Facial Plast Surg 2022; 38(03): 293-299
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1741010
Original Research

Do Orbital Implants Differ in Complication Rates: A Retrospective Study of 88 Patients, and an Argument for Cost-Effective Practices in the Face of Rising Health Care Costs

Husayn F. Ramji
1   University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
,
Nathan W. Blessing
2   Department of Oculofacial Plastic, Reconstructive, & Orbital Surgery, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Health System, Miami, Florida
3   Department of Oculofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dean McGee Eye Institute, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
,
Jeremy F. Tan
3   Department of Oculofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dean McGee Eye Institute, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
,
Annie Moreau
3   Department of Oculofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dean McGee Eye Institute, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Operative repair of orbital fractures utilizes implants constructed of a plethora of materials that vary in cost. Surgeon preference as well as fracture complexity may dictate the implant chosen. In this study, we retrospectively compared the complication rates of the four most common types of implants utilized at our institution. We found no significant difference in complication rates in our sample of 88 patients. Additionally, the least expensive implant was as effective as the most expensive implant in addressing isolated orbital blowout fractures. This situation is not unique to the field of oculoplastics. As evidenced from published literature in other areas of surgery, from orthopaedics to orthodontics, cheaper alternatives often afford similar outcomes as more expensive options. We herein argue that a cost-effective approach should be considered while still allowing for high quality of care, in the face of rising health care costs and health disparities in America.



Publication History

Article published online:
29 December 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Roth FS, Koshy JC, Goldberg JS, Soparkar CN. Pearls of orbital trauma management. Semin Plast Surg 2010; 24 (04) 398-410
  • 2 Boyette JR, Pemberton JD, Bonilla-Velez J. Management of orbital fractures: challenges and solutions. Clin Ophthalmol 2015; 9: 2127-2137
  • 3 Young SM, Sundar G, Lim TC, Lang SS, Thomas G, Amrith S. Use of bioresorbable implants for orbital fracture reconstruction. Br J Ophthalmol 2017; 101 (08) 1080-1085
  • 4 Avashia YJ, Sastry A, Fan KL, Mir HS, Thaller SR. Materials used for reconstruction after orbital floor fracture. J Craniofac Surg 2012; 23 (7, Suppl 1): 1991-1997
  • 5 Mok D, Lessard L, Cordoba C, Harris PG, Nikolis A. A review of materials currently used in orbital floor reconstruction. Can J Plast Surg 2004; 12 (03) 134-140
  • 6 Gosau M, Schöneich M, Draenert FG, Ettl T, Driemel O, Reichert TE. Retrospective analysis of orbital floor fractures–complications, outcome, and review of literature. Clin Oral Investig 2011; 15 (03) 305-313
  • 7 Gunarajah DR, Samman N. Biomaterials for repair of orbital floor blowout fractures: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 71 (03) 550-570
  • 8 Ko MJ, Morris CK, Kim JW, Lad SP, Arrigo RT, Lad EM. Orbital fractures: national inpatient trends and complications. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 29 (04) 298-303
  • 9 Emanuel EJ. The real cost of the US health care system. JAMA 2018; 319 (10) 983-985
  • 10 Siotos C, Sarmiento S, McColl M. et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of silicone versus saline implant-based breast reconstruction using the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 143 (02) 276e-284e
  • 11 FitzGerald C, Hurst S. Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review. BMC Med Ethics 2017; 18 (01) 19
  • 12 Blessing NW, Rong AJ, Tse BC, Erickson BP, Lee BW, Johnson TE. Orbital bony reconstruction with presized and precontoured porous polyethylene-titanium implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 37 (03) 284-289
  • 13 Burns LR, Housman MG, Booth RE, Koenig AM. Physician preference items: what factors matter to surgeons? Does the vendor matter?. Med Devices (Auckl) 2018; 11: 39-49
  • 14 Saposnik G, Redelmeier D, Ruff CC, Tobler PN. Cognitive biases associated with medical decisions: a systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2016; 16 (01) 138
  • 15 Park DJ, Garibaldi DC, Iliff NT, Grant MP, Merbs SL. Smooth nylon foil (SupraFOIL) orbital implants in orbital fractures: a case series of 181 patients. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 24 (04) 266-270
  • 16 Custer PL, Lind A, Trinkaus KM. Complications of supramid orbital implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 19 (01) 62-67
  • 17 Ridwan-Pramana A, Wolff J, Raziei A, Ashton-James CE, Forouzanfar T. Porous polyethylene implants in facial reconstruction: outcome and complications. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2015; 43 (08) 1330-1334
  • 18 Lee CA, Kang SJ, Yun JY, Sun H. Late complication of a silicone implant thirty years after orbital fracture reconstruction. Arch Craniofac Surg 2017; 18 (02) 137-140
  • 19 Prendes MA, Gudgel B, Kassa EB. et al. Intracapsular hemorrhage rates in non-fixated nylon sheet orbital implants for orbital fracture management. Am J Otolaryngol 2019; 40 (04) 509-511
  • 20 Aryasit O, Ng DS, Goh ASC, Woo KI, Kim Y-D. Delayed onset porous polyethylene implant-related inflammation after orbital blowout fracture repair: four case reports. BMC Ophthalmol 2016; 16 (01) 94
  • 21 Lee GH, Ho SY. Orbital adherence syndrome following the use of titanium precontoured orbital mesh for the reconstruction of posttraumatic orbital floor defects. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2017; 10 (01) 77-83
  • 22 Mims MM, Wang EW. Cost analysis of implants in the surgical repair of orbital floor fractures. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2020; 129 (05) 456-461
  • 23 Allan GM, Lexchin J. Physician awareness of diagnostic and nondrug therapeutic costs: a systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2008; 24 (02) 158-165
  • 24 Fred HL. Cutting the cost of health care: the physician's role. Tex Heart Inst J 2016; 43 (01) 4-6
  • 25 Horton S. Chapter 7 - Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition. In: Jamison DT GH, Horton S. eds. Disease Control Priorities: Improving Health and Reducing Poverty. 3rd ed.. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development /The World Bank; 2017
  • 26 Lalloo R, Lucchesi LR, Bisignano C. et al. Epidemiology of facial fractures: incidence, prevalence and years lived with disability estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2017 study. Inj Prev 2020; 26 (Suppl. 01) i27-i35
  • 27 Burnstine MA. Clinical recommendations for repair of isolated orbital floor fractures: an evidence-based analysis. Ophthalmology 2002; 109 (07) 1207-1210 ; discussion 1210–1201; quiz 1212–1203
  • 28 Joseph JM, Glavas IP. Orbital fractures: a review. Clin Ophthalmol 2011; 5: 95-100
  • 29 Chiang E, Saadat LV, Spitz JA, Bryar PJ, Chambers CB. Etiology of orbital fractures at a level I trauma center in a large metropolitan city. Taiwan J Ophthalmol 2016; 6 (01) 26-31
  • 30 Galbraith AA, Wong ST, Kim SE, Newacheck PW. Out-of-pocket financial burden for low-income families with children: socioeconomic disparities and effects of insurance. Health Serv Res 2005; 40 (6 Pt 1): 1722-1736
  • 31 Uninsurance IoMUCotCo. 3: Who Goes Without Health Insurance?. Who Is Most Likely to Be Uninsured?. In: Coverage Matters: Insurance and Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001
  • 32 American Medical Association. AMA to Ensure Future Physicians Receive Health Care Economics Training; 2019
  • 33 Emanuel E, Tanden N, Altman S. et al. A systemic approach to containing health care spending. N Engl J Med 2012; 367 (10) 949-954
  • 34 Jain V. Time to take health economics seriously-medical education in the United Kingdom. Perspect Med Educ 2016; 5 (01) 45-47
  • 35 Fickweiler F, Fickweiler W, Urbach E. Interactions between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry generally and sales representatives specifically and their association with physicians' attitudes and prescribing habits: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2017; 7 (09) e016408
  • 36 Rajan PV, Qudsi RA, Wolf LL, Losina E. Cost-effectiveness analyses in orthopaedic surgery: raising the bar. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99 (13) e71