PDF herunterladen
J Knee Surg 2022; 35(09): e1
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1727158
Erratum

Erratum: Return to Sport and Work after Randomization for Knee Distraction versus High Tibial Osteotomy: Is There a Difference?

Autoren

  • Alexander Hoorntje

    1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    2   Academic Center for Evidence-Based Sports Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    3   Amsterdam Collaboration on Health & Safety in Sports, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    4   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Foundation FORCE (Foundation for Orthopaedic Research Care and Education), Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands

  • P. Paul F. M. Kuijer

    5   Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  • Koen L. M. Koenraadt

    4   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Foundation FORCE (Foundation for Orthopaedic Research Care and Education), Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands

  • Suzanne Waterval-Witjes

    2   Academic Center for Evidence-Based Sports Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    3   Amsterdam Collaboration on Health & Safety in Sports, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    4   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Foundation FORCE (Foundation for Orthopaedic Research Care and Education), Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands

  • Gino M. M. J. Kerkhoffs

    1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    2   Academic Center for Evidence-Based Sports Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    3   Amsterdam Collaboration on Health & Safety in Sports, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  • Simon C. Mastbergen

    6   Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

  • Anne C. A. Marijnissen

    6   Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

  • Mylène P. Jansen

    6   Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

  • Rutger C. I. van Geenen

    4   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Foundation FORCE (Foundation for Orthopaedic Research Care and Education), Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
Weitere Informationen
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Originalartikel zu diesem Erratum:

Return to Sport and Work after Randomization for Knee Distraction versus High Tibial Osteotomy: Is There a Difference?J Knee Surg 2022; 35(09): 949-958
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721027

It has been brought to the publisher's attention that the two subparts “A'' and “B'' of [Figure 5] were inadvertently swapped in the article with DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721027 published on November 23, 2020. The corrected figure appears as follows:

Zoom
Fig. 5 (A, B) Reported difficulty with 13 work-related activities for the knee joint distraction group (left) and high tibial osteotomy group (right) at three time points. The percentage of patients that experienced severe difficulty is depicted for each task.


Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 18. Juli 2020

Angenommen: 05. Oktober 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
14. April 2021

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA