Diagnostik und Staging gynäkologischer Tumoren mittels MRT

Zusammenfassung

Die MRT ist die Schnittbildgebung der Wahl, um gynäkologische Tumoren darzustellen. In welchen Fällen sie wie und mit welchen Sequenzen eingesetzt werden kann und was bei den einzelnen Entitäten zu berücksichtigen ist, wird im folgenden Beitrag dargestellt.

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is known as the cross-sectional imaging modality of choice for evaluation of the female pelvis due to an excellent soft tissue contrast and its high resolution images. It provides morphologic and functional sequences and is commonly used for evaluation of a sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass, for differentiation and characterization of pelvic organ lesions, as well as for tumor staging and therapy monitoring during/after treatment. This article gives insights into the currently valid implementation of MR-imaging, tailored to the different female pelvic organs and its special features.

Schlüsselwörter

MRT - gynäkologische Tumoren

Key words

MRI - gynecologic malignancies - female pelvic neoplasms

• Literatur

• 1 Alt C. Weibliches Becken. In: Radiologische Diagnostik Abdomen und Thorax. Thieme; 2015: 648-687
• 2 Balleyguier C, Sala E, Da Cunha T. et al. Staging of uterine cervical cancer with MRI: guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 1102-1110
• 3 Kinkel K, Forstner R, Danza FM. et al. Staging of endometrial cancer with MRI: guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Imaging. Eur Radiol 2009; 19: 1565-1574
• 4 Forstner R, Sala E, Kinkel K. et al. ESUR guidelines: ovarian cancer staging and follow-up. Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 2773-2780
• 5 Kirchhoff S. MR Vagina, Uterus, Adnexe. In: Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Boss A. Hrsg. Praxisbuch MRT Abdomen und Becken. Heidelberg: Springer; 2012: 181-194
• 6 Kröncke T. Benign uterine Lesions. In: Hamm B, Forstner R. eds. MRI and CT of the female Pelvis. Heidelberg: Springer; 2007: 61-100
• 7 Forstner R, Thomassin-Naggara I, Cunha TM. et al. ESUR recommendations for MR imaging of the sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass: an update. Eur Radiol 2017; 27: 2248-2257
• 8 Kinkel K, Kaji Y, Yu KK. et al. Radiologic staging in patients with endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis. Radiology 1999; 212: 711-718
• 9 Sala E, Rockall AG, Freeman SJ. et al. The added role of MR imaging in treatment stratification of patients with gynecologic malignancies: what the radiologist needs to know. Radiology 2013; 266: 717-740
• 10 Wittekind C, Meyer H-J. International Union against Cancer, Hrsg. TNM: Klassifikation maligner Tumoren. 7. Aufl.. Weinheim: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010: XIX 295
• 11 Alt C, Gebauer G. Uterus. In: Hallscheidt P, Haferkamp A. Hrsg. Urogenitale Bildgebung. Heidelberg: Springer; 2011: 232-301
• 12 Sala E, Wakely S, Senior E. et al. MRI of malignant neoplasms of the uterine corpus and cervix. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188: 1577-1587
• 13 Scheidler J, Heuck AF. Imaging of cancer of the cervix. Radiol Clin North Am 2002; 40: 577-590
• 14 Zand KR, Reinhold C, Abe H. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervix. Cancer Imaging 2007; 7: 69-76
• 15 Santos P, Cunha TM. Uterine sarcomas: Clinical presentation and MRI features. Diagnostic Interv Radiol 2015; 21: 4-9
• 16 Thomassin-Naggara I, Dechoux S, Bonneau C. et al. How to differentiate benign from malignant myometrial tumours using MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2013; 23: 2306-2314
• 17 Tanaka YO, Tsunoda H, Minami R. et al. Carcinosarcoma of the uterus: MR findings. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28: 434-439
• 18 Kato H, Kanematsu M, Furui T. et al. Carcinosarcoma of the uterus: radiologic-pathologic correlations with magnetic resonance imaging including diffusion-weighted imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 26: 1446-1450
• 19 Jonat W, Bauerschlag D, Schem C. et al. Gut- und bösartige gynäkologische Tumoren. In: Diedrich K, Holzgreve W, Jonat W, Schneider K-T, Schultze-Mosgau A. Hrsg. Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. Heidelberg: Springer; 2007: 211-298
• 20 Forstner R, Meissnitzer M, Margarida T. Update on Imaging of Ovarian Cancer. Curr Radiol Rep 2016; 4: 1-11
• 21 Hricak H, Chen M, Coakley FV. et al. Complex adnexal masses: detection and characterization with MR imaging-multivariate analysis. Radiology 2000; 214: 39-46
• 22 Zaspel U, Hamm B. Cervical Cancer. In: Hamm B, Forstner R. eds. MRI and CT of the female Pelvis. Heidelberg: Springer; 2007: 121-180
• 23 Thill M, Bohlmann MK, Dittmer C. et al. Diagnostik und operative Therapie des Vulva- und Vaginalkarzinoms. Der Onkologe 2009; 15: 28-39
• 24 Taylor MB, Dugar N, Davidson SE. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of primary vaginal carcinoma. Clin Radiol 2007; 62: 549-555
• 25 Zaspel U, Hamm B. Vagina. MRI and CT of the female Pelvis. Heidelberg: Springer; 2007
• 26 Gong Y, Wang Q, Dong L. et al. Different imaging techniques for the detection of pelvic lymph nodes metastasis from gynecological malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2017; 8: 14.107-14.125
• 27 Pano B, Sebastià C, Ripoll E. et al. Pathways of lymphatic spread in gynecologic malignancies. Radiographics 2015; 35: 916-945
• 28 Kitajima K, Tanaka U, Ueno Y. et al. Role of diffusion weighted imaging and contrast-enhanced MRI in the evaluation of intrapelvic recurrence of gynecological malignant tumor. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0117411
• 29 Kaufmann M, Costa SD, Scharl A. Hrsg. Vulva. Die Gynäkologie. Heidelberg: Springer; 2013: 416-428