Trends in Spontaneous and Medically Indicated Preterm Birth in Twins versus Singletons: A California Cohort 2007 to 2011

Abstract

Objective The study aimed to describe preterm birth (PTB) rates, subtypes, and risk factors in twins compared with singletons to better understand reasons for the decline in PTB rate between 2007 and 2011.

Study Design This was a retrospective population-based analysis using the California linked birth certificates and maternal-infant hospital discharge records from 2007 to 2011. The main outcomes were overall, spontaneous (following spontaneous labor or preterm premature rupture of membranes), and medically indicated PTB at various gestational age categories: <37, <32, and 34 to 36 weeks in twins and singletons.

Results Among the 2,290,973 singletons and 28,937 twin live births pairs included, overall PTB <37 weeks decreased by 8.46% (6.77–6.20%) in singletons and 7.17% (55.31–51.35%) in twins during the study period. In singletons, this was primarily due to a 24.91% decrease in medically indicated PTB with almost no change in spontaneous PTB, whereas in twins indicated PTB declined 7.02% and spontaneous PTB by 7.39%.

Conclusion Recent declines in PTB in singletons appear to be largely due to declines in indicated PTB, whereas both spontaneous and indicated PTB declined in twins.

Key Points

• The declines in PTB noted between 2006 and 2014 occurred in both singleton and twins.

• Declines were mostly in medically indicated PTB.

• Interventions proposed as causing the declines in singletons would not apply to twins.

Keywords

twins - preterm birth - trends - spontaneous preterm birth - medically indicated preterm birth

Note

This work was previously presented at the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine 37th Annual Meeting: The Pregnancy Meeting in Las Vegas, NV from January 23 to 28, 2017. During the period 2007 to 2011, declines in PTB rates in California occurred in both singletons and twins but differed by PTB phenotype.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 10. Juni 2020

Angenommen: 02. März 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
02. Mai 2021

• References

• 1 Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK, Drake P. Births: final data for 2017. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2018; 67 (08) 1-50
• 2 Martin JA, Osterman MJK, Sutton PD. Are preterm births on the decline in the United States? Recent data from the National Vital Statistics System. NCHS Data Brief 2010; (39) 1-8
• 3 Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Ananth CV. Trends in spontaneous and indicated preterm delivery among singleton gestations in the United States, 2005-2012. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124 (06) 1069-1074
• 4 Schoen CN, Tabbah S, Iams JD, Caughey AB, Berghella V. Why the United States preterm birth rate is declining. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213 (02) 175-180
• 5 Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Publications Committee, with assistance of Vincenzo Berghella. Progesterone and preterm birth prevention: translating clinical trials data into clinical practice. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206 (05) 376-386
• 6 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. ACOG practice bulletin no. 127: Management of preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119 (06) 1308-1317
• 7 Biggio Jr JR. Progesterone, pessary or cerclage for preterm birth prevention in twins: no answers yet. BJOG 2017; 124 (08) 1175
• 8 Jarde A, Lutsiv O, Park CK. et al. Preterm birth prevention in twin pregnancies with progesterone, pessary, or cerclage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2017; 124 (08) 1163-1173
• 9 Shachar BZ, Mayo JA, Lyell DJ. et al. Interpregnancy interval after live birth or pregnancy termination and estimated risk of preterm birth: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG 2016; 123 (12) 2009-2017
• 10 Herrchen B, Gould JB, Nesbitt TS. Vital statistics linked birth/infant death and hospital discharge record linkage for epidemiological studies. Comput Biomed Res 1997; 30 (04) 290-305
• 11 Ananth CV, Joseph KS, Demissie K, Vintzileos AM. Trends in twin preterm birth subtypes in the United States, 1989 through 2000: impact on perinatal mortality. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193 (3 Pt 2): 1076-1082
• 12 Ananth CV, Joseph KS, Oyelese Y, Demissie K, Vintzileos AM. Trends in preterm birth and perinatal mortality among singletons: United States, 1989 through 2000. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105 (5 Pt 1): 1084-1091
• 13 Lisonkova S, Hutcheon JA, Joseph KS. Temporal trends in neonatal outcomes following iatrogenic preterm delivery. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2011; 11: 39
• 14 Summary of recommendations - WHO Recommendations for Prevention and Treatment of Pre-Eclampsia and Eclampsia - NCBI Bookshelf. Accessed 2021 at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK140555/
• 15 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Hypertension in pregnancy. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122 (05) 1122-1131
• 16 LeFevre ML. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Low-dose aspirin use for the prevention of morbidity and mortality from preeclampsia: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2014; 161 (11) 819-826