Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2018; 235(12): 1383-1392
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-123831
Übersicht
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Wann wird heute noch gelasert?

Indications for Retinal Laser Therapy Revisited
P. Enders*
Zentrum für Augenheilkunde, Universität zu Köln
,
F. Schaub*
Zentrum für Augenheilkunde, Universität zu Köln
,
S. Fauser
Zentrum für Augenheilkunde, Universität zu Köln
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

eingereicht 21 November 2016

akzeptiert 06 December 2016

Publication Date:
10 February 2017 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund Die Laserbehandlung ist eine Therapieoption bei retinalen, bevorzugt vaskulären Pathologien. Meist kommen destruktive Verfahren zum Einsatz. Durch das Hinzukommen der intravitrealen Applikation von Antikörper(fragmenten) gegen den Wachstumsfaktor „vascular endothelial growth factor“ (VEGF) muss jedoch bei einigen Indikationen der Einsatz der Laserbehandlung als First-Line-Therapie kritisch hinterfragt werden. Neue Strategien und Behandlungskonzepte sollen erläutert werden.

Material und Methoden Zusammenfassung der Literatur aus PubMed sowie relevanter Leitlinien und Stellungnahmen.

Ergebnisse und Schlussfolgerung Das Anwendungsspektrum der retinalen Laserphotokoagulation ist vielfältig. Trotz und neben neuen, vielversprechenden medikamentösen Therapieansätzen stellt die retinale Laserbehandlung auch heute noch eine unverzichtbare Therapieoption insbesondere bei der proliferativen diabetischen Retinopathie, venösen ischämischen Verschlüssen und selteneren Erkrankungen wie Retinopathia praematurorum oder Morbus Coats dar.

Abstract

Background Laser therapy is an important treatment option in retinal diseases, especially in cases of vascular involvement. Most approaches are based on coagulation of retinal structures. As there is increasing use of agents targetting vascular endothelial growth factor in the treatment of macular diseases, indications for the use of laser treatment need to be reviewed carefully, especially with respect to their significance in first line therapy. This article explains recent strategies and treatment protocols.

Materials and Methods Review of current literature in PubMed as well as synopsis of relevant guidelines.

Results and Conclusion Retinal laser therapy is still widely used within retinal opthalmology and covers a large spectrum of indications. Despite the success of medical approaches, retinal laser therapy remains an indispensable treatment option for proliferative diabetic retinopathy, central or peripheral vein occlusion and less frequent pathologies, such as retinopathy of prematurity or Coatsʼs disease.

* P. Enders und F. Schaub haben die gemeinsame Erstautorenschaft.


 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Treatment techniques and clinical guidelines for photocoagulation of diabetic macular edema. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Report Number 2. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology 1987; 94: 761-774
  • 2 Abbate M, Cravedi P, Iliev I. et al.. Prevention and treatment of diabetic retinopathy: evidence from clinical trials and perspectives. Curr Diabetes Rev 2011; 7: 190-200
  • 3 Arnarsson A, Stefansson E. Laser treatment and the mechanism of edema reduction in branch retinal vein occlusion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: 877-879
  • 4 Battaglia PM, Iacono P, Pierro L. et al.. Subthreshold laser treatment versus threshold laser treatment for symptomatic retinal arterial macroaneurysm. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012; 53: 1783-1786
  • 5 Finis D, Stammen J, Joussen AM. [Familial exudative vitreoretinopathy]. Ophthalmologe 2010; 107: 683-691
  • 6 Park S, Cho HJ, Lee DW. et al.. Intravitreal bevacizumab injections combined with laser photocoagulation for adult-onset Coatsʼ disease. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2016; 254: 1511-1517
  • 7 Cruess AF, Zlateva G, Pleil AM. et al.. Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin in age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review of efficacy, safety, treatment modifications and pharmacoeconomic properties. Acta Ophthalmol 2009; 87: 118-132
  • 8 Ladas ID, Chatziralli IP, Kotsolis AI. et al.. Intravitreal ranibizumab versus thermal laser photocoagulation in the treatment of extrafoveal classic choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmologica 2012; 228: 93-101
  • 9 Kernt M, Ulbig M, Kampik A. et al.. [Navigated retinal laser therapy]. Ophthalmologe 2013; 110: 776-782
  • 10 Gross JG, Glassman AR, Jampol LM. et al.. Panretinal Photocoagulation vs. Intravitreous Ranibizumab for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2015; 314: 2137-2146
  • 11 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Techniques for scatter and local photocoagulation treatment of diabetic retinopathy: Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Report no. 3. The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1987; 27: 254-264
  • 12 Stefansson E. Oxygen and diabetic eye disease. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1990; 228: 120-123
  • 13 Mitchell P, Bandello F, Schmidt-Erfurth U. et al.. The RESTORE study: ranibizumab monotherapy or combined with laser versus laser monotherapy for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology 2011; 118: 615-625
  • 14 Wilkinson CP. Interventions for asymptomatic retinal breaks and lattice degeneration for preventing retinal detachment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (09) CD003170
  • 15 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Photocoagulation treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Clinical application of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (DRS) findings, DRS Report Number 8. The Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology 1981; 88: 583-600
  • 16 Holzrichter JF, Schawlow AL. Design and analysis of flashlamp systems for pumping organic dye lasers. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1969; 168: 703-714
  • 17 Manson N, Marshall J, Mellerio J. et al.. Comments on histological studies of gas laser lesions in humans and possible non-linear optical phenomena, together with experiments using a tuneable dye laser. Mod Probl Ophthalmol 1972; 10: 114-128
  • 18 Brucker AJ, Qin H, Antoszyk AN. et al.. Observational study of the development of diabetic macular edema following panretinal (scatter) photocoagulation given in 1 or 4 sittings. Arch Ophthalmol 2009; 127: 132-140
  • 19 Little HL, Zweng HC, Peabody RR. Argon laser slit-lamp retinal photocoagulation. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1970; 74: 85-97
  • 20 McDonald HR, Schatz H. Visual loss following panretinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 1985; 92: 388-393
  • 21 Luttrull JK, Dorin G. Subthreshold diode micropulse laser photocoagulation (SDM) as invisible retinal phototherapy for diabetic macular edema: a review. Curr Diabetes Rev 2012; 8: 274-284
  • 22 Roider J, Hillenkamp F, Flotte T. et al.. Microphotocoagulation: selective effects of repetitive short laser pulses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993; 90: 8643-8647
  • 23 Dorin G. Subthreshold and micropulse diode laser photocoagulation. Semin Ophthalmol 2003; 18: 147-153
  • 24 Roider J, Michaud NA, Flotte TJ. et al.. Response of the retinal pigment epithelium to selective photocoagulation. Arch Ophthalmol 1992; 110: 1786-1792
  • 25 Blumenkranz MS, Yellachich D, Andersen DE. et al.. Semiautomated patterned scanning laser for retinal photocoagulation. Retina 2006; 26: 370-376
  • 26 Muqit MM, Marcellino GR, Gray JC. et al.. Pain responses of Pascal 20 ms multi-spot and 100 ms single-spot panretinal photocoagulation: Manchester Pascal Study, MAPASS report 2. Br J Ophthalmol 2010; 94: 1493-1498
  • 27 Nagpal M, Marlecha S, Nagpal K. Comparison of laser photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy using 532-nm standard laser versus multispot pattern scan laser. Retina 2010; 30: 452-458
  • 28 Kernt M, Cheuteu R, Vounotrypidis E. et al.. Focal and panretinal photocoagulation with a navigated laser (NAVILAS(R)). Acta Ophthalmol 2011; 89: e662-e664
  • 29 Kozak I, Oster SF, Cortes MA. et al.. Clinical evaluation and treatment accuracy in diabetic macular edema using navigated laser photocoagulator NAVILAS. Ophthalmology 2011; 118: 1119-1124
  • 30 Kozak I, Luttrull JK. Modern retinal laser therapy. Saudi J Ophthalmol 2015; 29: 137-146
  • 31 Kernt M, Cheuteu RE, Cserhati S. et al.. Pain and accuracy of focal laser treatment for diabetic macular edema using a retinal navigated laser (Navilas). Clin Ophthalmol 2012; 6: 289-296
  • 32 Ober MD, Kernt M, Cortes MA. et al.. Time required for navigated macular laser photocoagulation treatment with the Navilas. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2013; 251: 1049-1053
  • 33 Kozak I, Kim JS, Oster SF. et al.. Focal navigated laser photocoagulation in retinovascular disease: clinical results in initial case series. Retina 2012; 32: 930-935
  • 34 Ziemssen F, Lemmen K, Bertram B. et al.. [National guidelines for treatment of diabetic retinopathy: Second edition of the national guidelines for treatment of diabetic retinopathy]. Ophthalmologe 2016; 113: 623-638
  • 35 Evans JR, Michelessi M, Virgili G. Laser photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (11) CD011234
  • 36 Lee SB, Yun YJ, Kim SH. et al.. Changes in macular thickness after panretinal photocoagulation in patients with severe diabetic retinopathy and no macular edema. Retina 2010; 30: 756-760
  • 37 Oh JH, Kim SW, Kwon SS. et al.. The change of macular thickness following single-session pattern scan laser panretinal photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015; 253: 57-63
  • 38 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Early photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report number 9. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology 1991; 98: 766-785
  • 39 Bundesärztekammer, Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung, AWMF. Nationale Versorgungs-Leitlinie Prävention und Therapie von Netzhautkomplikationen bei Diabetes – Langfassung. 2. Aufl.. Im Internet: http://www.netzhautkomplikationen.versorgungsleitlinien.de Stand: 20.11.2015
  • 40 Haritoglou C, Kernt M, Wolf A. [Diabetic maculopathy]. Ophthalmologe 2015; 112: 871-883
  • 41 Elman MJ, Bressler NM, Qin H. et al.. Expanded 2-year follow-up of ranibizumab plus prompt or deferred laser or triamcinolone plus prompt laser for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology 2011; 118: 609-614
  • 42 Do DV, Nguyen QD, Boyer D. et al.. One-year outcomes of the da Vinci Study of VEGF Trap-Eye in eyes with diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology 2012; 119: 1658-1665
  • 43 Rajendram R, Fraser-Bell S, Kaines A. et al.. A 2-year prospective randomized controlled trial of intravitreal bevacizumab or laser therapy (BOLT) in the management of diabetic macular edema: 24-month data: report 3. Arch Ophthalmol 2012; 130: 972-979
  • 44 Elman MJ, Qin H, Aiello LP. et al.. Intravitreal ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema with prompt versus deferred laser treatment: three-year randomized trial results. Ophthalmology 2012; 119: 2312-2318
  • 45 Elman MJ, Ayala A, Bressler NM. et al.. Intravitreal Ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema with prompt versus deferred laser treatment: 5-year randomized trial results. Ophthalmology 2015; 122: 375-381
  • 46 Venkatesh P, Ramanjulu R, Azad R. et al.. Subthreshold micropulse diode laser and double frequency neodymium: YAG laser in treatment of diabetic macular edema: a prospective, randomized study using multifocal electroretinography. Photomed Laser Surg 2011; 29: 727-733
  • 47 Helbig H, Kellner U, Bornfeld N. et al.. [Vitrectomy in diabetic retinopathy: outcome, risk factors, complications]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1998; 212: 339-342
  • 48 Ostri C. Intraocular surgery in a large diabetes patient population: risk factors and surgical results. Acta Ophthalmol 2014; 92 Thesis 1 1-13
  • 49 McIntosh RL, Rogers SL, Lim L. et al.. Natural history of central retinal vein occlusion: an evidence-based systematic review. Ophthalmology 2010; 117: 1113-1123
  • 50 Rogers S, McIntosh RL, Cheung N. et al.. The prevalence of retinal vein occlusion: pooled data from population studies from the United States, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Ophthalmology 2010; 117: 313-319
  • 51 Deutsche Ophthalmologische Gesellschaft (DOG), Retinologische Gesellschaft (RG), Berufsverband der Augenärzte Deutschlands (BVA). Stellungnahme der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, der Retinologischen Gesellschaft und des Berufsverbandes der Augenärzte Deutschlands zur Therapie des Makulaödems beim retinalen Venenverschluss. Therapeutische Strategien. Im Internet: http://cms.augeninfo.de/fileadmin/stellungnahmen/2012_06_07_therapie_makulaoedem_nach_ret_venenthrombosen.pdf Stand: 20.11.2015
  • 52 Branch Vein Occlusion Study Group. Argon laser photocoagulation for macular edema in branch vein occlusion. The Branch Vein Occlusion Study Group. Am J Ophthalmol 1984; 98: 271-282
  • 53 Central Vein Occlusion Study Group. Central vein occlusion study of photocoagulation therapy. Baseline findings. Central Vein Occlusion Study Group. Online J Curr Clin Trials 1993; Doc No 95
  • 54 Patel A, Nguyen C, Lu S. Central retinal vein occlusion: a review of current evidence-based treatment options. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2016; 23: 44-48
  • 55 Hayreh SS, Rojas P, Podhajsky P. et al.. Ocular neovascularization with retinal vascular occlusion-III. Incidence of ocular neovascularization with retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmology 1983; 90: 488-506
  • 56 Russo V, Barone A, Conte E. et al.. Bevacizumab compared with macular laser grid photocoagulation for cystoid macular edema in branch retinal vein occlusion. Retina 2009; 29: 511-515
  • 57 Battaglia PM, Saviano S, Bergamini L. et al.. Grid laser treatment of macular edema in macular branch retinal vein occlusion. Doc Ophthalmol 1999; 97: 427-431
  • 58 Meier P. [Retinal detachment in children: differential diagnosis and current therapy]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2008; 225: 779-790
  • 59 Benson WE. Familial exudative vitreoretinopathy. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1995; 93: 473-521
  • 60 Pendergast SD, Trese MT. Familial exudative vitreoretinopathy. Results of surgical management. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 1015-1023
  • 61 Jones JH, Kroll AJ, Lou PL. et al.. Coatsʼ disease. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2001; 41: 189-198
  • 62 Shields JA, Shields CL, Honavar SG. et al.. Clinical variations and complications of Coats disease in 150 cases: the 2000 Sanford Gifford Memorial Lecture. Am J Ophthalmol 2001; 131: 561-571
  • 63 Yang Q, Wei W, Shi X. et al.. Successful use of intravitreal ranibizumab injection and combined treatment in the management of Coatsʼ disease. Acta Ophthalmol 2016; 94: 401-406
  • 64 Shinojima A, Fujita K, Mori R. et al.. Investigation of the etiology of central serous chorioretinopathy using en-face optical coherence tomography and indocyanine green angiography. Ophthalmologica 2016; 236: 100-107
  • 65 Scholz P, Altay L, Fauser S. Comparison of subthreshold micropulse laser (577 nm) treatment and half-dose photodynamic therapy in patients with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Eye (Lond) 2016; 30: 1371-1377
  • 66 Cheng CK, Chang CK, Peng CH. Comparison of photodynamic therapy using half-dose of verteporfin or half-fluence of laser light for the treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina 2016; DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001138.
  • 67 Lai FH, Ng DS, Bakthavatsalam M. et al.. A multicenter study on the long-term outcomes of half-dose photodynamic therapy in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2016; 170: 91-99
  • 68 Breukink MB, Downes SM, Querques G. et al.. Comparing half-dose photodynamic therapy with high-density subthreshold micropulse laser treatment in patients with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (the PLACE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2015; 16: 419
  • 69 International Committee for the Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity. The International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity revisited. Arch Ophthalmol 2005; 123: 991-999
  • 70 Jandeck C, Kellner U, Lorenz B. et al.. [Guidelines for ophthalmologic screening of premature infants]. Ophthalmologe 2008; 105: 955-963
  • 71 Krohne TU, Aisenbrey S, Holz FG. [Current therapeutic options in retinopathy of prematurity]. Ophthalmologe 2012; 109: 1189-1197
  • 72 Lorenz B, Spasovska K, Elflein H. et al.. Wide-field digital imaging based telemedicine for screening for acute retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Six-year results of a multicentre field study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2009; 247: 1251-1262
  • 73 Muether PS, Kribs A, Hahn M. et al.. No advanced retinopathy of prematurity stages 4 or 5 in a large high-risk German cohort. Br J Ophthalmol 2012; 96: 400-404
  • 74 Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group. Multicenter trial of cryotherapy for retinopathy of prematurity. Preliminary results. Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group. Arch Ophthalmol 1988; 106: 471-479
  • 75 Ng EY, Connolly BP, McNamara JA. et al.. A comparison of laser photocoagulation with cryotherapy for threshold retinopathy of prematurity at 10 years: part 1. Visual function and structural outcome. Ophthalmology 2002; 109: 928-934
  • 76 Hardy RJ, Good WV, Dobson V. et al.. Multicenter trial of early treatment for retinopathy of prematurity: study design. Control Clin Trials 2004; 25: 311-325
  • 77 Averbukh E. The evidence supporting the early treatment for type 1 retinopathy of prematurity needs further evaluation. Arch Ophthalmol 2005; 123: 406-410
  • 78 Mintz-Hittner HA, Kennedy KA, Chuang AZ. Efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab for stage 3+ retinopathy of prematurity. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 603-615
  • 79 Banach MJ, Ferrone PJ, Trese MT. A comparison of dense versus less dense diode laser photocoagulation patterns for threshold retinopathy of prematurity. Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 324-327