J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2023; 84(02): 103-108
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735861
Original Article

Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Diskectomy for Lumbar Disk Herniation: Young (Age <60 years) versus Older (Age ≥60 years) Patients

Zhu Zhong-Sheng*
1   Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Fengxian Central Hospital, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
,
Fang Rui*
2   Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Sixth Peoples Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
,
Kong Yan-Long
1   Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Fengxian Central Hospital, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
,
Xiao Hai-Jun
1   Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Fengxian Central Hospital, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
2   Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Sixth Peoples Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
,
Zhang Ya-Dong
3   Department of Spine Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
,
Xue Feng
1   Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Fengxian Central Hospital, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background We compare the differences in the efficacy of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic diskectomy (PTED) between the younger (age <60 years) and older (age ≥60 years) patients with lumbar disk herniation (LDH).

Methods From December 2016 to December 2017, 128 patients with symptomatic LDH underwent PTED and were followed up. Forty-four 60 years old and above, including 19 males and 25 females with an average age of 68.7 (61–82) years, were classified as the elderly age group. Eighty-four patients younger than 60 years were classified as the young age group, which included 48 males and 36 females with an average age of 44.7 (16–58) years. The visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, and satisfaction rates of the two groups before and after surgery were compared.

Results The operation was completed successfully in both groups. The average follow-up times of the elderly and young age groups were 18.47 ± 2.62 (12–23) and 17.90 ± 3.27 (12–23) months, respectively. One patient in the young age group had recurrence 7 months after surgery, and the symptoms were relieved after PTED was performed again. Two patients with nerve root injury after surgery in the young age group completely recovered after 2 months of conservative treatment. There were no significant surgical complications in the elderly age group. There was no significant difference in postoperative VAS, JOA, and MacNab scores between the two groups. The MacNab scores in the elderly age group were excellent for 28 patients, good for 10 patients, and fair for 6 patients; the satisfaction rate was 86.3%. In the young age group, scores were excellent for 63 patients, good for 14 patients, fair for 5 patients, and poor for 2 patients; the satisfaction rate was 91.7%.

Conclusion The clinical effectiveness of PTED for treatment of LDH in both elderly and young patients is satisfactory. Age is not a predictor of poor outcomes of PTED.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

This study was conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. This study was conducted with approval from the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Feng Xian District Central Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.


Availability of Data and Material

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.


* Zhu Zhong-Sheng, and Fang Rui contributed equally to this study and share first authorship. They are all considered co-first authors.




Publication History

Received: 19 May 2020

Accepted: 09 March 2021

Article published online:
12 December 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • Reference

  • 1 Jang JS, An SH, Lee SH. Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic discectomy in the treatment of foraminal and extraforaminal lumbar disc herniations. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006; 19 (05) 338-343
  • 2 Lee SH, Chung SE, Ahn Y, Kim TH, Park JY, Shin SW. Comparative radiologic evaluation of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open microdiscectomy: a matched cohort analysis. Mt Sinai J Med 2006; 73 (05) 795-801
  • 3 Gembun Y, Nakayama Y, Shirai Y, Miyamoto M, Kitagawa Y, Yamada T. Surgical results of lumbar disc herniation in the elderly. J Nippon Med Sch 2001; 68 (01) 50-53
  • 4 Pulido-Rivas P, Sola RG, Pallares-Fernández JM, Pintor-Escobar A. Lumbar spinal surgery in elderly patients. Rev Neurol 2004; 39 (06) 501-507
  • 5 Jasper GP, Francisco GM, Telfeian AE. A retrospective evaluation of the clinical success of transforaminal endoscopic discectomy with foraminotomy in geriatric patients. Pain Physician 2013; 16 (03) 225-229
  • 6 Rothoerl RD, Woertgen C, Holzschuh M, Schlaier J. Are there differences in the symptoms, signs and outcome after lumbar disc surgery in the elderly compared with younger patients?. Br J Neurosurg 1998; 12 (03) 250-253
  • 7 Kim CH, Chung CK, Choi Y. et al. The selection of open or percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy according to an age cut-off point: nationwide cohort study. Spine 2015; 40 (19) E1063-E1070
  • 8 Wang K, Hong X, Zhou BY. et al. Evaluation of transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Int Orthop 2015; 39 (08) 1599-1604
  • 9 Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011; 63 (Suppl. 11) S240-S252
  • 10 Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M. et al; Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 2. Verification of its reliability: The Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. J Orthop Sci 2007; 12 (06) 526-532
  • 11 Macnab I. Negative disc exploration. An analysis of the causes of nerve-root involvement in sixty-eight patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1971; 53 (05) 891-903
  • 12 Fujii K, Henmi T, Kanematsu Y, Mishiro T, Sakai T. Surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003; 85 (08) 1146-1150
  • 13 Strömqvist F, Strömqvist B, Jönsson B, Karlsson MK. The outcome of lumbar disc herniation surgery is worse in old adults than in young adults. Acta Orthop 2016; 87 (05) 516-521
  • 14 Daubs MD, Lenke LG, Cheh G, Stobbs G, Bridwell KH. Adult spinal deformity surgery: complications and outcomes in patients over age 60. Spine 2007; 32 (20) 2238-2244
  • 15 Chen HC, Lee CH, Wei L, Lui TN, Lin TJ. Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open lumbar surgery for adjacent segment degeneration and recurrent disc herniation. Neurol Res Int 2015; 2015: 791943
  • 16 Chen X, Qin R, Hao J. et al. Percutaneous endoscopic decompression via transforaminal approach for lumbar lateral recess stenosis in geriatric patients. Int Orthop 2019; 43 (05) 1263-1269
  • 17 McGirt MJ, Ambrossi GL, Datoo G. et al. Recurrent disc herniation and long-term back pain after primary lumbar discectomy: review of outcomes reported for limited versus aggressive disc removal. Neurosurgery 2009; 64 (02) 338-344 , discussion 344–345
  • 18 Zhang B, Liu S, Liu J. et al. Transforaminal endoscopic discectomy versus conventional microdiscectomy for lumbar discherniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 2018; 13 (01) 169
  • 19 Gempt J, Jonek M, Ringel F, Preuss A, Wolf P, Ryang Y. Long-term follow-up of standard microdiscectomy versus minimal access surgery for lumbar disc herniations. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2013; 155 (12) 2333-2338