Endoscopy 2017; 49(07): 668-674
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-103407
Innovations and brief communications
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Laparoscopic transgastric circumferential stapler-assisted vs. endoscopic esophageal mucosectomy in a porcine model

Daniel C. Steinemann
1   Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
2   St. Claraspital AG, Departement of Surgery, Basel, Switzerland
,
Andreas Zerz
3   Department of Surgery, Klinik Stephanshorn, St. Gallen, Switzerland
,
Philip C. Müller
1   Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
,
Peter Sauer
4   Department of Gastroenterology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
,
Anja Schaible
4   Department of Gastroenterology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
,
Felix Lasitschka
5   Institute of Pathology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
,
Anne-Catherine Schwarz
1   Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
,
Beat P. Müller-Stich
1   Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
,
Georg R. Linke
1   Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
6   Department of Surgery, Hospital STS Thun AG, Thun, Switzerland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 31 October 2016

accepted after revision 26 January 2017

Publication Date:
16 March 2017 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Background and study aims Extensive endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for Barrett’s esophagus (BE) may lead to stenosis. Laparoscopic, transgastric, stapler-assisted mucosectomy (SAM) with the retrieval of a circumferential specimen is proposed.

Methods SAM was evaluated in two phases. The feasibility of SAM and the quality of specimens were assessed in eight animals. The mucosal healing was evaluated in a 6-week survival experiment comparing SAM (n = 6) with EMR (n = 6). The ratio of the esophageal lumen width (REL) at the resection level measured on fluoroscopy at 6 weeks divided by the width immediately after resection was compared.

Results In all animals, a circular mucosectomy specimen was successfully obtained, with a median area of 492 mm2 (interquartile range [IQR] 426 – 573 mm2) and 941 mm2 (IQR 813 – 1209 mm2) using a 21 mm and 25 mm stapler, respectively. In the survival experiments, symptomatic stenosis developed in two animals after EMR and in none after SAM. The REL was 0.27 (0.18 – 0.39) and 0.96 (0.9 – 1.04; P < 0.0001) for EMR and SAM, respectively.

Conclusions SAM provides a novel technique for en bloc mucosectomy in BE. In contrast to EMR, mucosal healing after SAM was not associated with stenosis up to 6 weeks after intervention.