RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1809064
Triggering Factors of Arthrofibrosis Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Artikel in mehreren Sprachen: español | EnglishAbstract
Arthrofibrosis corresponds to an intra- and periarticular invasion of fibrous tissue responsible for joint ankylosis. It is a complication that arises due to multiple factors that promote excessive proliferation of myofibroblasts, regulated by reduced apoptosis, adhesions, and aggressive synthesis of extracellular matrix. An incidence of 5–35% has been reported, which is higher in women. The most common triggering factors include the presence of concomitant injuries in the knee joint, limited preoperative range of motion, chronic inflammation in the knee prior to surgery, surgical trauma, errors in surgical technique, postoperative infection, inadequate rehabilitation, and prolonged immobilization after surgery. Understanding the etiology of this condition is essential to identify individuals at higher risk of developing this complication and to develop prevention strategies and appropriate treatment to minimize the risk of arthrofibrosis.
Introduction
The anterior cruciate ligament is an essential structure for knee stability, providing resistance to excessive forward displacement of the tibia relative to the femur. The femur is composed of collagen fibers surrounded by loose connective tissue and synovial fluid. Injury to the ligament can result in joint instability and functional limitations. ACL reconstruction surgery is a commonly performed procedure to restore knee stability, but it can lead to complications such as arthrofibrosis.
Arthrofibrosis is defined as the diffuse proliferation of scar tissue within a joint, forming adhesions between joint structures. This process produces inflammatory agents, growth factors, and cytokines, which initiate a series of events that generate extracellular matrix production. This process, when overexpressed, causes the tissue to become proinflammatory and fibrosis to develop. After surgery, arthrofibrosis manifests as severe pain with limited joint mobility in extension, flexion, or both, with an immobile patella causing knee stiffness. The identification and timely management of these factors can prevent, as far as possible, the appearance of arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Materials and Methods
Inductive method. Conducting a retrospective longitudinal descriptive study.
Biological Factors
The biological factors that make an individual more likely to develop arthrofibrosis are genetic predisposition, age, gender, and weight, the latter being the only modifiable factor when considering prevention. Regarding genetic predisposition, presenting the alleles HLA-Cw*07, HLA-Cw*08 and HLA-DQB1*06 predisposes to the development of arthrofibrosis, although it is not yet clear whether this is due to weakened defense mechanisms or increased susceptibility. The allele that has been detected in the highest proportion is HLA Cw*08.[1] [2]
The incidence increases in children under 18 years of age, due to the increasing prevalence of ACL injuries in the active adolescent population and in older adults, especially those over 40 years of age, due to degenerative changes in the joint. The age-related risk of developing arthrofibrosis is attributed to the mechanism of injury, activity level, and preoperative factors.[3] [4]
Females are 2.5 to 2.8 times more likely to develop arthrofibrosis, which is attributed to a combination of social, psychological, musculoskeletal, and hormonal factors. These include social pressure, fear and anxiety, joint laxity and muscle strength, smaller femoral notch, estrogen levels, and the menstrual cycle.[4] [5] [6]
A high body mass index increases the risk of ACL rupture and of developing arthrofibrosis following its reconstruction. This is associated with participation in high-impact sports.[7] An HbA1c greater than 6.5% is associated with a higher risk of arthrofibrosis, with a rate of 44%, the probability of its development is 16 times higher compared to those who do not suffer from diabetes, this is due to both systemic and localized inflammation observed due to diabetes and surgical intervention.[8]
Trauma-Related Factors
According to the literature, meniscal and concomitant ligament injuries contribute to 5.2% of the development of arthrofibrosis following ACL reconstruction. The development of arthrofibrosis associated with meniscal injury is primarily due to meniscal suturing and a restrictive rehabilitation regimen following surgery.[9] Injuries to three or more ligaments requiring surgical intervention are associated with increased stiffness. Damage to articular cartilage due to the injury increases the risk of arthrofibrosis due to the formation of bone hematomas. More severe ACL injuries are more likely to develop arthrofibrosis because extensive soft tissue damage provokes a more intense inflammatory response and requires a longer surgical time.[10]
Surgical Factors
Surgical factors such as early surgical intervention, reduced preoperative range of motion (ROM), graft type, poor graft placement, extra-articular procedures, and meniscus repair favor increased myofibroblast proliferation and reduced apoptosis, leading to increased concentration of myofibroblasts in the synovial membrane, causing arthrofibrosis.[10] [11]
The most important factor in the development of arthrofibrosis is the time elapsed between the injury and surgery. Performing surgery before muscle tone and full mobility has been restored increases the risk of arthrofibrosis. It should be delayed until the inflammatory response subsides and the knee has significantly improved, as evidenced by a reduction in edema, swelling, and joint effusion, along with improved mobility.[7] [12]
According to current guidelines, surgery is performed between the 3rd week and the 5th month after the injury, ideally in the first 3 months, to allow for the reduction of irritation, initiate preoperative rehabilitation, and minimize the risk of damage to other tissues. After the 5th month, the risk of meniscal and chondral injuries increases.[5] [13] [14] [15]
Studies have shown that a reduced preoperative knee ROM is a risk factor for arthrofibrosis because the preoperative range of motion predicts the arc of motion after ligament reconstruction.[16] Preoperative rehabilitation should be initiated, consisting of short-term progressive exercise therapy focused on maximizing ROM and improving knee function.[17]
The choice of graft for ACL reconstruction may influence the development of arthrofibrosis. Previous studies have identified that patellar tendon and quadriceps tendon autografts pose a higher risk due to their greater stiffness and higher collagen content.[4] However, patellar tendon autograft remains the gold standard for ACL reconstruction due to its rapid integration into bone tunnels compared to other grafts. Studies suggest that allografts are associated with a lower risk of arthrofibrosis than autografts.[13]
Technical errors during ACL reconstruction are the main cause of failure of primary surgery. Improper graft positioning and excessive tension are most often associated with the development of arthrofibrosis. Tension depends on the position of the femoral and tibial tunnels, as they determine the graft insertion points. Ideally, the graft should be positioned at the anatomical site of the ACL; its correct placement achieves tension similar to that of the native ACL.[18] [19] [20]
During reconstruction, the reaction to debridement, perforation during tibial tunnel formation, and microtrauma of the graft are traumas to the soft tissues and the joint itself, which lead to an inflammatory response, promote the activation and proliferation of fibroblasts, resulting in the formation of a large amount of extracellular matrix and, ultimately, in the formation of fibrosis.[21] [22]
ACL reconstruction with concomitant procedures increases surgical trauma to the joint, triggering a more intense inflammatory response and predisposing to the development of arthrofibrosis.[23] [24] Repair of other ligaments is associated with longer postoperative immobilization. Meniscal repair increases the risk of arthrofibrosis by 10% due to a more restrictive rehabilitation protocol.[5]
Post-surgical Factors
Postoperative factors that influence the development of arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction include prolonged immobilization, inadequate rehabilitation, complex regional pain syndrome, infection, hematoma, and synovitis.[7] These factors promote a chronically inflamed joint, which undergoes cycles of oxidative stress in which cytokines and growth factors are released that intensify the inflammatory response, increasing the recruitment of inflammatory cells that promote fibroblast proliferation and reduce vascularization, leading to arthrofibrosis.[25]
Prolonged postoperative immobilization results in some degree of permanent loss of mobility, primarily 2-week immobilization.[1] An immobilized joint following trauma favors elevated levels of transforming growth factor beta 1 mRNA and proteins, which is chemoattractant and mitogenic for fibroblasts that can upregulate collagen synthesis due to the release of growth factors and proteases mediated by myofibroblasts and mast cells, this produces excess collagen in the joint which leads to stiffness and fibrosis.[26]
Inadequate postoperative rehabilitation promotes knee pain and inflammation, resulting in the formation of scar tissue that causes arthrofibrosis.[7] [12] Therapy begins without resistance for the first 2 weeks to reduce joint irritation, and resistance is added after 6 weeks. Continuous passive motion reduces the risk of postoperative stiffness by reducing pain and initiating joint movement early.[27]
Fear of pain or damage to the ligament reconstruction leads to avoidance of movements perceived as risky, and postoperative pain and inflammation lead to avoidance of full range of motion, limiting joint ROM. Inadequate pain management limits the ability to perform movements necessary to regain active knee range of motion. Analgesia and functional rehabilitation are crucial to prevent the progression of arthrofibrosis. Providing an educational plan and incorporating neuromuscular education techniques can benefit the patient.[28]
Infection following ACL reconstruction is a complication that can occur in approximately 0.14–5.7% of cases and reduces the likelihood of a good functional outcome due to knee stiffness and cartilage damage. It manifests as a very swollen and painful knee, limited ROM, a sudden increase in throbbing pain, persistent and rapidly increasing joint effusion, local erythema, warmth, intermittent fever, and hyperemia with discharge. Infection is primarily of bacterial origin and is due to contamination of the graft with bacterial flora from the skin during harvesting or graft preparation.[29] [30]
A hematoma after ACL reconstruction increases the risk of developing arthrofibrosis because blood products generate an accumulation of inflammatory mediators in the joint that promote the formation of excessive scar tissue. It is characterized by persistent pain, and swelling, reduces the patient's willingness to begin rehabilitation, and is mainly associated with the use of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. Agents such as low molecular weight heparin, factor Xa inhibitors, fondaparinux, and warfarin increase the risk of requiring another intervention for arthrofibrosis 2.6 times more, while the use of aspirin does not.[5] [31]
Conclusion
Arthrofibrosis following ACL reconstruction has a multifactorial etiology, with key factors including sex, age, genetic predisposition, timing of the surgical intervention, reduced preoperative range of motion, graft type, technical errors, prolonged immobilization, inadequate rehabilitation, infection, and hematoma. These factors dysregulate the inflammatory response, leading to excessive extracellular matrix production and the development of fibrosis. Early identification of these factors can reduce the risk of arthrofibrosis development.
ACL reconstruction requires careful preoperative planning and meticulous surgical technique. Graft selection should be individualized and meet the biomechanical properties of the native ACL. It is important to consider that certain graft types and surgical techniques may increase the risk of arthrofibrosis. Currently, patellar tendon autografts are more commonly associated with this complication, whereas the use of allografts is linked to a reduced risk.
Conflicto de Interés
Ninguno.
Evidence Level
EBM: Recommendation: Grade A Level of Scientific Evidence: Level IV
-
Referencias Bibliográficas
- 1 Figueroa D, Espinoza J, Yañez C, Bernal N. Rigidez en cirugía de reconstrucción del ligamento cruzado anterior. Rev Chil Ortop Traumatol 2018; 59 (03) 95-99
- 2 Skutek M, Elsner HA, Slateva K. et al. Screening for arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: analysis of association with human leukocyte antigen. Arthroscopy 2004; 20 (05) 469-473 citado 14Mayo2024 [en línea]
- 3 Price MJ, Tuca M, Cordasco FA, Green DW. Nonmodifiable risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury. Curr Opin Pediatr 2017; 29 (01) 55-64 citado 16Abr2024 [en línea]
- 4 Agarwal AR, Harris AB, Tarawneh O. et al. Delay of timing of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with lower risk of arthrofibrosis requiring intervention. Arthroscopy 2023; 39 (07) 1682-1689.e2 citado 7Mayo2024 [en línea]
- 5 Sanders TL, Kremers HM, Bryan AJ, Kremers WK, Stuart MJ, Krych AJ. Procedural intervention for arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction: trends over two decades. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (02) 532-537
- 6 Haley RM, Lamplot JD, Myer GD. et al. Localized anterior arthrofibrosis after soft-tissue quadriceps tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is more common in patients who are female, undergo meniscal repair, and have grafts of larger diameter. Arthroscopy 2023; 39 (06) 1472-1479 citado 8Feb2024 [en línea]
- 7 Dauty M, Menu P, Grondin J, Crenn V, Daley P, Fouasson-Chailloux A. Arthrofibrosis risk factors after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Front Sports Act Living 2023; 5: 1264150
- 8 Lavoie-Gagne O, Nukala V, Berkson EM. et al. Hemoglobin A1c levels >6.6% are associated with higher postoperative complications after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2024; 6 (01) 100843 citado 7Mayo2024 [en línea]
- 9 Bierke S, Abdelativ Y, Hees T. et al. Risk of arthrofibrosis in anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the role of timing and meniscus suture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2021; 141 (05) 743-750 citado 17Abr2024 [en línea]
- 10 Dunn WR, Spindler KP, Amendola A. et al; MOON ACL Investigation. Which preoperative factors, including bone bruise, are associated with knee pain/symptoms at index anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR)? A Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) ACLR Cohort Study. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38 (09) 1778-1787 citado 17Abr2024 [en línea]
- 11 Ly T-D, Sambale M, Klösener L. et al. Understanding of arthrofibrosis: New explorative insights into extracellular matrix remodeling of synovial fibroblasts. PLoS One 2023; 18 (05) e0286334 citado 4Abr2024 [en línea]
- 12 Phillips B, Mihalko M. Artroscopia del miembro inferior. En: Azar FM, Beauty JH. Campbell. Cirugía ortopédica. 14 ed. Barcelona: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2022. : p. 2640.
- 13 Rangel F, Hernández G, Macías E, López L, Gutiérrez I. Estado actual de la reconstrucción del ligamento cruzado anterior en México. Encuesta nacional. Ortho Tips 2023; 19 (01) 5-10
- 14 Harris MC, Venrick C, Hines AC. et al. Prospective evaluation of range of motion in acute acl reconstruction using patellar tendon autograft. Orthop J Sports Med 2019; 7 (10) 2325967119875415 citado 17Abr2024 [en línea]
- 15 von Essen C, Eriksson K, Barenius B. Acute ACL reconstruction shows superior clinical results and can be performed safely without an increased risk of developing arthrofibrosis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2020; 28 (07) 2036-2043 citado 7Mar2024 [en línea]
- 16 Ferrer Benito A, Félez Sánchez A, Comet Cepero B, Remírez Vicario N, Coronas Turmo S, Espeso Ambroj N. Efectividad de la rehabilitación preoperatoria en lesiones de ligamento cruzado anterior. Revisión sistemática. Rev Sanit Investig [en línea]. 2022 [citado 8 Feb 2024]; 3(3): 64. Disponible en: https://revistasanitariadeinvestigacion.com/efectividad-de-la-rehabilitacion-preoperatoria-en-lesiones-de-ligamento-cruzado-anterior-revision-sistematica/ 28
- 17 Eitzen I, Moksnes H, Snyder-Mackler L, Risberg MA. A progressive 5-week exercise therapy program leads to significant improvement in knee function early after anterior cruciate ligament injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010; 40 (11) 705-721 citado 16Abr2024 [en línea]
- 18 Villalba JF, Bennet C, Gutiérrez D. En la búsqueda de predictores que nos ayuden a obtener un mejor resultado en la cirugía de revisión de ligamento cruzado anterior. Artroscopia [en línea]. 2023 [citado 7 Abr 2024]; 30(01): 16-20. Disponible en: https://revistaartroscopia.com.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/279/307
- 19 Fleites Santisteban E, Lara Valdivia JE, Álvarez Cambras RJ. Reconstrucción del ligamento cruzado anterior asistida por artroscopia, evolución a los 2 años. Rev Cubana Ortop Traumatol [en línea]. 2016 [citado 9 Abr 2024]; 30(1): 88-102. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864 215 × 2016000100008&lng = es.
- 20 Figueroa F, Figueroa D, Calvo R, Vaisman A, Morales N, Paccot D. Reconstrucción de ligamento cruzado anterior con técnica anatómica: resultados. Revisión bibliográfica y experiencia personal. Artroscopia [en línea]. 2015 [citado 7 Abr 2024]; 22(3): 71-77. Disponible en: https://www.revistaartroscopia.com.ar/ediciones-anteriores/images/artroscopia/volumen-22-nro-3/PDF/22_03_04_Figueroa.pdf
- 21 Ghisi JP, Schneebeli G, Lamanna A. Instrucción ortopédica de posgrado - imágenes. Resolución del caso. Rev Asoc Argent Ortop Traumatol 2019; 84 (02) 188-196 citado 7 Mar 2024 [en línea]
- 22 Jia D, Chen H, Dai J. et al. Human infrapatellar fat pad mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles inhibit fibroblast proliferation by regulating mt2a to reduce knee arthrofibrosis. Stem Cells Int 2023; 2023 (01) 9067621 citado 17Abr2024 [en línea]
- 23 Álvarez López A, García Lorenzo Y, Puentes Álvarez A, García Lorenzo M. Artrofibrosis de la rodilla. Archivo Médico Camagüey [en línea]. 2014 [citado 4 Abr 2024];14 (4). Disponible en: https://revistaamc.sld.cu/index.php/amc/article/view/2335/771
- 24 Lee DR, Therrien E, Song BM. et al. Arthrofibrosis nightmares: prevention and management strategies. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 2022; 30 (01) 29-41
- 25 Martinez-Lozano E, Beeram I, Yeritsyan D. et al. Management of arthrofibrosis in neuromuscular disorders: a review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23 (01) 725 citado 28Abr2024 [en línea]
- 26 Chen AF, Lee YS, Seidl AJ, Abboud JA. Arthrofibrosis and large joint scarring. Connect Tissue Res 2019; 60 (01) 21-28 citado 17Abr2024 [en línea]
- 27 Solanki RB, Bhise AR. Arthrofibrosis following total knee arthroplasty. Int J Physiother Res 2014; 2 (06) 762-765 citado 16 Abr 2024 [en línea]
- 28 Eckenrode BJ, Carey JL, Sennett BJ, Zgonis MH. Prevention and management of post operative complications following acl reconstruction. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2017; 10 (03) 315-321 citado 28Abr2024 [en línea]
- 29 Rivarola H, Collazo C, Palanconi M. et al. Infección asociada a reconstrucción del ligamento cruzado anterior. Artroscopia [en línea]. 2014 [cita 17 Abr 2024]; 21(4): 110-114. Disponible en: https://revistaartroscopia.com.ar/ediciones-anteriores/images/artroscopia/volumen-21-nro-4/PDF/RA_21_04_Rivarola.pdf
- 30 García-Mansilla I, Zuain A, Zícaro JP, Yacuzzi C, Costa-Paz M. Preparación del injerto con vancomicina y su incidencia en la disminución de infección luego de la 31 reconstrucción del LCA. Artroscopia [en línea]. 2022 [citado 9 Abr 2024]; 29(1): 08-13. Disponible en: https://www.revistaartroscopia.com.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/241/218
- 31 Qin C, Qin MM, Baker H, Shi LL, Strelzow J, Athiviraham A. Pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis other than aspirin is associated with increased risk for procedural intervention for arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2021; 37 (02) 619-623
Address for correspondence
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 19. März 2025
Angenommen: 02. April 2025
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
20. Mai 2025
© 2025. Sociedad Chilena de Ortopedia y Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua Rego Freitas, 175, loja 1, República, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01220-010, Brazil
-
Referencias Bibliográficas
- 1 Figueroa D, Espinoza J, Yañez C, Bernal N. Rigidez en cirugía de reconstrucción del ligamento cruzado anterior. Rev Chil Ortop Traumatol 2018; 59 (03) 95-99
- 2 Skutek M, Elsner HA, Slateva K. et al. Screening for arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: analysis of association with human leukocyte antigen. Arthroscopy 2004; 20 (05) 469-473 citado 14Mayo2024 [en línea]
- 3 Price MJ, Tuca M, Cordasco FA, Green DW. Nonmodifiable risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury. Curr Opin Pediatr 2017; 29 (01) 55-64 citado 16Abr2024 [en línea]
- 4 Agarwal AR, Harris AB, Tarawneh O. et al. Delay of timing of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with lower risk of arthrofibrosis requiring intervention. Arthroscopy 2023; 39 (07) 1682-1689.e2 citado 7Mayo2024 [en línea]
- 5 Sanders TL, Kremers HM, Bryan AJ, Kremers WK, Stuart MJ, Krych AJ. Procedural intervention for arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction: trends over two decades. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (02) 532-537
- 6 Haley RM, Lamplot JD, Myer GD. et al. Localized anterior arthrofibrosis after soft-tissue quadriceps tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is more common in patients who are female, undergo meniscal repair, and have grafts of larger diameter. Arthroscopy 2023; 39 (06) 1472-1479 citado 8Feb2024 [en línea]
- 7 Dauty M, Menu P, Grondin J, Crenn V, Daley P, Fouasson-Chailloux A. Arthrofibrosis risk factors after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Front Sports Act Living 2023; 5: 1264150
- 8 Lavoie-Gagne O, Nukala V, Berkson EM. et al. Hemoglobin A1c levels >6.6% are associated with higher postoperative complications after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2024; 6 (01) 100843 citado 7Mayo2024 [en línea]
- 9 Bierke S, Abdelativ Y, Hees T. et al. Risk of arthrofibrosis in anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the role of timing and meniscus suture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2021; 141 (05) 743-750 citado 17Abr2024 [en línea]
- 10 Dunn WR, Spindler KP, Amendola A. et al; MOON ACL Investigation. Which preoperative factors, including bone bruise, are associated with knee pain/symptoms at index anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR)? A Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) ACLR Cohort Study. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38 (09) 1778-1787 citado 17Abr2024 [en línea]
- 11 Ly T-D, Sambale M, Klösener L. et al. Understanding of arthrofibrosis: New explorative insights into extracellular matrix remodeling of synovial fibroblasts. PLoS One 2023; 18 (05) e0286334 citado 4Abr2024 [en línea]
- 12 Phillips B, Mihalko M. Artroscopia del miembro inferior. En: Azar FM, Beauty JH. Campbell. Cirugía ortopédica. 14 ed. Barcelona: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2022. : p. 2640.
- 13 Rangel F, Hernández G, Macías E, López L, Gutiérrez I. Estado actual de la reconstrucción del ligamento cruzado anterior en México. Encuesta nacional. Ortho Tips 2023; 19 (01) 5-10
- 14 Harris MC, Venrick C, Hines AC. et al. Prospective evaluation of range of motion in acute acl reconstruction using patellar tendon autograft. Orthop J Sports Med 2019; 7 (10) 2325967119875415 citado 17Abr2024 [en línea]
- 15 von Essen C, Eriksson K, Barenius B. Acute ACL reconstruction shows superior clinical results and can be performed safely without an increased risk of developing arthrofibrosis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2020; 28 (07) 2036-2043 citado 7Mar2024 [en línea]
- 16 Ferrer Benito A, Félez Sánchez A, Comet Cepero B, Remírez Vicario N, Coronas Turmo S, Espeso Ambroj N. Efectividad de la rehabilitación preoperatoria en lesiones de ligamento cruzado anterior. Revisión sistemática. Rev Sanit Investig [en línea]. 2022 [citado 8 Feb 2024]; 3(3): 64. Disponible en: https://revistasanitariadeinvestigacion.com/efectividad-de-la-rehabilitacion-preoperatoria-en-lesiones-de-ligamento-cruzado-anterior-revision-sistematica/ 28
- 17 Eitzen I, Moksnes H, Snyder-Mackler L, Risberg MA. A progressive 5-week exercise therapy program leads to significant improvement in knee function early after anterior cruciate ligament injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010; 40 (11) 705-721 citado 16Abr2024 [en línea]
- 18 Villalba JF, Bennet C, Gutiérrez D. En la búsqueda de predictores que nos ayuden a obtener un mejor resultado en la cirugía de revisión de ligamento cruzado anterior. Artroscopia [en línea]. 2023 [citado 7 Abr 2024]; 30(01): 16-20. Disponible en: https://revistaartroscopia.com.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/279/307
- 19 Fleites Santisteban E, Lara Valdivia JE, Álvarez Cambras RJ. Reconstrucción del ligamento cruzado anterior asistida por artroscopia, evolución a los 2 años. Rev Cubana Ortop Traumatol [en línea]. 2016 [citado 9 Abr 2024]; 30(1): 88-102. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864 215 × 2016000100008&lng = es.
- 20 Figueroa F, Figueroa D, Calvo R, Vaisman A, Morales N, Paccot D. Reconstrucción de ligamento cruzado anterior con técnica anatómica: resultados. Revisión bibliográfica y experiencia personal. Artroscopia [en línea]. 2015 [citado 7 Abr 2024]; 22(3): 71-77. Disponible en: https://www.revistaartroscopia.com.ar/ediciones-anteriores/images/artroscopia/volumen-22-nro-3/PDF/22_03_04_Figueroa.pdf
- 21 Ghisi JP, Schneebeli G, Lamanna A. Instrucción ortopédica de posgrado - imágenes. Resolución del caso. Rev Asoc Argent Ortop Traumatol 2019; 84 (02) 188-196 citado 7 Mar 2024 [en línea]
- 22 Jia D, Chen H, Dai J. et al. Human infrapatellar fat pad mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles inhibit fibroblast proliferation by regulating mt2a to reduce knee arthrofibrosis. Stem Cells Int 2023; 2023 (01) 9067621 citado 17Abr2024 [en línea]
- 23 Álvarez López A, García Lorenzo Y, Puentes Álvarez A, García Lorenzo M. Artrofibrosis de la rodilla. Archivo Médico Camagüey [en línea]. 2014 [citado 4 Abr 2024];14 (4). Disponible en: https://revistaamc.sld.cu/index.php/amc/article/view/2335/771
- 24 Lee DR, Therrien E, Song BM. et al. Arthrofibrosis nightmares: prevention and management strategies. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 2022; 30 (01) 29-41
- 25 Martinez-Lozano E, Beeram I, Yeritsyan D. et al. Management of arthrofibrosis in neuromuscular disorders: a review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23 (01) 725 citado 28Abr2024 [en línea]
- 26 Chen AF, Lee YS, Seidl AJ, Abboud JA. Arthrofibrosis and large joint scarring. Connect Tissue Res 2019; 60 (01) 21-28 citado 17Abr2024 [en línea]
- 27 Solanki RB, Bhise AR. Arthrofibrosis following total knee arthroplasty. Int J Physiother Res 2014; 2 (06) 762-765 citado 16 Abr 2024 [en línea]
- 28 Eckenrode BJ, Carey JL, Sennett BJ, Zgonis MH. Prevention and management of post operative complications following acl reconstruction. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2017; 10 (03) 315-321 citado 28Abr2024 [en línea]
- 29 Rivarola H, Collazo C, Palanconi M. et al. Infección asociada a reconstrucción del ligamento cruzado anterior. Artroscopia [en línea]. 2014 [cita 17 Abr 2024]; 21(4): 110-114. Disponible en: https://revistaartroscopia.com.ar/ediciones-anteriores/images/artroscopia/volumen-21-nro-4/PDF/RA_21_04_Rivarola.pdf
- 30 García-Mansilla I, Zuain A, Zícaro JP, Yacuzzi C, Costa-Paz M. Preparación del injerto con vancomicina y su incidencia en la disminución de infección luego de la 31 reconstrucción del LCA. Artroscopia [en línea]. 2022 [citado 9 Abr 2024]; 29(1): 08-13. Disponible en: https://www.revistaartroscopia.com.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/241/218
- 31 Qin C, Qin MM, Baker H, Shi LL, Strelzow J, Athiviraham A. Pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis other than aspirin is associated with increased risk for procedural intervention for arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2021; 37 (02) 619-623