RSS-Feed abonnieren
Bitte kopieren Sie die angezeigte URL und fügen sie dann in Ihren RSS-Reader ein.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/de/10.1055-s-00000051.xml
PDF herunterladen
Semin Plast Surg 2021; 35(02): 098-109
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1727272
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1727272
Review Article
Revision Breast Augmentation
Abstract
Breast augmentation is consistently one of the most commonly performed aesthetic operations every year. Unfortunately, revision rates following primary augmentation remain as high as 36%. There are several causes for revision breast augmentation; however, the most common and challenging of these include capsular contracture, implant malposition, and ptosis of the aging breast following augmentation. Successful management of these problems requires knowledge on how to best treat the implant and capsule with the corresponding soft tissue simultaneously. While surgical management is important, understanding the pathological causes of these entities during the primary operation can reduce the need for revision. This article utilizes the most up-to-date literature to review the appropriate clinical evaluation and surgical management of these complex cases.
Keywords
revision breast augmentation - secondary breast augmentation - capsular contracture - implant malposition - breast ptosisPublikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
08. Juni 2021
© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Plastic Surgery Statistics Report. 2019. ASPS National Clearinghouse of Plastic Surgery Procedural Statistics. American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
- 2 Brown MH, Somogyi RB, Aggarwal S. Secondary breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (01) 119e-135e
- 3 Bachour Y, Bargon CA, de Blok CJM, Ket JCF, Ritt MJPF, Niessen FB. Risk factors for developing capsular contracture in women after breast implant surgery: a systematic review of the literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018; 71 (09) e29-e48
- 4 Flugstad NA, Pozner JN, Baxter RA. et al. Does implant insertion with a funnel decrease capsular contracture? A preliminary report. Aesthet Surg J 2016; 36 (05) 550-556
- 5 Graf R, Ascenço ASK, Freitas RDS. et al. Prevention of capsular contracture using leukotriene antagonists. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136 (05) 592e-596e
- 6 Bachour Y, Verweij SP, Gibbs S. et al. The aetiopathogenesis of capsular contracture: a systematic review of the literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018; 71 (03) 307-317
- 7 Ajdic D, Zoghbi Y, Gerth D, Panthaki ZJ, Thaller S. The relationship of bacterial biofilms and capsular contracture in breast implants. Aesthet Surg J 2016; 36 (03) 297-309
- 8 Wagner DS, Mirhaidari SJ. Capsulectomy, implant exchange, and placement of acellular dermal matrix is effective in treating capsular contracture in breast augmentation patients. Aesthet Surg J 2021; 41 (03) 304-312
- 9 Calobrace MB, Stevens WG, Capizzi PJ, Cohen R, Godinez T, Beckstrand M. Risk factor analysis for capsular contracture: a 10-year Sientra study using round, smooth, and textured implants for breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (4S Sientra Shaped and Round Cohesive Gel Implants, 4S): 20S-28S
- 10 Tamboto H, Vickery K, Deva AK. Subclinical (biofilm) infection causes capsular contracture in a porcine model following augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (03) 835-842
- 11 Deva AK, Adams Jr WP, Vickery K. The role of bacterial biofilms in device-associated infection. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (05) 1319-1328
- 12 Pajkos A, Deva AK, Vickery K, Cope C, Chang L, Cossart YE. Detection of subclinical infection in significant breast implant capsules. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111 (05) 1605-1611
- 13 Adams Jr WP, Haydon MS, Raniere Jr J. et al. A rabbit model for capsular contracture: development and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (04) 1214-1219 , discussion 1220–1221
- 14 Cunningham B. The Mentor Core study on silicone MemoryGel breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (07) (Suppl. 01) 19S-29S
- 15 Cunningham B, McCue J. Safety and effectiveness of Mentor's MemoryGel implants at 6 years. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2009; 33 (03) 440-444
- 16 Spear SL, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Walker PS. Inamed Silicone Breast Implant U.S. Study Group. Inamed silicone breast implant core study results at 6 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (07) (Suppl. 01) 8S-16S
- 17 Stevens WG, Calobrace MB, Harrington J, Alizadeh K, Zeidler KR, d'Incelli RC. Nine-year core study data for Sientra's FDA-approved round and shaped implants with high-strength cohesive silicone gel. Aesthet Surg J 2016; 36 (04) 404-416
- 18 Yalanis GC, Liu EW, Cheng HT. Efficacy and safety of povidone-iodine irrigation in reducing the risk of capsular contracture in aesthetic breast augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136 (04) 687-698
- 19 Adams Jr WP. The process of breast augmentation: four sequential steps for optimizing outcomes for patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (06) 1892-1900
- 20 Henriksen TF, Fryzek JP, Hölmich LR. et al. Surgical intervention and capsular contracture after breast augmentation: a prospective study of risk factors. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 54 (04) 343-351
- 21 Namnoum JD, Largent J, Kaplan HM, Oefelein MG, Brown MH. Primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device type. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66 (09) 1165-1172
- 22 Somogyi RB, Brown MH. Outcomes in primary breast augmentation: a single surgeon's review of 1539 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (01) 87-97
- 23 Tebbetts JB. Achieving a zero percent reoperation rate at 3 years in a 50-consecutive-case augmentation mammaplasty premarket approval study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118 (06) 1453-1457
- 24 Handel N, Jensen JA, Black Q, Waisman JR, Silverstein MJ. The fate of breast implants: a critical analysis of complications and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 96 (07) 1521-1533
- 25 Codner MA, Mejia JD, Locke MB. et al. A 15-year experience with primary breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (03) 1300-1310
- 26 Wixtrom RN, Stutman RL, Burke RM, Mahoney AK, Codner MA. Risk of breast implant bacterial contamination from endogenous breast flora, prevention with nipple shields, and implications for biofilm formation. Aesthet Surg J 2012; 32 (08) 956-963
- 27 Lista F, Austin RE, Saheb-Al-Zamani M, Ahmad J. Does implant surface texture affect the risk of capsular contracture in subglandular breast augmentation and breast augmentation-mastopexy?. Aesthet Surg J 2020; 40 (05) 499-512
- 28 Adams Jr WP, Culbertson EJ, Deva AK. et al. Macrotextured breast implants with defined steps to minimize bacterial contamination around the device: experience in 42,000 implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (03) 427-431
- 29 Adams Jr WP, Rios JL, Smith SJ. Enhancing patient outcomes in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery using triple antibiotic breast irrigation: six-year prospective clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118 (7, Suppl): 46S-52S
- 30 Culbertson EJ, Felder-Scott C, Deva AK, Greenberg DE, Adams Jr WP. Optimizing breast pocket irrigation: the breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) era. Aesthet Surg J 2020; 40 (06) 619-625
- 31 Hu H, Johani K, Almatroudi A. et al. Bacterial biofilm infection detected in breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (06) 1659-1669
- 32 Jewell ML, Adams Jr WP. Betadine and breast implants. Aesthet Surg J 2018; 38 (06) 623-626
- 33 Ryan MP, Adley CC. The antibiotic susceptibility of water-based bacteria Ralstonia pickettii and Ralstonia insidiosa. J Med Microbiol 2013; 62 (Pt 7): 1025-1031
- 34 Drinane JJ, Chowdhry T, Pham TH, Ritter E. Examining the role of antimicrobial irrigation and capsular contracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Plast Surg 2017; 79 (01) 107-114
- 35 Lynch JM, Sebai ME, Rodriguez-Unda NA, Seal S, Rosson GD, Manahan MA. Breast pocket irrigation with antibiotic solution at implant insertion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2018; 42 (05) 1179-1186
- 36 Epps MT, Langsdon S, Pels TK. et al. Pocket irrigation and technique during reconstructive surgery: an American Society of Plastic Surgery Survey of Current Practice. Ann Plast Surg 2019; 82 (6S): (Suppl. 05) S427-S432
- 37 Mladick RA. “No-touch” submuscular saline breast augmentation technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1993; 17 (03) 183-192
- 38 Newman AN, Davison SP. Effect of Keller Funnel on the rate of capsular contracture in periareolar breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018; 6 (06) e1834
- 39 Calobrace MB, Mays C. An algorithm for the management of explantation surgery. Clin Plast Surg 2021; 48 (01) 1-16
- 40 Wan D, Rohrich RJ. Revisiting the management of capsular contracture in breast augmentation: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (03) 826-841
- 41 Swanson E. Open capsulotomy: an effective but overlooked treatment for capsular contracture after breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016; 4 (10) e1096
- 42 Hidalgo DA, Weinstein AL. Surgical treatment for capsular contracture: a new paradigm and algorithm. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 146 (03) 516-525
- 43 Maxwell GP, Van Natta BW, Bengtson BP, Murphy DK. Ten-year results from the Natrelle 410 anatomical form-stable silicone breast implant core study. Aesthet Surg J 2015; 35 (02) 145-155
- 44 McGuire P, Reisman NR, Murphy DK. Risk factor analysis for capsular contracture, malposition, and late seroma in subjects receiving Natrelle 410 form-stable silicone breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (01) 1-9
- 45 Kim YJ, Kim YW, Cheon YW. Prevention of implant malposition in inframammary augmentation mammaplasty. Arch Plast Surg 2014; 41 (04) 407-413
- 46 Chopra K, Gowda AU, Kwon E, Eagan M, Grant Stevens W. Techniques to repair implant malposition after breast augmentation: a review. Aesthet Surg J 2016; 36 (06) 660-671
- 47 Muntan CD, Sundine MJ, Rink RD, Acland RD. Inframammary fold: a histologic reappraisal. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (02) 549-556 , discussion 557
- 48 Salgarello M, Visconti G. Staying out of double-bubble and bottoming-out deformities in dual-plane breast augmentation: anatomical and clinical study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2017; 41 (05) 999-1006
- 49 Fisher J. Mastopexy without implant exchange. In: Fisher J, Handel N. eds. Problems in Breast Surgery: A Repair Manual. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2014: 329-334
- 50 Moliver CL, Sanchez ER, Kaltwasser K, Sanchez RJ. A muscular etiology for medial implant malposition following subpectoral augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 2015; 35 (07) NP203-NP210
- 51 Wong MT, Cheong EC, Lim J, Lim TC. Creation of an intermammary sulcus in congenital synmastia. Singapore Med J 2007; 48 (01) e29-e31
- 52 Frame J. The waterfall effect in breast augmentation. Gland Surg 2017; 6 (02) 193-202
- 53 Hidalgo DA, Spector JA. Breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133 (04) 567e-583e
- 54 Kolker AR, Austen Jr WG, Slavin SA. Endoscopic-assisted transaxillary breast augmentation: minimizing complications and maximizing results with improvements in patient selection and technique. Ann Plast Surg 2010; 64 (05) 667-673
- 55 Teitelbaum S. The inframammary approach to breast augmentation. Clin Plast Surg 2009; 36 (01) 33-43 , v–vi
- 56 Tebbetts JB, Adams WP. Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118 (7, Suppl): 35S-45S
- 57 Derby BM, Codner MA. Textured silicone breast implant use in primary augmentation: core data update and review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (01) 113-124
- 58 Calobrace MB, Schwartz MR, Zeidler KR, Pittman TA, Cohen R, Stevens WG. Long-term safety of textured and smooth breast implants. Aesthet Surg J 2017; 38 (01) 38-48
- 59 Spear SL, Little JW. 3rd. Breast capsulorrhaphy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988; 81 (02) 274-279
- 60 Chasan PE, Francis CS. Capsulorrhaphy for revisionary breast surgery. Aesthet Surg J 2008; 28 (01) 63-69
- 61 Harris R, Raphael P, Harris SW. Thermal capsulorrhaphy: a modified technique for breast pocket revision. Aesthet Surg J 2014; 34 (07) 1041-1049
- 62 Calobrace MB, Mays C, Wilson R, Wermeling R. Popcorn capsulorrhaphy in revision aesthetic breast surgery. Aesthet Surg J 2020; 40 (01) 63-74
- 63 Voice SD, Carlsen LN. Using a capsular flap to correct breast implant malposition. Aesthet Surg J 2001; 21 (05) 441-444
- 64 Yoo G, Lee PK. Capsular flaps for the management of malpositioned implants after augmentation mammoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2010; 34 (01) 111-115
- 65 Nahabedian MY, Spear SL. Acellular dermal matrix for secondary procedures following prosthetic breast reconstruction. Aesthet Surg J 2011; 31 (7, Suppl): 38S-50S
- 66 Maxwell GP, Gabriel A. Acellular dermal matrix in aesthetic revisionary breast surgery. Aesthet Surg J 2011; 31 (7, Suppl): 65S-76S
- 67 Spear SL, Seruya M, Clemens MW, Teitelbaum S, Nahabedian MY. Acellular dermal matrix for the treatment and prevention of implant-associated breast deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (03) 1047-1058
- 68 Hartzell TL, Taghinia AH, Chang J, Lin SJ, Slavin SA. The use of human acellular dermal matrix for the correction of secondary deformities after breast augmentation: results and costs. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (05) 1711-1720
- 69 Davis C, Boyd C, Mateo de Acosta Andino DA. et al. Dermal autografts in breast reconstruction: a review of past and current trends. Ann Plast Surg 2020; 84 (05) 618-622
- 70 Colwell AS, Breuing KH. Improving shape and symmetry in mastopexy with autologous or cadaveric dermal slings. Ann Plast Surg 2008; 61 (02) 138-142
- 71 Becker H, Lind II JG. The use of synthetic mesh in reconstructive, revision, and cosmetic breast surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2013; 37 (05) 914-921
- 72 Nair NM, Mills DC. Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) scaffold internal support: preliminary experience with direct implant opposition during complex breast revisions. Aesthet Surg J 2019; 39 (11) 1203-1213
- 73 Lesavoy MA, Trussler AP, Dickinson BP. Difficulties with subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty and its correction: the role of subglandular site change in revision aesthetic breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (01) 363-371
- 74 Junior IM, Graf RM, Ascenço ASK. et al. Is there a breast augmentation outcome difference between subfascial and subglandular implant placement? A prospective randomized double-blinded study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2019; 43 (06) 1429-1436
- 75 Maxwell GP, Gabriel A. The neopectoral pocket in revisionary breast surgery. Aesthet Surg J 2008; 28 (04) 463-467
- 76 Spear SL, Dayan JH, Bogue D. et al. The “neosubpectoral” pocket for the correction of symmastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (03) 695-703
- 77 Grotting JC, Gardner PM, Cohn AB. Reoperative surgery following breast augmentation. In: Grotting JC. ed. Reoperative Aesthetic and Reconstructive Plastic Surgery. 2nd ed.. St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishing; 2007: 1261-1311
- 78 Netscher DT. Aesthetic outcome of breast implant removal in 85 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113 (03) 1057-1059
- 79 Graf RM, Closs Ono MC, Pace D, Balbinot P, Pazio ALB, de Paula DR. Breast auto-augmentation (mastopexy and lipofilling): an option for quitting breast implants. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2019; 43 (05) 1133-1141
- 80 Rohrich RJ, Parker III TH. Aesthetic management of the breast after explantation: evaluation and mastopexy options. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (01) 312-315
- 81 Maxwell GP, Gabriel A. Efficacy of acellular dermal matrices in revisionary aesthetic breast surgery: a 6-year experience. Aesthet Surg J 2013; 33 (03) 389-399
- 82 Pozner JN, White JB, Newman MI. Use of porcine acellular dermal matrix in revisionary cosmetic breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 2013; 33 (05) 681-690
- 83 Spear SL, Sinkin JC, Al-Attar A. Porcine acellular dermal matrix (strattice) in primary and revision cosmetic breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (05) 1140-1148
- 84 Barker DE, Retsky MI, Schultz S. “Bleeding” of silicone from bag-gel breast implants, and its clinical relation to fibrous capsule reaction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 61 (06) 836-841
- 85 Baker Jr JL, Chandler ML, LeVier RR. Occurrence and activity of myofibroblasts in human capsular tissue surrounding mammary implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 1981; 68 (06) 905-912
- 86 Hwang K, Sim HB, Huan F, Kim DJ. Myofibroblasts and capsular tissue tension in breast capsular contracture. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2010; 34 (06) 716-721
- 87 Del Vecchio D, Wall Jr S. Expansion vibration lipofilling: a new technique in large-volume fat transplantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (05) 639e-649e
- 88 Abboud MH, Dibo SA, Abboud NM. Power-assisted liposuction and lipofilling: techniques and experience in large-volume fat grafting. Aesthet Surg J 2020; 40 (02) 180-190