Microenvironment of the Lower Reproductive Tract: Focus on the Cervical Mucus Plug

Abstract

The female lower reproductive tract microbiota is a complex ecosystem comprising various microorganisms that play a pivotal role in maintaining women's reproductive well-being. During pregnancy, the vaginal microbiota undergoes dynamic changes that are important for a successful gestation. This review summarizes the implications of the cervical mucus plug microenvironment and its profound impact on reproductive health. Further, the symbiotic relationship between the vaginal microbiome and the cervical mucus plug is highlighted, with a special emphasis on how this natural barrier serves as a guardian against ascending infections. Understanding this complex host–microbes interplay could pave the way for innovative approaches to improve women's reproductive health and fertility.

Keywords

cervical mucus plug - microbiota - microbiome - pregnancy - preterm birth

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
23. Januar 2024

• References

• 1 Koedooder R, Maghdid DM, Beckers NGM, Schoenmakers S, Kok DJ, Laven JSE. Dynamics of the urinary microbiome in pregnancy and the coincidental predictive value of the microbiota for IVF/IVF-ICSI outcome. Reprod Biomed Online 2021; 43 (05) 871-879
• 2 Chen YC, Greenbaum J, Shen H, Deng HW. Association between gut microbiota and bone health: potential mechanisms and prospective. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2017; 102 (10) 3635-3646
• 3 Rowland I, Gibson G, Heinken A. et al. Gut microbiota functions: metabolism of nutrients and other food components. Eur J Nutr 2018; 57 (01) 1-24
• 4 Bull MJ, Plummer NT. Part 1: The human gut microbiome in health and disease. Integr Med (Encinitas) 2014; 13 (06) 17-22
• 5 Hou K, Wu ZX, Chen XY. et al. Microbiota in health and diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2022; 7 (01) 135
• 6 Swidsinski S, Moll WM, Swidsinski A. Bacterial vaginosis-vaginal polymicrobial biofilms and dysbiosis. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2023; 120 (20) 347-354
• 7 Younes JA, Lievens E, Hummelen R, van der Westen R, Reid G, Petrova MI. Women and their microbes: the unexpected friendship. Trends Microbiol 2018; 26 (01) 16-32
• 8 Altmäe S, Franasiak JM, Mändar R. The seminal microbiome in health and disease. Nat Rev Urol 2019; 16 (12) 703-721
• 9 Molina NM, Sola-Leyva A, Saez-Lara MJ. et al. New opportunities for endometrial health by modifying uterine microbial composition: present or future?. Biomolecules 2020; 10 (04) 593
• 10 Al-Nasiry S, Ambrosino E, Schlaepfer M. et al. The interplay between reproductive tract microbiota and immunological system in human reproduction. Front Immunol 2020; 11: 378
• 11 Molina NM, Sola-Leyva A, Haahr T. et al. Analysing endometrial microbiome: methodological considerations and recommendations for good practice. Hum Reprod 2021; 36 (04) 859-879
• 12 Sirota I, Zarek SM, Segars JH. Potential influence of the microbiome on infertility and assisted reproductive technology. Semin Reprod Med 2014; 32 (01) 35-42
• 13 Power ML, Quaglieri C, Schulkin J. Reproductive microbiomes: a new thread in the microbial network. Reprod Sci 2017; 24 (11) 1482-1492
• 14 Zakaria ZZ, Al-Rumaihi S, Al-Absi RS. et al. Physiological changes and interactions between microbiome and the host during pregnancy. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2022; 12: 824925
• 15 Di Simone N, Santamaria Ortiz A, Specchia M. et al. Recent insights on the maternal microbiota: impact on pregnancy outcomes. Front Immunol 2020; 11: 528202 Accessed November52023
• 16 Siena M, Laterza L, Matteo MV. et al. Gut and reproductive tract microbiota adaptation during pregnancy: new insights for pregnancy-related complications and therapy. Microorganisms 2021; 9 (03) 473
• 17 Venneri MA, Franceschini E, Sciarra F, Rosato E, D'Ettorre G, Lenzi A. Human genital tracts microbiota: dysbiosis crucial for infertility. J Endocrinol Invest 2022; 45 (06) 1151-1160
• 18 Romero R. Prenatal medicine: the child is the father of the man. 1996. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2009; 22 (08) 636-639
• 19 Lacroix G, Gouyer V, Gottrand F, Desseyn JL. The cervicovaginal mucus barrier. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21 (21) 8266
• 20 Silvano A, Meriggi N, Renzi S. et al. Vaginal microbiome in pregnant women with and without short cervix. Nutrients 2023; 15 (09) 2173
• 21 Parraga-Leo A, Oskotsky TT, Oskotsky B. et al. VMAP: vaginal microbiome atlas during pregnancy. medRxiv. Published online April 5, 2023:2023.03.21.23286947
• 22 Zheng N, Guo R, Wang J, Zhou W, Ling Z. Contribution of Lactobacillus iners to vaginal health and diseases: a systematic review. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2021; 11: 792787
• 23 Chee WJY, Chew SY, Than LTL. Vaginal microbiota and the potential of Lactobacillus derivatives in maintaining vaginal health. Microb Cell Fact 2020; 19 (01) 203
• 24 Punzón-Jiménez P, Labarta E. The impact of the female genital tract microbiome in women health and reproduction: a review. J Assist Reprod Genet 2021; 38 (10) 2519-2541
• 25 Mall AS, Habte H, Mthembu Y, Peacocke J, de Beer C. Mucus and Mucins: do they have a role in the inhibition of the human immunodeficiency virus?. Virol J 2017; 14 (01) 192
• 26 Kindinger LM, MacIntyre DA, Lee YS. et al. Relationship between vaginal microbial dysbiosis, inflammation, and pregnancy outcomes in cervical cerclage. Sci Transl Med 2016; 8 (350) 350ra102
• 27 Lykke MR, Becher N, Haahr T, Boedtkjer E, Jensen JS, Uldbjerg N. Vaginal, cervical and uterine ph in women with normal and abnormal vaginal microbiota. Pathogens 2021; 10 (02) 90
• 28 Wessels JM, Felker AM, Dupont HA, Kaushic C. The relationship between sex hormones, the vaginal microbiome and immunity in HIV-1 susceptibility in women. Dis Model Mech 2018; 11 (09) dmm035147
• 29 Holzman C, Leventhal JM, Qiu H, Jones NM, Wang J. BV Study Group. Factors linked to bacterial vaginosis in nonpregnant women. Am J Public Health 2001; 91 (10) 1664-1670
• 30 Park S, Moon J, Kang N. et al. Predicting preterm birth through vaginal microbiota, cervical length, and WBC using a machine learning model. Front Microbiol 2022; 13: 912853
• 31 Vornhagen J, Quach P, Santana-Ufret V. et al. Human cervical mucus plugs exhibit insufficiencies in antimicrobial activity towards group B Streptococcus. J Infect Dis 2018; 217 (10) 1626-1636
• 32 Taherali F, Varum F, Basit AW. A slippery slope: on the origin, role and physiology of mucus. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2018; 124: 16-33
• 33 Hansen LK, Becher N, Bastholm S. et al. The cervical mucus plug inhibits, but does not block, the passage of ascending bacteria from the vagina during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014; 93 (01) 102-108
• 34 Katz DF. Human cervical mucus: research update. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165 (6, Pt 2): 1984-1986
• 35 Altmäe S. Commentary: uterine microbiota: residents, tourists, or invaders?. Front Immunol 2018; 9: 1874
• 36 Vagios S, Mitchell CM. Mutual preservation: a review of interactions between cervicovaginal mucus and microbiota. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2021; 11: 676114
• 37 Chen C, Song X, Wei W. et al. The microbiota continuum along the female reproductive tract and its relation to uterine-related diseases. Nat Commun 2017; 8 (01) 875
• 38 Winters AD, Romero R, Gervasi MT. et al. Does the endometrial cavity have a molecular microbial signature?. Sci Rep 2019; 9 (01) 9905
• 39 Tsai HW, Tsui KH, Chiu YC, Wang LC. Adverse effect of lactobacilli-depauperate cervicovaginal microbiota on pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Reprod Med Biol 2023; 22 (01) e12495
• 40 Hua X, Xu L, Li Q. et al. Deep grouping analysis of the altered cervical canal microbiota in intrauterine adhesion patients. Reprod Sci 2022; 29 (12) 3494-3507
• 41 Chang CYY, Chiang AJ, Lai MT. et al. A more diverse cervical microbiome associates with better clinical outcomes in patients with endometriosis: a pilot study. Biomedicines 2022; 10 (01) 174
• 42 Akiyama K, Nishioka K, Khan KN. et al. Molecular detection of microbial colonization in cervical mucus of women with and without endometriosis. Am J Reprod Immunol 2019; 82 (02) e13147
• 43 Becher N, Adams Waldorf K, Hein M, Uldbjerg N. The cervical mucus plug: structured review of the literature. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009; 88 (05) 502-513
• 44 Smith-Dupont KB, Wagner CE, Witten J. et al. Probing the potential of mucus permeability to signify preterm birth risk. Sci Rep 2017; 7 (01) 10302
• 45 Hein M, Petersen AC, Helmig RB, Uldbjerg N, Reinholdt J. Immunoglobulin levels and phagocytes in the cervical mucus plug at term of pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005; 84 (08) 734-742
• 46 Shen L, Wang W, Hou W. et al. The function and mechanism of action of uterine microecology in pregnancy immunity and its complications. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2023; 12: 1025714
• 47 Noori M, Helmig RB, Hein M, Steer PJ. Could a cervical occlusion suture be effective at improving perinatal outcome?. BJOG 2007; 114 (05) 532-536
• 48 Lithgow KV, Buchholz VCH, Ku E, Konschuh S, D'Aubeterre A, Sycuro LK. Protease activities of vaginal Porphyromonas species disrupt coagulation and extracellular matrix in the cervicovaginal niche. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 2022; 8 (01) 8
• 49 Hein M, Helmig RB, Schønheyder HC, Ganz T, Uldbjerg N. An in vitro study of antibacterial properties of the cervical mucus plug in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185 (03) 586-592
• 50 Hein M, Valore EV, Helmig RB, Uldbjerg N, Ganz T. Antimicrobial factors in the cervical mucus plug. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187 (01) 137-144
• 51 Brunham RC, Paavonen J. Reproductive system infections in women: upper genital tract, fetal, neonatal and infant syndromes. Pathog Dis 2020; 78 (05) ftaa023
• 52 Vargas M, Yañez F, Elias A. et al. Cervical pessary and cerclage placement for preterm birth prevention and cervicovaginal microbiome changes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2022; 101 (12) 1403-1413
• 53 Becher N, Hein M, Danielsen CC, Uldbjerg N. Matrix metalloproteinases in the cervical mucus plug in relation to gestational age, plug compartment, and preterm labor. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2010; 8: 113
• 54 Gerson KD, Anton L, Ferguson B, Ravel J, Burris HH, Elovitz MA. Gardnerella vaginalis induces matrix metalloproteinases in the cervicovaginal epithelium through TLR-2 activation. J Reprod Immunol 2022; 152: 103648
• 55 Anton L, Ferguson B, Friedman ES, Gerson KD, Brown AG, Elovitz MA. Gardnerella vaginalis alters cervicovaginal epithelial cell function through microbe-specific immune responses. Microbiome 2022; 10 (01) 119
• 56 Wang C, Feng Y, Zhou WJ. et al. Screening and identification of endometrial proteins as novel potential biomarkers for repeated implantation failure. PeerJ 2021; 9: e11009
• 57 Dube R, Kar SS. Genital microbiota and outcome of assisted reproductive treatment - a systematic review. Life (Basel) 2022; 12 (11) 1867
• 58 Karaer A, Doğan B, Günal S. et al. The vaginal microbiota composition of women undergoing assisted reproduction: a prospective cohort study. BJOG 2021; 128 (13) 2101-2109
• 59 Moreno I, Codoñer FM, Vilella F. et al. Evidence that the endometrial microbiota has an effect on implantation success or failure. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215 (06) 684-703
• 60 Vitale SG, Ferrari F, Ciebiera M. et al. The role of genital tract microbiome in fertility: a systematic review. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 23 (01) 180
• 61 Moreno I, Garcia-Grau I, Perez-Villaroya D. et al. Endometrial microbiota composition is associated with reproductive outcome in infertile patients. Microbiome 2022; 10 (01)
• 62 Hao X, Li P, Wu S, Tan J. Association of the Cervical Microbiota With Pregnancy Outcome in a Subfertile Population Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization: A Case-Control Study. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2021; 11: 654202
• 63 Altmäe S, Rienzi L. Endometrial microbiome: new hope, or hype?. Reprod Biomed Online 2021; 42 (06) 1051-1052
• 64 Sola-Leyva A, Andrés-León E, Molina NM. et al. Mapping the entire functionally active endometrial microbiota. Hum Reprod 2021; 36 (04) 1021-1031
• 65 Canha-Gouveia A, Pérez-Prieto I, Rodríguez CM. et al. The female upper reproductive tract harbors endogenous microbial profiles. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023; 14: 1096050
• 66 Youssef A, Lashley L, Dieben S, Verburg H, van der Hoorn ML. Defining recurrent pregnancy loss: associated factors and prognosis in couples with two versus three or more pregnancy losses. Reprod Biomed Online 2020; 41 (04) 679-685
• 67 Shi Y, Yamada H, Sasagawa Y, Tanimura K, Deguchi M. Uterine endometrium microbiota and pregnancy outcome in women with recurrent pregnancy loss. J Reprod Immunol 2022; 152: 103653
• 68 Mori R, Hayakawa T, Hirayama M. et al. Cervicovaginal microbiome in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss. J Reprod Immunol 2023; 157: 103944
• 69 Liu FT, Yang S, Yang Z. et al. An altered microbiota in the lower and upper female reproductive tract of women with recurrent spontaneous abortion. Microbiol Spectr 2022; 10 (03) e0046222
• 70 Guang Y, Shen X, Tan Y. et al. Systematic analysis of microbiota in pregnant Chinese women and its association with miscarriage. Ann Transl Med 2022; 10 (20) 1099