The Eyelid Trans-orbital Trans-cavernous Approach to the Basilar Apex: A Cadaveric Proof-of-Concept Study

Abstract

Objective The pretemporal transcavernous approach is an elegant technique that provides exposure to the basilar apex, which is conventionally completed with a frontotemporal incision. This can also be performed via a minimally invasive eyelid transorbital approach, which has unique attributes. This is a proof-of-concept cadaveric study to demonstrate details of the combination of these two approaches.

Design This study is a proof-of-concept study using cadaveric heads.

Setting This study is a proof-of-concept study in a cadaveric laboratory.

Participants A latex-injected cadaveric head.

Main Outcome Measures Detailed dissection was performed and demonstrated in a step-by-step fashion.

Results The eyelid transorbital approach provides the exact exposure required to complete the pretemporal osteotomy including an anterior clinoidectomy and dissection, so that a transcavernous approach can be completed. The basilar apex and its branches can also be accessed via the eyelid transorbital approach, with comparable exposure to the traditional approach; however, the access trajectory is much narrower. It takes advantages of the inferior corridor with a more medial access angle and provides a complementary perspective to the cavernous sinus contents and basilar apex complex.

Conclusion The combination of an eyelid transorbital and pretemporal transcavernous approaches can achieve a deep exposure via a minimally invasive incision, which may add an additional approach to the cavernous sinus and basilar apex regions.

Keywords

transorbital approach - pretemporal approach - transcavernous approach - basilar apex

Previous Presentation

This study has been presented as a podium presentation in the 33rd NASBS meeting in Atlanta, Georgia, United States on February 17, 2024.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 25. Februar 2024

Angenommen: 29. April 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
24. Mai 2024

• References

• 1 Dolenc VV, Škrap M, Šušteršič J, Škrbec M, Morina A. A transcavernous-transsellar approach to the basilar tip aneurysms. Br J Neurosurg 1987; 1 (02) 251-259
• 2 Krisht AF. Transcavernous approach to diseases of the anterior upper third of the posterior fossa. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 19 (02) E2
• 3 Adepoju A, Krisht AF. 557 results of microsurgical clipping of unruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms (ACOMa) using the pretemporal minimal durotomy approach. Neurosurgery 2023; 69 (Suppl. 01) 123
• 4 Hsu SP, Krisht AF, Lin C-F. et al. Immediate results of microsurgical clipping of posterior communicating artery aneurysms using the pretemporal transclinoidal approach. J Chin Med Assoc 2012; 75 (09) 454-458
• 5 Krisht A, Pravdenkova S. Outcome of the microsurgical treatment of 221 paraclinoid aneurysms. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2017; 78 (01) A128
• 6 Krisht AF, Kadri PA. Surgical clipping of complex basilar apex aneurysms: a strategy for successful outcome using the pretemporal transzygomatic transcavernous approach. Neurosurgery 2005; 56 (2, Suppl): 261-273 , discussion 261–273
• 7 Krisht AF, Basma J, Cai L. Transcavernous approach in vascular neurosurgery. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2022; 33 (4S): e1-e6
• 8 Di Somma A, Andaluz N, Cavallo LM. et al. Endoscopic transorbital superior eyelid approach: anatomical study from a neurosurgical perspective. J Neurosurg 2018; 129 (05) 1203-1216
• 9 Houlihan LM, Staudinger Knoll AJ, Kakodkar P. et al. Transorbital neuroendoscopic surgery as a mainstream neurosurgical corridor: a systematic review. World Neurosurg 2021; 152: 167-179.e4
• 10 Balakrishnan K, Moe KS. Applications and outcomes of orbital and transorbital endoscopic surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 144 (05) 815-820
• 11 Moe KS, Lubbe DE. 20 Transorbital neuroendoscopic surgery of the skull base and brain. Transnasal Endoscopic Skull Base and Brain Surgery Surgical Anatomy Its Applications 2nd ed. Thieme 2019; 186
• 12 Park HH, Hong SD, Kim YH. et al. Endoscopic transorbital and endonasal approach for trigeminal schwannomas: a retrospective multicenter analysis (KOSEN-005). J Neurosurg 2020; 133 (02) 467-476
• 13 Gosain AK, Sewall SR, Yousif NJ. The temporal branch of the facial nerve: how reliably can we predict its path?. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99 (05) 1224-1233 , discussion 1234–1236
• 14 Salas E, Ziyal IM, Bejjani GK, Sekhar LN. Anatomy of the frontotemporal branch of the facial nerve and indications for interfascial dissection. Neurosurgery 1998; 43 (03) 563-568 , discussion 568–569
• 15 Pieper DR, Al-Mefty O. Cranio-orbito-zygomatic approach. Operative Techniques in Neurosurgery 1999; 2 (01) 2-9
• 16 Zabramski JM, Kiriş T, Sankhla SK, Cabiol J, Spetzler RF. Orbitozygomatic craniotomy. Technical note. J Neurosurg 1998; 89 (02) 336-341
• 17 Xie Q, Wang D-J, Sun L. et al. Minimal invasive trans-eyelid approach to anterior and middle skull base meningioma: a preliminary study of Shanghai Huashan hospital. Int J Clin Exp Med 2014; 7 (11) 3974-3982
• 18 Noguchi A, Balasingam V, Shiokawa Y, McMenomey SO, Delashaw Jr JB. Extradural anterior clinoidectomy. Technical note. J Neurosurg 2005; 102 (05) 945-950