Download PDF
Suchttherapie 2017; 18(03): 126-133
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-113858
Schwerpunktthema
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Individuelle und gesellschaftliche Aspekte des E-Zigaretten-Konsums aus der Perspektive der Konsumierenden: Ein qualitativer Ansatz

Consumer’s Point of View of Individual and Social Aspects of E-Cigarette use: A Qualitative Approach
Kirsten Lehmann
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Zentrum für Interdisziplinäre Suchtforschung der Universität Hamburg, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
,
Silke Kuhn
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Zentrum für Interdisziplinäre Suchtforschung der Universität Hamburg, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
,
Jens Reimer
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Zentrum für Interdisziplinäre Suchtforschung der Universität Hamburg, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
2   Zentrum für Psychosoziale Medizin, Gesundheit Nord, Bremen
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
14 July 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund Sowohl der Bekanntheitsgrad als auch die Nutzung von elektronischen Zigaretten (E-Zigaretten) sind in den vergangenen Jahren rapide angestiegen. Der gesundheitliche Nutzen eines Umstiegs von Tabakprodukten auf E-Zigaretten sowie das bisher ungeklärte Langzeitrisiko des Konsums führten zu einem Public Health-Dilemma.

Methodik Qualitative explorative Inhaltsanalyse der Freitexte von 1969 aktuell E-Zigaretten konsumierenden Personen, die an einer Online-Befragung zu Konsumgewohnheiten und Motiven von E-Zigarettennutzenden teilgenommen haben.

Ergebnisse 4 Hauptthemen wurden identifiziert: E-Zigaretten im (1) politischen sowie im (2) gesellschaftlichen Kontext, (3) Motive und subjektiver Nutzen des Konsums und (4) E-Zigaretten Equipment. Aufgrund der wahrgenommenen positiven gesundheitlichen Auswirkungen des Umstiegs von Tabakprodukten auf E-Zigaretten und der Erleichterung, nicht mehr tabakabhängig zu sein, wird ein freier Zugang zu E-Zigaretten gefordert. Eine Regulierung hinsichtlich des Jugendschutzes und mit Blick auf die Sicherheit von Geräten und der Qualität des Liquids wird befürwortet.

Diskussion Die befragten E-Zigaretten-Konsumierenden bieten sich als Partner bei politischen Entscheidungen und für Forschungsfragen an.

Abstract

Background Awareness and use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have increased rapidly over the years. Reported health benefits when switching from tobacco products to e-cigarettes and unclear long-term risks of e-cigarettes lead to a public health dilemma.

Design Qualitative content analysis of open-ended questions of 1996 study participants. Data were gained from an online survey of e-cigarette users regarding their motives and consumption habits.

Findings 4 themes were identified: e-cigarettes in the context of (1) policy and (2) society, (3) motives and subjective benefits of e-cigarette use and (4) e-cigarette equipment. Due to perceived positive health effects when switching from tobacco products to e-cigarettes and the relief of being no longer dependent on tobacco, free access to e-cigarettes is demanded. Regulation on protecting youth, the safety of devices and quality of liquids is advocated.

Conclusions E-cigarette users offer themselves as partners in political decisions and research questions.

Schlüsselwörter

elektrische Zigarette - elektronische Zigarette - E-Zigarette - Inhaltsanalyse - qualitative Forschung

Key words

electronic cigarette - e-cigarette - content analysis - qualitative research
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Czogala J, Goniewicz ML, Fidelus B. et al. Secondhand exposure to vapors from electronic cigarettes. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2014; 16: 655-662
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hutzler C, Paschke M, Kruschinski S. et al. Chemical hazards present in liquids and vapors of electronic cigarettes. Arch Toxicol 2014; 88: 1295-1308
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Etter J-F. Electronic cigarettes: A survey of users. BMC Public Health 2010; 10
    PubMed
  • 4 Royal College of Physicians. Nicotine without smoke: Tobacco harm reduction. London: RCP; 2016
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Cahn Z, Siegel M. Electronic cigarettes as a harm reduction strategy for tobacco control: A step forward or a repeat of past mistakes?. Journal of Public Health Policy 2011; 32: 16-31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Adkison SE, O’Connor RJ, Bansal-Travers M. et al. Electronic nicotine delivery systems. International tobacco control four-country survey. Am J Prev Med 2013; 44: 207-215
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Andler R, Guignard R, Wilquin J-L. et al. Electronic cigarette use in France in 2014. Int J Public Health 2015; 61: 159-165 doi:110.1007/s00038-00015-00773-00039 Epub 02015 Dec 00021
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Barbeau AM, Burda J, Siegel M. Perceived efficacy of e-cigarettes versus nicotine replacement therapy among successful e-cigarette users: A qualitative approach. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2013; 8: 5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Goniewicz ML, Knysak J, Gawron M. et al. Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes. Tobacco Control: An International Journal 2014; 23: 133-139
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hajek P, Etter JF, Benowitz N. et al. Electronic cigarettes: Review of use, content, safety, effects on smokers and potential for harm and benefit. Addiction 2014; 109: 1801-1810
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 McNeill A, Brose L, Calder R et al. E-cigarettes: An evidence update. Public Health England 2015
    PubMed
  • 12 Shahab L, Goniewicz M, Blount BC. et al. Nicotine, carcinogen, and toxin exposure in long-term e-cigarette and nicotine replacement therapy users. Ann Intern Med 2017; DOI: 10.7326/M16-1107.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Cobb CO, Hendricks PS, Eissenberg T. Electronic cigarettes and nicotine dependence: Evolving products, evolving problems. BMC Medicine 2015; 13
    PubMed
  • 14 Williams M, Villarrea A, Bozhilov K. et al. Metal and silicate particles including nanoparticles are present in electronic cigarette cartomizer fluid and aerosol. PLoS ONE 2013; 8: e57987
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Caponnetto P, Campagna D, Cibella F et al. Efficiency and safety of an electronic cigarette (eclat) as tobacco cigarettes substitute: A prospective 12-month randomized control design study. PLoS One 2013; 8
    PubMed
  • 16 Orr K, Asal N. Efficacy of electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2014; 48: 1502-1506
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Brown J, Beard E, Kotz D. et al. Real-world effectiveness of e-cigarettes when used to aid smoking cessation: A cross-sectional population study. Addiction 2014; 109: 1531-1540
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Bullen C, Howe C, Laugesen M. et al. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: A randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 2013; 382: 1629-1637
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 McKee M. E-cigarettes and the marketing push that surprised everyone. Ongoing debate in Europe over regulation may favour the interests of the industry. Bmj 2013; 347
    PubMed
  • 20 Grana RA, Benowitz N, Glantz SA. E-cigarettes. A scientific review. Circulation 2014; 129: 1972-1986
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Farrimond H. E-cigarette regulation and policy: UK vapers’ perspectives. Addiction 2016; 111: 1077-1083
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Europäische Union. Amtsblatt l 127. 2014
    PubMed
  • 23 Schneider S, Görig T, Diehl K. Die E-Zigarette – Bundesweite Daten zu Bekanntheit, Nutzung und Risikowahrnehmung. ASU Arbeitsmed Sozialmed Umweltmed 2015; 50: 818-823
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Eichler M, Blettner M, Singer S. The use of e-cigarettes. A population-based cross-sectional survey of 4002 individuals in 2016. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2016; 113: 847-854
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Etter J-F, Bullen C. Electronic cigarette: Users profile, utilization, satisfaction and perceived efficacy. Addiction 2011; 106: 2017-2028
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Lehmann K, Kuhn S, Reimer J. Electronic cigarettes in Germany: Patterns of use and perceived health improvement. Eur Addict Res 2017; 23: 136-147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 McQueen A, Tower S, Sumner W. Interviews with "vapers": Implications for future research with electronic cigarettes. Nicotine Tob Res 2011; 13: 860-867 doi:810.1093/ntr/ntr1088 Epub 2011 May 1012
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Mayring P. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. Weinheim und Basel: Beltz Verlag; 2010
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Mayring P. Qualitative content analysis. Forum qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative social research 2000
    PubMed
  • 30 Wackowski OA, Delnevo CD. Smokers’ attitudes and support for e-cigarette policies and regulation in the United States. Tob Control 2015; 24: 543-546
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Fraser D, Weier M, Keane H. et al. Vapers' perspectives on electronic cigarette regulation in Australia. Int J Drug Policy 2015; 26: 589-594 doi:510.1016/j.drugpo.2015.1001.1019 Epub 2015 Jan 1031
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Rüther T, Wissen F, Linhardt A. et al. Electronic cigarettes - attitudes and use in Germany. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2015; Advance Access published September 18: 1-10
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Office for National Statistics. Dataset. E-cigarette use in Great Britain. Opinion and lifestyle survey 2016; 2015:
    PubMed
  • 34 Chapman S, Freeman B. Markers of the denormalisation of smoking and the tobacco industry. Tob Control 2008; 17: 25-31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Louka P, Maguire M, Evans P. et al. ‘I think that it’s a pain in the ass that I have to stand outside in the cold and have a cigarette’ representations of smoking and experiences of disapproval in UK and Greek smokers. Journal of Health Psychology 2006; 11: 441-451
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar