Download PDF
J Am Acad Audiol 2021; 32(06): 374-378
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731592
Research Article

Long-Term Effects of Hearing Aids on Hearing Ability in Patients with Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Anurag R. Goel 
1   Weill Cornell School of Medicine, New York, New York
,
Haley A. Bruce
2   Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
,
Nicholas Williams
3   Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
,
George Alexiades
2   Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
› Author Affiliations Funding N.W. was partially supported by the following grant: Clinical and Translational Science Center at Weill Cornell Medical College (1-UL1-TR002384–01). The other authors have no funding interests to disclose.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background A frequent concern surrounding amplification with hearing aids for patients with sensorineural hearing loss is whether these devices negatively affect hearing ability. To date, there have been few studies examining the long-term effects of amplification on audiometric outcomes in adults.

Purpose In the present study, we examined how hearing aids affect standard audiometric outcomes over long-term periods of follow-up.

Research Design We retrospectively collected audiometric data in adults with sensorineural hearing loss, constructing a model of long-term outcomes.

Study Sample This retrospective cohort study included 802 ears from 401 adult patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss eligible for amplification with hearing aids at a single institution.

Intervention Of the eligible patients, 88 were aided bilaterally, and 313 were unaided.

Data Collection and Analysis We examined the standard three-frequency pure-tone average (PTA3-Freq), a novel extended pure-tone average (PTAExt), and word recognition score (WRS) per-ear at each encounter. We then modeled the association between the use of hearing aids for 5 years and these audiometric outcomes using targeted maximum likelihood estimation.

Results In comparing aided and unaided ears at the end of 5 years, there were discernible effects for all measurements. The PTA3-Freq was 5 dB greater in aided ears (95% CI: 1.37–8.64, p = 0.007), WRS was 4.5 percentage points lower in aided ears (95% CI: −9.14 to 0.15, p = 0.058), and PTAExt was 5 dB greater in aided ears (95% CI: 2.18–7.82, p < 0.001), adjusting for measured confounders.

Conclusion Our analysis revealed discernible effects of 5 years of hearing aid use on hearing ability, specifically as measured by the PTA3-Freq, novel PTAExt, and WRS, suggesting a greater decline in hearing ability in patients using hearing aids. Future studies are needed to examine these effects between treatment groups over longer periods of time and in more heterogeneous populations to improve clinical practice guidelines and safety of both prescriptive fitting nonprescriptive amplification.

Keywords

sensorineural hearing loss - hearing aid - long-term effects - pure-tone average - word recognition - hearing ability - adverse effect


Publication History

Received: 09 October 2020

Accepted: 14 February 2021

Article published online:
03 June 2021

© 2021. American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Arlinger S. Negative consequences of uncorrected hearing loss—a review. Int J Audiol 2003; 42 (02, Suppl 2): S17-S20
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Davis A, McMahon CM, Pichora-Fuller KM. et al. Aging and hearing health: the life-course approach. Gerontologist 2016; 56 (Suppl. 02) S256-S267
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Dawes P, Cruickshanks KJ, Fischer ME, Klein BEK, Klein R, Nondahl DM. Hearing-aid use and long-term health outcomes: hearing handicap, mental health, social engagement, cognitive function, physical health, and mortality. Int J Audiol 2015; 54 (11) 838-844
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Peters CA, Potter JF, Scholer SG. Hearing impairment as a predictor of cognitive decline in dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 1988; 36 (11) 981-986
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Chisolm TH, Johnson CE, Danhauer JL. et al. A systematic review of health-related quality of life and hearing aids: final report of the American Academy of Audiology Task Force On the Health-Related Quality of Life Benefits of Amplification in Adults. J Am Acad Audiol 2007; 18 (02) 151-183
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Klein AJ, Weber PC. Hearing aids. Med Clin North Am 1999; 83 (01) 139-151
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ferguson MA, Kitterick PT, Chong LY, Edmondson-Jones M, Barker F, Hoare DJ. Hearing aids for mild to moderate hearing loss in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 9: CD012023
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Humes LE. Dimensions of hearing aid outcome. J Am Acad Audiol 1999; 10 (01) 26-39
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Granberg S, Dahlström J, Möller C, Kähäri K, Danermark B. The ICF Core Sets for hearing loss--researcher perspective. Part I: Systematic review of outcome measures identified in audiological research. Int J Audiol 2014; 53 (02) 65-76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Brant LJ, Gordon-Salant S, Pearson JD. et al. Risk factors related to age-associated hearing loss in the speech frequencies. J Am Acad Audiol 1996; 7 (03) 152-160
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Cruickshanks KJ, Tweed TS, Wiley TL. et al. The 5-year incidence and progression of hearing loss: the epidemiology of hearing loss study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 129 (10) 1041-1046
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Gates GA, Cooper JC. Incidence of hearing decline in the elderly. Acta Otolaryngol 1991; 111 (02) 240-248
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ching TYC, Johnson EE, Seeto M, Macrae JH. Hearing-aid safety: a comparison of estimated threshold shifts for gains recommended by NAL-NL2 and DSL m[i/o] prescriptions for children. Int J Audiol 2013; 52 (Suppl. 02) S39-S45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Dolan TG, Maurer JF. Noise exposure associated with hearing aid use in industry. J Speech Hear Res 1996; 39 (02) 251-260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Johnson EE. Safety limit warning levels for the avoidance of excessive sound amplification to protect against further hearing loss. Int J Audiol 2017; 56 (11) 829-836
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Macrae JH. Deterioration of the residual hearing of children with sensorineural deafness. Acta Otolaryngol 1968; 66 (01) 33-39
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Macrae JH. Temporary and permanent threshold shift caused by hearing aid use. J Speech Hear Res 1995; 38 (04) 949-959
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Markides A. The effect of hearing aid use on the user's residual hearing. Scand Audiol 1978; 7: 19-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Podoshin L, Kremer M, Fradis M, Feiglin H. Effect of hearing aids on hearing. Laryngoscope 1984; 94 (01) 113-117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Bratt GW, Rosenfeld MAL, Williams DW. NIDCD/VA hearing aid clinical trial and follow-up: background. J Am Acad Audiol 2007; 18 (04) 274-281
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Peek BF, Rosenfeld MAL, Bratt GW, Williams DW. NIDCD/VA hearing aid clinical trial and follow-up: coupler and real-ear measurement. J Am Acad Audiol 2007; 18 (04) 282-291
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Shanks JE, Wilson RH, Stelmachowicz P, Bratt GW, Williams DW. Speech-recognition performance after long-term hearing aid use. J Am Acad Audiol 2007; 18 (04) 292-303
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Gelfand SA, Silman S, Ross L. Long-term effects of monaural, binaural and no amplification in subjects with bilateral hearing loss. Scand Audiol 1987; 16 (04) 201-207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Song JE, Tanaka SM, Pinto JM, Rasmussen B, Ferro LM, Saadia-Redleaf MI. Long-term effects of hearing aids on word recognition scores. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2011; 120 (05) 314-319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kochkin S. MarkeTrak VIII: utilization of PSAPs and direct-mail hearing aids by people with hearing impairment. Hear Rev 2010; 17: 12-16
    Google Scholar
  • 26 World Health Organization. Grades of hearing impairment. Accessed May 4, 2020 at: https://www.who.int/health-topics/hearing-loss#tab=tab_1
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Occupational Safety & Health Administration. Recording criteria for cases involving occupational hearing loss. 2019 . Available at: https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1904/1904.10
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Katz J, Chasin M, English KM, Hood LJ, Tillery KL. Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2015
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Moshammer H, Kundi M, Wallner P, Herbst A, Feuerstein A, Hutter HP. Early prognosis of noise-induced hearing loss. Occup Environ Med 2015; 72 (02) 85-89
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Gruber S, van der Laan M. Targeted maximum likelihood estimation: a gentle introduction. UC Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series. Working Paper 252. Accessed August 31, 2009 at: https://biostats.bepress.com/ucbbiostat/paper252
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Naimi AI, Balzer LB. Stacked generalization: an introduction to super learning. Eur J Epidemiol 2018; 33 (05) 459-464
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 The R Foundation. The R Project for Statistical Computing. Accessed October 5, 2020 at: https://www.r-project.org/
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Lendle SD, Schwab J, Petersen ML, van der Laan MJ. ltmle: an R Package implementing targeted minimum loss-based estimation for longitudinal data. J Stat Softw 2017; 81: 1-21
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Polley E, LeDell E, Kennedy C, Lendle S, van der Laan M. SuperLearner: Super Learner Prediction. 2019 Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/package=SuperLearner
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Humes LE, Bess FH. Tutorial on the potential deterioration in hearing due to hearing aid usage. J Speech Hear Res 1981; 24 (01) 3-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar