Effect of Vaginal Washing before Intravaginal Prostaglandin Insertion on Induction of Labor: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Abstract

Objective Saline vaginal douching prior to intravaginal prostaglandin application might increase the vaginal pH, leading to improvement of prostaglandin bioavailability, by which the outcomes of labor induction can be greatly improved. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the effect of vaginal washing with normal saline before insertion of vaginal prostaglandin for labor induction.

Study Design A systematic search was done in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science from inception to March 2022. We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared vaginal washing using normal saline versus no vaginal washing in the control group before intravaginal prostaglandin insertion during labor induction. We used RevMan software for our meta-analysis. Our main outcomes were the duration of intravaginal prostaglandin application, duration from intravaginal prostaglandin insertion to active phase of labor, duration from intravaginal prostaglandin insertion till total cervical dilatation, labor induction failure rate, incidence of cesarean section (CS), and rates of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission and fetal infection postdelivery.

Results Five RCTs were retrieved with a total number of 842 patients. Duration of prostaglandin application, duration from prostaglandin insertion to active phase of labor, and time interval from prostaglandin insertion to total cervical dilatation were significantly shorter among vaginal washing group (p < 0.05). Vaginal douching prior to prostaglandin insertion significantly decreased the incidence of failed labor induction (p < 0.001). After the removal of reported heterogeneity, vaginal washing was linked to a significant decline in CS incidence (p = 0.04). In addition, the rates of NICU admission and fetal infection were significantly lower in the vaginal washing group (p < 0.001).

Conclusion Vaginal washing with normal saline before intravaginal prostaglandin insertion is a useful and easily applicable method for labor induction with good outcomes.

Key Points

• Induction of labor is frequently used in the obstetrics field.

• We assessed vaginal washing impact before prostaglandin insertion for labor induction.

• Vaginal washing is an easily applicable method for labor induction with good outcomes.

Keywords

vaginal washing - vaginal douching - labor induction - prostaglandin - cervical ripening

Publication History

Received: 22 April 2022

Accepted: 16 December 2022

Article published online:
21 February 2023

• References

• 1 Teal EN, Lewkowitz AK, Koser SLP, Tran CBN, Gaw SL. Quantifying the risks and benefits of continuing labor induction: data for shared decision-making. Am J Perinatol 2021; 38 (09) 935-943
• 2 Wagner SM, Sandoval G, Grobman WA. et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Labor induction at 39 weeks compared with expectant management in low-risk parous women. Am J Perinatol 2022; 39 (05) 519-525
• 3 Levine LD, Downes KL, Elovitz MA, Parry S, Sammel MD, Srinivas SK. Mechanical and pharmacologic methods of labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128 (06) 1357-1364
• 4 Viteri OA, Tabsh KK, Alrais MA. et al. Transcervical foley balloon plus vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol alone for cervical ripening in nulliparous obese women: a multicenter, randomized, comparative-effectiveness trial. Am J Perinatol 2021; 38 (S 01): e123-e128
• 5 Melamed N, Yariv O, Hiersch L, Wiznitzer A, Meizner I, Yogev Y. Labor induction with prostaglandin E2: characteristics of response and prediction of failure. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013; 26 (02) 132-136
• 6 Thomas J, Fairclough A, Kavanagh J, Kelly AJ. Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 2014 (06) CD003101
• 7 Bakker R, Pierce S, Myers D. The role of prostaglandins E1 and E2, dinoprostone, and misoprostol in cervical ripening and the induction of labor: a mechanistic approach. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017; 296 (02) 167-179
• 8 Kumari A, Sharma SL, Pal A, Bhatia V. Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of the dinoprostone gel on labor induction and outcomes. J Postgrad Med Educ Res 2019; 53 (02) 72-74
• 9 Johnson TA, Greer IA, Kelly RW, Calder AA. The effect of pH on release of PGE2 from vaginal and endocervical preparations for induction of labour: an in-vitro study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99 (11) 877-880
• 10 Basirat Z, Barat SH, Ghanbarpour A, Golsorkhtabar-Amiri M. Does vaginal pH affect the efficacy of dinoprostone in cervical ripening/labor duration?. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39 (04) 522-525
• 11 Martino JL, Vermund SH. Vaginal douching: evidence for risks or benefits to women's health. Epidemiol Rev 2002; 24 (02) 109-124
• 12 Yayla Abide Ç, Kurek Eken M, Ozkaya E. et al. Effect of vaginal washing before intravaginal dinoprostone insertion for labor induction: a randomized clinical trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2018; 44 (12) 2149-2155
• 13 Kabodmehri R, Sharami SH, Milani F. et al. Effect of vaginal washing before misoprostol insertion on cervical ripening before induction of labor: a randomized single-blind clinical trial. Health Sci Rep 2022; 5 (02) e502
• 14 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151 (04) 264-269 , W64
• 15 Higgins JPT, Green S. . Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Cochrane Handbook for: Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2011:3–10
• 16 Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327 (7414): 557-560
• 17 Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 2015; 14: 1-16
• 18 Terrin N, Schmid CH, Lau J, Olkin I. Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity. Stat Med 2003; 22 (13) 2113-2126
• 19 Şahin B, Çelik S, Soyer C, Hatirnaz Ş. Efficacy of vaginal douching before the application of dinoprostone pessary in labour induction, a randomized controlled study. Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi 2020; 17 (03) 431-434
• 20 Shabir NA, Hanif S, Ehsan A, Peerzada H, Shabbir R, Zubair M. Induction of labour with prostaglandin with or without vaginal douching. J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Pak 2020; 10 (03) 159-164
• 21 Suryaprabha V, Nimmala LB. Effect of vaginal wash before intravaginal Misoprostol (PGE1) insertion for induction of labour. Asian J Sci Technol 2021; 12 (06) 11739-11742
• 22 Dhivya DS, Jayanthi DK. Study on influence of vaginal pH on efficacy of dinoprostone gel for labour induction. Int J Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2019; 3 (05) 380-384
• 23 Kendall G, Peebles D. Acute fetal hypoxia: the modulating effect of infection. Early Hum Dev 2005; 81 (01) 27-34
• 24 MacDonald IA, Weir RF. The effect of pH on release of PGE2 from vaginal and endocervical preparations for induction of labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100 (11) 1066-1067
• 25 Kelekci S, Yilmaz B, Savan K. Misoprostol wetting with acetic acid for pre-abortion cervical priming. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004; 85 (02) 188-189
• 26 Önen S, Özakşit G, Yılmaz B. et al. The role of vaginal pH on efficacy of controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert for cervical ripening/labor induction: a prospective double-blind study. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2008; 9: 206-211
• 27 Rashwan ASSA, Alalfy M, El-Sharkawy M. et al. Comparative study regarding effect of pH on Misoprostol in induction of labor in full term primigravida pregnant women, a double blind randomized controlled trial. J Perinat Med 2020; 49 (01) 43-49
• 28 Wiebe ER. Misoprostol administration in medical abortion. A comparison of three regimens. J Reprod Med 2001; 46 (02) 125-129
• 29 Bhattacharjee N, Saha SP, Ganguly RP. et al. A randomized comparative study on vaginal administration of acetic acid-moistened versus dry misoprostol for mid-trimester pregnancy termination. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012; 285 (02) 311-316
• 30 Zanjani M, Kohpayeh J, Karimi Z. The Effect of Vaginal pH on the Efficacy of Vaginal Misoprostol for the Induction of Midtrimester Pregnancy Termination. Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Cancer Research 2022;2(01):
• 31 Ramsey PS, Ogburn Jr PL, Harris DY, Heise RH, Ramin KD. Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of the dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening/labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187 (04) 843-846
• 32 Kurian MJ, Rao B, Rao A, Shameem VPA. Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of dinoprostone gel for labour induction. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2016; 5 (04) 1196-1201
• 33 Chandra S, Allen V, Lee W, Fanning C, Young D. The effect of vaginal pH on labor induction with vaginal misoprostol. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2005; 17 (06) 387-391
• 34 Poomalar GK, Fathima Shantini N, Ezhil R. Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of dinoprostone gel for labour induction: a cross-sectional study. J Obstet Gynaecol 2022; 42 (02) 228-231