Download PDF
Die Wirbelsäule 2017; 01(04): 284-293
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-117265
Übersicht
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Antibiotikatherapie der pyogenen Spondylodiszitis bei Erwachsenen

Antibiotic therapy of pyogenic spondylodiscitis in adults
Christoph Fleege
1   Abteilung für Wirbelsäulenorthopädie, Orthopädische Universitätsklinik Friedrichsheim gGmbH, Frankfurt am Main
,
Michael Rauschmann
1   Abteilung für Wirbelsäulenorthopädie, Orthopädische Universitätsklinik Friedrichsheim gGmbH, Frankfurt am Main
,
Thomas A. Wichelhaus
2   Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Krankenhaushygiene, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
07 November 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Für eine erfolgreiche Behandlung der pyogenen Spondylodiszitis ist eine suffiziente Antibiotikatherapie essenziell. Bei hämodynamisch stabilen Patienten mit normalem neurologischem Status sollte mit einer Antibiotikatherapie solange gewartet werden, bis die mikrobiologische Diagnostik einen Erregernachweis mit Antibiogramm erbringt und somit eine gezielte Therapie ermöglicht. Bei hämodynamisch instabilen Patienten oder bei Patienten mit fortschreitenden bzw. schweren neurologischen Symptomen sollte vor der kalkulierten Therapie eine mikrobiologische Diagnostik (Blutkulturen) eingeleitet werden. Empfehlungen zur kalkulierten und gezielten Therapie der pyogenen Spondylodiszitis sind in dieser Arbeit formuliert. In unkomplizierten Verläufen, ohne operative Instrumentation, ist eine systemische Therapiedauer von 6 Wochen ausreichend. Im Rahmen einer operativen Sanierung des Infektherdes stehen lokale Antibiotikaträger auf der Basis von Hydroxylapatit und Kalziumsulfat zur Verfügung.

Abstract

For a successful treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis, sufficient antibiotic therapy is essential. In cases with hemodynamically stable patients with normal neurological status, an antibiotic treatment should be withheld until microbiological diagnostics provide antibiotic detection and thus allow adequate therapy. In hemodynamically unstable situations or in patients with progressive or severe neurological symptoms microbiological diagnostics (blood cultures) should be initiated before the calculated therapy is started. Recommendations on the calculated and targeted therapy of pyogenic spondylodiscitis are formulated in this work. In uncomplicated courses, without an instrumentation, a systemic therapy duration of 6 weeks is sufficient. Local antibiotics basing on hydroxylapatite and calcium sulfate are available as part of an surgical sanitation of the infective focus.

Schlüsselwörter

Spondylodiszitis - Antibiotika - Mikrobiologie - lokale Antibiotikatherapie - systemische Antibiotikatherapie

Keywords

spondylodiscitis - antibiotics - microbiology - local antibiotic treatment - systemic antibiotic treatment
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Cottle L, Riordan T. Infectious spondylodiscitis. J Infect 2008; 56: 401-412
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Mete B, Kurt C, Yilmaz MH. et al. Vertebral osteomyelitis: eight years experience of 100 cases. Rheumatol Int 2011; 32: 3591-3597
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Hadjipavlou AG, Mader JT, Nessessary JT. et al. Haematogenous pyogenic spinal infections and theis surgical management. Spine 2000; 25: 1668-1679
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Murillo O, Grau I, Lora-Tamayo J. et al. The changing epidemiology of bacteraemic osteoarticular infections in the early 21st century. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015; 21: 254.e1-e8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kim J, Kim YS, Peck KR. et al. Outcome of culture-negative pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis: comparison with microbiologically confirmed pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2014; 44: 246-252
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Sakkas LI, Davas EM, Kapsalaki E. Hematogenous spinal infection in central Greece. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: E513-E518
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kim CJ, Song KH, Jeon JH. A comparative study of pyogenic and tuberculous spondylodiscitis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35: E1096
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Mylona E, Samarkos M, Kakalou E. Pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis: a systematic review of clinical characteristics. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2009; 39: 10-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 D’Agostino C, Scorzolini L, Massetti AP. A sevenyear prospective study on spondylodiscitis: epidemiological and microbiological features. Infection 2010; 38: 102-107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Gardos F, Lescure FX, Senneville E. et al. Suggestions for managing pyogenic (non-tuberculous) discitis in adults. Joint Bone Spine 2007; 74: 133-139
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Nourbakhsh A, Grady JJ, Garges KJ. Percutaneous spine biopsy: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90: 1722-1725 49.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lora-Tamayo J, Euba G, Narvaez JA. Changing trends in the epidemiology of pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis: the impact of cases with no microbiologic diagnosis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2011; 41: 247-255
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Cebrian JL, Saez-Arenillas Martin A, Urda Martinez-Aedo AL. Management of infectious discitis. Outcome in one hundred and eight patients in a university hospital. Int Orthop 2012; 36: 239-244
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Lehner B, Akbar M, Rehnitz C. et al. Standards of microbiological diagnostics of spondylodiscitis. Orthopäde 2012; 41: 702-710
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Societe de Pathologie Infectieuse de Langue Francaise ( SPILF ). Recommandations pour la pratique Clinique, Spondylodiscites infectieuses primitives, et secondaires a un geste intra-discal, sans mise en place de materiel. Med. Mal Infect 2007; 37: 554-572
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Shibayama M, Nagahara M, Kawase G. New needle biopsy technique for lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35: E1347-E1349
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Gras G, Buzele R, Parienti JJ. Microbiological diagnosis of vertebral osteomyelitis: relevance of second percutaneous biopsy following initial negative biopsy and limited yield of post-biopsy blood cultures. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2014; 33: 371-375
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Müller-Broich JD, Petersdorf S, Pfugmacher R. Implementation of a diagnostic-algorhythm in the treatment of unspecific spondylodiszitis – save tool for pathogen detection. Eur Spine J 2011; 20: 1979-2066
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Marschall J, Bhavan KP, Olsen MA. The impact of prebiopsy antibiotics on pathogen recovery in hematogenous vertebral osteomyelitis. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52: 867-872
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 de Lucas EM, Gonzalez MandlyA, Gutierrez A. CT-guided fine-needle aspiration in vertebral osteomyelitis: true usefulness of a common practice. Clin Rheumatol 2009; 28: 315-320
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kim CJ, Song KH, Park WB. Microbiologically and clinically diagnosed vertebral osteomyelitis: impact of prior antibiotic exposure. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012; 56: 2122-2124
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Nickerson EK, Sinha R. Vertebral osteomyelitisin adults: an update. British medical bulletin 2016; 117: 121-138
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Rutges JP, Kempen DH, van Dijk M. et al. Outcome of conservative and surgical treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis: a systematic literature review. Eur Spine J Apr 2016; 25: 983-999
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Landersdorfer CB, Bulitta JB, Kinzig M. et al. Penetration of antibacterials into bone: pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and bioanalytical considerations. Clin.Pharmacokinet 2009; 48: 89-124
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Berbari EF, Kanj SS, Kowalski TJ. et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Native Vertebral Osteomyelitis in Adults. Clin.Infect Dis 2015; 61: 859-863
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Ascione T, Balato G, DiDonato SL. et al. ( 2017) Clinical and microbiological outcomes in haematogenous spondylodiscitis treated conservatively. Eur Spine J 2017; DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5036-4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Rangaraj G, Cleveland KO, Gelfand MS. Comparative analysis of daptomycin and vancomycin in the treatment of vertebral osteomyelitis. Infect Dis Clin Pract 2014; 22: 219-222
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Hagiya H, Haruki Y, Uchida T. et al. Emergence of Daptomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus during treatment. Intern Med 2016; 55: 73-78
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Lefebvre M, Jacqueline C, Amador G. et al. Efficacy of daptomycin combined with rifampicin for the treatment of experimental methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) acute osteomyelitis. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2010; 36: 542-544
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Graninger W, Leitha T, Breyer S. et al. Methicillin- and gentamicin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: susceptibility to fosfomycin, cefamandole, N-formimidoyl-thienamycin, clindamycin, fusidic acid and vancomycin. Drugs Exp Clin Res 1985; 11: 23-27
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Fachinformation InfectoFos.
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Lee WS, Chen YC, Chen HP. et al. Vertebral osteomyelitis caused by vancomycin-tolerant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: Experience with teicoplanin plus fosfomycin combination therapy. J Micobiol Immunol Infect 2016; 49: 600-603
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Moenster RP, Linneman TW, Call WB. The potential role of newer gram-positive antibiotics in the setting of osteomyelitis of adults. J Clin Pharm Ther 2013; 38: 89-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Hopkinson N, Stevenson J, Benjamin S. A case ascertainment study of septic discitis: clinical, microbiological and radiological features. Q J Med 2001; 94: 465-470
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Zimmerli W. Vertebral Osteomyelitis. N Eng J Med 2010; 362: 1022-1029
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 McHenry MC, Easley KA, Locker GA. (2002) Verebral osteomyelitis: long term outcome for 253 patients from 7 Cleveland-area hospitals. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 34: 1342-1350
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Friedman JA, Maher CO, Quast LM. et al. Spontaneous disc space infections in adults. Surg. Neurol 2002; 57: 81-86
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Jensen AG, Espersen F, Skinhoj P. Bacteremic Staphylococcus aureus spondylitis. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158: 509-517
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Sobottke R. Aktuelle Diagnostik und Therapie der Spondylodiszitis. Dtsch Ärtzebl. 2008; 105: 181-187
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Bernard L, Dinh A, Ghout I. Antibiotic treatment for 6 weeks versus 12 weeks in patients with pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 2014; 385: 875-882
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Roblot F, Besnier JM, Juhel L. et al. Optimal duration of antibiotic therapy in vertebral osteomyelitis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2007; 36: 269-277
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Park KH, Chong YP, Kim SH. Clinical characteristics and therapeutic outcomes of hematogenous vertebral osteomyelitis caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect 2013; 67: 556-564
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Govender S. Spinal infections. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 1454-1458
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Klemm R, Schnettler R. Gentamycin-PMMA-Ketten Chirurgische Infektionen von Knochen, Gelenken und Weichteilen. Berlin-New-York: Schultheis, Rehm und Ecke, de-Gruyter-Verlag; 1991: 45-47
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Mehta S, Humphrey JS, Schenkman DI. et al. Gentamicin distribution from collagen carrier. J Orthop Res 1996; 14: 749-754
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Ascherl R, Sternberg A, Lechner F. et al. Local treatment of infection with collagen gentamicin. Aktuelle Probl Chir Orthop 1990; 34: 85-93
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Rauschmann MA, Wichelhaus TA, Stirnal V. et al. Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite and calcium sulphate as biodegradable composite carrier material for local delivery of antibiotics in bone infections. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 2677-2684
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Bostemann R, Steiger Jh, Scholz AO. First report on treating spontaneous infectious spondylodiscitis of lumbar spine with posterior debridement, posterior instrumentation and an injectable calcium sulfate/hydroxyapatite composite eluting gentamicin: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2016; 12;10: 349
    Google Scholar
  • 49 Winkler H, Janata O, Berger C. et al. In vitro release of vancomycin and tobramycin from impregnated human and bovine bone grafts. J Antimicrob Chemother 2000; 423-428
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Mayberry-Carson KJ, Tober-Meyer B, Smith JK. et al. Bacterial adherence and glycocalyx formation in osteomyelitis experimentally induced with staphylococcus aureus. Infection and Immunity 1984; 43: 825-833
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Walenkamp GH, Vree TOMB, Van Rens TJ. Gentamicin-PMMA beads: Pharmacokinetic and nephrotoxicological study. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research 1986; 205: 171-183
    Google Scholar
  • 52 Chang W, Colangeli M, Colangeli S. et al. Adult osteomyelitis: Debridement versus debridement plus osteoset T® pellets. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica 2007; 73: 238-244
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Stewart PS, Costerton JW. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. The Lancet (9276) 2001; 358: 135-138
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Buser Z, Brodke DS, Youssef JA. et al. Synthetic bone graft versus autograft or allograft for spinal fusion: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine 2016; 25: 509-516
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Jamali A, Hilpert A, Debes J. et al. Hydroxyapatite/carbonate (HA/CC) vs. Plaster of Paris: a histomorphometric and radiographic study in a rabbit tibial defect model. Calcif Tissue Int 2002; 71: 172-178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Rathbone CR, Cross JD, Brown KV. et al. Effect of various concentrations of antibiotics on osteogenic cell viability and activity. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 2011; 29: 1070-1074
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Eder C, Schenk S, Trifinopoulos J. et al. Does intrawound application of vancomycin influence bone healing in spinal surgery?. Eur Spine 2016; 25: 1021-1028
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Goldschmidt E, Rasmussen J, Chabot JD. et al. The effect of vancomycin powder on human dural fibroblast culture and its implications for dural repair during spine surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 2016; 25: 665-670
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Mendoza MC, Sonn KA, Kannan AS. et al. The effect of vancomycin powder on bone healing in a rat spinal rh BMP-2 model. J Neurosurg Spine 2016; 25: 147-153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 von Stechow D, Rauschmann M. Effectiveness of Combination Use of Antibiotic-Loaded PerOssal with Spinal Surgery in Patients with Spondylodiscitis. Eur Surg Res 2009; 43: 298-305
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Tuchscherr L, Kreis CA, Hoerr V. et al. Staphylococcus aureus develops increased resistance to antibiotics by forming dynamic small colony variants during chronic osteomyelitis. J Antimicrob Chemother 2016; 71: 438-448
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Proctor RA, Kahl B, von Eiff C. et al. Staphylococcal small colony variants have novel mechanisms for antibiotic resistance. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 27 (Suppl. 01) 68-74
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Lenhard JR, von Eiff C, Hong IS. et al. Evolution of Staphylococcus aureus under vancomycin selective pressure: the role of the small-colony variant phenotype. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2015; 59: 1347-1351
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Baquero F, Negri M, Morosini M. et al. Selection of very small differences in bacterial evolution. International Microbiology 1998; 1: 295-300
    PubMedGoogle Scholar