Introduction
Schwannomas are benign slow growing tumors that arise from the Schwann cells of the
neural sheath of the nerves and account for between 6 and 8% of all primary intracranial
neoplasms.[1]
[2]
[3] Even though they can be seen in most cranial nerves (except from the optic and olfactory
nerves),[3]
[4] they usually arise from sensory nerves (most frequently from the vestibular nerve,
followed by the trigeminal nerve), with motor nerves being rarely affected.[3]
[5]
Schwannomas of the abducens nerve are rare. Since a schwannoma of the abducens nerve
was first reported by Chen in 1981,[6] only 31 other cases had been reported worldwide by 2017.[7] The authors report a case of a patient who presented with headache and diplopia
for 2 months, whose neurological exam demonstrated a right abducens nerve paresis.
Investigation demonstrated an extra-axial lesion located in the prepontine cistern.
During surgery, it was noticed that the tumor originated from the abducens nerve,
and the histopathological diagnosis confirmed that it was a schwannoma. The patient
completely recovered her ocular motricity after 1 month of follow-up.
Case Report
A 55-year-old previously healthy woman was referred to the department of oncological
neurosurgery for investigation of a 2-month evolution of headache whose intensity
was progressively increasing, associated with diplopia and loss of dynamic balance.
The neurological exam of the patient demonstrated an inner horizontal deviation of
the right eyeball secondary to paresis of the right abducens nerve. Other ocular movements
were preserved. The patient presented no paresis, but coordination and delicate movements
control were disturbed, since the patient presented a right sided dysdiadokokinesis,
gait ataxia, and right-sided deviation of the dynamic balance. Magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) demonstrated an extra-axial lesion located in the prepontine cistern
compressing the anterolateral right side of the pons. The tumor was predominantly
isointense (compared with the brain parenchyma) on T1 images, with areas of hypointense
signal. On T2 images, the tumor was hyperintense. After gadolinium infusion the tumor
presented a heterogenous enhancement ([Fig. 1]). The venous phase of an angioresonance demonstrated a significative right sigmoid
sinus dominance. This was one of the reasons why the posterior petrosal approach was
not considered a good option.
Fig. 1 Presurgical magnetic resonance imaging demonstrating a heterogenous but predominantly
isointense signal on T1 images (A), hyperintense signal on T2 images (B) with a circumferential
enhancement after gadolinium infusion (C).
The patient was submitted to surgery by a lateral suboccipital right-sided retrosigmoid
approach with complete removal of the tumor. During the surgery, it was noticed that
the origin of the tumor was from rootlets of the right abducens nerve that emerged
as two different roots. This duplicated origin of the nerve allowed the preservation
of the main trunk in all its trajectory. A postoperative MRI scan showed gross total
tumor resection ([Fig. 2]). An anatomopathological analysis diagnosed the tumor as schwannoma, represented
mostly by Antoni A areas consisting of closely apposed spindle-shaped cells in a palisading
pattern ([Fig. 3]).
Fig. 2 Postsurgical magnetic resonance imaging demonstrating complete tumor resection
Fig. 3 Schwannoma consisting of closely apposed spindle-shaped cells in a palisading pattern
(Antoni A).
During the early postoperative period, the patient persisted with right abducent palsy,
but no other neurological deficits. By the 7th day of postoperative follow-up, the patient was discharged from hospital care, sustaining
excellent wound healing and complete neurological recovery. Ocular motricity was completely
recovered after 1 month of follow-up ([Fig. 4]). The patient authorized the authors to publish the present case report by signing
an informed consent form.
Fig. 4 Postsurgical ocular extrinsic exam demonstrating normal horizontal ocular movement.
(A) Patient looking forward. (B) Patient looking to the left. (C) Patient looking
to the right.
Discussion
The trigeminal nerve is the second most common site of schwannomas, representing ∼
0.2% of all intracranial tumors.[5] Pure motor nerves that supply the ocular muscles (IIIrd, IVth and VIth nerves) are very rarely affected by this neoplasm.[4]
[8]
[9] Unlike the more common vestibular schwannomas, those of the VIth nerve usually arise distal from the glial-Schwann sheath junction. This transitional
zone of the abducens nerve represents the junction of central and peripheral myelin
and lies < 1 mm from the brainstem.[8]
[10]
[11]
Abducens nerve schwannomas are more frequent in females, with a mean age of 45 years
old (peak of frequency in the 5th decade of life), characteristics that were also found in our case. The youngest patient
ever described was 10 years old,[12] and the oldest was 66 years old.[13] Some of the cases described in the literature were associated with neurofibromatosis
type 1 (NF-1).
The abducens nerve emerges from the brainstem near the midline at the pontomedullary
sulcus. It courses upwardly, laterally, and anteriorly in the prepontine cistern and
passes underneath the Gruber ligament, entering the Dorello canal. The nerve enters
in the cavernous sinus at the lower part of the posterior wall, crossing the sinus
medially to the ophthalmic nerve and lateral to the internal carotid artery. Finally,
the nerve enters the orbital cavity at the medial end of the superior orbital fissure.[10]
Abducens nerve schwannomas can arise from the intracranial or intraorbital portion
of the nerve. Intracranial tumors can originate from the emergence of the nerve in
the pontomedullary sulcus to the cavernous portion close to the superior orbital fissure.
Tung et al. classified intracranial abducens schwannomas into two types depending
their location: Type 1 occurs in the cavernous sinus (cavernous abducens schwannoma);
and Type 2 occurs at the prepontine cistern (cisternal abducens schwannoma).[14] However, some cases involving cisternal and cavernous segments were described, named
as cisternocavernous dumbbell-shaped type, and were assigned to a new category of
abducens schwannomas (Type 3).[5] Based on the aforementioned classification, most abducens schwannomas arise from
the cisternal portion, followed equally by the cavernous and cisternocavernous types.[8] A literature research has identified only two cases of extracranial intraorbital
abducens nerve schwannomas.[4]
[15]
The clinical presentation differ according to the location of the tumor. Diplopia,
secondary to isolated abducens nerve palsy, is the most frequent manifestation of
Type 1 tumors.[3] In contrast, tumors located in the cistern may present with obstructive hydrocephalus
and raised intracranial pressure, besides VIth nerve palsy.[8] Depending on the size of the cisternal tumor, other cranial nerves can be involved,
such as the trigeminal, the vestibulocochlear and the facial nerves.[8]
[10] In such cases, patients may present with facial pain, facial numbness, hearing disturbance
or oculomotor palsy.[3]
Clinical features and neuroradiologic image are frequently insufficient to reach an
accurate preoperative diagnosis.[3] The diagnosis of abducens schwannoma is seldomly performed before operation and,
typically, the primary suspicion is meningioma or trigeminal schwannoma.[8]
The typical MRI findings of schwannomas demonstrate an iso-to-hypointensity image
in T1, hyperintensity in T2, and a heterogeneous contrast enhancement. Heterogeneous
signal intensity and postcontrast enhancement are suggestive of internal hemorrhage
and myxoid/cystic changes.[16] Besides, schwannomas can show degenerative changes, such as cyst formation, calcification,
hemorrhage, and hyalinization,[17] characteristics that make the radiological diagnosis more difficult.
Most abducens schwannomas are solid, but a cystic variant with a ring-like enhancement
is found in a significant percentage of cases.[8] Other indirect signs that highlight the suspicion of nonvestibular Schwannomas are:
normal size of the internal acoustic meatus and posterior displacement of the facial
and vestibulocochlear nerve complex, which preclude the possibility of the vestibular
origin.[3] A 3D-Constructive Interference in Steady State (3D-CISS) acquisition, a part of
fast gradient echo sequences, can possibly define preoperatively the relationship
details of the tumor and the cranial nerves adjacent to the neoplasm.[18]
A specific radiological characteristic was described in dumbbell-shaped schwannomas,
which are often seen in the trigeminal nerves. But compared with the trigeminal tumors,
the neoplasms arising from the abducens nerve present a different pattern. The neck
constriction of dumbbell-shaped schwannomas forms an obtuse angle in trigeminal schwannomas,
whereas in abducens schwannomas, it forms an acute angle.[5]
The first operated abducens schwannoma was described by Chen in 1981,[6] and, up to now, operation is the only therapy that has been reported to be successful.[8] Besides, the definite diagnosis of an abducens nerve schwannoma is established intraoperatively,
when the surgeon can visualize the tumor attachment into the VIth nerve.[8]
The surgical technique and approach vary according to the location of the tumor. For
schwannomas in the cavernous and parasellar regions (Type 1), the frontotemporal,
subtemporal, orbitozygomatic, and anterior transpetrosal approaches have all been
reported. For prepontine lesions (Type 2), the lateral suboccipital retrosigmoid,
lateral suboccipital transcondylar, and anterior transpetrosal approaches have been
reported.[5]
[8]
The surgical technique used to resect dumbbell-shaped tumors that extend both to the
posterior and middle cranial fossae has not been described specifically for abducens
schwannomas. The reports in the literature are for trigeminal schwannomas, in which
case the anterior transpetrosal approach would be a good option.[19]
Preservation of nerve function as well as maximum tumor removal are critical in surgery
for intracranial schwannomas, but abducens nerve function uncommonly recovers completely
after removal of the abducens nerve schwannoma. To date, among the 32 cases of pathologically
confirmed intracranial abducens nerve schwannoma reported, postoperative nerve function
recovered completely in only 7 cases and partially in 3 cases.[8]
[9]
[20] Permanent or transient abducens nerve palsy occur postoperatively in most cases
because the nerve was usually disturbed or sacrificed.
The reason for complete recovery of nerve function in the seven cases reported in
the literature, as well as in the present case, may be the splitting of the nerve
root or the existence of a separate trunk of the abducens nerve in the subarachnoid
space.[8] The preservation of one of the nerve roots or the preservation of some nerve fascicles
in patients with a single nerve root makes possible the recovery of ocular external
gaze. This suggests that intentional subcapsular removal preserving part of the tumor
capsule as a scaffold for regeneration of the nerve would potentiate functional recovery
even in cases in which the course of the abducens nerve is not identified intraoperatively,
as long as nerve function is preserved preoperatively.[8]
Finally, since the abducens nerve is a pure motor nerve, primary nerve repair using
anastomosis would potentiate functional recovery. Direct end-to-end anastomosis after
complete excision of the tumor may result in functional improvement during follow-up.[3]
Conclusion
The authors describe the 33rd case of abducens nerve schwannoma in the medical literature, but the 8th with full recovery of nerve function. Tumoral gross total removal remains the goal
of the treatment, and the preservation of one the nerve roots (when multiple) or fascicles
of the nerve (when single) is of paramount importance for the recovery of ocular movement.
