The Effects of Body Mass Index on Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Autologous Free Flap Breast Reconstruction

Abstract

Background The prevalence of obesity in the United States exceeds 40%, yet perioperative effects of higher body mass index (BMI) in autologous breast reconstruction remain poorly studied. The purpose of this study was to investigate BMI's impact on postop complications in abdominal and gluteal-based autologous breast reconstruction.

Methods We conducted a retrospective study using TriNetX, a health care database containing de-identified data from more than 250 million patients. Patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction were identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. Four cohorts were established by BMI class: <24.99, 25 to 29.99, 30 to 34.99, and 35 to 39.99 kg/m². Outcomes of interest were defined by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes. A two-sample t-test was performed to compare incidence of postoperative complications between cohorts within 3 months of surgery. Patients with a BMI < 24.99 kg/m² served as the control. Cohorts were balanced on age, race, and ethnicity.

Results We identified 8,791 patients who underwent autologous breast reconstruction. Of those, 1,143 had a BMI < 24.99 kg/m², 1,867 had a BMI of 25 to 29.99 kg/m², 1,396 had a BMI of 30 to 34.99 kg/m², and 559 had a BMI of 35 to 39.99 kg/m². Patients with a BMI of 25 to 29.99 kg/m² had a significantly increased risk of cellulitis. Patients with a BMI of 30 to 34.99 and 35 to 39.99 kg/m² had a significantly increased risk of cellulitis, surgical site infection, need for debridement, wound dehiscence, and flap failure.

Conclusion Our study illustrates that there is an increased risk of postoperative complications associated with higher BMI classes. Understanding these data are imperative for providers to adequately stratify patients and guide the procedural decision-making.

Keywords

breast reconstruction - free flap reconstruction - postoperative complications - body mass index

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 18. September 2023

Angenommen: 21. Januar 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
23. Februar 2024

• References

• 1 Imes CC, Burke LE. The obesity epidemic: The United States as a cautionary tale for the rest of the world. Curr Epidemiol Rep 2014; 1 (02) 82-88
• 2 Seidell JC, Halberstadt J. Obesity: the obesity epidemic in the USA - no end in sight?. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2016; 12 (09) 499-500
• 3 Wang Y, Beydoun MA, Min J, Xue H, Kaminsky LA, Cheskin LJ. Has the prevalence of overweight, obesity and central obesity levelled off in the United States? Trends, patterns, disparities, and future projections for the obesity epidemic. Int J Epidemiol 2020; 49 (03) 810-823
• 4 Pierpont YN, Dinh TP, Salas RE. et al. Obesity and surgical wound healing: a current review. ISRN Obes 2014; 2014: 638936
• 5 Wilson JA, Clark JJ. Obesity: impediment to wound healing. Crit Care Nurs Q 2003; 26 (02) 119-132
• 6 Wilson JA, Clark JJ. Obesity: impediment to postsurgical wound healing. Adv Skin Wound Care 2004; 17 (08) 426-435
• 7 Srinivasa DR, Clemens MW, Qi J. et al. Obesity and breast reconstruction: complications and patient-reported outcomes in a multicenter, prospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (03) 481e-490e
• 8 Garvey PB, Buchel EW, Pockaj BA, Gray RJ, Samson TD. The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction in overweight and obese patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (02) 447-457
• 9 Chang EI, Liu J. Prospective evaluation of obese patients undergoing autologous abdominal free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142 (02) 120e-125e
• 10 Jandali S, Nelson JA, Sonnad SS. et al. Breast reconstruction with free tissue transfer from the abdomen in the morbidly obese. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (06) 2206-2213
• 11 Ozturk CN, Kundu N, Bernard S, Cooper K, Ozturk C, Djohan R. Breast reconstruction with abdominal-based free flaps in high body mass index population: postoperative complications and impact of weight loss. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 72 (01) 13-22
• 12 Moran SL, Serletti JM. Outcome comparison between free and pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction in the obese patient. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108 (07) 1954-1960 , discussion 1961–1962
• 13 Spear SL, Ducic I, Cuoco F, Taylor N. Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (03) 788-795
• 14 Hanwright PJ, Davila AA, Hirsch EM. et al. The differential effect of BMI on prosthetic versus autogenous breast reconstruction: a multivariate analysis of 12,986 patients. Breast 2013; 22 (05) 938-945
• 15 Garvey PB, Villa MT, Rozanski AT, Liu J, Robb GL, Beahm EK. The advantages of free abdominal-based flaps over implants for breast reconstruction in obese patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (05) 991-1000
• 16 Mehrara BJ, Santoro TD, Arcilla E, Watson JP, Shaw WW, Da Lio AL. Complications after microvascular breast reconstruction: experience with 1195 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118 (05) 1100-1109
• 17 TriNetX. The global health research network. Accessed at: January 12, 2023 https://trinetx.com
• 18 Bigarella LG, Dal Bó EF, Pires GC. et al. Response to: The impact of obesity on plastic surgery outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthet Surg J 2023; 43 (04) NP295-NP296
• 19 Chen CL, Shore AD, Johns R, Clark JM, Manahan M, Makary MA. The impact of obesity on breast surgery complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (05) 395e-402e
• 20 Maus J, Pestana IA. Patient-reported abdominal morbidity following abdomen-based breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2024; 40 (05) 363-370
• 21 Patterson CW, Palines PA, Bartow MJ. et al. Stratification of surgical risk in DIEP breast reconstruction based on classification of obesity. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (01) 1-9
• 22 Velazquez C, Siska RC, Pestana IA. Breast reconstruction completion in the obese: does reconstruction technique make a difference in its achievement?. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (09) 720-727
• 23 Marquez JL, Sudduth JD, Kuo K. et al. A comparison of postoperative outcomes between immediate, delayed immediate, and delayed autologous free flap breast reconstruction: analysis of 2010-2020 NSQIP data. J Reconstr Microsurg 2023; 39 (08) 664-670
• 24 Sudduth JD, Marquez JL, Samlowski EE. et al. The effect of body mass index on free flap breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2024; 40 (02) 132-138
• 25 Stamou SC, Nussbaum M, Stiegel RM. et al. Effect of body mass index on outcomes after cardiac surgery: is there an obesity paradox?. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 91 (01) 42-47
• 26 Galyfos G, Geropapas GI, Kerasidis S, Sianou A, Sigala F, Filis K. The effect of body mass index on major outcomes after vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg 2017; 65 (04) 1193-1207
• 27 Reeves BC, Ascione R, Chamberlain MH, Angelini GD. Effect of body mass index on early outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42 (04) 668-676
• 28 Chern H, Chou J, Donkor C. et al. Effects of obesity in rectal cancer surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 211 (01) 55-60
• 29 Alizadeh RF, Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Whealon MD. et al. Body mass index significantly impacts outcomes of colorectal surgery. Am Surg 2016; 82 (10) 930-935
• 30 Mullen JT, Moorman DW, Davenport DL. The obesity paradox: body mass index and outcomes in patients undergoing nonbariatric general surgery. Ann Surg 2009; 250 (01) 166-172
• 31 Benjamin ER, Dilektasli E, Haltmeier T, Beale E, Inaba K, Demetriades D. The effects of body mass index on complications and mortality after emergency abdominal operations: the obesity paradox. Am J Surg 2017; 214 (05) 899-903
• 32 Dindo D, Muller MK, Weber M, Clavien PA. Obesity in general elective surgery. Lancet 2003; 361 (9374) 2032-2035
• 33 Almasaudi AS, McSorley ST, Edwards CA, McMillan DC. The relationship between body mass index and short term postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing potentially curative surgery for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2018; 121: 68-73
• 34 Shimada H, Fukagawa T, Haga Y, Oba K. Does postoperative morbidity worsen the oncological outcome after radical surgery for gastrointestinal cancers? A systematic review of the literature. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2017; 1 (01) 11-23
• 35 Antonopoulos AS, Tousoulis D. The molecular mechanisms of obesity paradox. Cardiovasc Res 2017; 113 (09) 1074-1086
• 36 Barnes AS. The epidemic of obesity and diabetes: trends and treatments. Tex Heart Inst J 2011; 38 (02) 142-144
• 37 Poirier P, Giles TD, Bray GA. et al; American Heart Association, Obesity Committee of the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism. Obesity and cardiovascular disease: pathophysiology, evaluation, and effect of weight loss: an update of the 1997 American Heart Association Scientific Statement on Obesity and Heart Disease from the Obesity Committee of the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism. Circulation 2006; 113 (06) 898-918
• 38 Jiang SZ, Lu W, Zong XF, Ruan HY, Liu Y. Obesity and hypertension. Exp Ther Med 2016; 12 (04) 2395-2399
• 39 Guo S, Dipietro LA. Factors affecting wound healing. J Dent Res 2010; 89 (03) 219-229
• 40 Ahmed AA, Mooar PA, Kleiner M, Torg JS, Miyamoto CT. Hypertensive patients show delayed wound healing following total hip arthroplasty. PLoS ONE 2011; 6 (08) e23224
• 41 Baltzis D, Eleftheriadou I, Veves A. Pathogenesis and treatment of impaired wound healing in diabetes mellitus: new insights. Adv Ther 2014; 31 (08) 817-836
• 42 Martin ET, Kaye KS, Knott C. et al. Diabetes and risk of surgical site infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016; 37 (01) 88-99