Keywords
enamel - dentin - tooth remineralization - toothpaste - scanning electron microscope
Introduction
Dental erosion, defined as the irreversible chemical wear of the dental hard tissue
without the involvement of bacteria, represents a tooth pathology that causes patient
discomfort.[1] Enamel remineralized by natural saliva is not able to withstand the recurrent erosive
attack to the tooth structure.[2] Therefore, preventive measures are indicated for preventing progressive, erosive
tooth wear.[3] Fluoride-containing oral care products used against enamel and dentin erosion might
promote remineralization through apatite crystallization or replacement of the lost
mineral.[4] In fact, most of these products only reduce the hydroxyapatite dissolution to some
extent.[4] Recently, a new generation of biomimetic oral care products, using advanced technologies
with stronger surface bioactivity, has been developed to optimize the interaction
with the dental tissues.[5] Different components or supplements associated with fluoride were added as ingredients
in these products aiming to reproduce the natural process of dental tissue mineralization[5]
[6] and boost the remineralization and regeneration potential of the hydroxyapatite.[7]
[8]
Several promising biomimetic approaches to prevent tooth erosion have been investigated.
One of the approaches comprises altering the dissolution properties of the hydroxyapatite
with different foreign ions as substituents in the different sites of the hydroxyapatite
molecule.[9]
[10] Each ionic grouping of the hydroxyapatite molecule can be replaced by another of
the same or different valence, either anionic or cationic.[9]
[11] Changes in the solubility of hydroxyapatite may occur depending on the substitution
at the calcium, phosphate, and/or hydroxyl sites.[11] The degree of substitution by foreign ions can vary from low substitution (such
as fluoride, magnesium, and potassium) to a complete substitution (three sites).[12] The properties of the ion-substituted hydroxyapatite may vary according to crystallite
morphology, crystallinity, particle size, and foreign ion substitute.[9]
A proprietary technology named REFIX was recently developed. It comprises a fluoride-containing
toothpaste in association with phosphates and silica. According to the manufacturer,
this association favors the formation of a fluoridated apatite and the deposition
of silicon which was also incorporated deep into the hydroxyapatite and the open dentinal
tubules.[13] A recent in vitro study[14] demonstrated that brushing teeth with the REFIX-containing toothpaste induced the
formation of a silicon-enriched mineral layer on the enamel surface, proving the biomimetic
mechanism of action of this fluoridated oral care product. To date, the effect of
REFIX technology to prevent tooth erosive wear is unclear. This in vitro study aimed to characterize the mineral content and surface and cross-sectional morphology
of enamel treated with fluoridated toothpaste containing REFIX technology after an
erosive challenge.
Materials and Methods
Specimen Preparation of Dental Enamel
Enamel blocks (4 mm × 4 mm × 2 mm) were prepared from extracted bovine incisor teeth
and stored in 0.08% thymol solution. The specimens (n = 5) were embedded in self-cured acrylic resin circular molds 16-mm diameter and
3-mm deep. The outer enamel surface was ground flat with grit papers (600–1,500 grades)
under water cooling and polished with 1-µm diamond paste (Extec Corporation, Enfield,
CT) in a rotating polishing machine PSK-2V (Skill-tec Comércio e Manutenção Ltda,
São Paulo, SP, Brazil).
Caries-Like Lesion Formation
Following 5-min sonication in water using an ultrasonic device, one-third of the exposed
enamel surface was covered with two layers of nail varnish (Risque; Niasi, Taboão
da Serra, São Paulo, Brazil) as a reference sound area. Then, the specimens were demineralized
to form an artificial caries lesion. Subsurface enamel demineralization was carried
out using a modified model.[15] Following 5-min sonication in water using an ultrasonic device, the enamel blocks
were immersed individually in 32 mL of a demineralizing solution containing 1.3 mM/L
Ca(NO3)24H2O, 0.78 mM/L NaH2PO4 H2O in 0.05 M/L acetate buffer, 0.03 mgF/mL (NaF),
pH of 5.0, 32 mL/specimen, during 16 hours at 37°C.
The pH Cycling
Before the remineralization pH cycling model,[16] the enamel specimens had another one-third of its surface covered with two layers
of nail varnish (Risque) as a reference for caries lesion area. The specimens were
submitted to a pH cycling model at 37°C for 6 days. The blocks were immersed individually
in a remineralization solution (1.5 mM.L-1 calcium, 0.9 mM.L-1 phosphate, 150 mM.L-1
potassium chloride in 0.02 mM.L-1 cacodylic buffer, pH = 7.0; 0.02 µgF/mL and 1 mL/mm2), for 22 hours. The cariogenic challenge was performed by immersing the enamel blocks
in a demineralization solution (2.0 mM.L-1 calcium and phosphate in 75 mM.L-1 acetate
buffer, pH = 4.7; 0.03 µgF/mL and 3 mL/mm) for 2 hours per day (12–2 p.m.). Twice
a day, at 10 a.m. and 2 p.m., the enamel blocks were exposed to toothpaste slurries
(toothpaste: deionized water, 1:3 w/w; 2 mL/enamel specimen) for 1 minute, under agitation.
Enamel blocks were then rinsed with deionized water between each step. Then, the enamel
blocks were individually immersed in a remineralization solution at 37°C. The de and
remineralizing solutions were changed daily. Between the steps, the specimens were
water rinsed with deionized water for 5 seconds. Deionized water rinses were performed
between each steps. In between treatments, each enamel block was individually immersed
in remineralization solution at 37°C. The de- and remineralizing solutions were freshly
changed every day. The toothpastes selected for the present study are described in
[Table 1].
Table 1
Composition of the toothpastes selected for the study
Product
|
Ingredients
|
Active agents
|
Lot no.
Expiry date
|
Abbreviations: PEG, polyethylene glycol; F-, fluoride.
aManufacturer’s information: Rabbit Corp., Londrina, PR, Brazil.
bManufacturer’s information: Unilever UK Limited, Leatherhead, Surrey, United Kingdom.
c
Manufacturers’ information: GlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
|
Regenerate Enamel Sciencea
|
Glycerin, calcium silicate, PEG-8, hydrated silica, trisodium phosphate, sodium phosphate,
aqua, PEG’60, sodium lauryl sulfate, aroma, flavor, synthetic fluorphlogopite, sodium
saccharin, polyacrylic acid, tin oxide, limonene, CI 77891
pH: 8.92 (Tomaz et al)13
|
1,450 ppm F- (as sodium fluoride and sodium monofluorophosphate)
NR-5 technology: calcium silicate and sodium phosphate
|
L72878CCApril, 2020
|
Regenerador + Sensitive DentalCleanb
|
Glycerin, silica, sorbitol, sodium lauryl sulfate, aqua, aroma, PEG-12, cellulose
gum, O-phosphoric acid, xylitol, sodium saccharin, triclosan, menthol, mica, sodium
benzoate
pH: 4.73 (Tomaz et al)13
|
1,450 ppm F- (as sodium fluoride)
REFIX technology
Tetrasodium pyrophosphate
|
41531
May, 2021
|
Sensodyne Repair & Protectc
|
Glycerin, PEG-8, hydrated silica, pentasodium triphosphate, sodium lauryl sulfate,
flavor, titanium dioxide, polyacrylic acid, cocamidopropyl betaine, sodium saccharin.
pH: 8.63 (João-Souza et al) 40
|
1,450 ppm F- (as sodium fluoride)
Calcium sodium phosphosilicate 5% (Novamin)
|
BN 028E
December, 2019
|
Erosive Challenge
After the caries pH cycling, the blocks were then subjected to an erosive challenge.
Enamel blocks were immersed in 50% citric acid for 2 minutes, and subsequently washed
in abundant distilled water for at least 5 minutes.[17] The results were compared to untreated control half blocks.
Characterization of the Enamel Surfaces by Scanning Electron Microscopy Imaging Observation
and Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy
The morphological analysis of the specimens was performed using a scanning electron
microscope (SEM; TESCAN VEGA3, LMU, Kohoutovice, the Czech Republic) operating at
15 kV. The blocks were first sputter coated with gold in a vacuum evaporator (MED
010; Balzers, Balzers, Liechtenstein) and then microscopically analyzed to obtain
photomicrographs of the surface morphology of the treated specimens (×1,000 magnification).
Representative images of selected regions of the specimens were obtained to characterize
the morphological aspect of the surface. The energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy
(EDS) point analysis (80 mm2, silicon drift detector [SDD], Oxford Instruments, Concord, Massachusetts, United
States) was performed to determine a qualitative elemental analysis of the specimens,
operating in high vacuum mode with an accelerating voltage of 15 kV. Five points per
sample were randomly selected (300 µm2 per point), and the mean values were calculated.
Characterization of the Cross-Sections by Scanning Electron Microscope Imaging Observation
For the subsurface analysis, cross-sections of the bovine blocks were obtained by
longitudinally sectioning the specimens under water cooling. Both half blocks were
used for the SEM analysis. The halves were dehydrated in silica gel for 3 hours. The
specimens were then gold-sputtered and evaluated using SEM.
Results
[Fig. 1]
shows the representative scanning electron micrographs of the enamel surfaces treated
with the different toothpastes after the pH cycling (images above) and after the erosive
challenge (images below). After the erosive challenge, the extent to which the enamel
surface presented a characteristic morphological aspect of eroded mineral tissues
depended on the previous treatments (
[Fig. 1B]
). The morphological aspect of the eroded enamel surfaces in the specimens treated
with the toothpaste containing NR-5 technology (Regenerate Enamel Science) resembled
the control group ([Figs. 1D ]and [1B ], respectively). Similarly, eroded morphology was observed for the specimens treated
with the product containing Novamin (Sensodyne Repair & Protect;
[Fig. 1H]
), which also resembled the control group. On the other hand, the specimens treated
with the product containing REFIX technology presented a smoother enamel surface morphology
compared to the other treatments (
[Fig. 1F]
).
Fig. 1 A representative scanning electron micrograph of the enamel surfaces treated with
the different toothpastes during the pH cycling (images above) and after the erosive
challenge (images below). (A, B) The morphological aspect of the control (untreated area) before and after the erosive
challenge of the control, untreated group; (C, D) Morphology of the enamel surface treated with toothpaste containing NR-5 technology
(Regenerate Enamel Science), before and after the erosive challenge. (E, F) Representative image of the morphology of the enamel surface treated with the product
containing REFIX technology before and after the erosive challenge. (G, H) Representative micrograph of the morphology of the enamel surface treated with a
product containing Novamin (Sensodyne Repair & Protect), before and after the erosive
challenge. Mag, magnification. WD. Working distance. EHT: Electron high tension. HV.
high vacuum. WD. Working distance. CME-UFPR. Centro de Microscopia Eletrônica da Universidade
Federal do Paraná. There is no need to spell out VEGA3, TESCAN. These words are specifications
of the SEM model.
[Table 2] shows the elemental mapping of the enamel treated with the different toothpastes
and after the erosive challenge. EDS detected different amounts of carbon, oxygen,
silicon, phosphorus, and calcium before and after the erosive challenge. In the specimens
treated with the REFIX technology, no changes in the chemical elements were observed
after the erosive challenge, which agrees with the morphological analysis. Conversely,
a reduction in the percentage weight of calcium was observed in the specimens treated
with Novamin after the erosive challenge (from 34.11 to 29.33%). The percentage weight
of calcium increased in the eroded specimens treated with NR-5 (from 28.07 to 30.39%).
However, this increase may be not a real increase, instead the resulting of measuring
the calcium content of the enamel layer exposed after the erosive challenge. This
can be confirmed by the Ca/P ratio after the erosive challenge (2.11), which is similar
to that found in untreated bovine hydroxyapatite (2.08).[18] The percentage weight of silicon was similar after the erosive challenge for the
specimens treated with the REFIX and Novamin technologies. Conversely, when the enamel
was treated with the NR-5-containing toothpaste, a decrease in the percentage weight
was observed (from 0.33 to 0.27% weight). The highest percentage weight of silicon
was found in the specimens treated with REFIX technology, before and after the erosive
challenge (0.42 and 0.41%, respectively).
Table 2
Elemental mapping of the enamel treated with the different toothpastes and after erosive
challenge
|
C weight %
|
O weight %
|
Ca weight %
|
P weight %
|
Si weight %
|
Na weight %
|
Ca/P ratio
|
Toothpaste
|
Before
|
After
|
Before
|
After
|
Before
|
After
|
Before
|
After
|
Before
|
After
|
Before
|
After
|
Before
|
After
|
Abbreviations: C, carbon; Ca, calcium; Na, sodium; O, oxygen; P, phosphorus; Si, silicon.
|
Regenerate Enamel Science
|
7.36
|
6.48
|
32.09
|
30.90
|
28.07
|
30.39
|
14.17
|
14.39
|
0.33
|
0.27
|
0.42
|
0.53
|
1.98
|
2.11
|
Regenerador Diário DentalClean
|
6.92
|
7.14
|
31.97
|
32.35
|
31.61
|
30.72
|
15.31
|
15.11
|
0.42
|
0.41
|
0.43
|
0.31
|
2.06
|
2.03
|
Sensodyne Repair & Protect
|
4.95
|
7.60
|
18.97
|
25.14
|
34.11
|
29.33
|
16.74
|
14.27
|
0.32
|
0.33
|
0.29
|
0.36
|
2.03
|
2.05
|
[Fig. 2]
shows micrographs of cross-sectional areas of the enamel treated with the different
toothpastes. A mineralized layer formed on the enamel surface after treatment with
NR-5 (
[Fig. 2A]
) and REFIX technologies (
[Fig. 2B]
). A thicker mineral layer was observed for REFIX in all the specimens evaluated.
Conversely, no mineralized surface layer was observed in the specimens treated with
Novamin technology (
[Fig. 2C]
). This toothpaste is known to induce the formation of a mineralized layer on the
dentin and inside the dentinal tubules.[19]
Fig. 2 Representative scanning electron micrographs of the enamel cross sections of the enamel
treated with the different technology-containing fluoride toothpastes. (A) NR-5 technology (Regenerate Enamel Science); (B) REFIX technology (Regenerador + Sensitive DentalClean); (C) Novamin technology (Sensodyne Repair & Protect). MAG, magnification; SEM, scanning
electron microscopes.
[Fig. 3]
shows micrographs of cross-sectional areas of the enamel treated with REFIX technology,
in which a mineralized layer formed on the enamel surface is observed (
[Fig. 3B]
), in comparison with the untreated enamel (
[Fig. 3A]
). The product containing REFIX technology induced the formation of a mineralized
layer when associated with pH cycling. This layer was approximately 6-µm thick (
[Fig. 3B]
).
Fig. 3 (A, B) Scanning electron micrographs of the morphological analysis of the cross-sectional
areas of the enamel showing the formation of a mineralized surface layer after treatment
with the REFIX-containing fluoride toothpaste (B), in comparison to the untreated specimen (A). Mag, magnification; WD, Working distance; EHT, Electron high tension.
[Fig. 4]
shows photomicrographs of the morphology of cross-sectional areas of the enamel treated
with the REFIX-containing toothpaste comparing the effect of the erosive challenge
with an intact, untreated enamel area. The eroded area was around 15-µm deep in the
intact enamel (
[Fig. 4A]
). Conversely, in the specimens treated with the REFIX technology, virtually no erosion
was observed and the mineralized layer after the erosion challenge (
[Fig. 4B]
).
Fig. 4 Scanning electron micrographs of the morphological analysis of the cross-sectional
areas of the enamel comparing the untreated control area (A) and the treated area (B) with the REFIX-containing fluoride toothpaste. Mag, magnification. WD. Working distance.
EHT: Electron high tension.
Discussion
As dental erosion may lead to irreversible loss of hydroxyapatite, it is of paramount
importance to prescribe products with remineralizing potential that can assist in
the mineral gain of the demineralized surface and reduce the solubility of the dental
structure in recurrent acidic challenges.[9] As previously pointed out, fluoride-containing products may have antierosive properties,
but they are only able to repair smaller enamel lesions.[20]
[21] Promising biomimetic approaches to erosion prevention have been developed.[4]
[22]
The toothpaste with the proprietary technology called NR-5 contains, according to
the manufacturer, sodium phosphate associated with calcium silicate. Also, according
to the manufacturer, this technology was developed by combining calcium silicate,
sodium phosphate salts, and fluoride. This technology was proposed to accelerate the
mineralization processes provided by saliva, assisting the nucleation of hydroxyapatite
and in the formation of minerals in the enamel, thereby remineralizing, protecting,
and repairing the enamel. A previous in vitro study[23] investigated the repair and protective properties after the deposition of calcium
silicate on acid-eroded enamel surfaces. That study demonstrated that calcium silicate
could transform into hydroxyapatite and be deposited on both intact and eroded enamel
surfaces, providing significant protection against erosive challenges. This technology
seems to induce the formation of a mineralized layer on the enamel surface after treatment
with NR-5, as demonstrated in the present study (
[Fig. 2A]
). In another in vitro study[13] the toothpaste with NR-5 technology favored the recovery of superficial enamel hardness
more than 100% compared to the untreated control. Conversely, this effect was not
observed at the enamel subsurface, demonstrating that this technology was less effective
at remineralizing the enamel in depth. This helps to explain the reasons for not promoting
an effective protection against the erosive challenge.
The other product containing Novamin technology (Sensodyne Repair & Protect) uses
sodium and calcium phosphosilicate (Bioglass) in the form of an amorphous inorganic
compound.[24] According to the manufacturer, a series of chemical reactions occurs when Bioglass
is in contact with an aqueous solution, leading to the formation of a layer of carbonated
hydroxyapatite on the dentin that forms an insoluble mineralized layer on the surface.
This technology may favor another mechanism of action in enamel, possibly altering
the structure of the enamel hydroxyapatite, and reinforcing it without actually forming
a superficial mineralized layer on the enamel. In the present study, it was not observed
the formation of a mineralized layer on the enamel surface (
[Fig. 2C]
), although the formation of a less-soluble surface hydroxyapatite, which is resistant
to acid challenges, may occur.[25]
In an in vitro study,[26] the protective effect of four commercial toothpastes containing antierosion agents
was investigated. The authors found that the toothpaste containing Novamin was not
effective in preventing the erosion effect caused by orange juice when applied either
before or after the erosive challenge. The authors of a recent systematic review[27] searched for clinical evidence of the effectiveness of Novamin in publications,
evaluating its action as a remineralizing agent. The analysis of the different studies
led to the conclusion that Novamin had significantly less clinical evidence to demonstrate
its effectiveness as a remineralization agent in treating both carious and noncarious
lesions. The authors recommended better-designed clinical trials to make definitive
recommendations about this technology.[27]
The toothpaste containing proprietary REFIX technology, according to the manufacturer,
represents a novel, multifunctional, phosphate-based dental gel technology in an acidified
stabilized phosphate/fluoride complex which is established especially in saliva.[13] The combination of toothpaste, saliva, and dental tooth structures favors the generation
of new minerals containing calcium/phosphate/fluorine, promoting the enamel surface,
and remineralizing within the subsurface carious lesion.[13] This product presents an acid pH that may be the main reason for its effectiveness
due to the formation of calcium phosphate crystals in an acidic environment.[13]
[28]
In the present study, it was demonstrated that a mineralized layer was formed on the
enamel surface after treatment with REFIX technology (
[Figs. 2]
B and 3B), in comparison with the untreated enamel (
[Fig. 3A]
). A previous study demonstrated the formation of a silicon-enriched mineral layer
on the enamel surface induced by the REFIX-based toothpaste was favored by the formation
of complexes of the bioactive particles of calcium, phosphorus, and sodium.[14] Substituting PO4 with SiO4 is believed to affect the mechanical properties of the silicon-enriched hydroxyapatite
in a dose-dependent manner, decreasing hardness and the elastic modulus.[29] Conversely, the silicon content in the toothpaste formulation in association with
fluorine and phosphate groups induces increased bioactivity and apatite-forming ability
of hydroxyapatite, which is enhanced by the substitution of silicon, or silicate,
into the remineralizing hydroxyapatite.[30]
[31] In this manner, a protective effect is provided by inducing the formation of hydroxyapatite
after its deposition onto the eroded surfaces.[23]
The results of the present study can also be explained by the pH at which the remineralization
processes occur ([Table 1]). The biomimetic effect of the technology-containing fluoride toothpastes may induce
the nucleation and growth of new enamel crystals by incorporation into the porous
spaces of the lesion, and at later stages by means of the growth and fusion with the
preexisting crystals. In this manner, a faster remineralization process may be expected
when treating the enamel with these multifunctional toothpastes compared with conventional
fluoride toothpastes. Fluorine ions, known to reduce hydroxyapatite solubility, can
replace hydroxyl ions.[32] The small-sized fluoride anions are able to diffuse throughout the enamel matrix
in either acidic or basic pH, inducing the remineralization process using a nucleophilic
attack on silicon, coordinating to it, and promoting subsequent reactions.[33] In an acidic pH, such as the REFIX-containing toothpaste, the remineralization process
in the presence of silicon leads to the formation of a less porous hydroxyapatite
structure (<2 nm).[34] In addition, the REFIX product contains 30% more silicon than the other products
([Table 2]). Conversely, in a basic medium, such as the NR-5- and Novamin-containing toothpastes,
there is a tendency to form a mesoporous enamel structure,[34] with porosity varying from 2 to 50 nm.[35]
[36] This also helps to explain the differences in the resistance to the erosive challenge
after treatment among the technology-containing fluoride toothpastes.
Limitations
Considering the limitations of the present in vitro study, the protocol used to evaluate the protective effectiveness of the selected
fluoride toothpastes can be explained considering that both cariogenic and erosive
challenges might simultaneously occur in the oral cavity, depending on different etiological
factors.[37]
[38] By treating the enamel with the fluoride toothpastes allowed changes in the hydroxyapatite
structure, which ends up forming fluoridated apatite and the deposition and/or replacement
of hydroxyapatite sites with other substitutes. This also seems to occur deeper into
the hydroxyapatite.[39] Without this protocol, it would not be possible to evaluate the effectiveness of
the toothpastes to promote a protective effect after exposure to the erosive challenges.
This protective effect of the toothpastes containing different technologies may not
only be restricted to the enamel surface but also to the enamel subsurface. It is
true that the erosive challenge used in the present study has also limitations, but
it is a valid and well-established method.[17] Another limitation relies on the fact that this morphologic evaluation is qualitative,
and one may argue that the results are quite subjective. In spite of this fact, the
images are clear to demonstrate the results when the treatments were compared.
The present study found that the protective effect against the erosive challenge was
material dependent. The toothpaste containing 1,450 ppm of sodium fluoride with REFIX
technology enabled the formation of a mineralized surface layer less affected by the
erosive challenge. This outcome appears to be due to the formation of an acid-resistance
silicon-enriched mineral surface layer on the enamel surface. Although the treatment
with the toothpaste containing NR-5 technology also enabled the formation of a mineralized
surface layer, an eroded enamel surface morphology was observed after the erosive
challenge, similar to the untreated enamel control. Conversely, no mineralized surface
layer was observed in the specimens treated with the toothpaste containing Novamin
technology, and the enamel surface morphology was significantly affected by the erosive
challenge.
Conclusion
The present study characterized the enamel surface and subsurface morphology of specimens
treated with different 1,450-ppm fluoride toothpastes containing different biomimetic
technologies. These technologies were developed to accelerate the remineralization
process or to minimize the demineralization process of dental tissues, especially
in the event of repetitive erosive challenges. Despite the limitations of the present
in vitro study, the preferred REFIX technology was the most promising compared to other Novamin
and NR-5 technologies. In addition to forming a mineralized layer superficially on
the enamel, the most important result was the ability to resist acid dissolution by
the erosive challenge. Further studies are needed to investigate the performance of
the dental gel containing the REFIX technology using in situ and in vivo studies on the effectiveness of the dental gel on dental substrates.