PDF herunterladen
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2023; 27(04): 421-431
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1770354
Review Article

Overview of Periosteal Reaction by Imaging

Valérie Bousson 
1   Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Lariboisière-Fernand Widal. APHP.Nord-Université de Paris, Paris, France
,
Damien Bisseret
2   Imagerie du bassin Lorientais, Lorient, France
,
Rachid Kaci
3   Service d'anatomopathologie, Hôpital Lariboisière-Fernand Widal. APHP.Nord-Université de Paris, Paris, France
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

The periosteum is a membrane that covers almost all bones in the body. It is a living structure but attracts little attention unless it reacts excessively. We highlight the important points in the anatomy, histology, and physiology of the periosteum, the stimuli and various aspects of periosteal reaction, and the main conditions underlying periosteal reaction.

Keywords

periosteum - periosteal reaction - periostitis - bone tumor


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
25. September 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Dwek JR. The periosteum: what is it, where is it, and what mimics it in its absence?. Skeletal Radiol 2010; 39 (04) 319-323
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Edeiken J, Hodes PJ, Caplan LH. New bone production and periosteal reaction. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1966; 97 (03) 708-718
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Rana RS, Wu JS, Eisenberg RL. Periosteal reaction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193 (04) W259-72
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Bisseret D, Kaci R, Lafage-Proust MH. et al. Periosteum: characteristic imaging findings with emphasis on radiologic-pathologic comparisons. Skeletal Radiol 2015; 44 (03) 321-338
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Allen H, Barnthouse NC, Chan BY. Periosteal pathologic conditions: imaging findings and pathophysiology. Radiographics 2023; 43 (02) e220120
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Allen MR, Hock JM, Burr DB. Periosteum: biology, regulation, and response to osteoporosis therapies. Bone 2004; 35 (05) 1003-1012
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Roberts SJ, van Gastel N, Carmeliet G, Luyten FP. Uncovering the periosteum for skeletal regeneration: the stem cell that lies beneath. Bone 2015; 70: 10-18
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Murray DW, Wilson-MacDonald J, Morscher E, Rahn BA, Käslin M. Bone growth and remodelling after fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996; 78 (01) 42-50
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Nakahara H, Bruder SP, Haynesworth SE. et al. Bone and cartilage formation in diffusion chambers by subcultured cells derived from the periosteum. Bone 1990; 11 (03) 181-188
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Zhang X, Awad HA, O'Keefe RJ, Guldberg RE, Schwarz EM. A perspective: engineering periosteum for structural bone graft healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466 (08) 1777-1787
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Ragsdale BD, Madewell JE, Sweet DE. Radiologic and pathologic analysis of solitary bone lesions. Part II: periosteal reactions. Radiol Clin North Am 1981; 19 (04) 749-783
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Kenan S, Abdelwahab IF, Klein MJ, Hermann G, Lewis MM. Lesions of juxtacortical origin (surface lesions of bone). Skeletal Radiol 1993; 22 (05) 337-357
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Walker MM, Baumann ME, Alexander JH. et al. Mechanical strain induces ex vivo expansion of periosteum. PLoS One 2022; 17 (12) e0279519
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Cotten A, Flipo RM, Mentre A, Delaporte E, Duquesnoy B, Chastanet P. SAPHO syndrome. Radiographics 1995; 15 (05) 1147-1154
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Chigira M, Shimizu T. Computed tomographic appearances of sternocostoclavicular hyperostosis. Skeletal Radiol 1989; 18 (05) 347-352
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Earwaker JWS, Cotten A. SAPHO: syndrome or concept? Imaging findings. Skeletal Radiol 2003; 32 (06) 311-327
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Suei Y, Taguchi A, Tanimoto K. Diagnostic points and possible origin of osteomyelitis in synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis and osteitis (SAPHO) syndrome: a radiographic study of 77 mandibular osteomyelitis cases. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003; 42 (11) 1398-1403
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Fournié B, Viraben R, Durroux R, Lassoued S, Gay R, Fournié A. Psoriatic onycho-pachydermo-periostitis of the big toe. Anatomo-clinical study and physiopathogenic approach apropos of 4 cases [in French].. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic 1989; 56 (8–9): 579-582
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Gravallese EM, Schett G. Effects of the IL-23-IL-17 pathway on bone in spondyloarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2018; 14 (11) 631-640
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Tsukazaki H, Kaito T. The role of the IL-23/IL-17 pathway in the pathogenesis of spondyloarthritis. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21 (17) 6401
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Vecellio M, Hake VX, Davidson C, Carena MC, Wordsworth BP, Selmi C. The IL-17/IL-23 axis and its genetic contribution to psoriatic arthritis. Front Immunol 2021; 11: 596086
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Caffey J. Infantile cortical hyperostosis; a review of the clinical and radiographic features. Proc R Soc Med 1957; 50 (05) 347-354
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Gensure RC, Mäkitie O, Barclay C. et al. A novel COL1A1 mutation in infantile cortical hyperostosis (Caffey disease) expands the spectrum of collagen-related disorders. J Clin Invest 2005; 115 (05) 1250-1257
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Glorieux FH. Caffey disease: an unlikely collagenopathy. J Clin Invest 2005; 115 (05) 1142-1144
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Uppal S, Diggle CP, Carr IM. et al. Mutations in 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase cause primary hypertrophic osteoarthropathy. Nat Genet 2008; 40 (06) 789-793
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Tan I, Lomasney L, Stacy GS, Lazarus M, Mar WA. Spectrum of voriconazole-induced periostitis with review of the differential diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019; 212 (01) 157-165
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Reber JD, McKenzie GA, Broski SM. Voriconazole-induced periostitis: beyond post-transplant patients. Skeletal Radiol 2016; 45 (06) 839-842
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Kang H, Jha S, Deng Z. et al. Somatic activating mutations in MAP2K1 cause melorheostosis. Nat Commun 2018; 9 (01) 1390
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Fratzl-Zelman N, Roschger P, Kang H. et al. Melorheostotic bone lesions caused by somatic mutations in MAP2K1 have deteriorated microarchitecture and periosteal reaction. J Bone Miner Res 2019; 34 (05) 883-895
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Jha S, Fratzl-Zelman N, Roschger P. et al. Distinct clinical and pathological features of melorheostosis associated with somatic MAP2K1 mutations. J Bone Miner Res 2019; 34 (01) 145-156
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Cheung MS, Glorieux FH, Rauch F. Natural history of hyperplastic callus formation in osteogenesis imperfecta type V. J Bone Miner Res 2007; 22 (08) 1181-1186
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Kim OH, Jin DK, Kosaki K. et al. Osteogenesis imperfecta type V: clinical and radiographic manifestations in mutation confirmed patients. Am J Med Genet A 2013; 161A (08) 1972-1979
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Rauch F, Moffatt P, Cheung M. et al. Osteogenesis imperfecta type V: marked phenotypic variability despite the presence of the IFITM5 c.-14C>T mutation in all patients. J Med Genet 2013; 50 (01) 21-24
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar