Semin Speech Lang
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1809158
Research Article: Adult

A Survey of Communication Partner Training for Individuals with Traumatic Brain Injury in China: Awareness, Benefits, and Barriers

1   Department of Psychological Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
,
2   School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Moravian University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
› Author Affiliations

Funding This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Abstract

Communication partner training (CPT) is an evidence-based treatment approach, applied when working with people with traumatic brain injury (pwTBI). However, all existing programs are available in English only. This article focuses on surveying people in China about their awareness of CPT for pwTBI, and the perceived benefits and challenges of implementing CPT programs, with a view to providing recommendations for optimal services. The authors surveyed 339 medical professional (n = 169) and non-medical professional (n = 170) communication partners to obtain their awareness about CPT. Further, they were asked to identify the potential barriers and benefits of implementing CPT. Potential components that should be considered when developing a CPT program for pwTBI in China were also identified by the communication partners. This article reported low awareness levels about CPT for both medical professional (33.33%) and non-medical professional (22.14%) communication partners. Both groups reported interest in opportunities to receive CPT. The findings of this study will be useful as a guide when developing CPT programs for pwTBI in China. The findings also have implications for the global translation of CPT programs to other languages and countries where they may have a positive impact on the lives of pwTBI and their communication partners.



Publication History

Article published online:
21 May 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • Aaronson, N., Alonso, J., Burnam, A., Lohr, K. N., Patrick, D. L., Perrin, E., & Stein, R. E. (2002). Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 11(3), 193–205
  • Anderson, M. I., Parmenter, T. R., & Mok, M. (2002). The relationship between neurobehavioural problems of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), family functioning and the psychological well-being of the spouse/caregiver: path model analysis. Brain Injury, 16(9), 743–757
  • Arco, L. (2002). Using self-generated feedback for generalising and maintaining staff performance in a rehabilitation program. Behaviour Change, 19(2), 75–89
  • Avramovic, P., Rietdijk, R., Attard, M., Kenny, B., Power, E., & Togher, L. (2023). Cognitive and behavioral digital health interventions for people with traumatic brain injury and their caregivers: a systematic review. Journal of Neurotrauma, 40(3-4), 159–194
  • Behn, N., Francis, J., Togher, L., Hatch, E., Moss, B., & Hilari, K. (2021). Description and effectiveness of communication partner training in TBI: a systematic review. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 36(1), 56–71
  • Behn, N., Francis, J. J., Power, E., Hatch, E., & Hilari, K. (2020). Communication partner training in traumatic brain injury: a UK survey of speech and language therapists' clinical practice. Brain Injury, 34(7), 934–944
  • Behn, N., Togher, L., Power, E., & Heard, R. (2012). Evaluating communication training for paid carers of people with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 26(13-14), 1702–1715
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101
  • Brown, W., Ellis, H., Keegan, L., & Hoepner, J. K. (in press). “I lost all of them but honestly, they lost me”: a qualitative investigation of friendships in ABI. Qualitative Research in Communication Differences and Disorders.
  • Center of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2022). Traumatic brain injury & concussion. Accessed April 28, 2025 at: https://www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/index.html
  • Cermak, C. A., McCabe, S. A., Kuchurean, B., Schaefer, J., Tendera, A., & Beal, D. S. (2022). Parent interventions improve behavior after pediatric traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 37(5), 293–302
  • Christensen, I., Power, E., Togher, L., Brassel, S., Elbourn, E., Folder, N., & Jensen, L. R. (2024). Communication between rehabilitation staff and people with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 34(8), 1071–1109
  • Damschroder, L. J., Reardon, C. M., Widerquist, M. A. O., & Lowery, J. (2022). The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback. Implementation Science, 17, 75
  • Elbourn, E., Brassel, S., Steel, J., & Togher, L. (2024). Perceptions of communication recovery following traumatic brain injury: a qualitative investigation across 2 years. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 59(2), 463–482
  • Elsass, L., & Kinsella, G. (1987). Social interaction following severe closed head injury. Psychological Medicine, 17(1), 67–78
  • Esopenko, C., & Levine, B. (2015). Aging, neurodegenerative disease, and traumatic brain injury: the role of neuroimaging. Journal of Neurotrauma, 32(4), 209–220
  • Fadyl, J. K., Theadom, A., Channon, A., & McPherson, K. M. (2019). Recovery and adaptation after traumatic brain injury in New Zealand: longitudinal qualitative findings over the first two years. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 29(7), 1095–1112
  • Flynn, M. A., Mutlu, B., Duff, M. C., & Turkstra, L. S. (2018). Friendship quality, friendship quantity, and social participation in adults with traumatic brain injury. Seminars in Speech and Language, 39(5), 416–426
  • Goldblum, G., & Alant, E. (2009). Sales assistants serving customers with traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology, 2009(23), 87–109
  • Grayson, L., Brady, M. C., Togher, L., & Ali, M. (2020). A survey of cognitive-communication difficulties following TBI: Are families receiving the training and support they need? International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 55(5), 712–723
  • Hall, A., Hoepner, J. K., Rietdijk, R., & Togher, L. (2025). North American Pilot of TBIconneCT: a social communication intervention via telehealth for individuals with traumatic brain injury and their conversation partners. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, •••, 1–19. Adva nce online publication . 10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00148
  • Hall, Z., Elbourn, E., Togher, L., & Carragher, M. (2023). Co-constructed communication therapy for individuals with acquired brain injury: a systematic review. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders. ( Advance online publication) . Doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12841
  • Hao, G., McCrea, E., McNeilly, L., & Wang, R. (2015). CISHA: the history and development of the Chinese international speech, language and hearing association. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 16(3), 11
  • Hoepner, J. K., Dahl, K. A., Keegan, L. C., & Proud, D. N. (2024). Healthcare perceptions of persons with traumatic brain injuries across providers: shortcomings in the chronic phase of care. Brain Injury, 38(5), 347–354
  • Hoepner, J. K., & Keegan, L. C. (2023). “I avoid interactions with medical professionals as much as possible now”: health care experiences of individuals with traumatic brain injuries. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 32, 848–866
  • Hoepner, J. K., & Olson, S. E. (2018). Joint video self-modeling as a conversational intervention for an individual with traumatic brain injury and his everyday partner: a pilot investigation. Clinical Archives of Communication Disorders, 3(1), 22–41
  • Hopper, T., Holland, A., & Rewega, M. (2002). Conversational coaching: treatment outcomes and future directions. Aphasiology, 16(7), 745–761
  • Jiang, J. Y., Gao, G. Y., Feng, J. F., Mao, Q., Chen, L. G., Yang, X. F., Liu, J. F., Wang, Y. H., Qiu, B. H., & Huang, X. J. (2019). Traumatic brain injury in China. Lancet Neurology, 18(3), 286–295
  • Keegan, L. C., Hoepner, J. K., Togher, L., & Kennedy, M. (2023). Clinically applicable sociolinguistic assessment for cognitive-communication disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 32(2S), 966–976
  • Kersten, P., Cummins, C., Kayes, N., Babbage, D., Elder, H., Foster, A., Weatherall, M., Siegert, R. J., Smith, G., & McPherson, K. (2018). Making sense of recovery after traumatic brain injury through a peer mentoring intervention: a qualitative exploration. BMJ Open, 8(10), e020672
  • Kong, A. P., Chan, K. P., & Jagoe, C. (2021). Systematic review of training communication partners of Chinese-speaking persons with aphasia. Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation, 3(4), 100152
  • MacDonald, S. (2017). Introducing the model of cognitive-communication competence: a model to guide evidence-based communication interventions after brain injury. Brain Injury, 31(13-14), 1760–1780
  • Mańko, G., Markiewicz, K., Chantsoulis, M., Rasmus, A., Łukaszewska, B., & Mirska, N. (2012). Modification of communication barriers in the rehabilitation of TBI patients. Acta Neuropsychologica, 10(4)
  • Miao, M., Power, E., Rietdijk, R., Brunner, M., Togher, L., & Debono, D. (2021). The social brain toolkit: implementation considerations from the development of a suite of novel online social communication training programs for adults With acquired brain injury and their communication partners. Journal of Clinical Practice in Speech-Language Pathology, 23(2), 74–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/22087168.2021.12370319
  • Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. (2023). 国家通用语言文字推广普及工作表彰大会暨2023年国家语委全体委员会议召开 [The commendation meeting for the promotion and popularization of the national common spoken and written language and the 2023 State Language Commission plenary meeting were held]. Chinese Government. Accessed April 28, 2025 at: http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_zzjg/huodong/202305/t20230510_1059081.html
  • Nielsen, A. I., Power, E., & Jensen, L. R. (2020). Communication with patients in post-traumatic confusional state: perception of rehabilitation staff. Brain Injury : [BI], 34(4), 447–455
  • Parola, A., Bosco, F. M., Gabbatore, I., Galetto, V., Zettin, M., & Marini, A. (2019). The impact of the Cognitive Pragmatic Treatment on the pragmatic and informative skills of individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Journal of Neurolinguistics, 51, 53–62
  • Petrella, L., McColl, M. A., Krupa, T., & Johnston, J. (2005). Returning to productive activities: perspectives of individuals with long-standing acquired brain injuries. Brain Injury, 19(9), 643–655
  • Rietdijk, R., Power, E., Brunner, M., & Togher, L. (2019). A single case experimental design study on improving social communication skills after traumatic brain injury using communication partner telehealth training. Brain Injury, 33(1), 94–104
  • Rowley, D. A., Rogish, M., Alexander, T., & Riggs, K. J. (2017). Cognitive correlates of pragmatic language comprehension in adult traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Brain Injury, 31(12), 1564–1574
  • Salas, C. E., Casassus, M., Rowlands, L., Pimm, S., & Flanagan, D. A. J. (2018). “Relating through sameness”: a qualitative study of friendship and social isolation in chronic traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 28(7), 1161–1178
  • Simmons-Mackie, N., Raymer, A., Armstrong, E., Holland, A., & Cherney, L. R. (2010). Communication partner training in aphasia: a systematic review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91(12), 1814–1837
  • Togher, L., Douglas, J., Turkstra, L. S., Welch-West, P., Janzen, S., Harnett, A., Kennedy, M., Kua, A., Patsakos, E., Ponsford, J., Teasell, R., Bayley, M. T., & Wiseman-Hakes, C. (2023). INCOG 2.0 guidelines for cognitive rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury, part IV: cognitive-communication and social cognition disorders. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 38(1), 65–82
  • Togher, L., McDonald, S., Tate, R., Power, E., & Rietdijk, R. (2013). Training communication partners of people with severe traumatic brain injury improves everyday conversations: a multicenter single blind clinical trial. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 45(7), 637–645
  • Togher, L., McDonald, S., Tate, R., Rietdijk, R., & Power, E. (2016). The effectiveness of social communication partner training for adults with severe chronic TBI and their families using a measure of perceived communication ability. NeuroRehabilitation, 38(3), 243–255
  • Togher, L., Power, E., Rietdijk, R., McDonald, S., & Tate, R. (2012). An exploration of participant experience of a communication training program for people with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34(18), 1562–1574
  • Wei, G., & Riccardi, J. (2024). Examining speech-language pathology research relating to people with traumatic brain injury in China: a scoping review. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 31(5). ( Advance online publication). Doi: 10.12968/ijtr.2023.0138
  • Wei, G., Yuan, A., Tian, R., & Liu, K. (2024). Speech-language pathology in China: an overview. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 9(3), 877–882
  • Wiseman-Hakes, C., Ryu, H., Lightfoot, D., Kukreja, G., Colantonio, A., & Matheson, F. I. (2019). Examining the efficacy of communication partner training for improving communication interactions and outcomes for individuals with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation, 2(1), 100036
  • World Health Organization. (n.d.). Ageing and health in China. Accessed April 28, 2025 at: https://www.who.int/china/health-topics/ageing
  • Yeates, K. O., Taylor, H. G., Walz, N. C., Stancin, T., & Wade, S. L. (2010). The family environment as a moderator of psychosocial outcomes following traumatic brain injury in young children. Neuropsychology, 24(3), 345–356