Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Lab Physicians 2022; 14(03): 271-277
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1742636
Original Article

Plasmid-Mediated Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii

Geetha P. Venkataramana
1   Department of Microbiology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Porur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Aishwarya K.V. Lalitha
1   Department of Microbiology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Porur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Shanthi Mariappan
1   Department of Microbiology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Porur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Uma Sekar
1   Department of Microbiology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Porur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
› Author Affiliations

Funding This study is funded by Department of Science & Technology (DST) under Women Scientists Scheme (WOS-A).
 

Abstract

IntroductionPseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii are important pathogens in health care–associated infections. Fluoroquinolone resistance has emerged in these pathogens. In this study, we aimed to determine the occurrence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) determinants (qnrA, qnrB, qnrS, aac(6′)-Ib-cr, oqxAB, and qepA) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and the transmissibility of plasmid-borne resistance determinants in clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii.

Materials and Methods The study included P. aeruginosa (85) and A. baumannii (45) which were nonduplicate, clinically significant, and ciprofloxacin resistant. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was done by disk diffusion method for other antimicrobial agents, namely amikacin, ceftazidime, piperacillin/tazobactam, ofloxacin, levofloxacin, and imipenem. Minimum inhibitory concentration of ciprofloxacin was determined. Efflux pump activity was evaluated using carbonyl-cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP). The presence of PMQR genes was screened by PCR amplification. Transferability of PMQR genes was determined by conjugation experiment, and plasmid-based replicon typing was performed.

Results Resistance to other classes of antimicrobial agents was as follows: ceftazidime (86.9%), piperacillin/tazobactam (73.8%), imipenem (69.2%), and amikacin (63.8%). The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC)50 and MIC90 for ciprofloxacin were 64 and greater than or equal to 256 µg/mL, respectively. There was a reduction in MIC for 37 (28.4%) isolates with CCCP. In P. aeruginosa, 12 (14.1%) isolates harbored qnrB, 12 (14.1%) qnrS, 9 (10.5%) both qnrB and qnrS, 66 (77.6%) aac(6′)-Ib-cr, and 3 (3.5%) oqxAB gene. In A. baumannii, qnrB was detected in 2 (4.4%), 1 (2.2%) harbored both the qnrA and qnrS, 1 isolate harbored qnrB and qnrS, 21 (46.6%) aac(6′)-Ib-cr, and 1 (2.2%) isolate harbored oqxAB gene. Notably, qepA gene was not detected in any of the study isolates. Conjugation experiments revealed that 12 (9.2%) were transferable. Of the transconjugants, seven (58.3%) belonged to IncFII type plasmid replicon, followed by four (33.3%) IncA/C and one (8.3%) IncFIC type.

Conclusion The plasmid-mediated resistance aac(6′)-Ib-cr gene is primarily responsible for mediating fluoroquinolone resistance in clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii. The predominant plasmid type is IncFII.


Introduction

Fluoroquinolones are synthetic antimicrobial agents with a broad spectrum of activity. They are effective against a wide range of gram-negative and gram-positive pathogenic bacteria. Over the past few years, fueled by their wide use, resistance to fluoroquinolones has raised globally.[1] An important resistance mechanism to fluoroquinolones is described by mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining regions of gyrase and topoisomerase encoding genes.[2] Another well-known fluoroquinolone resistance mechanism is the decreased intracellular drug accumulation by upregulation of efflux pumps or decreased expression of outer membrane porin.[3] The emergence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) has been reported since 1998. These are horizontally transferable and are referred to as “PMQR.” The three PMQR genes include: (1) the qnr, (2) aac(6′)-Ib-cr (aminoglycoside acetyltransferase), and (3) oqxAB and qepA (efflux pumps).[4]

The plasmid qnr genes (qnrA, qnrB, and qnrS) encode for proteins of the pentapeptide repeat family that protect DNA gyrase and topoisomerase intravenous from fluoroquinolone inhibition. The aac(6)-Ib-cr is a bifunctional variant of aminoglycoside acetyltransferase capable of modifying the fluoroquinolones that have an amino nitrogen on the C7 of piperazinyl ring, such as ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin, thereby reducing their activity.[5] Other fluoroquinolones lacking an unsubstituted piperazinyl nitrogen are not affected.[6] The plasmid-mediated qepA efflux pump belongs to the major facilitator superfamily that decreases susceptibility to hydrophilic fluoroquinolones, especially ciprofloxacin.[7] The oqxAB encodes for efflux pumps belonging to the resistance nodulation division family and is a multidrug efflux pump.[8]

Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are well recognized representatives of nonfermenting gram-negative pathogens which are responsible for health care-acquired infections. In both species, resistance to fluoroquinolones has been a recognized problem due to their ready ability to acquire resistance determinants.[2] Most studies on prevalence of PMQR genes are focused on Enterobacteriaceae.[9] [10] [11] Data on the prevalence of PMQR genes among clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii are scarce.[12]

The presence of fluoroquinolone resistance genes on plasmid enables their spread to other bacterial species by horizontal gene transfer. The identification of related plasmids associated with specific resistance genes helps track the spread of resistant plasmids. Hence, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based replicon typing (PBRT) has been adopted worldwide as the method for plasmid identification and typing.[13]

In this study, we aimed to determine the occurrence of PMQR determinants (qnrA, qnrB, qnrS, aac(6′)-Ib-cr, oqxAB, and qepA) by PCR and the transmissibility of these plasmid-borne resistance determinants in clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii.


Materials and Methods

Bacterial Isolates

The study included P. aeruginosa (85) and A. baumannii (45) which were nonduplicate, clinically significant and ciprofloxacin resistant (as determined by disc diffusion test) and obtained from clinical specimens of hospitalized patients at university teaching hospital in South India. They were collected over a period of 1 year from July 2014 to June 2015. They were obtained from clinical specimens such as urine (5), exudative samples (66), respiratory secretions (47), and blood stream (12). The isolates were identified up to species level by automated system (VITEK2 GN-card; BioMerieux, Brussels, Belgium) and/or standard biochemical tests.


Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Antibiotic susceptibility testing was done by Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method for the following antimicrobials: ceftazidime (30 µg), piperacillin/tazobactam (30 µg), imipenem (10 µg), amikacin (30 µg), levofloxacin (5 µg), and ofloxacin (5 µg) (Himedia Laboratories, India). The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ciprofloxacin was determined by agar dilution technique according to CLSI 2017 guidelines.[14] ATCC Escherichia coli 25922 was used as control for both disc diffusion method and MIC determination.


Phenotypic Detection of Efflux Pump Activity

To detect the presence of efflux pump mechanism, carbonyl-cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP), the efflux pump inhibitor was added to each Muller–Hinton (MH) agar plate containing 0.125 to 256 μg/mL of ciprofloxacin. The fixed concentration of CCCP in the MH agar was 20 μg/mL. The MIC with CCCP incorporated was determined in twofold serial dilutions as for the antibiotic (CLSI 2017).[14] A plate without antibiotic and containing only CCCP inhibitor was used as control. The criteria for the presence of efflux pump activity was based on a fourfold decrease in MIC of ciprofloxacin on addition of CCCP.[15]


Polymerase Chain Reaction

The DNA of the study isolates was extracted by the boiling method. The amplification of qnr genes (qnrA, qnrB, and qnrS) was performed by multiplex PCR using the cyclic profile: initial denaturation at 94°C for 7 minutes; denaturation at 94°C for 50 seconds, annealing at 53°C for 40 seconds, and elongation at 72°C for 60 seconds, repeated for 35 cycles, and a final extension at 72°C for 5 minutes.[16] The PCR conditions for acc(6′)-Ib-cr were: initial denaturation at 94°C for 7 minutes, denaturation at 94°C for 50 seconds, annealing at 55°C for 40 seconds, and elongation at 72°C for 60 seconds, repeated for 35 cycles, and a final extension at 72°C for 5 minutes.[17] The PCR cyclic parameters for oqxAB were as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 15 minutes; 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 seconds, 63°C for 90 seconds, and 72°C for 90 seconds, followed by a final extension at 72°C for 10 minutes. The PCR conditions used for qepA were as follows: initial denaturation at 96°C for 1 minute, followed by 30 cycles of amplification at 96°C for 1 minute, annealing at 60°C for 1 minute, extension at 72°C for 1 minute, and the final extension step was at 72°C for 5 minutes.[18] The primers used is given in [Table 1].[16] [17] [18] The PCR by-product was examined by electrophoresis in agarose gel containing ethidium bromide and visualized by gel documentation system.

Table 1

Primers used in this study

PMQR gene

Primers

Product size

Reference

qnrA

5′-TCAGCAAGAGGATTTCTCA-3′

5′-GGCAGCACTATTA CTCCCA-3′

516

[16]

qnrB

5′-GATCGTGAAAGCCAGAAAGG3′

5′-ACGATG CCTGGTAGTTGTCC-3′

469

[16]

qnrS

5′-ACGACATTCGTCAACTGCAA-3′

5′-TAAATTGGCACCCTGTAGGC-3′

417

[16]

acc(6')-Ib-cr

5′-TTGGAAGCGGGGACGGAM-3′

5′-ACACGGCTGGACCATA -3′

260

[17]

oqxAB

5′-CCGCACCGATAAATTAGTCC-3′

5′-GGCGAGGTTTTGATAGTGGA-3′

313

[18]

qepA

5-GCA GGT CCA GCA GCG GGT AG-3

5-CTT CCT GCC CGA GTA TCG TG-3

218

[18]

Abbreviation: PMQR, plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance.



DNA Sequencing

The PCR positive amplicons were sequenced at SciGenome Labs Pvt, Ltd., India and analyzed with BLAST tools (www.ncbi.nim.nih.gov). The assigned GenBank accession number for the submitted sequences are: (1) MH709266 (qnrA); (2) KY130487 (qnrB); (3) KY130488 (qnrS); (4) MH709269 (acc(6')-Ib-cr), and (5) MN273774 (oqxAB).


Conjugation

Conjugation experiments were performed for all PMQR positive isolates. Escherichia coli J53 AziR strain was used as the recipient and PMQR positive isolates as donor. The donor and recipient cells (0.5 mL each) in logarithmic phase were added to 3 mL of LB broth and incubated at 37°C overnight. Transconjugants were selected by plating on MacConkey agar plates containing sodium azide (100 µg/mL) and ciprofloxacin (0.5 µg/mL).[19] The transfer of PMQR genes in transconjugants was confirmed by PCR.


Incompatibility Grouping of Plasmid Encoding Resistance for PMQR Genes

Plasmid Inc group for the transconjugants was determined by PBRT. Five sets of multiplex PCR ([HI1, HI2, I1]; [X, L/M, N]; [FIA, FIB, W]; [YP FIC]; [A/C, T, FIIS]) and three simplex PCR (FrepB, K/B, B/O) were performed.[13] The primers employed is depicted in [Table 2].[13]

Table 2

Primers for PCR-based replicon typing[13]

Replicon type

Primer sequence (5′–3′)

Amplicon size (bp)

HI1

F-GGAGCGATGGATTACTTCAGTAC

R-TGCCGTTTCACCTCGTGAGTA

471

HI2

F-TTTCTCCTGAGTCACCTGTTAACAC

R-GGCTCACTACCGTTGTCATCCT

644

I1

F-CGAAAGCCGGACGGCAGAA

R-TCGTCGTTCCGCCAAGTTCGT

139

X

F-AACCTTAGAGGCTATTTAAGTTGCTGAT

R-TGAGAGTCAATTTTTATCTCATGTTTTAGC

376

L/M

F-GGATGAAAACTATCAGCATCTGAAG

R-CTGCAGGGGCGATTCTTTAGG

785

N

F-GTCTAACGAGCTTACCGAAG

R-GTTTCAACTCTGCCAAGTTC

559

FIA

F-CCATGCTGGTTCTAGAGAAGGTG

R-GTATATCCTTACTGGCTTCCGCAG

462

FIB

F-GGAGTTCTGACACACGATTTTCTG

R-CTCCCGTCGCTTCAGGGCATT

308

W

F-CCTAAGAACAACAAAGCCCCCG

R-GGTGCGCGGCATAGAACCGT

242

Y

F-AATTCAAACAACACTGTGCAGCCTG

R-GCGAGAATGGACGATTACAAAACTTT

765

P

F-CTATGGCCCTGCAAACGCGCCAGAAA

R-TCACGCGCCAGGGCGCAGCC

534

FIC

F-GTGAACTGGCAGATGAGGAAGG

R-TTCTCCTCGTCGCCAAACTAGAT

262

A/C

F-GAGAACCAAAGACAAAGACCTGGA

R-ACGACAAACCTGAATTGCCTCCTT

465

T

F-TTGGCCTGTTTGTGCCTAAACCAT

R-CGTTGATTACACTTAGCTTTGGAC

750

FIIS

F-CTGTCGTAAGCTGATGGC

R-CTCTGCCACAAACTTCAGC

270

FrepB

F-TGATCGTTTAAGGAATTTTG

R-GAAGATCAGTCACACCATCC

270

K/B

F-GCGGTCCGGAAAGCCAGAAAA

R-TCTTTCACGAGCCCGCCAAA

160

B/O

F-GCGGTCCGGAAAGCCAGAAAA

R-TCTGCGTTCCGCCAAGTTCGA

159

Abbreviation: PCR, polymerase chain reaction.




Results

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

All the study isolates were resistant to other fluoroquinolones—levofloxacin and ofloxacin. Resistance to other classes of antimicrobial agents was as follows: ceftazidime (86.9%), piperacillin/tazobactam (73.8%), imipenem (69.2%), and amikacin (63.8%). The MIC of ciprofloxacin ranged from 4 to greater than or equal to 256 µg/mL. The MIC50 and MIC90 values were 64 and greater than or equal to 256 µg/mL, respectively.


Detection of Efflux Pump Activity

Among 130 isolates, twofold reduction was evident in 46 (35.8%) and fourfold or more reduction was observed in 37 (28.4%). Fourfold was evident in 11 (12.9%), 8-fold in 5 (5.8%), 16-fold in 7 (8.2%), 32-fold in 3 (3.5%), and 128 fold in 2 (2.3%) among P. aeruginosa. In A. baumannii, 4-fold reduction was observed in one (2.2%) isolate, 8-fold in three (6.6%), 16-fold in two (4.4%), and 64-fold in three (6.6%), respectively ([Table 3]).

Table 3

Effect of CCCP on the ciprofloxacin MIC

Organism (n = 130)

Fold reduction in MIC + CCCP (µg/mL)

0

2

4

8

16

32

64

128

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 85)

21

36

11

5

7

3

0

2

Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 45)

26

10

1

3

2

0

3

0

Abbreviations: CCCP, carbonyl-cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone; MIC, minimal inhibitory concentration.



Polymerase Chain Reaction

Among P. aeruginosa, qnr genes were detected in 36 (27.6%) isolates, of which 12 (14.1%) isolates harbored qnrB, 12 (14.1%) carried qnrS gene, and 9 (10.5%) isolates harbored both qnrB and qnrS genes. Among A. baumannii, qnrB was detected in two (4.4%) isolates and only one (2.2%) harbored both the qnrA and qnrS; 77.6% (66) of P. aeruginosa and 46.6% (21) of A. baumannii isolates harbored aac(6′)-Ib-cr gene; 3.5% (3) of P. aeruginosa and 2.2% (1) of A. baumannii isolates harbored oqxAB gene. qepA gene was not detected in any of the study isolates. The PMQR genes encountered is depicted in [Table 4].

Table 4

Distribution of PMQR genes

PMQR genes

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 85)

Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 45)

Total prevalence (n = 130)

aac(6′)-Ib-cr

31 (36.4%)

17 (37.7%)

48 (36.9%)

oqxAB

1 (1.1%)

1 (2.2%)

2 (1.5%)

qnrB + aac(6′)-Ib-cr

12 (14.1%)

2 (4.4%)

14 (10.7%)

qnrS + aac(6′)-Ib-cr

12 (14.1%)

0

12 (9.2%)

qnrA + qnrS + aac(6′)-Ib-cr

0

1 (2.2%)

1 (0.7%)

qnrB + qnrS + aac(6′)-Ib-cr

9 (10.5%)

1 (2.2%)

10 (7.6%)

qnrB + qnrS + oqxAB + aac(6′)-Ib-cr

1 (1.1%)

0

1 (0.7%)

oqxAB + aac(6′)-Ib-cr

1 (1.1%)

0

1 (0.7%)

Total

67 (78.8%)

22 (48.8%)

89 (68.5%)

Abbreviation: PMQR, plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance.



PMQR Gene Transfer and Distribution of Plasmid Replicons

In P. aeruginosa, 9.2% (12/130) were transferred successfully. All the 12 transconjugants were positive only for aac(6′)-Ib-cr gene. In A. baumannii, none of them was transferable.

The plasmid incompatibility types of the transconjugants were recognized by PBRT. Of the 12 transconjugants, 7 (58.3%) belonged to IncFII type plasmid replicon, 4 (33.3%) were IncA/C, and 1 (8.3%) IncFIC type.



Discussion

Fluoroquinolones are potent antibiotics active against a broad range of bacteria. The global increase in the prevalence of clinical strains with reduced susceptibility to fluoroquinolones constitutes a major concern.[20] The emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance among P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii presents a serious challenge in clinical management of bacterial infections.[21] In this study, antibiotic susceptibility testing revealed that all the test isolates were resistance to the other fluoroquinolones also: levofloxacin and ofloxacin. Resistance to other class of antibiotics was ceftazidime (86.9%), piperacillin/tazobactam (73.8%), imipenem (69.2%), and amikacin (63.8%). In this study, 32.9% (28) of P. aeruginosa and 37.7% (17) of A. baumannii isolates had an MIC of greater than or equal to 256 μg/mL to ciprofloxacin and similar observation has also been documented by Zaki et al.[22]

In this study, the MIC decrease factor value of fourfold and more reduction was evident in 28.4% (37/130) of isolates. In one isolate (4.5%) (P. aeruginosa), it resulted in loss of ciprofloxacin resistance thus reflecting a highly active efflux activity as evidenced by the decrease in MIC from 256 to 0.5 μg/mL on addition of CCCP inhibitor. Similar inhibition of efflux pump activity has been described previously.[23] [24] Researchers in the United States, Iran, and Bahrain have observed nonsignificant twofold reduction in MIC on addition of efflux pump inhibitor CCCP in P. aeruginosa.[25] [26] [27] Helmy et al in their study reported significant efflux pump activity in A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa (46.1 and 41.1%).[28] Gomaa et al in Egypt recorded a high percentage of efflux pump-mediated resistance (77.8%) in A. baumanni.[29] In contrast, in South Africa, CCCP inhibitors did not affect MIC in A. baumanni.[24]

In this study, among qnr genes, 14.1% (12) were qnrB and 14.1% (12) were qnrS in P. aeruginosa which is a higher rate compared with a previous study from Egypt, which documented the presence of qnrB and qnrS genes in 1.8 and 2.7% of Pseudomonas spp.[18] In contrast, El-Badawy et al and Rafiq et al documented high prevalence of qnrS (79.5 and 24%) gene, respectively. qnrA and qnrB were not detected in any of their isolates of Pseudomonas spp.[30] [31] Similar to the earlier study, qnrA gene was not detected in any of the isolates of P. aeruginosa in the present study. In China, a single isolate of P. aeruginosa with qnrA has been observed.[32] In many other studies, qnr determinants were not detectable in clinical isolates of P.aeruginosa.[33] [34]

Yang et al examined the prevalence of qnr genes among 39 isolates of A. baumannii where 7.7% (3/39) isolates harbored qnrB and 2.6% (1/39) qnrS.[12] Hamed et al also reported the presence of qnrS gene in one isolate of A. baumannii.[35] Touati et al observed qnrA gene in only one isolate in their study.[36] In the present study, qnrB was encountered in two isolates singly. One isolate harbored qnrB and qnrS, while another carried both qnrA and qnrS.

In Brazil, a low prevalence of aac(6′)-Ib-cr gene (2.6%) was found in P. aeruginosa.[37] Studies from Turkey and Egypt reported a high prevalence 56.4 and 79.5% in P. aeruginosa, respectively. This is similar to the findings of the present study (66.9%).[38] In this study, only four (3%) isolates harbored oqxAB. Notably, qepA gene was not encountered. oqxAB and qepA genes were not identified in many other studies too.[39] [40] [41]

Conjugation experiments demonstrated that in 14.1% (12/85) of P. aeruginosa, PMQR determinants were successfully transferred and all the transconjugants harbored the aac(6)-Ib-cr gene. In A. baumannii, none of them was transferable. Jiang et al in their study documented that in 33.3% of nonfermenting gram negative bacteria (NFGNB), the transconjugants harbored the same PMQR determinants as their donors.[42] In this study, more than one half of PMQR determinants, 59.2% were nonconjugative, and this suggests that these genes may be of chromosomal location. Among the PMQR genes, high incidence of aac(6)-Ib-cr (66.9%) was encountered and when conjugated, the transferability rate was 100% for this gene. This emphasizes that aac(6)-Ib-cr gene plays a major role in mediating fluoroquinolone resistance. In the present study, of the 12 transconjugants, 33.3% belonged to IncA/C type plasmid replicon. In Nigeria, IncF plasmid harboring aac(6)-Ib-cr gene has been described in P. aeruginosa.[43] A recent study in Argentina has demonstrated plasmid IncR group in P. aeruginosa.[44]

In this study, the prevalence rate of PMQR determinants is (68.5%), which is higher than the rates in China (1.7%), Egypt (4.5%), and Nigeria (61%).[18] [42] [45] However, increasing rates of fluoroquinolone resistance have limited the treatment option. The approach of combined antibiotic therapies is an alternative to this phenomenon.[46]

The ciprofloxacin resistance isolates which were negative for PMQR genes in our study may probably harbor the chromosomal mutation genes (gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE). These genes were not looked for in the present study.


Conclusion

Plasmid-mediated fluoroquinolone resistance is encountered in (78.8%) of P. aeruginosa, while in A. baumannii, it is present in a proportion of 48.8% of clinical isolates. Single clinical isolate can harbor multiple PMQR genes. Plasmid-mediated efflux fluoroquinolone resistance is responsible only for a small proportion of resistance to fluoroquinolone in clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii. Of the plasmid efflux pump genes, only oqxAB is present in 3% of isolates. It is reasonable to assume that of the plasmid-mediated resistance, aac(6′)-Ib-cr is primarily responsible for mediating a major proportion of resistance to fluoroquinolones. IncFII is the predominant plasmid type followed by IncA/C and IncFIC type.



Conflict of Interest

None declared.


Address for correspondence

Geetha P. Venkataramana, MSc
Department of Microbiology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Porur
Chennai, 600116, Tamil Nadu
India   

Publication History

Article published online:
09 February 2022

© 2022. The Indian Association of Laboratory Physicians. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India