Sequential Clinical Recovery after Replantation for Complete Finger Amputation in Tamai Zone 1

Abstract

Background The clinical results of replantation for an amputated distal finger are functionally acceptable. However, few reports exist regarding sequential clinical postoperative recovery. The purpose of this study was to examine the clinical recovery at every 3 months up to 1 year postoperatively.

Methods Nineteen patients (16 patients were men), representing 19 fingers with complete amputation at Tamai's zone 1 and replanted successfully, were included in this study. Total active motion (TAM), grip strength (GS), Semmes–Weinstein monofilament (SW) test result, static two-point discrimination (s2PD), and Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score questionnaire results were obtained postoperatively at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Pulp atrophy and nail deformity were assessed at 12 months postoperatively.

Results The postoperative %TAM (compared to the uninjured side, 81.8 ± 18.1 at 3 months vs. 91.5 ± 11.9 at 6 months, p < 0.01), %GS (compared with the uninjured side, 61.3 ± 25.9 at 3 months vs. 78.3 ± 20.4 at 6 months, p = 0.02), s2PD (excellent and good/poor; 7/12 at 3 months vs. 18/1 at 6 months, p < 0.01), and DASH scores (26.1 ± 23.1 at 3 months vs. 12.0 ± 12.9 at 6 months, p < 0.01) recovered significantly from 3 to 6 months but did not change significantly from 6 months onward. The SW test results showed a significant recovery between 3 and 12 months postoperatively (2.83 and 3.61/4.31, 6.65, and undetectable, 1/18 at 3 months vs. 7/12 at 12 months, p = 0.04). The DASH score at 12 months postoperatively was significantly associated with %TAM (r = −0.64, p < 0.01) and %GS (r = −0.58, p < 0.01) at 12 months postoperatively and age (r = 0.52, p = 0.02). Five fingers had pulp atrophy and four fingers had nail deformity.

Conclusion This 1-year follow-up study showed the sequential clinical recovery after replantation for complete amputation in Tamai zone 1. Postoperative %TAM, %GS, and the DASH score recovered significantly between 3 and 6 months but significant recovery up to 1 year was not observed.

Keywords

finger amputation - replantation - zone 1 - clinical recovery

Publication History

Article published online:
15 February 2022

• References

• 1 Komatsu S, Tamai S. Successful replantation of a completely cut-off thumb - case report. Plast Reconstr Surg 1968; 42: 374-377
• 2 Hattori Y, Doi K, Ikeda K, Estrella EP. A retrospective study of functional outcomes after successful replantation versus amputation closure for single fingertip amputations. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31 (05) 811-818
• 3 Hayashi K, Hattori Y, Chia DSY, Sakamoto S, Doi K. Long-term outcomes of successful fingertip replantation: a follow-up of at least 10 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 146 (05) 1059-1069
• 4 Ross DC, Manktelow RT, Wells MT, Boyd JB. Tendon function after replantation: prognostic factors and strategies to enhance total active motion. Ann Plast Surg 2003; 51 (02) 141-146
• 5 Tamai S. Twenty years' experience of limb replantation–review of 293 upper extremity replants. J Hand Surg Am 1982; 7 (06) 549-556
• 6 Urbaniak JR, Roth JH, Nunley JA, Goldner RD, Koman LA. The results of replantation after amputation of a single finger. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67 (04) 611-619
• 7 Hasuo T, Nishi G, Tsuchiya D, Otsuka T. Fingertip replantations: importance of venous anastomosis and the clinical results. Hand Surg 2009; 14 (01) 1-6
• 8 Matsuzaki H, Yoshizu T, Maki Y, Tsubokawa N. Functional and cosmetic results of fingertip replantation: anastomosing only the digital artery. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 53 (04) 353-359
• 9 Zhang X, Wen S, Wang B, Wang Q, Li C, Zhu H. Reconstruction of circulation in the fingertip without vein repair in zone I replantation. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33 (09) 1597-1601
• 10 Purisa H, Ozturk MB, Kabakas F, Mersa B, Ozcelik IB, Sezer I. Intramedullary venous drainage system for distal fingertip replantations. Ann Plast Surg 2017; 79 (02) 166-173
• 11 Shi D, Qi J, Li D, Zhu L, Jin W, Cai D. Fingertip replantation at or beyond the nail base in children. Microsurgery 2010; 30 (05) 380-385
• 12 Akyürek M, Safak T, Keçik A. Fingertip replantation at or distal to the nail base: use of the technique of artery-only anastomosis. Ann Plast Surg 2001; 46 (06) 605-612
• 13 Ozcelik IB, Tuncer S, Purisa H. et al. Sensory outcome of fingertip replantations without nerve repair. Microsurgery 2008; 28 (07) 524-530
• 14 Yamano Y. Replantation of the amputated distal part of the fingers. J Hand Surg Am 1985; 10 (02) 211-218
• 15 Weinstein S. Fifty years of somatosensory research: from the Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments to the Weinstein Enhanced Sensory Test. J Hand Ther 1993; 6 (01) 11-22 , discussion 50
• 16 Weber RA, Breidenbach WC, Brown RE, Jabaley ME, Mass DP. A randomized prospective study of polyglycolic acid conduits for digital nerve reconstruction in humans. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106 (05) 1036-1045 , discussion 1046–1048
• 17 Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 2013; 48 (03) 452-458
• 18 Sebastin SJ, Chung KC. A systematic review of the outcomes of replantation of distal digital amputation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (03) 723-737
• 19 Roh YH, Lee BK, Noh JH, Oh JH, Gong HS, Baek GH. Factors delaying recovery after volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39 (08) 1465-1470
• 20 Ikeda K, Morikawa S, Hashimoto F, Tomita K. Fingertip replantation: pre-osteosynthesis vein graft technique. Microsurgery 1994; 15 (06) 430-432
• 21 Dellon AL. Two-point discrimination and Meissner corpuscles. Plast Reconstr Surg 1977; 60 (02) 270-271
• 22 Hattori Y, Doi K, Sakamoto S, Yamasaki H, Wahegaonkar A, Addosooki A. Fingertip replantation. J Hand Surg Am 2007; 32 (04) 548-555
• 23 Nishi G, Shibata Y, Tago K, Kubota M, Suzuki M. Nail regeneration in digits replanted after amputation through the distal phalanx. J Hand Surg Am 1996; 21 (02) 229-233