Download PDF
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2018; 235(04): 420-423
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-101013
Klinische Studie
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Inter-Rater Reliability of Cyclotorsion Measurements Using Fundus Photography

Interrater-Reliabilität der Zyklorotationsmessung an Fundusfotografien
Muriel Dysli
Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
,
Madeleine Kanku
Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
,
Ghislaine L. Traber
Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 20 September 2017

accepted 03 January 2018

Publication Date:
18 April 2018 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background The foveo-papillary angle (FPA) on fundus photographs is the accepted standard for the measurement of ocular cyclotorsion. We assessed the inter-rater reliability of this method in healthy subjects and in patients with trochlear nerve palsies.

Patients and Methods In this methodological study, fundus photographs of healthy subjects and of patients with trochlear nerve palsies were made with a fundus camera (Zeiss Fundus Camera FF 450 plus, Jena, Germany). Three independent observers measured the FPA on the fundus photographs of all subjects in synedra View (synedra View 16, Version 16.0.0.11, Innsbruck, Austria).

Results One hundred and four eyes of 52 subjects (26 healthy controls and 26 patients) were assessed. The mean FPA of the healthy controls was 5.80 degrees (°) [± 0.44 standard error of the mean (SEM)] compared to 11.55° (± 0.80 SEM) for patients with trochlear nerve palsies. The inter-rater reliability of all measured FPAs showed an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.98 (95% CI 0.97 – 0.98).

Conclusions The inter-rater reliability of objective cyclotorsion measurements using fundus photographs was very high.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund Der foveopapilläre Winkel auf Fundusfotografien dient bisher als Standard zur Bestimmung der objektiven okulären Zyklorotation. Das Ziel der Studie ist, die Interrater-Reliabilität der Zyklorotation bei gesunden Personen wie auch bei Patienten mit Trochlearisparese anhand der Fundusfotografien zu messen.

Patienten und Methoden Fundusfotografien von Probanden wie auch von Patienten mit Trochlearisparese wurden mit einer Funduskamera (Zeiss Fundus Camera FF 450 plus, Jena, Deutschland) aufgenommen. Drei unabhängige Personen haben den foveopapillären Winkel anhand der Fundusfotografien in synedra View (synedra View 16, Version 16.0.0.11, Innsbruck, Österreich) gemessen.

Ergebnisse Es wurden 104 Augen von 52 Personen untersucht (26 Probanden, 26 Patienten). Bei den Probanden betrug der foveopapilläre Winkel durchschnittlich 5,8° (± 0,44 Standard Error of the Mean [SEM]), bei den Patienten mit Trochlearisparese 11,55° (± 0,80 SEM). Die Interrater-Reliabilität der gemessenen foveopapillären Winkel zeigte einen Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) von 0,98 (95%-KI 0,97 – 0,98).

Schlussfolgerung Die objektive Zyklorotationsmessung anhand von Fundusfotografien zeigte eine hohe Interrater-Reliabilität zwischen verschiedenen Untersuchern.

Key words

cyclotorsion - fundus photography - ocular torsion - trochlear nerve palsy - foveo-papillary angle - disc-fovea angle

Schlüsselwörter

Trochlearisparese - foveopapillärer Winkel - Fundusfotografie - Zyklorotation - okuläre Torsion
 

  • References

  • 1 von Noorden GK, Murray E, Wong SY. Superior oblique paralysis. A review of 270 cases. Arch Ophthalmol 1986; 104: 1771-1776
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Leigh RJ, Zee DS. The Neurology of Eye Movements. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Lemos J, Eggenberger E. Clinical utility and assessment of cyclodeviation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2013; 24: 558-565
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kushner BJ, Hariharan L. Observations about objective and subjective ocular torsion. Ophthalmology 2009; 116: 2001-2010
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Pfenninger L, Landau K, Bergamin O. Comparison of Harms tangent screen and search coil recordings in patients with trochlear nerve palsy. Vision Res 2006; 46: 1404-1410
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Roh YR, Hwang JM. Comparison of subjective and objective torsion in patients with acquired unilateral superior oblique muscle palsy. Br J Ophthalmol 2011; 95: 1583-1587
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Lefèvre F, Leroy K, Delrieu B. et al. [Study of the optic nerve head-fovea angle with retinophotography in healthy patients]. J Fr Ophtalmol 2007; 30: 598-606
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Straumann D. [The validity of oculomotor laws]. Schweiz Arch Neurol Psychiatr (1985) 1995; 146: 151-156
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Lengwiler F, Rappoport D, Jaggi GP. et al. Reliability of cyclotorsion measurements using scanning laser ophthalmoscopy imaging in healthy subjects: the CySLO study. Br J Ophthalmol 2017; DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310396.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Parsa CF, Kumar AB. Cyclodeviation of the retinal vascular arcades: an accessory sign of ocular torsion. Br J Ophthalmol 2013; 97: 126-129
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Rohrschneider K. Determination of the location of the fovea on the fundus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: 3257-3258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Jethani J, Seethapathy G, Purohit J. et al. Measuring normal ocular torsion and its variation by fundus photography in children between 5–15 years of age. Indian J Ophthalmol 2010; 58: 417-419
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Piedrahita-Alonso E, Valverde-Megias A, Gomez-de-Liano R. Rotation of retinal vascular arcades and comparison with disc-fovea angle in the assessment of cycloposition. Br J Ophthalmol 2014; 98: 115-119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bixenman WW, von Noorden GK. Apparent foveal displacement in normal subjects and in cyclotropia. Ophthalmology 1982; 89: 58-62
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar