RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740362
Suprathreshold Auditory Measures for Detecting Early-Stage Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Young Adults

Abstract
Background Over 1 billion young adults are at risk for developing noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) due to their habit of listening to music at loud levels. The gold standard for detecting NIHL is the audiometric notch around 3,000 to 6,000 Hz observed in pure tone audiogram. However, recent studies suggested that suprathreshold auditory measures might be more sensitive to detect early-stage NIHL in young adults.
Purpose The present study compared suprathreshold measures in individuals with high and low noise exposure backgrounds (NEBs). We hypothesized that individuals with high NEB would exhibit reduced performance on suprathreshold measures than those with low NEB.
Study sample An initial sample of 100 English-speaking healthy adults (18–35 years; females = 70) was obtained from five university classes. We identified 15 participants with the lowest NEB scores (10 females) and 15 participants with the highest NEB scores (10 females). We selected a sample of healthy young adults with no history of middle ear infection, and those in the low NEB group were selected with no history of impulse noise exposure.
Data collection and analysis The study included conventional audiometry, extended high-frequency audiometry, middle ear muscle reflex (MEMR) thresholds, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), QuickSIN, and suprathreshold auditory brainstem response (ABR) measures. We used independent sample t-tests, correlation coefficients, and linear mixed model analysis to compare the audiometric measures between the NEB groups.
Results The prevalence of audiometric notch was low in the study sample, even for individuals with high NEB. We found that: (1) individuals with high NEB revealed significantly reduced QuickSIN performance than those with low NEB; (2) music exposure via earphone revealed a significant association with QuickSIN; (3) individuals with high NEB revealed significantly reduced DPOAEs and ABR wave I amplitude compared with individuals with low NEB; (4) MEMR and ABR latency measures showed a modest association with NEB; and (5) audiometric thresholds across the frequency range did not show statistically significant association with NEB.
Conclusion Our results suggest that young adults with high NEB might exhibit impaired peripheral neural coding deficits leading to reduced speech-in-noise (SIN) performance despite clinically normal hearing thresholds. SIN measures might be more sensitive than audiometric notch for detecting early-stage NIHL in young adults.
Keywords
noise - noise-induced hearing loss - cochlear synaptopathy - auditory evoked potentials - auditory brainstem response - speech-in-noiseDisclaimer
Any mention of a product, service, or procedure in the Journal of the American Academy of Audiology does not constitute an endorsement of the product, service, or procedure by the American Academy of Audiology.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 06. Juli 2021
Angenommen: 21. Oktober 2021
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
04. Oktober 2022
© 2022. American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders. Noise-induced hearing loss. 2019. Accessed November 12, 2020 at: https://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/noise-induced-hearing-loss
- 2 Niskar AS, Kieszak SM, Holmes AE, Esteban E, Rubin C, Brody DJ. Estimated prevalence of noise-induced hearing threshold shifts among children 6 to 19 years of age: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994, United States. Pediatrics 2001; 108 (01) 40-43
- 3 Phillips SL, Henrich VC, Mace ST. Prevalence of noise-induced hearing loss in student musicians. Int J Audiol 2010; 49 (04) 309-316
- 4 Henderson E, Testa MA, Hartnick C. Prevalence of noise-induced hearing-threshold shifts and hearing loss among US youths. Pediatrics 2011; 127 (01) e39-e46
- 5 Bhatt IS, Guthrie O. Analysis of audiometric notch as a noise-induced hearing loss phenotype in US youth: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005-2010. Int J Audiol 2017; 56 (06) 392-399
- 6 World Health Organization. Addressing the prevalence of hearing loss. 2018. Accessed December 2019 at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/260336/9789241550260-eng.pdf;sequence=1
- 7 Carter L, Williams W, Black D, Bundy A. The leisure-noise dilemma: hearing loss or hearsay? What does the literature tell us?. Ear Hear 2014; 35 (05) 491-505
- 8 Breinbauer HA, Anabalón JL, Gutierrez D, Cárcamo R, Olivares C, Caro J. Output capabilities of personal music players and assessment of preferred listening levels of test subjects: outlining recommendations for preventing music-induced hearing loss. Laryngoscope 2012; 122 (11) 2549-2556
- 9 Vogel I, Brug J, Van der Ploeg CP, Raat H. Prevention of adolescents' music-induced hearing loss due to discotheque attendance: a Delphi study. Health Educ Res 2009; 24 (06) 1043-1050
- 10 Vogel I, van de Looij-Jansen PM, Mieloo CL, Burdorf A, de Waart F. Risky music listening, permanent tinnitus and depression, anxiety, thoughts about suicide and adverse general health. PLoS One 2014; 9 (06) e98912
- 11 Jiang W, Zhao F, Guderley N, Manchaiah V. Daily music exposure dose and hearing problems using personal listening devices in adolescents and young adults: a systematic review. Int J Audiol 2016; 55 (04) 197-205
- 12 Kirchner DB, Evenson E, Dobie RA. et al; ACOEM Task Force on Occupational Hearing Loss. Occupational noise-induced hearing loss: ACOEM task force on occupational hearing loss. J Occup Environ Med 2012; 54 (01) 106-108
- 13 Mirza R, Kirchner DB, Dobie RA, Crawford J, Loss ATFOH. ACOEM Task Force on Occupational Hearing Loss. Occupational noise-induced hearing loss. J Occup Environ Med 2018; 60 (09) e498-e501
- 14 Cody AR, Russell IJ. Outer hair cells in the mammalian cochlea and noise-induced hearing loss. Nature 1985; 315 (6021): 662-665
- 15 Subramaniam M, Salvi RJ, Spongr VP, Henderson D, Powers NL. Changes in distortion product otoacoustic emissions and outer hair cells following interrupted noise exposures. Hear Res 1994; 74 (1–2): 204-216
- 16 Chen GD, Fechter LD. The relationship between noise-induced hearing loss and hair cell loss in rats. Hear Res 2003; 177 (1–2): 81-90
- 17 Mostafapour SP, Lahargoue K, Gates GA. Noise-induced hearing loss in young adults: the role of personal listening devices and other sources of leisure noise. Laryngoscope 1998; 108 (12) 1832-1839
- 18 Marlenga B, Berg RL, Linneman JG, Wood DJ, Kirkhorn SR, Pickett W. Determinants of early-stage hearing loss among a cohort of young workers with 16-year follow-up. Occup Environ Med 2012; 69 (07) 479-484
- 19 Su BM, Chan DK. Prevalence of hearing loss in US children and adolescents: findings from NHANES 1988–2010. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 143 (09) 920-927
- 20 Coles RR, Lutman ME, Buffin JT. Guidelines on the diagnosis of noise-induced hearing loss for medicolegal purposes. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2000; 25 (04) 264-273
- 21 Schlauch RS, Carney E. A multinomial model for identifying significant pure-tone threshold shifts. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2007; 50 (06) 1391-1403
- 22 Schlauch RS, Carney E. Are false-positive rates leading to an overestimation of noise-induced hearing loss?. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2011; 54 (02) 679-692
- 23 Bhatt IS. Supra-aural transducer-related artifact contributes to overestimation of noise-induced hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 2018; 143 (04) 2055
- 24 Bhatt IS. Determinants of the audiometric notch at 4000 and 6000 Hz in young adults. J Am Acad Audiol 2020; 31 (06) 371-383
- 25 Clark WW. Recent studies of temporary threshold shift (TTS) and permanent threshold shift (PTS) in animals. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90 (01) 155-163
- 26 Nordmann AS, Bohne BA, Harding GW. Histopathological differences between temporary and permanent threshold shift. Hear Res 2000; 139 (1–2): 13-30
- 27 Henderson D, Bielefeld EC, Harris KC, Hu BH. The role of oxidative stress in noise-induced hearing loss. Ear Hear 2006; 27 (01) 1-19
- 28 McGill TJ, Schuknecht HF. Human cochlear changes in noise induced hearing loss. Laryngoscope 1976; 86 (09) 1293-1302
- 29 Kemp DT. Otoacoustic emissions, their origin in cochlear function, and use. Br Med Bull 2002; 63 (01) 223-241
- 30 Attias J, Furst M, Furman V, Reshef I, Horowitz G, Bresloff I. Noise-induced otoacoustic emission loss with or without hearing loss. Ear Hear 1995; 16 (06) 612-618
- 31 Marshall L, Lapsley Miller JA, Heller LM. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions as a screening tool for noise-induced hearing loss. Noise Health 2001; 3 (12) 43-60
- 32 Attias J, Horovitz G, El-Hatib N, Nageris B. Detection and clinical diagnosis of noise-induced hearing loss by otoacoustic emissions. Noise Health 2001; 3 (12) 19-31
- 33 Bhagat SP, Davis AM. Modification of otoacoustic emissions following ear-level exposure to MP3 player music. Int J Audiol 2008; 47 (12) 751-760
- 34 Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after “temporary” noise-induced hearing loss. J Neurosci 2009; 29 (45) 14077-14085
- 35 Furman AC, Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. Noise-induced cochlear neuropathy is selective for fibers with low spontaneous rates. J Neurophysiol 2013; 110 (03) 577-586
- 36 Sergeyenko Y, Lall K, Liberman MC, Kujawa SG. Age-related cochlear synaptopathy: an early-onset contributor to auditory functional decline. J Neurosci 2013; 33 (34) 13686-13694
- 37 Lin HW, Furman AC, Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. Primary neural degeneration in the Guinea pig cochlea after reversible noise-induced threshold shift. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2011; 12 (05) 605-616
- 38 Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. Synaptopathy in the noise-exposed and aging cochlea: primary neural degeneration in acquired sensorineural hearing loss. Hear Res 2015; 330 (Pt B): 191-199
- 39 Liberman LD, Suzuki J, Liberman MC. Dynamics of cochlear synaptopathy after acoustic overexposure. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2015; 16 (02) 205-219
- 40 Hill K, Yuan H, Wang X, Sha SH. Noise-induced loss of hair cells and cochlear synaptopathy are mediated by the activation of AMPK. J Neurosci 2016; 36 (28) 7497-7510
- 41 Kobel M, Le Prell CG, Liu J, Hawks JW, Bao J. Noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy: past findings and future studies. Hear Res 2017; 349: 148-154
- 42 Lobarinas E, Spankovich C, Le Prell CG. Evidence of “hidden hearing loss” following noise exposures that produce robust TTS and ABR wave-I amplitude reductions. Hear Res 2017; 349: 155-163
- 43 Valero MD, Burton JA, Hauser SN, Hackett TA, Ramachandran R, Liberman MC. Noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Hear Res 2017; 353: 213-223
- 44 Chen H, Shi L, Liu L, Yin S, Aiken S, Wang J. Noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy and signal processing disorders. Neuroscience 2019; 407: 41-52
- 45 Fernandez KA, Jeffers PW, Lall K, Liberman MC, Kujawa SG. Aging after noise exposure: acceleration of cochlear synaptopathy in “recovered” ears. J Neurosci 2015; 35 (19) 7509-7520
- 46 Schaette R, McAlpine D. Tinnitus with a normal audiogram: physiological evidence for hidden hearing loss and computational model. J Neurosci 2011; 31 (38) 13452-13457
- 47 Liberman MC, Epstein MJ, Cleveland SS, Wang H, Maison SF. Toward a differential diagnosis of hidden hearing loss in humans. PLoS One 2016; 11 (09) e0162726
- 48 Costalupes JA, Young ED, Gibson DJ. Effects of continuous noise backgrounds on rate response of auditory nerve fibers in cat. J Neurophysiol 1984; 51 (06) 1326-1344
- 49 Joris PX, Smith PH, Yin TC. Enhancement of neural synchronization in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus. II. Responses in the tuning curve tail. J Neurophysiol 1994; 71 (03) 1037-1051
- 50 Rhode WS, Greenberg S. Encoding of amplitude modulation in the cochlear nucleus of the cat. J Neurophysiol 1994; 71 (05) 1797-1825
- 51 Plack CJ, Barker D, Prendergast G. Perceptual consequences of “hidden” hearing loss. Trends Hear 2014; 18: 2331216514550621
- 52 Brattico E, Kujala T, Tervaniemi M, Alku P, Ambrosi L, Monitillo V. Long-term exposure to occupational noise alters the cortical organization of sound processing. Clin Neurophysiol 2005; 116 (01) 190-203
- 53 Stone MA, Moore BC, Greenish H. Discrimination of envelope statistics reveals evidence of sub-clinical hearing damage in a noise-exposed population with ‘normal’ hearing thresholds. Int J Audiol 2008; 47 (12) 737-750
- 54 Hope AJ, Luxon LM, Bamiou DE. Effects of chronic noise exposure on speech-in-noise perception in the presence of normal audiometry. J Laryngol Otol 2013; 127 (03) 233-238
- 55 Pienkowski M. On the etiology of listening difficulties in noise despite clinically normal audiograms. Ear Hear 2017; 38 (02) 135-148
- 56 Bressler S, Goldberg H, Shinn-Cunningham B. Sensory coding and cognitive processing of sound in Veterans with blast exposure. Hear Res 2017; 349: 98-110
- 57 Bharadwaj HM, Flesher B, Mai A, Dougherty K, Simpson JM, Heinz MG. Suprathreshold hearing in middle age and relationship to cochlear synaptopathy. J Acoust Soc Am 2018; 144 (03) 1899-1899
- 58 Bhatt IS, Wang J. Evaluation of dichotic listening performance in normal-hearing, noise-exposed young females. Hear Res 2019; 380: 10-21
- 59 Le Prell CG, Brungart DS. Speech-in-noise tests and supra-threshold auditory evoked potentials as metrics for noise damage and clinical trial outcome measures. Otol Neurotol 2016; 37 (08) e295-e302
- 60 Bharadwaj HM, Mai AR, Simpson JM, Choi I, Heinz MG, Shinn-Cunningham BG. Non-invasive assays of cochlear synaptopathy - candidates and considerations. Neuroscience 2019; 407: 53-66
- 61
Prendergast G,
Couth S,
Millman RE.
et al.
Effects of age and noise exposure on proxy measures of cochlear synaptopathy. Trends
Hear 2019; 23: 2331216519877301
MissingFormLabel
- 62 Stamper GC, Johnson TA. Auditory function in normal-hearing, noise-exposed human ears. Ear Hear 2015; 36 (02) 172-184
- 63 Wojtczak M, Beim JA, Oxenham AJ. Weak middle-ear-muscle reflex in humans with noise-induced tinnitus and normal hearing may reflect cochlear synaptopathy. eNeuro 2017; 4 (06) ENEURO.0363 -17.2017
- 64 Kohrman DC, Wan G, Cassinotti L, Corfas G. Hidden hearing loss: a disorder with multiple etiologies and mechanisms. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2020; 10 (01) a035493
- 65 Bramhall NF, Konrad-Martin D, McMillan GP, Griest SE. Auditory brainstem response altered in humans with noise exposure despite normal outer hair cell function. Ear Hear 2017; 38 (01) e1-e12
- 66 Grose JH, Buss E, Hall III JW. Loud music exposure and cochlear synaptopathy in young adults: isolated auditory brainstem response effects but no perceptual consequences. Trends Hear 2017; 21: 2331216517737417
- 67 Liberman MC, Liberman LD, Maison SF. Efferent feedback slows cochlear aging. J Neurosci 2014; 34 (13) 4599-4607
- 68 Wang Y, Hirose K, Liberman MC. Dynamics of noise-induced cellular injury and repair in the mouse cochlea. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2002; 3 (03) 248-268
- 69 Maison SF, Usubuchi H, Liberman MC. Efferent feedback minimizes cochlear neuropathy from moderate noise exposure. J Neurosci 2013; 33 (13) 5542-5552
- 70 Somma G, Pietroiusti A, Magrini A. et al. Extended high-frequency audiometry and noise induced hearing loss in cement workers. Am J Ind Med 2008; 51 (06) 452-462
- 71 Mehrparvar AH, Mirmohammadi SJ, Ghoreyshi A, Mollasadeghi A, Loukzadeh Z. High-frequency audiometry: a means for early diagnosis of noise-induced hearing loss. Noise Health 2011; 13 (55) 402-406
- 72 Grant KJ, Mepani AM, Wu P. et al. Electrophysiological markers of cochlear function correlate with hearing-in-noise performance among audiometrically normal subjects. J Neurophysiol 2020; 124 (02) 418-431
- 73 Dhrruvakumar S, Shambhu T, Konadath S. Assessment of hidden hearing loss in individuals exposed to occupational noise using cochlear, neural, temporal functions and quality of life measures. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021;
- 74 Motlagh Zadeh L, Silbert NH, Sternasty K, Swanepoel W, Hunter LL, Moore DR. Extended high-frequency hearing enhances speech perception in noise. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2019; 116 (47) 23753-23759
- 75 Fulbright ANC, Le Prell CG, Griffiths SK, Lobarinas E. Effects of recreational noise on threshold and suprathreshold measures of auditory function. Semin Hear 2017; 38 (04) 298-318
- 76 Grinn SK, Wiseman KB, Baker JA, Le Prell CG. Hidden hearing loss? No effect of common recreational noise exposure on cochlear nerve response amplitude in humans. Front Neurosci 2017; 11: 465
- 77 Guest H, Munro KJ, Prendergast G, Howe S, Plack CJ. Tinnitus with a normal audiogram: relation to noise exposure but no evidence for cochlear synaptopathy. Hear Res 2017; 344: 265-274
- 78
Yeend I,
Beach EF,
Sharma M,
Dillon H.
The effects of noise exposure and musical training on suprathreshold auditory processing
and speech perception in noise. Hear Res 2017; 353: 224-236
MissingFormLabel
- 79 Starck J, Toppila E, Pyykkö I. Impulse noise and risk criteria. Noise Health 2003; 5 (20) 63-73
- 80 Hickman TT, Smalt C, Bobrow J, Quatieri T, Liberman MC. Blast-induced cochlear synaptopathy in chinchillas. Sci Rep 2018; 8 (01) 10740
- 81 Johnson TA, Cooper S, Stamper GC, Chertoff M. Noise exposure questionnaire: a tool for quantifying annual noise exposure. J Am Acad Audiol 2017; 28 (01) 14-35
- 82 Washnik NJ, Bhatt IS, Phillips SL, Tucker D, Richter S. Evaluation of cochlear activity in normal-hearing musicians. Hear Res 2020; 395: 108027
- 83 Wilson RH, Carnell CS, Cleghorn AL. The Words-in-Noise (WIN) test with multitalker babble and speech-spectrum noise maskers. J Am Acad Audiol 2007; 18 (06) 522-529
- 84 Killion MC, Niquette PA, Revit LJ, Skinner MW. Quick SIN and BKB-SIN, two new speech-in-noise tests permitting SNR-50 estimates in 1 to 2 min. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 109 (05) 2502-2502
- 85 Noble W, Jensen NS, Naylor G, Bhullar N, Akeroyd MA. A short form of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale suitable for clinical use: the SSQ12. Int J Audiol 2013; 52 (06) 409-412
- 86 Poling GL, Siegel JH, Lee J, Lee J, Dhar S. Characteristics of the 2f(1)-f(2) distortion product otoacoustic emission in a normal hearing population. J Acoust Soc Am 2014; 135 (01) 287-299
- 87 Phillips SL, Richter SJ, Teglas SL. et al. Feasibility of a bilateral 4000-6000 Hz notch as a phenotype for genetic association analysis. Int J Audiol 2015; 54 (10) 645-652
- 88
Holder JT,
Levin LM,
Gifford RH.
Speech recognition in noise for adults with normal hearing: age-normative performance
for AzBio, BKB-SIN, and QuickSIN. Otol Neurotol 2018; 39 (10) e972-e978
MissingFormLabel
- 89 Heinrich A. The role of cognition for speech-in-noise perception: Considering individual listening strategies related to aging and hearing loss. Int J Behav Dev 2021; 45 (05) 382-388
- 90 Liberman MC, Kujawa SG. Cochlear synaptopathy in acquired sensorineural hearing loss: manifestations and mechanisms. Hear Res 2017; 349: 138-147
- 91 Darwin CJ. Auditory grouping. Trends Cogn Sci 1997; 1 (09) 327-333
- 92 Holmes E, Griffiths TD. ‘Normal’ hearing thresholds and fundamental auditory grouping processes predict difficulties with speech-in-noise perception. Sci Rep 2019; 9 (01) 16771
- 93 Kim S, Emory C, Choi I. Neurofeedback training of auditory selective attention enhances speech-in-noise perception. Front Hum Neurosci 2021; 5: 676992
- 94 Schoof T, Rosen S. The role of auditory and cognitive factors in understanding speech in noise by normal-hearing older listeners. Front Aging Neurosci 2014; 6: 307
- 95 Haines MM, Stansfeld SA, Job RF, Berglund B, Head J. Chronic aircraft noise exposure, stress responses, mental health and cognitive performance in school children. Psychol Med 2001; 31 (02) 265-277
- 96 Irgens-Hansen K, Gundersen H, Sunde E. et al. Noise exposure and cognitive performance: a study on personnel on board Royal Norwegian Navy vessels. Noise Health 2015; 17 (78) 320-327
- 97 Eggermont JJ. Effects of long-term non-traumatic noise exposure on the adult central auditory system. Hearing problems without hearing loss. Hear Res 2017; 352: 12-22
- 98 Zeydabadi A, Askari J, Vakili M, Mirmohammadi SJ, Ghovveh MA, Mehrparvar AH. The effect of industrial noise exposure on attention, reaction time, and memory. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2019; 92 (01) 111-116
- 99 Wu PZ, Liberman LD, Bennett K, de Gruttola V, O'Malley JT, Liberman MC. Primary neural degeneration in the human cochlea: evidence for hidden hearing loss in the aging ear. Neuroscience 2019; 407: 8-20
- 100 Bramhall NF, Niemczak CE, Kampel SD, Billings CJ, McMillan GP. Evoked potentials reveal noise exposure-related central auditory changes despite normal audiograms. Am J Audiol 2020; 29 (02) 152-164
- 101 Muchnik C, Amir N, Shabtai E, Kaplan-Neeman R. Preferred listening levels of personal listening devices in young teenagers: self reports and physical measurements. Int J Audiol 2012; 51 (04) 287-293
- 102 Dai W, Yu K. Contestability in the digital music player market. J Ind Compet Trade 2019; 19 (02) 293-311
- 103 Gilliver M, Nguyen J, Beach EF, Barr C. Personal listening devices in Australia: patterns of use and levels of risk. Semin Hear 2017; 38 (04) 282-297
- 104 Ishak WS, Zhao F, Stephens D, Culling J, Bai Z, Meyer-Bisch C. Test-retest reliability and validity of Audioscan and Békésy compared with pure tone audiometry. Audiol Med 2011; 9 (01) 40-46