PDF herunterladen
J Am Acad Audiol 2021; 32(06): 347-354
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1728799
Research Article

Influence of Alignment Strategies and Consonant Acoustic Features on Laterality Index in Dichotic Testing in Indian Languages

Indira Chenthamara Pazhayapisharath
1   Department of Audiology, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysore, Karnataka, India
2   Department of Audiology, JSS Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysore, Karnataka, India
,
Sanjana Singh Sathyanarayana
2   Department of Audiology, JSS Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysore, Karnataka, India
,
Vijaya Kumar Narne
2   Department of Audiology, JSS Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysore, Karnataka, India
3   Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background The right ear advantage (REA) observed for dichotic CV (DCV) testing in Indian languages is seen to be smaller compared with the observations in several studies in English and other languages.

Purpose The present study aims to explore whether the differences in the temporal alignment of consonant–vowel (CV) stimuli used for the dichotic task is a contributing factor that can explain the smaller REAs observed in Indian languages.

Research Design The study compared the laterality index (LI) values between DCV test results obtained using CV stimuli that were temporally aligned at the acoustic onset versus the burst onset, with 0 milliseconds lag between the right and left ears.

Study Sample A total of 50 right-handed individuals (native speakers of Kannada language) in the age range of 17 to 30 years with normal hearing sensitivity participated in the study.

Data Collection and Analysis The participants' responses to the two sets of DCV stimuli were recorded and compared. LI was calculated for the overall scores as well as for specific voiced and unvoiced segment combinations. To test the reliability of the findings, 10 of the participants were re-tested using the same stimuli and the data were checked for reliability.

Results The overall LI was 15.1% for the stimuli temporally aligned at the burst onset, whereas it was 5.7% for the stimuli temporally aligned at the acoustic onset. The difference in LI was not significant between the alignment conditions for unvoiced–unvoiced and voiced–voiced CV combinations, but this difference was significant for the unvoiced–voiced and voiced–unvoiced CV combinations. Comparing test and re-test scores showed good reliability.

Conclusion The results support our hypothesis that smaller REA observed in DCV task in Indian languages was due to the temporal alignment of CV stimuli. In the acoustic-onset-aligned condition, presenting pairs contrasting in the voicing feature tends to cancel out a relative ear advantage.

Keywords

dichotic listening - voice onset time - right ear advantage - laterality index


Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 12. August 2020

Angenommen: 22. Dezember 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
03. Juni 2021

© 2021. American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Kimura D. Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Can J Psychol 1961; 15: 166
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hugdahl K. Dichotic listening: an experimental tool in clinical neuropsychology. In: Hugdahl K. ed. Experimental Methods in Neuropsychology. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Bellis TJ, Ross J. Performance of normal adults and children on central auditory diagnostic tests and their corresponding visual analogs. J Am Acad Audiol 2011; 22 (08) 491-500
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Musiek FE, Chermak GD. Psychophysical and behavioral peripheral and central auditory tests. Handb Clin Neurol 2015; 129: 313-332
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Moncrieff DW, Musiek FE. Interaural asymmetries revealed by dichotic listening tests in normal and dyslexic children. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13 (08) 428-437
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Moncrieff DW, Black JR. Dichotic listening deficits in children with dyslexia. Dyslexia 2008; 14 (01) 54-75
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Berlin CI, Lowe-Bell SS, Cullen Jr JK, Thompson CL, Loovis CF. Dichotic speech perception: an interpretation of right-ear advantage and temporal offset effects. J Acoust Soc Am 1973; 53 (03) 699-709
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Studdert-Kennedy M, Shankweiler D. Hemispheric specialization for speech perception. J Acoust Soc Am 1970; 48 (02) 579-594
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Weihing J, Atcherson SR. Dichotic listening tests. In: Chermak GD, Musiek FE. eds. Handbook of Central Auditory Processing Disorder. Auditory Neuroscience and Diagnosis. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2014
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Haggard MP. Encoding and the REA for speech signals. Q J Exp Psychol 1971; 23 (01) 34-45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Asbjørnsen AE, Helland T. Dichotic listening performance predicts language comprehension. Laterality 2006; 11 (03) 251-262
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Rimol LM, Eichele T, Hugdahl K. The effect of voice-onset-time on dichotic listening with consonant-vowel syllables. Neuropsychologia 2006; 44 (02) 191-196
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Shanks J, Ryan W. A comparison of aphasic and non-brain-injured adults on a dichotic CV-syllable listening task. Cortex 1976; 12 (02) 100-112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Gowri K. Dichotic CV Test-Revised Normative Data on Children [Doctoral dissertation]. Mysore: University of Mysore; 2001
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Yathiraj A, Priyadarsini K. Effect of training on dichotic CV and dichotic digit scores. J Indian Speech Language Hearing Assoc 2009; 23: 74-80
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Yathiraj A, Maggu AR. Screening test for auditory processing (STAP): a preliminary report. J Am Acad Audiol 2013; 24 (09) 867-878
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Moumitha C. Normative Data for Adults on Dichotic CV Test-Revised: CD Version [Doctoral dissertation]. Mysore: University of Mysore; 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Puranik PP. Dichotic CV Test-Revised Normative Data for Adults. [Doctoral dissertation]. Mysore: University of Mysore; 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Asbjørnsen AE, Hugdahl K. Attentional effects in dichotic listening. Brain Lang 1995; 49 (03) 189-201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Shinn JB, Baran JA, Moncrieff DW, Musiek FE. Differential attention effects on dichotic listening. J Am Acad Audiol 2005; 16 (04) 205-218
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Hugdahl K, Carlsson G, Eichele T. Age effects in dichotic listening to consonant-vowel syllables: interactions with attention. Dev Neuropsychol 2001; 20 (01) 445-457
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Haitjema-Huisman B, van den Broecke MPR. Stimulus dominance in dichotic listening. Lang Speech 1980; 23 (Pt 4): 393-402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Hannah JE. Phonetic and temporal titration of the dichotic right ear effect [Doctoral dissertation]. Louisiana: Louisiana State University; 1971
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Lisker L, Abramson AS. A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: acoustical measurements. Word 1964; 20: 384-422
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Tallus J, Hugdahl K, Alho K, Medvedev S, Hämäläinen H. Interaural intensity difference and ear advantage in listening to dichotic consonant-vowel syllable pairs. Brain Res 2007; 1185: 195-200
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Bedoin N, Ferragne E, Marsico E. Hemispheric asymmetries depend on the phonetic feature: a dichotic study of place of articulation and voicing in French stops. Brain Lang 2010; 115 (02) 133-140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Yathiraj A, Vanaja CS. Age related changes in auditory processes in children aged 6 to 10 years. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 79 (08) 1224-1234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971; 9 (01) 97-113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Repp BH. Measuring laterality effects in dichotic listening. J Acoust Soc Am 1977; 62 (03) 720-737
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Borod JC, Goodglass H. Lateralization of linguistic and melodic processing with age. Neuropsychologia 1980; 18 (01) 79-83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Marshall JC, Caplan D, Holmes JM. The measure of laterality. Neuropsychologia 1975; 13 (03) 315-321
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Bless JJ, Westerhausen R, von Koss Torkildsen J, Gudmundsen M, Kompus K, Hugdahl K. Laterality across languages: results from a global dichotic listening study using a smartphone application. Laterality 2015; 20 (04) 434-452
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Moncrieff D, Dubyne L. Enhanced identification of long versus short voice onset time consonant-vowel syllables in a dichotic listening task. Am J Audiol 2017; 26 (04) 555-561
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Lowe SS. Perception of dichotic and monotic simultaneous and time-staggered syllables [Doctoral dissertation]. California: Louisiana State University; 1970
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Athaide DD, Kumudavalli S. Comparison of voice onset time of English stops produced by native Kannada and native Tamil speakers. Language in India 2017; 17: 3
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Bhaskararao P. Salient phonetic features of Indian languages in speech technology. Sadhana 2011; 36: 587-599
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar