Transabdominal Robotic Harvest of Bilateral DIEP Pedicles in Breast Reconstruction: Technique and Interdisciplinary Approach

Abstract

Background The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction. However, the conventional procedure's anterior sheath division, from perforating vessels to the pedicle origin, risks weakening the abdominal wall's primary strength layer. Employing the da Vinci Xi Surgical System with indocyanine green dye and near-infrared fluorescence imaging, we refined a robotic technique for bilateral DIEP flap harvest. This approach enhances safety during vessel dissection, utilizing smaller fascial incisions. This study will present this technique in detail to microsurgeons interested in robotic DIEP flaps.

Methods In a retrospective cohort study spanning July 2021 to September 2022, female patients undergoing robotic bilateral DIEP flap reconstruction were analyzed. Following suprafascial flap dissection, the surgical robot was docked to target the pelvis, identifying and exposing deep inferior epigastric vessels intracorporeally. Mobilization and division occurred at their bases, with retrieval through a minimal anterior fascial incision, minimizing disruption to the abdominal wall and its motor innervation.

Results The study comprised 23 patients (46 flaps), with a mean fascial length of 4.1 cm and mean pedicle length of 12.82 cm. Mesh usage was absent. Robotic time averaged 139 minutes, overall case length was 739 minutes, and the average length of stay was 3.9 days. Notably, no pedicle or intra-abdominal injuries were reported.

Conclusion This technique ensures safe and efficient pedicle dissection in robotic DIEP flap harvests. Given the limited number of plastic surgeons adept in minimally invasive abdominal surgeries, we recommend collaborative efforts, with general surgeons initially assisting microsurgeons in adopting the robotic approach. This strategy facilitates a smooth transition until plastic surgeons attain confidence and competence in independent robotic dissection.

Keywords

free flap - robotic surgery - DIEP flap

Publication History

Received: 03 January 2024

Accepted: 19 July 2024

Article published online:
27 August 2024

• References

• 1 Uroskie TW, Colen LB. History of breast reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg 2004; 18 (02) 65-69
• 2 Vyas RM, Dickinson BP, Fastekjian JH, Watson JP, DaLio AL, Crisera CA. Risk factors for abdominal donor-site morbidity in free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (05) 1519-1526
• 3 Haddock NT, Culver AJ, Teotia SS. Abdominal weakness, bulge, or hernia after DIEP flaps: an algorithm of management, prevention, and surgical repair with classification. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 74 (09) 2194-2201
• 4 Selber JC. The robotic DIEP flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (02) 340-343
• 5 Tsai CY, Kim BS, Kuo WL. et al. Novel port placement in robot-assisted DIEP flap harvest improves visibility and bilateral DIEP access: early controlled cohort study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 152 (04) 590e-595e
• 6 Lee MJ, Won J, Song SY. et al. Clinical outcomes following robotic versus conventional DIEP flap in breast reconstruction: a retrospective matched study. Front Oncol 2022; 12: 989231
• 7 Daar DA, Anzai LM, Vranis NM. et al. Robotic deep inferior epigastric perforator flap harvest in breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 2022; 42 (04) 319-325
• 8 Choi JH, Song SY, Park HS. et al. Robotic DIEP flap harvest through a totally extraperitoneal approach using a single-port surgical robotic system. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 148 (02) 304-307
• 9 Kurlander DE, Le-Petross HT, Shuck JW, Butler CE, Selber JC. Robotic DIEP patient selection: analysis of CT angiography. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021; 9 (12) e3970
• 10 Moon HK, Taylor GI. The vascular anatomy of rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps based on the deep superior epigastric system. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988; 82 (05) 815-832
• 11 Nelson W, Murariu D, Moreira AA. Indocyanine green-guided near-infrared fluorescence enhances vascular anatomy in robot-assisted DIEP flap harvest. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024; 154 (04) 796-798
• 12 Khan MTA, Won BW, Baumgardner K. et al. Literature review: robotic-assisted harvest of deep inferior epigastric flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2022; 89 (06) 703-708
• 13 Bishop SN, Selber JC. Minimally invasive robotic breast reconstruction surgery. Gland Surg 2021; 10 (01) 469-478
• 14 Tanna N, Sugiyama G, Smith ML. et al. The full continuum of robotic breast surgery: robotic-assisted mastectomy, robotic DIEP flap, and robotic supermicrosurgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2023; 11 (12) e5491
• 15 Roy N, Alessandro CJ, Ibelli TJ. et al. The expanding utility of robotic-assisted flap harvest in autologous breast reconstruction: a systematic review. J Clin Med 2023; 12 (15) 4951
• 16 Dayaratna N, Ahmadi N, Mak C, Dusseldorp JR. Robotic-assisted deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap harvest for breast reconstruction. ANZ J Surg 2023; 93 (04) 1072-1074
• 17 Manrique OJ, Bustos SS, Mohan AT. et al. Robotic-assisted DIEP flap harvest for autologous breast reconstruction: a comparative feasibility study on a cadaveric model. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (05) 362-368
• 18 Garvey PB, Buchel EW, Pockaj BA. et al. DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a comparison of outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (06) 1711-1719 , discussion 1720–1721
• 19 Martinez CA, Boutros SG. Abdominoplasty and breast augmentation with outpatient cosmetic deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 151 (02) 234e-240e
• 20 Shakir S, Spencer AB, Kozak GM, Nathan SL, Soriano IS, Kanchwala SK. Laproscopically assisted DIEP flap harvest minimizes fascial incision in autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 146 (03) 265e-275e
• 21 Tonouchi H, Ohmori Y, Kobayashi M, Kusunoki M. Trocar site hernia. Arch Surg 2004; 139 (11) 1248-1256
• 22 Owens M, Barry M, Janjua AZ, Winter DC. A systematic review of laparoscopic port site hernias in gastrointestinal surgery. Surgeon 2011; 9 (04) 218-224
• 23 Cohen RV, Alvarez G, Roll S. et al. Transabdominal or totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair?. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1998; 8 (04) 264-268
• 24 Gass M, Banz VM, Rosella L, Adamina M, Candinas D, Güller U. TAPP or TEP? Population-based analysis of prospective data on 4,552 patients undergoing endoscopic inguinal hernia repair. World J Surg 2012; 36 (12) 2782-2786
• 25 Chen B, Bailey E, Nelson W. et al. Learning curve for robotic-assisted harvest of deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: comparison between a general surgeon and a plastic surgeon performing the robotic dissection. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2023; 11 (10S): 29-30