L. The effects of central processing strategies on learning disabled, mildly retarded, average, and gifted children's elaborative encod- ing abilities.  J Exp Child Psychol . 1989;  47 370-397
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Wilson B. Success and failure in memory training following a cerebral vascular accident.  Cortex . 1982;  18 581-594
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Gianutsos R. Training the short- and long-term verbal recall of a post-encephalitic amnesic.  J Clin Neuropsychol . 1981;  3 143-153
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Robinson F. Effective Study.  Rev ed. New York: Harper & Row; 1970
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 24 Glasgow R E, Zeiss R A, Barrera M J, Lewinsohn P M. Case studies on remediating memory deficits in brain-damaged individuals.  J Clin Psychol . 1977;  33 1049-1054
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Wilson B A. Memory rehabilitation in brain-injured people. In: Stuss D, Winocur G, Robertson IH, eds. Cognitive Neurorehabilitation Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press 1999: 333-346
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 26 Wilson B A. Coping with memory impairments. In: Davies GM, Logie RH, eds. Memory in Everyday Life Amsterdam: Elsevier Science BV 1993: 461-481
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 27 Kim H J, Burke D T, Dowds M MJ, Boone K A, Park G J. Electronic memory aids for outpatient brain injury: follow-up findings.  Brain Injury . 2000;  14 187-196
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Fahy J F, Whelan J P, Long C J. Memory remediation after severe closed head injury: notebook training vs.  supportive therapy. J Consult Clin Psychol . 1995;  63 484-489
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Turkstra L, Flora T. Compensating for executive function impairments after TBI: a single case study of functional intervention.  2000 (unpublished data).
    PubMed
  • 30 Glisky E L, Glisky M L. Memory rehabilitation in the elderly. In: Stuss D, Winocur G, Robertson IH, eds. Cognitive Neurorehabilitation Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press 1999: 347-361
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 31 Wilson B A, Evans J J, Emslie H, Malinek V. Evaluation of NeuroPage: a new memory aid.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry . 1997;  63 113-115
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Hersh N, Treadgold L. NeuroPage: the rehabilitation of memory dysfunction by prosthetic memory and cueing.  Neurorehabilitation . 1994;  4 187-197
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Rose, F D, Brooks, B M, Attree, E A. A preliminary investigation into the use of virtual environments in memory retraining after vascular brain injury: indications for future strategy?.  Disabil Rehabil . 1999;  21 548-554
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Glisky E L. Computer-assisted instruction for patients with traumatic brain injury: teaching of domain-specific knowledge.  J Head Trauma Rehabil . 1992;  7 1-12
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Schacter D. Implicit expressions of memory in organic amnesia: learning of new facts and associations.  Hum Neurobiol . 1987;  6 107-118
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Squire L R. Memory and Brain.  New York: Oxford University Press; 1987
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 37 Brush J, Camp C. A Therapy Technique for Improving Memory: Spaced Retrieval.  Beachwood, OH: Menorah Park Center for the Aging; 1998
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 38 Ewert J, Levin H S, Watson M G, Kalisky Z. Procedural memory during post-traumatic amnesia in survivors of severe closed head injury.  Arch Neurol . 1989;  46 911-916
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Verfaellie M, Bauer R, Bowers D. Autonomic and behavioral evidence of ``implicit'' memory in amnesia.  Brain Cognition . 1991;  15 10-25
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Glisky E L, Schacter D L. Extending the limits of complex learning in organic amnesia: computer training in a vocational domain.  Neuropsychologia . 1989;  27 107-120
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Brush J, Camp C. Using spaced retrieval as an intervention during speech-language therapy.  Clin Gerontol . 1998;  19 51-64
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Baddeley A, Wilson B A. When implicit learning fails: amnesia and the problem of error elimination.  Neuropsychologia . 1994;  32 53-68
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Wilson B A, Baddeley A, Evans J. Errorless learning in the rehabilitation of memory impaired people.  Neuropsychol Rehabil . 1994;  4 307-326
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Squires E J, Hunkin N M, Parkin A J. Memory notebook training in a case of severe amnesia: generalising from paired associate learning to real life.  Neuropsychol Rehabil . 1996;  6 55-65
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Ylvisaker M, Feeney T J. Collaborative Brain Injury Intervention: Positive Everyday Routines.  San Diego, CA: Singular; 1998
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 46 Ylvisaker M. Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation: Children and Adolescents, 2nd ed. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1998
  • 47 Reynolds E, Turkstra L. A case study of behavioral intervention after childhood traumatic brain injury.  Neurophysiol Neurogen Speech Lang Disord . 1998;  8 6-10
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Levin H S, Peters B H, Kalisky Z. Effects of oral physostigmine and lecithin on memory and attention in closed head-injured patients.  CNS Trauma . 1986;  3 333-342
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Leiter F L, Cummings J L. Pharmacological interventions in Alzheimer's disease. In: Stuss D, Winocur G, Robertson IH, eds. Cognitive Neurorehabilitation Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press 1999: 153-172
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 50 Kaelin D L, Cifu D X, Matthies B. Methylphenidate effect on attention deficit in the acutely brain-injured adult.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 1996;  77 6-9
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Powell J H, Al-Adawi S, Morgan J, Greenwood R J. Motivational deficits after brain injury: effects of bromocriptine in 11 patients.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry . 1996;  60 416-421
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Sloan R L, Brown K W, Pentland B. Fluoxetine as a treatment for emotional lability after brain injury.  Brain Injury . 1992;  6 315-319
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 53 Healey M, Pickens R, Meisch R, McKenna. Effects of clorazepate, diazepam, lorazepam, and placebo on human memory.  J Clin Psychiatry . 1983;  44 436-439
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Vogel D, Carter J E, Carter P B. The Effects of Drugs on Communication Disorders, 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Singular 2000
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 55 Whyte J. Toward rational psychopharmacological treatment: integrating research and clinical practice.  J Head Trauma Rehabil . 1994;  9 91-103
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 56 Prigatano G P. Personality and social aspects of rehabilitation. In: Baddeley AD, Wilson BA, Watts FN, eds. Handbook of Memory Disorders Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons 1995: 604-614
    Search in Google Scholar